Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

126 Comments

Castlevania: Harmony of Despair Review

2
  • XBGS

Harmony of Despair's multiplayer design isn't fleshed out well enough to make you forget about the grind.


 It might sound crazy, but you can actually play from this pulled-out viewpoint.
 It might sound crazy, but you can actually play from this pulled-out viewpoint.
There's a single-player option in Castlevania: Harmony of Despair, but if you're the sort of person that only likes to play games by yourself, don't buy Castlevania: Harmony of Despair. Actually, with its kooky, grind-heavy design, I don't know that I'd recommend that anyone buy Konami's latest downloadable Castlevania game, but the game's definitely built to be played as a group.

Unlike traditional Castlevania games, there's no meaningful story element to Castlevania HD, and you aren't really exploring a large, singular castle. Instead, the game is broken up into six different chapters, each with its own map and boss. Also, each chapter comes with a time limit. So you're not expected to linger around in any one part of the game. In fact, you should probably get moving, even if you're playing alone, because nothing stops the clock. You can't pause the game at all. It's one of those kinds of games.

When you first start hacking away at a chapter, you'll probably be a little underpowered. That's because a lot of the game revolves around finding better gear or, depending on which of the five protagonists you decide to use, repeatedly using your attacks to increase their power. Those power increases aren't explicitly stated, and the game only lets you swap gear when you're at specific points on the map, making the whole system a bit more obfuscated than it probably should be. Maybe a more standard leveling system that gives you XP for kills would have been easier to follow.

The game allows up to six players to play, and there are some paths on each map that can only be taken if the players are working together, like switches or platforms that turn off flames or otherwise open doors that help everyone get to the boss fight faster. But since a big part of the game is hunting down more interesting equipment--and it feels like better equipment shows up in multiplayer games--you're better off scouring the four corners of each map before triggering the boss fight to see if you can find anything worthwhile. I'd say around 95% of the stuff I find is essentially vendor trash, though the stores don't sell good enough items to make your gold worth saving. It's like the game is driven by loot lust, but almost all of the loot is totally uninteresting.

 It's a six-player game with five selectable characters.
 It's a six-player game with five selectable characters.
At least the game has a specific look to it. Though it abbreviates to "Castlevania HD," it's hard to call Harmony of Despair a "high-definition" game. The characters look like they right out of the various Nintendo DS Castlevania games, and the game has a deliberately blocky look to it. That's not a bad thing, as it gives all of the visuals a very specific style, but it's hard not to feel like this game was thrown together to make a quick buck with existing assets. As a result, the only amazing thing about the game is its music.

But you're probably not looking to spend $15 on a soundtrack that you can only hear on your 360. Castlevania: Harmony of Despair has some neat ideas, but a lot of it's hidden behind a bevy of poorly explained menus and user-unfriendly mechanics. The expectation that you'll grind your way through the six chapters over and over again, only to do it all over again in hard mode is kind of ridiculous, and there just isn't enough of a reward there to make all of that grinding feel like anything other than, well, a grind.
Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

126 Comments

Avatar image for joshvandanger
JoshVanDanger

56

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By JoshVanDanger

Well, that sucks. Maybe it would have been better off with a story about why these characters must join forces.

Avatar image for mrklorox
MrKlorox

11220

Forum Posts

1071

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MrKlorox

I was going to add this to the page of 1080p native Xbox 360 games, but there doesn't seem to be one.
 
Also this game plays excellently with a fight stick once you get your default zoom levels set.
 
If I could remove the "Metroidvania" concept from this page and have it stay off, then I would be a little happier. This is NOT a metroidvania game, regardless of it being part of the Castlevania franchise. Metroidvania has a requirement that the player must gain new abilities in order to access new areas of the environment. This game has no such function.

Avatar image for iamjohn
iamjohn

6297

Forum Posts

13905

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By iamjohn
@Shady said:
" Yeah, no, the single player in Hydro Thunder is junk. The multiplayer is its only saving grace. Castlevania's single player doesn't come near to that level of awful, which, is saying a lot since it has its problems. "
I'm having trouble seeing what is so awful about Hydro Thunder's single player?  Shallow?  Sure.  But junk?  Only if you're an idiot.  But then again, seeing as how your comments towards other people imply that you've only played the demo, I'm having trouble understanding why I should care about what you think about Hydro Thunder.
 
Not to mention that arguing this game is good by comparing it to another game is pretty blase, bro.  I'm glad you don't like Hydro Thunder, I really am.  How does that change the fact that this game sucks?
Avatar image for trauma2007
Trauma2007

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Trauma2007

  I truly must have masochistic tendencies because I actually find that this game hits almost all of my OCD buttons one by one.   I've spent A fair amount of time just grinding the first few levels and I have to say I really like this game.  God help me, it's not A great game, I think Jeff hit all the right notes in his review.  But there is something here for us special few, those of us with that certain addictive personality.  If your one of us, one of those people who just has to find that next piece of loot, whether it improves your stats or not, then you might find something to amuse you here for some time.  And with the DLC on the way this will be wasting my time for many weeks to come.

Avatar image for imperiousrix
ImperiousRix

3095

Forum Posts

1964

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 4

Edited By ImperiousRix

Eeeeh, I'm not buying the reasons why this is "bad".  I still think it looks like a lot of fun, and being a Castlevania fan, I'm gonna pick it up.

Avatar image for shady
Shady

511

Forum Posts

255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Shady
@iAmJohn said:

" @Shady said:

" Yeah, no, the single player in Hydro Thunder is junk. The multiplayer is its only saving grace. Castlevania's single player doesn't come near to that level of awful, which, is saying a lot since it has its problems. "
I'm having trouble seeing what is so awful about Hydro Thunder's single player?  Shallow?  Sure.  But junk?  Only if you're an idiot.  But then again, seeing as how your comments towards other people imply that you've only played the demo, I'm having trouble understanding why I should care about what you think about Hydro Thunder.  Not to mention that arguing this game is good by comparing it to another game is pretty blase, bro.  I'm glad you don't like Hydro Thunder, I really am.  How does that change the fact that this game sucks? "
Are you infected with some kind of new dumb? News flash, kid, it's my take on the game. I know you can't understand that since you're obviously a troll and a pretty shitty one at that since you didn't even bother to do your homework. In fact, you're so off base now that I think you probably don't even know what my original point was.
 
Basically, what I'm saying is you've done nothing other than to prove to me you are a dumb shit.
Avatar image for lind_l_taylor
Lind_L_Taylor

4125

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By Lind_L_Taylor

Why do they bother with multiplayer games as the primary point of play?  It's like planned obsolescence for
the game, because if you don't buy it right away, there won't be anybody to play the fucking game with you
6 months from now, unless you just have 6 friends around that all buy the same game at the same time
& I don't know anybody that has that, maybe children.

Avatar image for mormonwarrior
MormonWarrior

2945

Forum Posts

577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 21

Edited By MormonWarrior

Would it have killed them to put in Nathan and Juste from the other two GBA Castlevania games? Then there would be seven to choose from for six players.

Avatar image for roycampbell
RoyCampbell

1092

Forum Posts

545

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By RoyCampbell
@Shady said:

" @iAmJohn said:

" @Shady said:

" Yeah, no, the single player in Hydro Thunder is junk. The multiplayer is its only saving grace. Castlevania's single player doesn't come near to that level of awful, which, is saying a lot since it has its problems. "
I'm having trouble seeing what is so awful about Hydro Thunder's single player?  Shallow?  Sure.  But junk?  Only if you're an idiot.  But then again, seeing as how your comments towards other people imply that you've only played the demo, I'm having trouble understanding why I should care about what you think about Hydro Thunder.  Not to mention that arguing this game is good by comparing it to another game is pretty blase, bro.  I'm glad you don't like Hydro Thunder, I really am.  How does that change the fact that this game sucks? "
Are you infected with some kind of new dumb? News flash, kid, it's my take on the game. I know you can't understand that since you're obviously a troll and a pretty shitty one at that since you didn't even bother to do your homework. In fact, you're so off base now that I think you probably don't even know what my original point was.  Basically, what I'm saying is you've done nothing other than to prove to me you are a dumb shit. "
Oh hey, let's check out the comment section of this review... *la da da da* Oh, vapid, ignorant snobs are having an incredibly childish argument. Not surprising.
 
Seriously though, berating another game to justify your purchase is just inconceivable to me. How about you guys direct all of that pointless, long winded energy into something productive, eh? And stop that "kid" stuff. Trying to talk down to someone on the Internet is awfully arrogant.
Avatar image for shady
Shady

511

Forum Posts

255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Shady
@RoyCampbell said:
" @Shady said:
" @iAmJohn said:

" @Shady said:

" Yeah, no, the single player in Hydro Thunder is junk. The multiplayer is its only saving grace. Castlevania's single player doesn't come near to that level of awful, which, is saying a lot since it has its problems. "
I'm having trouble seeing what is so awful about Hydro Thunder's single player?  Shallow?  Sure.  But junk?  Only if you're an idiot.  But then again, seeing as how your comments towards other people imply that you've only played the demo, I'm having trouble understanding why I should care about what you think about Hydro Thunder.  Not to mention that arguing this game is good by comparing it to another game is pretty blase, bro.  I'm glad you don't like Hydro Thunder, I really am.  How does that change the fact that this game sucks? "
Are you infected with some kind of new dumb? News flash, kid, it's my take on the game. I know you can't understand that since you're obviously a troll and a pretty shitty one at that since you didn't even bother to do your homework. In fact, you're so off base now that I think you probably don't even know what my original point was.  Basically, what I'm saying is you've done nothing other than to prove to me you are a dumb shit. "
Oh hey, let's check out the comment section of this review... *la da da da* Oh, vapid, ignorant snobs are having an incredibly childish argument. Not surprising.  Seriously though, berating another game to justify your purchase is just inconceivable to me. How about you guys direct all of that pointless, long winded energy into something productive, eh? And stop that "kid" bullshit. Trying to talk down to someone on the Internet is awfully arrogant. "
Is this post supposed to be ironic? I mean, it smells like it.

Also, I never tried to justify my purchase since, surprise, I bought the game even before this review went up. Not only that but I usually could care less about others not liking a game I enjoy. In fact, I can't remember the last time I used a review to guide my purchase.
 
The only thing I was saying this whole time is being selective about criteria you use to judge games is a bit asinine when you consider they should usually be consistent between things you judge.
Avatar image for roycampbell
RoyCampbell

1092

Forum Posts

545

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By RoyCampbell
@Shady: Uhh, ironic? I'm not seeing it, unless you actually think I'm also an arrogant snob. I don't remember calling games junk and whatnot; a mere observation is all I participated in.
 
The both of you were in the wrong. Two great games torn to shreds at the hands of you two just for the sake of arguing. I'd expect to see these kinds of comments on Kotaku or even (oh god) YouTube! I mean, come on guys.
 
All in all, I had always been of the opinion that Giantbomb's community kept it friendly. How's about giving it a try.
Avatar image for shady
Shady

511

Forum Posts

255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Shady
@RoyCampbell:  Thanks for the after school special, junior mod.
Avatar image for roycampbell
RoyCampbell

1092

Forum Posts

545

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By RoyCampbell
@Shady:  Heh. Antisocial much? 
 
I just can't believe you call the other guy a troll when I can't even get a decent conversation out of you.
 
Have fun with that new Castlevania game, though. Although the game shines when you play its multiplayer mode, I can't honestly see anyone wanting to play 30 seconds of any game with you. You are a jerk.
Avatar image for underwhelmed
Underwhelmed

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Underwhelmed

Obviously some people really dig this game, but as a long time fan of the series (I have even slogged through Haunted Castle which is atrocious) I have to say that this game really fails. It completely loses the exploration theme later games in the series have had by providing a paltry 6 stages, 3 of which are almost entirely linear. It completely fails to recreate the atmosphere of the earlier games in the series that were more about fiendish platforming and difficult enemies. The only thing this game manages to get "right" is the horrendous grind that the last couple of DS outings have had stuck in them (though with the exception of OoE, the grind was really unnecessary to advance)  
 
The stages are just dull, and not even the multiplayer aspect is compelling. They might as well made the stages randomly generated or shuffled the enemies around from play through to playthrough because as it is, there is no reason to keep going. You beat Dracula once and you have seen all there is.

Avatar image for mithrilmojo
MithrilMojo

155

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By MithrilMojo

I bought it, and and now regret it.  Heed my warnings, and buy Limbo instead. Or just treat  yourself to nice lunch somewhere.

Avatar image for shady
Shady

511

Forum Posts

255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Shady
@RoyCampbell:  Uh, what conversation? All you did was call both of us out on the same thing. I don't see how you can build a conversation off of that especially when it wasn't true in my case.
 
Also, I've been playing this with friends so I got that covered. You can make all the assumptions you want since, hey, you already made some anyway.
Avatar image for roycampbell
RoyCampbell

1092

Forum Posts

545

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By RoyCampbell
@Shady:  Aw man, it had been a day since your last reply. I thought you had taken off with whatever dignity you barely had left.
 
And with that, I'm done. Apparently, talking to someone is absolutely not a conversation according to Shady. 
 
I'm going to head on over to the Fox News website so I can at least keep in mind that there are actually dumber people than Shady.
 
(oh and as a "btw" sort of thing: imaginary friends don't count, boyo!) :(
Avatar image for shady
Shady

511

Forum Posts

255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Shady
@RoyCampbell:  Right. Whelp, I think the only thing you managed to do was drop my IQ by 50 points. Thanks a ton for that.
 
By the way, are those parentheses messages supposed to be an inner monologue with yourself about me? How about the emoticon? I mean, while we are at it, why not explain what nonsense you are going on about since, hey, I honestly couldn't tell what you were even here for.
Avatar image for toxicantidote
ToxicAntidote

1335

Forum Posts

2766

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By ToxicAntidote

I bought it and I do enjoy it, together with some of my friends of course. Sure, it would have been much better if the cost was 800MSP.

Avatar image for sil77
SIL77

7

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By SIL77

Why do every game have to be online/co-op? I want to play ALONE. I'm love the Castlevania series, but i'm not going to buy this one.

Avatar image for blazehedgehog
BlazeHedgehog

1286

Forum Posts

16034

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 3

Edited By BlazeHedgehog

I don't know how much I'd be willing to trust Jeff in this particular instance. It feels like he wrote this review directly after recording the Quicklook and never really bothered to investigate the game any deeper; according to the achievements on the Giantbombing account, he never even beat the game (a task that, with 2-3 other people, can take a couple hours or less).
 
Everybody is entitled to their own opinion, and my opinion is that I think this game is pretty cool, and a hell of a lot better than Jeff makes it sound (or even made it look, in the Quicklook). It's still not perfect, but it's everything you could ask for from multiplayer Castlevania, I think. 
 
I guess the game sucks if you play it by yourself, but considering how many of the later puzzles pretty much demand playing online with more than one person, I don't see why you'd want to play this by yourself anyway. It should be considered multiplayer only.

Avatar image for this_dude
This_Dude

311

Forum Posts

508

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By This_Dude

This game is great, and a ton of fun.  I really feel that there wasn't enough playtime involved in this review.  The points Jeff made were valid points, but some of the complaints he had just don't make sense based on the time I've spent with the game.  If you're any kind of a Castlevania fan this game is a must buy.  3 stars I could agree with, but 2 is just selling the title a bit short.

Avatar image for ragingwolf
RagingWolf

21

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By RagingWolf

You could tell the game wouldn't be great when they couldn't even bother including a BELMONT in it! The character's portraits look good, for what THAT'S worth.

Avatar image for xylonwarrior
XylonWarrior

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By XylonWarrior

See my user review if you want to know the real deal on this game, and all the pretentious "pro" reviewers trashing it. 
 
This_Dude said: 

"I really feel that there wasn't enough playtime involved in this review."

What's really odd is I got this impression from most "pro" reviews of this game; It distinctly sounds like they wrote the game off in as many ways as they could as fast as they could based solely on initial first impressions. 
 
I have a theory as to why this is; it seems "pro" game critics base their reviews around 2 basic critieria: hype and accessability. They feed off of hype; probably a majority of the hits/readers game journalism sites get come from hyping games that aren't out yet. There was basically no hype for this game, just one relatively humble press release. The gaming journalism community was given no hype to fuel their business, so they retaliated with bad reviews. 
 
I have another related theory on "pro" game critics; while I'm sure they like to believe they got their jobs by being "hardcore gamers', it seems to me more that they were hired because of their enthusiasm for and eagerness with which they embrace corporate hype.  So where we should have people with analytical minds who care about games as an art form, we are instead told what to play by fanboys who just loooooove Nintendo and Sony.    
Avatar image for xylonwarrior
XylonWarrior

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By XylonWarrior
@SIL77: yeah sucks that there are no single player games in the series for you. Seriously why does EVERY Castlevania game have to be multiplayer??? (cries)
Avatar image for davidh219
davidh219

904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Just picked up this game and tried playing it with a friend. Jeff does not at all address what is, imo, the biggest problem with the game, which is that when you get away from your friends, the game zooms out SOOO much that you can't even tell wtf you're doing or even see enemies on the screen. Who the hell thought that was a good idea? Even with my PS3 plugged into a big computer monitor that was a foot from our faces it was practically unplayable.