Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

280 Comments

Call of Duty: Black Ops Review

4
  • X360
  • PS3

Black Ops takes the kitchen sink approach by throwing in a ton of modes and options, but the core action remains mostly intact.


 Frank Woods: total badass.
 Frank Woods: total badass.
Call of Duty: Black Ops makes a lot of ambitious changes to things around the outside edges of the action while leaving the core campaign and multiplayer components largely intact. It's got a lot of great moments, but portions of the story feel cliched and hokey. Also, this is now the fourth game out of Activision that has used the same style of combat to power its campaign and multiplayer. The formula, as awesome as it can still be, is starting to wear thin.

That's not to say that Black Ops doesn't have a lot of new tricks up its sleeve. The story found in the campaign feels like a solid departure from what's come before it. Set in the same universe as Treyarch's Call of Duty: World At War, Black Ops doesn't spend much time weaving different playable characters together into a single narrative. Instead, you play the majority of the game as Alex Mason, a special ops guy who's hooked up with the CIA to do dirty work anywhere it needs doing, and missions where you don't control Mason are there to fill in some gaps or tell Mason's tale from a different angle. The game is set over a large chunk of the Cold War, opening with a Cuban raid as you attempt to assassinate Castro. For taking on that mission, you quickly end up locked away in a Siberian prison, and the globetrotting begins. As much of the game is told via flashback, Mason's adventures are able to cover a wide period of time, taking you up to the war in Vietnam and beyond. Since we're dealing with the past, you'll encounter a few characters from real-life history, too, which feels really out of place, considering all of the over-the-top theatrics you're performing across the rest of the game.

To be clear, Black Ops is not a Vietnam game. But the middle of it most definitely is, complete with cliched examples of licensed music from the era. At one point, you're traveling down a river, blasting "Sympathy For The Devil" by the Rolling Stones. I just sort of rolled my eyes at this point. They aren't always directly related to the music, most of which is really great, but the campaign is full of moments that just don't fit. The action, meanwhile, is fairly standard. There are a lot of guys to shoot, and all that shooting gets broken up by a few larger set-pieces, including one where the game sort of turns into a real-time strategy game for a few minutes as you order a squad around from the cockpit of an SR-71. There were also a couple of baffling moments that just feel like they're underexplained by the game. In one case, you need to run up to barrels full of napalm and interact with them to take out some enemies. But the game isn't clear that running up to them is the way to proceed, so I found myself shooting the barrels, running around the barrels, running past the barrels, and so on until I stumbled upon the trigger needed to make the game move forward.

It wouldn't be 'Nam without a chopper or two. At one point you'll fly one for yourself. 
It wouldn't be 'Nam without a chopper or two. At one point you'll fly one for yourself. 
But it's the multiplayer side of Call of Duty that keeps people coming back year after year, right? The list of modes in the team-based multiplayer component hasn't really changed. Yes, Headquarters is still Headquarters. There are some gameplay changes to consider, though. You can dive to a prone position by hitting the stance change button while running. This is especially fun when used to dive through windows, and there's an in-game challenge that'll get you some bonus experience points for diving through five of them. But by and large, it's the same game, new maps. There are some great maps in the game, like Nuketown, a 1950s-style neighborhood with mannequins hanging around. Oh, and at the end of every match, a nuke goes off and destroys the level. Other maps give you a larger playfield, like Jungle, which has a small, wooden bridge at its center with enough ways to get to it that anyone crossing the bridge tends to get gunned down pretty quickly. There are 14 multiplayer maps to choose from. 
 
Most of the killstreaks, perks, and equipment you'd expect to find in a Call of Duty game appear in Black Ops, though there are some notable changes. On the killstreak side, nukes are out and dogs (boo!) are in. There's also a new remote control car killstreak bonus that lets you control a little buggy with the aim of driving it up to a foe and making him and the car blow up. It's kind of annoying and it only requires three kills, so those little things are liable to be everywhere. Deathstreaks are completely gone. Perks are definitely present, but the pro versions of the perks take more work to unlock. Still, I found gaining the ability to get my gun back up more quickly after coming out of a run to be insanely invaluable. Some of the pro bonuses are, as before, very nice. While all this stuff is present, how you'll get it is a bit different this year.

A lot of the changes to how the multiplayer functions takes place outside of the game. The player progression has been broken into two pieces. Now, leveling up merely unlocks the ability to purchase additional weapons, perks, equipment, attachments, and, well, just about everything else. You'll have to spend your "COD points" to actually use any of that stuff. On one hand, this is nice because it lets you skip the items that don't fit with the way you play. For example, I have no desire to use gas grenades or sniper rifles. So I can focus my purchases on assault rifles and LMGs. The downside to this is that you don't feel the same thrill when you gain a level. By the time I was level 20 or so, I felt like I had unlocked just about everything to make my class function the way I like, leaving me with a lot less to look forward to. At least the pro versions of the perks are significantly tougher to unlock in many cases, giving you something significant to grind on. You can also gamble with your COD points using a contract system, which gives you a set amount of time--like 40 minutes of in-game time, in some cases--to complete specific tasks, like getting five headshots with a specific weapon or planting the bomb a certain number of times, and so on. You have to spend money to buy these contracts, and you only get paid if you complete the task before your time expires. The challenges appear to rotate on a regular basis, giving you new things to try over time, if you're so inclined. But that's not the only way you can lose all of your money.

 The crossbow is useful if you want to stay quiet, but you can strap explosives to your bolts if you want to go very, very loud.
 The crossbow is useful if you want to stay quiet, but you can strap explosives to your bolts if you want to go very, very loud.
The main new multiplayer thing in Black Ops is set of six-player free-for-all modes that fall under the heading of Wager Match. In these modes, you pony up some of your COD points as an ante, and the top three players in the round get a portion of the overall pot. These modes play around with how the weapons are used and acquired, so in Gun Game, you'll all start with basic pistols, but each kill upgrades you to a new gun, and the first player to cycle through all 20 guns (which includes the crossbow, one of the new weapons found in the game) wins. I think my favorite is One in the Chamber, which gives everyone a pistol with only one bullet. If you kill another player, you earn another bullet. So if you're out of ammo, you'll need to knife someone to rearm yourself or lose one of your three lives. It's a tense battle, because accuracy becomes so, so key. The wager-based modes feel like little mods and, in fact, Gun Game was actually a somewhat popular Counter-Strike mod. It's interesting to see the developers take a fresh stab at free-for-all play, considering that team-based modes effectively rule the shooter landscape in this day and age. It's a cool addition, but considering that most of the key items you'll unlock for multiplayer don't cost that much, it's not really something you'll need to turn to for additional funds too often.

Black Ops has a file-sharing and video editing setup similar to the tools found in Halo 3. Your matches are automatically saved, and if you like, you can go in and watch any other player's recent matches. You can also chop up smaller clips, fiddle with speed and camera angles, and save the files out to your file share, which has six slots for your saved films, screens, and custom game modes. While you can customize modes for private matches, the tools at your disposal feel fairly basic when you compare them to what Bungie's been doing with Halo for the past few years, but hey, it's a start.

The Nazi Zombies mode found in World At War returns in Black Ops, and you'll find two maps available for online play once you've completed the single-player campaign. Each map is setup with a little video, and each one has you play as a unique set of characters, giving each map its own "zombie team." Perhaps this is an unpopular stance, but I really didn't like the zombie mode in World At War, and it's not much better here. All it does here is make me miss the Spec Ops mode found in Modern Warfare 2, which I found to be a much more exciting cooperative mode. There's also a Combat Training mode that lets you go up against bots in deathmatch or team deathmatch, which would be a great option for players out there that don't have Internet connections... but for whatever reason, the mode is only available when you're connected to a network.

Hearing Cube gripe about how my tactical insertion was destroyed is probably one of my favorite parts of the entire game. 
Hearing Cube gripe about how my tactical insertion was destroyed is probably one of my favorite parts of the entire game. 
Moments of Black Ops look fantastic, and Treyarch's signature fire technology shines yet again, whether you're using a barrel-mounted flamethrower or just blowing things up. You'll find some sharp lighting in spots, and much of the character animation is solid. A few textures here and there look a little grungy, but it's easy to forgive some of its shortcomings when you consider the game's solid, smooth frame rate. You can opt to sacrifice a lot of that frame rate to play in a 3D mode, but I didn't find the tradeoff to be worth it at all. There are some moments that look really cool when you're playing on a proper 3D setup, but the Call of Duty series is all about that great frame rate. Without it, the entire experience suffers, even if you're getting some new depth from the 3D display.

The audio is largely fantastic. Gun reports, especially ones in the distance, really stand out nicely, and much of the voice acting helps sell the campaign. It's helped out by some big names, like Ed Harris and Ice Cube. But it's also hampered by Sam Worthington, who voices Alex Mason in such an awful, inconsistent way that by the end I was wondering if Mason (said to be a native of Alaska in the game's backstory) was Australian. Maybe it's just the horrors of interrogation, right? As I said before, a lot of the game's music is also fantastic, setting up the intense sequences with pounding tracks that don't try to be period-appropriate. The smattering of licensed music found in the game just sort of gets in the way, and makes you feel like the game is trying too hard to be compared to Vietnam-era films.

I'm usually not too big on bonus material, but Black Ops does a great job with its intel items. You'll get a couple of microfilm-style pages for each mission, and collecting intel items in those levels removes the redactions that prevent you from reading the text. This helps sell the covert CIA vibe that the game is attempting to pull off really nicely. Also, there's a hidden terminal in the game that lets you read e-mail and hack the accounts of world leaders to read theirs, as well. The terminal feels more fully featured than it probably needs to be--it even has a command history. You can unlock a couple of bonus games here, too, including an overhead twin-stick shooters and a classic text adventure. Though comparing a game to Enter the Matrix is usually seen as a bad thing, it's similar to the computer terminal found in that game, and it's very cool, even if reading JFK's e-mail feels ridiculously anachronistic.

Do you want to play more Call of Duty? I'm guessing the answer is yes, and by all means, Black Ops is worth playing. But for all its ambitious steps to set itself apart from the previous games, it flounders in a few too many of those areas to be a total success. Even with those flaws, though, the heart of the series--its competitive multiplayer--lives on quite well, which should be enough to satisfy most fans of the franchise.    
Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

280 Comments

Avatar image for milkman
Milkman

19372

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By Milkman

Damnit! 1000 points down the drain. I should have known better. Fucking Treyarch...

Avatar image for mechanized
Mechanized

573

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mechanized

Jeff, I really don't get why you don't like Nazi Zombies. It's a great mode, and really fun to play local multiplayer in.

Avatar image for deactivated-616d38c07628a
deactivated-616d38c07628a

392

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

4 stars is good enough for me, I will purchase it day one

Avatar image for wacomole
Wacomole

1194

Forum Posts

681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Wacomole

One good thing I've read about this game is the ability of the Theatre Mode to replay a match and fly around any part of the level to record.  So if you suspect there's someone boosting or glitching in your game, you don't have to chase around after them to catch them at it. It's apparently already recorded for everyone to see.  Not that will probably be a complete deterrent to some of the cheaters out there, but I think it may give many a reason to think twice.  

Avatar image for mooseymcman
MooseyMcMan

12782

Forum Posts

5577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Edited By MooseyMcMan
@Mrskidders said:
" @Alexander said:
"
"
Also, this is genius. "
This just made my day.  
 
Also, reading this really makes me want to play the game (because I usually like goofy and/or cliched stuff), but I may have to wait a bit, because of all the other games I have yet to play (and have already bought, I'm looking at you, New Vegas and Vanquish). 
Avatar image for vinchenzo
Vinchenzo

6461

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 2

Edited By Vinchenzo

I didn't need a review to know this game sucked!

Avatar image for nail1080
nail1080

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nail1080

Spec Ops better than zombies? Ok that's laughable, clearly you played zombies for around 10 minutes and died on the 5th wave or something. 
 
Don't trust this review. First of all 90% of people buy CoD for the multiplayer, and you didn't really give any details of your experience with it, instead you just listed features everyone knows about by now. 
 
Also if you have played the broken piece of shit that was MW2 online for longer than a day you would know that it was a terrible unbalanced noob tube fest. But then again I think Jeff has lost touch with games recently, he was actually a better reviewer when he was unemployed as he had more time to sink his teeth into games and wouldn't be saying absolutely retarded things such as SPEC OPS > Zombies....lol sorry but terrible review

Avatar image for thecheese33
TheCheese33

399

Forum Posts

1246

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Edited By TheCheese33
@nail1080: Go away, troll. You can't change his opinion; if he thinks it's worthy of four stars, it's worthy of four stars.
Avatar image for ben99
Ben99

1199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Ben99

I'd have prefered the leveling-up system of MW2 ot be present in BO. IT'S a MAJOR drawback for me ..

Avatar image for xenozak
XenoZak

172

Forum Posts

29

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By XenoZak

damn it, i should have put more down! I only won 250 points x(
On a related note i had to call in a favor and got a friend to buy me it over steam lol

Avatar image for fedorajay
fedorajay

326

Forum Posts

36

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By fedorajay
@TheCheese33 said:
" @nail1080: Go away, troll. You can't change his opinion; if he thinks it's worthy of four stars, it's worthy of four stars. "
Why? Everything he said was true. Jeff can have an opinion but no one can make remarks or an editorial about it? Maybe it's you that should go away, hm?
Avatar image for superjoe
superjoe

1450

Forum Posts

3149

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 4

Edited By superjoe

But can you hide in a fridge in Nuketown??

Avatar image for thecheese33
TheCheese33

399

Forum Posts

1246

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Edited By TheCheese33
@fedorajay said:
" @TheCheese33 said:
" @nail1080: Go away, troll. You can't change his opinion; if he thinks it's worthy of four stars, it's worthy of four stars. "
Why? Everything he said was true. Jeff can have an opinion but no one can make remarks or an editorial about it? Maybe it's you that should go away, hm? "
Everything he said wasn't true. "Don't trust this review" is the most ridiculous garbage I've ever heard. Just because he likes one mode more than a tired, shambling corpse that's been done to death in gaming doesn't mean his review is bad. Also the fact that he calls Modern Warfare 2 a "broken piece of shit" shows that he's one of those people that will complain if any game scores lower than Modern Warfare 2, even if Modern Warfare 2 is better (and it is) than Black Ops. People always blow Modern Warfare 2's bugs way out of proportion, and a couple of hours with Black Ops' multiplayer will tell you everything you need to know about it; if you didn't like Modern Warfare 2, you especially won't like Black Ops. Sometimes the bugs are even worse than Modern Warfare 2! 
 
It's popular to hate on Modern Warfare 2, to the point where every game lower than a five has a bunch of trolls going "Oh so it's not as good as this game that I think is buggy, even though all the bugs I'm listing have been fixed by patches?" If this man had any legitimate excuses, we would've heard them by now, but his best argument is "He thinks this one mode is better, and that destroys the whole review!" Hating for the sake of hating never helped anybody.
Avatar image for quacktastic
Quacktastic

1065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Quacktastic
You're anachronistic!  Dick!
 
I mostly wonder if more people will play MW2 or Black Ops 6 months from now.
Avatar image for armaan8014
armaan8014

6325

Forum Posts

2847

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 17

Edited By armaan8014
@ThePhantomnaut said:
" OPS THAT ARE BLACK YO! "
YO!
Avatar image for petitfool
petitfool

643

Forum Posts

29

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By petitfool

DAMMIT I knew he was going to give it 4 stars! I just chickened out of betting! RAGEEEEE

Avatar image for vonocourt
Vonocourt

2197

Forum Posts

127

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By Vonocourt

You know how most australian/british actors can take on a american accent great, Sam Worthington can't do it for his life.

Avatar image for dvorak
dvorak

1553

Forum Posts

616

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By dvorak
@nail1080 said:
" Spec Ops better than zombies? Ok that's laughable, clearly you played zombies for around 10 minutes and died on the 5th wave or something.  Don't trust this review. First of all 90% of people buy CoD for the multiplayer, and you didn't really give any details of your experience with it, instead you just listed features everyone knows about by now.  Also if you have played the broken piece of shit that was MW2 online for longer than a day you would know that it was a terrible unbalanced noob tube fest. But then again I think Jeff has lost touch with games recently, he was actually a better reviewer when he was unemployed as he had more time to sink his teeth into games and wouldn't be saying absolutely retarded things such as SPEC OPS > Zombies....lol sorry but terrible review "
Zombies really is pretty terrible in this game though.
Avatar image for cookiemonster
cookiemonster

2561

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By cookiemonster
@RiotBananas said:
" I will not play another COD game until they revamp it. THEY'VE RESKINNED THE SAME GAME 4 TIMES WITH A 5TH ALREADY BEING TALKED ABOUT. WHY IS NO ONE ELSE DISGUSTED BY THIS? AND HOW COME THE PEOPLE STILL ENJOYING COD AREN'T BURNED OUT BY THE NOW SATURATED MARKET? "
Pretty much how I feel. I might not be disgusted by it, but I find it bizarre how its maintained such a high level of popularity for almost 4 years now when they haven't really brought anything new to the table. 
Avatar image for marrec
marrec

258

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By marrec
@Vinchenzo said:
" I didn't need a review to know this game sucked! "
I know right? Obviously the worst game released this year. 
 
Then again, if ALL sucky games got 4 out of 5 stars then we might have to revise our rating system.
Avatar image for afroman269
Afroman269

7440

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Afroman269

Not surprised, more of the same CoD, so I'm not worried about saying goodbye to this series. I still don't see the appeal of zombie mode, just made me think of a poor man's Left 4 Dead which I would rather play. If they don't change this game up in any meaningful way, it's going to go the way of Guitar Hero.

Avatar image for m0nty
m0nty

173

Forum Posts

92

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By m0nty

Giant Bomb is full of dicks these days. Feels like NeoGaf except I'm paying for the privilege. 
 
Still shaking my head at comments like "zombies is a good game mode, you are wrong Jeff". As if it was ever a black and white case of right and wrong. All too often people expect reviews to be absolute. The issue with gaming journalism is that all too often gamers take it too seriously. After all, it's just the opinion of the person writing it. You're never asked to accept it as gospel. 
 
I would also be happy to see stars dropped from reviews here. Whenever a big game comes along and doesn't get 5 stars the fanboys run rampant on the site. 4/5 is still one hell of a game. If you read the review you'll see that.

Avatar image for nail1080
nail1080

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By nail1080
@TheCheese33 said:

" @fedorajay said:

" @TheCheese33 said:
" @nail1080: Go away, troll. You can't change his opinion; if he thinks it's worthy of four stars, it's worthy of four stars. "
Why? Everything he said was true. Jeff can have an opinion but no one can make remarks or an editorial about it? Maybe it's you that should go away, hm? "
Everything he said wasn't true. "Don't trust this review" is the most ridiculous garbage I've ever heard. Just because he likes one mode more than a tired, shambling corpse that's been done to death in gaming doesn't mean his review is bad. Also the fact that he calls Modern Warfare 2 a "broken piece of shit" shows that he's one of those people that will complain if any game scores lower than Modern Warfare 2, even if Modern Warfare 2 is better (and it is) than Black Ops. People always blow Modern Warfare 2's bugs way out of proportion, and a couple of hours with Black Ops' multiplayer will tell you everything you need to know about it; if you didn't like Modern Warfare 2, you especially won't like Black Ops. Sometimes the bugs are even worse than Modern Warfare 2!  It's popular to hate on Modern Warfare 2, to the point where every game lower than a five has a bunch of trolls going "Oh so it's not as good as this game that I think is buggy, even though all the bugs I'm listing have been fixed by patches?" If this man had any legitimate excuses, we would've heard them by now, but his best argument is "He thinks this one mode is better, and that destroys the whole review!" Hating for the sake of hating never helped anybody. "
I said not to trust the review as it's largely based on the single player portion of the game, which most people only play once for 6 hours or so and then they play the mp for the rest of the year. Unfortunately Jeff did not mention how much more balanced the mp portion of BOs is compared to the yes, broken piece of shit that is MW2 mp. Does Marathon Pro, Lightweight Pro, and Commando ring a bell to you? How about one man army and noob tubes? Or claymores and scavenger? Or how about that rock people hide in in Fuel which IW said they would patch but they never bothered? The list goes on and on, MW2 was a huge step backwards in terms of quality and polish for the COD series, and Black Ops brings back the polish and balance that made COD4 online so good minus Juggarnaught and people spamming frags. 
 
So sorry for having an opinion on his review, but don't go around like a jackass calling people with an opinion that doesn't agree with you a troll, as it's against the rules of the site. 
Avatar image for moeb
MoeB

44

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MoeB

Was this review written in a rush? The writing is so  janky.

Avatar image for dvorak
dvorak

1553

Forum Posts

616

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By dvorak

I can't believe I missed the entire part with that computer terminal. I've got to find where that is.

Avatar image for johndudebro
JohnDudebro

956

Forum Posts

3908

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By JohnDudebro

Motherfucker! I bet 7500 points that this would get 5 stars! 
 
What the fuck am I gonna win that back on? The year's pretty much done!

Avatar image for somejerk
SomeJerk

4077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By SomeJerk

I have spent six hours in PC multiplayer (though Steam says two) and I'm about to engage the singleplayer, unlocking and everything went without a problem and the stuttering was solved by /demo_record 0 in the console. Every freaking thing feels better than MW2 did at its launch last year and I have a good memory. Treyarch and Activison learned a few lessons with MW2, and you know what, if the MP of a Treyarch made MW3 will be better than this? I'm all for it man.
 
The singleplayer however.. time will tell.
 
Those who boycott this are not doing themselves a favour.

Avatar image for deactivated-653d2db498d3a
deactivated-653d2db498d3a

155

Forum Posts

155

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Is it safe to play Modern Warfare 2 now?

Avatar image for wrathofconn
wrathofconn

1511

Forum Posts

10983

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Edited By wrathofconn

Hot damn, I totes created the SR-71 page.

Almost certainly won't buy this game, but a good review.

Avatar image for ryno9881
ryno9881

652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By ryno9881

Great review Jeff, pretty much what I expected. The spec ops in MW2 was amazing and to hear that it's replaced by zombies...god. I get that treyarch is trying to separate themselves from the IW COD but from your review the game is pretty much the same with a few new additions and a dull campaign. When you make a game so close to the previous iteration why would you take out the best thing about it? The last paragraph was pretty much what I was expecting; excellent review.

Avatar image for matti00
matti00

677

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By matti00

Feel the ire of the Call of Duty fanboys in here! Kinda makes me laugh, I wish I cared about anything as much as they do about their prestige level.
Anyway, I have an actual question. Does anybody know approx. how long the single player will take to get through? I'm thinking about burning through it and trading it in ASAP.

Avatar image for manlybeast
ManlyBeast

1234

Forum Posts

49

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 6

Edited By ManlyBeast

More of the same.

Avatar image for tomance
tomance

1131

Forum Posts

272

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Edited By tomance

Last CoD I got into was 4.  So now I feel I'm ready for more. 

Avatar image for deactivated-5a6a692a4039a
deactivated-5a6a692a4039a

13

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great !! :)

Avatar image for deactivated-5c7ea8553cb72
deactivated-5c7ea8553cb72

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Fucking called it!

Avatar image for sambambo
Sambambo

3173

Forum Posts

1009

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By Sambambo
@matti00 said:
" Feel the ire of the Call of Duty fanboys in here! Kinda makes me laugh, I wish I cared about anything as much as they do about their prestige level. Anyway, I have an actual question. Does anybody know approx. how long the single player will take to get through? I'm thinking about burning through it and trading it in ASAP. "
6-8 hours.
Avatar image for arbitrarywater
ArbitraryWater

16104

Forum Posts

5585

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 66

Edited By ArbitraryWater

Kind of what I expected. I'm getting it anyways.

Avatar image for dg991
DG991

1435

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By DG991

I didn't think it would get 4 out of 5. Hmm, worth a look I guess. 

Avatar image for sins_of_mosin
sins_of_mosin

1713

Forum Posts

291

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 7

Edited By sins_of_mosin

So the few of us who don't care about MP will get yet another basic shooter with a few high points and a lot of stupid points?

Avatar image for jayross
Jayross

2647

Forum Posts

1791

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 6

Edited By Jayross

Hah, didn't call it. I said 5 stars :/

Avatar image for jmrwacko
jmrwacko

2537

Forum Posts

50

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By jmrwacko

 The formula, as awesome as it can still be, is starting to wear thin.

Says the guy who gave MW2 a 5/5 because you can shoot down UAVs.
Avatar image for sheldipez
sheldipez

36

Forum Posts

28

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Edited By sheldipez
@ChewEqfp said:
"I own all the IW cod games and none of the treyarch releases. I kinda feel like infinity ward is my better goreous ex girlfriend, and treyarch is a decent looking girl i hook up with, Sure she's wiling to do more after dark, but I cant help but feel like im selling myself short, But now my pretty ex girl friend was in a terrible accident and i dont know what she'll look like after surgery. "

Ha! You sir win comment of the month    
Avatar image for deactivated-5a00c029ab7c1
deactivated-5a00c029ab7c1

1777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

People still aren't bored with the gameplay yet? man I got sick with COD4 after a month sorry but this game is overrated to hell there's no depth to it, it's  just gimmicks. BTW COD copied CSS with gun game.

Avatar image for sileonex
sileonex

69

Forum Posts

129

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By sileonex

I am going to be incredibly annoyed if people start to think that gun game was created by Black Ops.
 
Beyond that, woo more gun game!

Avatar image for blacklab
blacklab

2025

Forum Posts

22

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By blacklab

Sam Worthington should not be allowed to be in popular media. He is possibly the worst actor ever.  Unbelievable that they keep foisting this jackass on us.

Avatar image for zombie2011
zombie2011

5628

Forum Posts

8742

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By zombie2011

I want to play this game, but then also don't. I have a weird feeling.

Avatar image for floppypants
Floppypants

814

Forum Posts

67

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

Edited By Floppypants

Last week was Kinect, this week is Call of Duty.  It's like going from 4th grade to 8th grade.

Avatar image for dabuddada
DaBuddaDa

306

Forum Posts

13894

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By DaBuddaDa

I am more interested in single-player than multi, so I'm stoked that the SP in Black Ops sounds like it's longer and better than the last two Modern Warfares.

Avatar image for applecause
applecause

7

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By applecause

great review I preordered it and hopefully comes in today