Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

231 Comments

Mario Kart 7 Review

3
  • 3DS

Confident execution of a familiar formula makes for a fun multiplayer experience, when the circumstances are right.

Mario! In a go-kart!
Mario! In a go-kart!

I’m a pretty staunch subscriber to the Unified Mario Kart Alpha Theory. For the non-scholars out there, this theory dictates that, within a certain margin of error, a person’s first Mario Kart game will always be their favorite, and any subsequent Mario Kart experiences are spent trying to recapture that initial, and fairly specific, buzz of camaraderie, trash-talk, and impossible, shamelessly computer-assisted comebacks. It’s a theory that, due to constant and intensive iteration, actually applies quite effortlessly to a lot of games.

But Mario Kart serves as such a sterling example of this “first bite” phenomenon because we’re now all the way up to Mario Kart 7--though this is the first in the series to explicitly rub the number of times we’ve fallen for the exact same trick in our collective faces--and Mario Kart expectations are intensely, almost dogmatically codified, and have been for years. In a way, it makes the already subjective process of writing a game review that much more nebulous. What is one even reviewing, exactly? The variations from one Mario Kart to the next can be extremely subtle, and whether a specific modulation is good or bad rests almost entirely in the hindsight of the player. That there has never been more than one Mario Kart on any given Nintendo platform further complicates things, and comparisons to other racing games--hell, other kart racing games, not that there have been any of particular merit in quite some time--are a moot point entirely.

As someone who, in the face of the above-mentioned theory, doesn’t really have a favorite Mario Kart game, what can I tell you about Mario Kart 7 for the 3DS? Well, it’s about as good as it is familiar. Yes, it introduces brief aerial and underwater sequences to break things up, further kart customization, additional power-ups, and as many brand-new courses as courses it recycles from Mario Karts of yore. Even if it’s all incredibly safe stuff, which it most definitely is, these modifications and additions seem good, or at least, do not contribute negatively to the previously established Mario Kart formula. To put it another way, if you like red sparks and hate blue shells, Mario Kart 7 is probably for you. To put it a third way, if this is your first Mario Kart, it seems like a pretty good one to kick things off with.

First-person mode is a short-lived novelty.
First-person mode is a short-lived novelty.

The fundamental action of hop-drifting around corners, trying to capitalize on boost pads and risky shortcuts, and deciding on the perfect moment to deploy your power-up remain the still-beating heart of Mario Kart. Of course, you’ll regularly have strong performances up-ended, and weak performances propped up, by the game’s unapologetically weighted power-up system, but if you didn’t, that wouldn’t really be Mario Kart, right?

You can run single races on one of the game’s 32 tracks, or compete in four-track grand prix cups. There are battle modes alongside the pure race events, but the open arena, proto-car-combat model feels more and more vestigial with each iteration. The single-player experience feels as anemic as always, with no structure beyond those grand prix cups, and no motivation beyond the promise of unlockable drivers and kart parts to keep playing. Online play seems snappy, even with a full load of eight players, though again, similar to the single-player experience, if the person you’re racing isn’t in the same room, online victories feel hollow, and there’s no one to punch when you lose at the last possible second. Well, no one that deserves it.

Local multiplayer remains the gold standard for Mario Kart 7. Eight players, each with their own copy of the game, would be ideal. Single-cart download support--which limits who and what you race, but not which tracks you can race on--seems generous, though load times are pronounced. It’s still quite fun with less than eight, but let me be clear that I cannot in good conscience recommend this game if you don’t have anyone to play with locally.

The new tracks are pretty consistently terrific.
The new tracks are pretty consistently terrific.

As is de rigueur for Mario Kart, 7 incorporates some of its platform’s native trickery in some conspicuous manner. Now you can opt to play Mario Kart by “turning” your 3DS as though it were a steering wheel, which is precisely as awful as it sounds. Worse, actually, because moving the 3DS around all but cancels out the game’s stereoscopic 3D effects, which I found more transfixing than I have in most 3DS games I’ve played. It’s the only 3DS game where, over time, I’ve found myself turning the 3D slider up, rather than the other way around.

Regardless of your appreciation for 3D effects, this is a crisp, colorful game, and maybe it’s just a matter of scale, but it might just be the best-looking Mario Kart yet. The track designs are impressive as well, and their scale, thematic ingenuity, use of 3D space, and smart but measured incorporation of underwater and aerial segments seem that much more impressive when compared directly to the classic tracks included.

Despite the game's slavish adherence to the Mario Kart formula, Mario Kart 7 has moments where it shines simply by executing that formula really well. Still, other than your personal history with Mario Kart, your enjoyment of Mario Kart 7 will likely hinge on your continued appreciation of that formula, and friends to enjoy it with, more than anything else.

231 Comments

Avatar image for toug
Toug

668

Forum Posts

452

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By Toug

@Jensonb: While I see where you're coming from, I'd have to say that the whole thesis of the 3 star review here is that Ryan is largely indifferent to the game. While it'd be great to further explain that, how would you? The whole concept of indifference is that there's no strong opinion one way or another, which is as valid an opinion, or critique, as any other.

He can't just make up stronger opinions. Not coming down one way or the other can be just as telling.

Avatar image for afroman269
Afroman269

7440

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Afroman269

Could not agree more with that first paragraph, it's why Mario Kart 64 is my favorite.

Avatar image for pompousdawson
PompousDawson

102

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Edited By PompousDawson

Another completely fair and honest review from Giant Bomb. Heres hoping for something a little different when Mario Kart touches down on Wii U.

Avatar image for tobygw
tobygw

666

Forum Posts

390

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: -1

Edited By tobygw
Avatar image for stealthraptor
StealthRaptor

568

Forum Posts

32

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By StealthRaptor

My favorite Mario Kart is Mario Kart 64, although my first was Super. Double Dash comes in at a close second.

Avatar image for xanavi
xanavi

216

Forum Posts

2317

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By xanavi

@Jensonb said:

[...]

And by the way I detect a distinct double standard. Why is it okay for people we know to be enthusiastic about Gears of War or Uncharted or Mortal Kombat to review those games, but asking for Mario Kart to be treated similarly is somehow asking for a biased review? The point isn't the score, it's the text. If Ryan's text is openly dismissive of the franchise and the game purely by extension of that, it's shoddy criticism. If they're willing to let Alex review Madden because he's more qualified to do so, why should I have to put up with Ryan being the one reviewing Mario Kart when his effort amounts to simply telling me it's Mario Kart? There is nothing of value in this review text. If anything, the 3-Star Score on its own is more useful.

I just wanted to pop in and say that it's not a double standard because the guys working at GB review the games they want to review. Their tastes just happen to align with some games they want to review, like Gears or Uncharted. I'm sure if they had someone on staff who wanted to review Mario Kart more than Ryan did then they would be allowed to do so, but it seems they didn't and so Ryan did it. For example, before Alex starting working at GB no one reviewed the Madden games because no one wanted to. And you don't have to put up with Ryan doing anything. You're not being forced to read it. You already said 1UP provided a better review so can't you just leave it at that?

Avatar image for toad_king
Toad_King

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Toad_King

I'm getting this solely for online multiplayer, so it sucks that none of the reviews can tell me how that is. I know they can't test it because it's not released and online is probably offline right now, but a better online is what I was looking forward to.

Avatar image for a_norman
A_Norman

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By A_Norman

Fair review, disagree with the alpha theory though. I played em all starting with Super and gotta say the DS one is my favorite.

Avatar image for cstrang
cstrang

2417

Forum Posts

2213

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By cstrang

@Shaanyboi said:

The "Unified Mario Kart Alpha Theory" sounds like kind of a cheap excuse to say "I really don't care, and saying 'It's Mario Kart' is a suitable enough review for this game." Yeah, it is just Mario Kart. Just like Uncharted 3 is just Uncharted. MW3 is just Call of Duty. Gears of War 3 is just Gears of War.

This is hardly a fair comparison. The Uncharted franchise has been around for 4 years, Call of Duty has been around for 8, and Gears for 5. Mario Kart has been around for almost 20. It's long-drawn out stagnation.

Avatar image for cloudenvy
Cloudenvy

5896

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Cloudenvy

@Sjupp said:

@Shayera

@Buckfitches said:

@hagridore said:

The best Mario Kart is Crash Team Racing.

Boom.

This guys knows what's up.

Nope. The best Mario Kart is Snowboard Kids. That's fact.

Sorry, CTR is boss.

Oh man, CTR was the best.

Avatar image for jensonb
Jensonb

2092

Forum Posts

3407

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 8

Edited By Jensonb

@snide said:

@Jensonb said:

I'm a Mario Kart nerd...

....WOULD YOU PLEASE HIRE A REVIEWER WHO ACTUALLY LIKES NINTENDO GAMES?...

...This isn't some fanboy rant either, I'm platform neutral...

Sorry Jesnonb, love ya tons, but your comment seemed a bit illogical so I had the team whip up some quick stats.

Average Review scores by platform.

PlatformAverage Score
X360 / Marketplace3.47
PS3 / PSN3.56
Wii / Wii Shop3.51
DS / 3DS / Dsi3.53

Average Review score of games developed by Nintendo.

DeveloperAverage Score
Nintendo / Nintendo EAD, Nintendo SPD3.9

What IS true is that we tend to review a lot more X360 / PS3 games than Nintendo games. That's partially due to audience, but (I hope Jeff will allow me a slight editorial opinion here) mostly due to higher amount of shit out on the Wii platform that really nobody in our audience really cares much about other than the occasional comedy quick-look. Don't worry, from my observations they tend to treat the Kinect the same way. All fairsies and what not.

This of course has nothing to do with your opinion about Ryan's review of THIS game, but I thought your generalizations were curious enough to look up.

For me personally, I think Ryan's Alpha theory pretty much sums up the series for the majority of people of an adult age. For you, my guess is that your early statement is what people need to know about your opinion. You are a Mario Kart nerd. That's ok, but it makes you susceptible to your own argument of bias when making accusatory comments.

I take your point Dave, and in fact your bringing up the stats helps clarify something I think I was initially unclear about. It's really not the score that bothers me. I've said in the past that review scores are so arbitrary as to be meaningless in many cases (The old are you really saying X is objectively as good as Y argument). I tend to avoid using a score whenever possible if I review something, because I find them to be difficult to set because opinions aren't digital enough to work on a numerical scale (Even if I tend to subscribe to a Good/Mediocre/Bad sliding scale of response - that's actually why I think the 5 Star system beats the 10 scale hands downs, because it's nearer to the broad assessments I think are more helpful in criticism than the fine grain 8.7 versus 7.8, which is trivial and meaningless).

The problem isn't the score. Ryan gave Mario Kart Wii a 3 Star review too, and whilst I would probably have given it a 4, that's just me. 1UP gave Mario Kart 7 a B- and their text easily justified it. Ryan's MK Wii review likewise justified its 3 Star rating. My problem with this review is the text, and the site's coverage of Nintendo in general (Of late, it's a historically recent trend) is the subtle dispassion relative to the other platform holders (I will clarify though that Giant Bomb is nowhere near the worst offender, and of course is much more balanced than, say Kotaku AKA "The 3DS is going to fail for XYZ reason the Vita is great because we said so dot com").

As I've said above, my problem here is Ryan's thesis really doesn't justify the existence of this review or that Giant Bomb's official editorial response to this game should be a resounding "meh". The core of this review is, "this is just another Mario Kart, I Ryan Davis am not that into Mario Kart, therefore: Meh". That opinion is valid, it's mine for Uncharted or Gears of War for example, but I'm not going around publishing professional editorial reviews of those games.

The text of this review is next to useless because Ryan doesn't have anything to say about Mario Kart. Jeff's review of the Mortal Kombat reboot was fantastic because his enthusiasm for the series gave him a platform to build an assessment off of. It is a universal truth that mediocre reviews are the hardest to write, and I can sympathise with that, but I feel short changed here. Mario Kart is a franchise I want to read about, but the official editorial review here reads like the staff simply don't care. That's worse to me than if they actively tore the game a new one, because I could at least look at that to temper the praise I've seen elsewhere. A shrug doesn't help anyone.

Jeff's review of Need for Speed: The Run is a good example too. I really wanted to like that game, because the idea they pitched was phenomenal. Jeff too approached the game with interest, and he still came away with a middling opinion, and a very fair review, because that same enthusiasm gave him a platform to build a review thesis from - namely that the execution was a disappointment. Ryan's attempt at a thesis for this review is insufficient to build any kind of criticism off. He posits that Mario Karts are broadly the same, but your favourite is usually your first. But he doesn't have anything informative or insightful to say about this game because that platform is too broad. It's not even that I expect I'll disagree with him when I play the game myself on Friday. The problem is there's nothing to disagree with - he doesn't really say anything! It's all just facts. That's just not a valuable review.

It's indicative also of that broader problem with the editorial here I referenced. The entire Giant Bomb crew seems heavily invested in franchises on Microsoft and Sony's platforms and on blockbuster multi-format franchises like Street Fighter, Call of Duty and so on. But when it comes to many of the Nintendo properties and hardware (notably this one), whilst there is no evident active dislike, there is an almost aggressive indifference. It's a very different proposition for suggesting the editorial is biased - that's a stupid thing to suggest because everyone on earth is biased tat's a basic aspect of humanity. The problem is there's no interest. I like that Patrick is a Jurassic Park nerd, I like that Jeff loves Mortal Kombat, I like that Alex knows his shit about Madden. Why can't there be someone who cares enough about Mario Kart and other Nintendo franchises to issue a review which is more substantial than this by-the-numbers effort? Mortal Kombat fans and Madden heads get lovely in-depth reviews from people who care about the topic. Why do I have to put up with something that seems to have been rattled off by someone who felt they had better things to do with their time?

I actively agree with the dismissive treatment of the stuff that gets shovelled onto the Wii and Kinect which has no demographic overlap with the site (That's just good business) - the tongue-in-cheek Quick Looks are fine ways to cover that stuff when it's covered at all. But Mario Kart is a blockbuster franchise (The number one standalone Wii game, making it the biggest game on the biggest platform) with a significant following amongst the hardcore, just like your Mortal Kombats or your Forza Motorsports or Battlefield. There is no explanation for why those kinds of games get thoughtful, highly considered reviews but the Mario Kart franchise is brushed aside as "Yup, it's Mario Kart". Halo Reach is Halo, Uncharted 3 is Uncharted, Gears of War 3 is Gears of War, Modern Warfare 3 is Call of Duty. But all of those games got far more thoughtful reviews with more well-developed insight than that despite the fact every single one comes from franchises which produce more entries (Adjusted for time since first game) with fewer substantial differences than Mario Kart.

It's a bad piece of criticism because it doesn't have anything to say. The score could be 5 Stars and it'd still be a bad piece of criticism. My plea is not about the opinions, it's about the content. If you're going to cover these games, have something to say about them, because covering them half-heatedly is much worse than not covering them at all - it comes across as dismissive and superior.

In short, I want someone who's interested in Mario Kart to review a Mario Kart game because it would produce a more useful review with something to say. Scores aren't really all that relevant, but here it's worse than that because the review has nothing to say which not only means the score isn't given a justification for those who care about such things abut also means that people looking for Giant Bomb's usual standard of insight (IE: Me) are left with a review barely more (And arguably less) informative than the Wiki article.

Avatar image for applederp
Applederp

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Applederp

OH GOD THEY DIDN'T GIVE THIS GAME A SCORE I AGREE WITH

AH BLOO BLOO BLOO

Grow the fuck up. You people make me not want to pursue a journalism career.

Avatar image for wfolse1
wfolse1

478

Forum Posts

172

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By wfolse1

@Jensonb: Well said, sir. It's nice to find the rare, well-considered comment in these places.

Avatar image for macgetmalled
macgetmalled

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By macgetmalled

I have not played the game yet, but I will. Because even if it's not great. 3 stars in my mind means it is a average/good game. Great Review, Thank you.

Avatar image for macgetmalled
macgetmalled

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By macgetmalled

Also the Unified Mario Kart Alpha Theory is on point..

Avatar image for deactivated-6050ef4074a17
deactivated-6050ef4074a17

3686

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

The complaints here are just amazing me. They're not even pretending to be about the review this time, unlike the Skyward Sword review criticism. It's purely about "not being nice enough" to Nintendo. Jesus.

Avatar image for boiglenoight
Boiglenoight

605

Forum Posts

154

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By Boiglenoight

A Mario Kart with blue shells is a Mario Kart worth passing on.

Avatar image for jensonb
Jensonb

2092

Forum Posts

3407

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 8

Edited By Jensonb

@xanavi: I take your point, and kudos on making it in a reasonable way. But to clarify I'm not suggesting the double standard is on the part of the editorial, it was a response to commenters suggesting I was asking for openly biased reviews - my point being I'm actually just frustrated that there's nothing much said in this review because Ryan doesn't seem to care, and that those same people jumping on me for suggesting do not complain when say, Jeff reviews Mortal Kombat (And nor do I for exactly the same reason I AM complaining now).

Avatar image for lively
Lively

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Lively

@Jensonb: If Ryan doesn't have anything passionate to say about Mario Kart, it might be because the franchise, in its current state, doesn't deserve getting passionate about. If you are passionate about it, good for you, but among the demographic that frequents this site, Ryan's opinion is probably closer to the majority than yours (not that this matters, though).

I'd argue that Mortal Kombat 9, in terms of what it did for the series, was worth getting excited about, to a far greater degree than what Mario Kart 7 brings to the table for that series.

If a major release comes out, and none of the staff is excited about it, would you ask that everyone recuse themselves and leave the product unreviewed? That seems a bit unreasonable, if that's what you're arguing.

Avatar image for milkman
Milkman

19372

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By Milkman

@Jensonb: You just wrote nine paragraphs about literally nothing. Why? Why not just move on?

Avatar image for marino
Marino

8616

Forum Posts

1365391

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 102

Edited By Marino  Staff

@hagridore said:

The best Mario Kart is Crash Team Racing.

Boom.

I would find it hard to argue with this.

Avatar image for lokilaufey
lokilaufey

306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By lokilaufey

This is pretty much what I expected from MK7. If you are a rabid MK fan you'll probably love it, for everyone else it's more of the same with some added extras. I think what people forget is that 3 out of 5 ain't bad, it's "average" or "good," nothing spectacular. Not bad. From what I've read and expect, this is an average game in the Mario Kart series which probably isn't as enjoyable as my personal favorite (which is Double Dash and not, in fact, my first ever MK game. I had played all that came prior at that point.)

Avatar image for ltsquigs
ltsquigs

310

Forum Posts

5000

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Edited By ltsquigs

@Jensonb: Hey there, We've actually been debating what you've been saying in Tested IRC and I figured I would try to give my response to your criticism of the review (criticism of a criticism?)

I may be incorrect on this, but my understanding of what you wrote is that your primary claim is that saying "Its more of the same", "It wasn't that interesting", and generally being indifferent to the game does not constitute good criticism. An example of why you consider this poor criticism is that this criticism could be applied to most games that have sequels and yet we don't do it.

First off a response to the claim that this criticism could also be applied to other games. That would only work if you consider the criticism in a vacuum, and I don't think that's fair. I think you must consider the general attitude of gamers and gamer culture when consider the veracity of arguments in a review. Nintendo has a reputation among gamers of publishing the same thing over and over again (the veracity of this stance may be dubious but its there), furthermore if you consider the general gaming culture this year that has been a growing resistance to sequels because so many have come up this year (this started with the critiques of Uncharted 3 that boiled down to "Its more of the same"). So therefore, given the current culture and the time that the game came out (because I do believe reviews are relative to the time that the game is reviewed at) I think that it is valid to apply the "more of the same" argument to MK7 while it may have been previously considered silly to apply it to something like GW3 (although if you reviewed GW3 now it would probably be valid). The point is, such an argument given the current context in gaming does end up being a useful criticism of a game.

Second off, on the veracity of simple indifference constituting a useful review. I do believe that indifference actually does provide good information for a review. We often like to think of terms in good or bad, but clearly indifference is a perfectly valid response to a game, and to be honest if the reviewer is indifferent to a game that tells me something about the game. Of course such a thing must be processed through the context of the reviewer themselves, considering such things as "maybe the reviewer doesn't like that type of game" or "maybe it was just a fluke for the reviewer" or maybe "The reviewer has the same tastes as me, so I will be indifferent to this game as well". Either way, it conveys pertinent information that helps me make a buying decision. Some people would reject the idea that such a subjective measure counts as a valid review, but I reject the idea that a review/criticism can be anything but subjective.

Avatar image for ruthloose
RuthLoose

909

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By RuthLoose

@Jensonb: Giant Bomb is not 1Up.com, nor is Ryan David Jeremy Parish. If you enjoy Nintendo and Nintendo's franchises, you might enjoy the coverage found elsewhere better. In fact, I recommend you listen to either their Games, Dammit! or Retronauts podcasts. Part of Giant Bomb's appeal is how transparent the editorial staff is in letting you know how they feel about stuff and that can come across as harsh to people who feel like they are on the other side of the argument.

I understand your frustration with the member of Giant Bomb not showing your level of passion for Nintendo but Jeff non-ironically showed a lot of interest in Super Mario 3D Land recently. Seriously, diversify your games enthusiast press coverage if you are not happy here. Things are not going to dramatically change until we get better 3DS software or a better handle on just what exactly the WiiU is.

Avatar image for big_jon
big_jon

6533

Forum Posts

2539

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 18

Edited By big_jon

Ryan, u such a h8ter, this sh1t is ignorant!!!11

Edit- After reading the review it really sounds to me like a four star review to be honest...

Avatar image for grognard66
Grognard66

79

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Edited By Grognard66

Glad this site hasn't followed the lead of the rest of the enthusiast press and given the artificial-Nintendo-nostalgia-score-bump to any of their "beloved" titles. Rehashing the same game over and over again and getting ridiculously high scores says more about the state of the gaming press these days than the games themselves. For those of you who are still immature enough to require validation go visit IGN for mindless pandering to this tired, cliched developer.

Avatar image for legalbagel
LegalBagel

1955

Forum Posts

1590

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 7

Edited By LegalBagel

@Jensonb: I'll say I agree with your overall viewpoint on GB's coverage of some games, and that comes from having a small team. I'm completely disregarding Patrick's Zelda review and GB's coverage because it was obvious I was coming from an entirely different viewpoint from him and the rest of the GB crew. It'd generally be nice to have more coverage/discussion of good Wii games, because even for the good or great ones that have come out, it's obvious that most of the staff has little interest in firing up their Wii to play them.

But I wouldn't say that Ryan's perspective on a game like this where he hasn't been a Mario Kart fan in years is useless. The perspective of a non-fan checking in to see if a series has done anything that warrants other non-fans paying attention is a good one. While I loved Twilight Princess and now Skyward Sword, I also have felt that Mario Kart isn't worth buying anymore and this review confirms I don't need to tune back in. That's a pretty valuable perspective to me.

If you don't agree with their background views they bring to the game, then don't pay attention to the review. Every review doesn't have to come from a fanboy, or from a detractor from that matter. A mix will probably tell you what you need to know and reflect the reality of a game. The thing GB does better than most is making their background views clear so you know whether the reviewer's perspective will match yours.

Avatar image for paulunga
paulunga

3517

Forum Posts

176

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By paulunga

I have to disagree with your theory there. My first Mario Kart was 64 and I had a blast playing it with my friends back then but having played Super Mario Kart, Double Dash and the Wii version I realize that it's by far the weakest one. Personally, I love Double Dash. Great multiplayer modes, fun tracks and that weird co-op mode (I always crushed with Toad & Toadette in the Bullet Bill kart with a buddy of mine).

Avatar image for jensonb
Jensonb

2092

Forum Posts

3407

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 8

Edited By Jensonb

@LtSquigs said:

@Jensonb: Hey there, We've actually been debating what you've been saying in Tested IRC and I figured I would try to give my response to your criticism of the review (criticism of a criticism?)

I may be incorrect on this, but my understanding of what you wrote is that your primary claim is that saying "Its more of the same", "It wasn't that interesting", and generally being indifferent to the game does not constitute good criticism. An example of why you consider this poor criticism is that this criticism could be applied to most games that have sequels and yet we don't do it.

First off a response to the claim that this criticism could also be applied to other games. That would only work if you consider the criticism in a vacuum, and I don't think that's fair. I think you must consider the general attitude of gamers and gamer culture when consider the veracity of arguments in a review. Nintendo has a reputation among gamers of publishing the same thing over and over again (the veracity of this stance may be dubious but its there), furthermore if you consider the general gaming culture this year that has been a growing resistance to sequels because so many have come up this year (this started with the critiques of Uncharted 3 that boiled down to "Its more of the same"). So therefore, given the current culture and the time that the game came out (because I do believe reviews are relative to the time that the game is reviewed at) I think that it is valid to apply the "more of the same" argument to MK7 while it may have been previously considered silly to apply it to something like GW3 (although if you reviewed GW3 now it would probably be valid). The point is, such an argument given the current context in gaming does end up being a useful criticism of a game.

Second off, on the veracity of simple indifference constituting a useful review. I do believe that indifference actually does provide good information for a review. We often like to think of terms in good or bad, but clearly indifference is a perfectly valid response to a game, and to be honest if the reviewer is indifferent to a game that tells me something about the game. Of course such a thing must be processed through the context of the reviewer themselves, considering such things as "maybe the reviewer doesn't like that type of game" or "maybe it was just a fluke for the reviewer" or maybe "The reviewer has the same tastes as me, so I will be indifferent to this game as well". Either way, it conveys pertinent information that helps me make a buying decision. Some people would reject the idea that such a subjective measure counts as a valid review, but I reject the idea that a review/criticism can be anything but subjective.

Your response is reasonable, but you haven't quite got what I was getting at. It is not that "It's more of the same" and an indifferent reaction are inherently poor critical points. As I said, 1UP's middling reaction to the game was fine. The problem is in the actual criticism. The text here has nothing to say. The review of Modern Warfare 3 took the time to explain where tweaks had been made, and how those affected gameplay in various ways. This review of Mario Kart didn't say anything. It used indifference as an excuse to bypass criticism. 1UP in their review(s) explained why it was that the game elicited a middling reaction. Ryan simply didn't say much of anything. That's just not useful as a review. If you're going into a review, you want it to offer some kind of insight about the strengths & weaknesses or to somehow explain why the reviewer arrived at a given conclusion. This review offers only it's starting point (Yes, It's Mario Kart) as justification for its assessment - an assessment which comes only in the score because the text offers little in the way of an opinion or any kind of evaluation outside of one or two sentences which are caveated.

Avatar image for deerokus
deerokus

996

Forum Posts

16

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By deerokus

In this interview http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-11-22-miyamoto-cold-on-mario-kart-7s-customisation-optionsMiyamoto himself says things not massively unlike what Ryan says in his review. To paraphrase, he says 'Hey we made a 3DS version of Mario Kart, it's a pretty good Mario Kart game with a few meaningless features added on and that's about it because there's not much else we can think of to do with it. You're not really getting anything unique or new with this.'

Clearly Miyamoto is biased against Nintendo.

Avatar image for cathryn
Cathryn

586

Forum Posts

1681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 14

Edited By Cathryn

Predictable bitching is predictable.

Anyone else notice that GameTrailers gave it an 8.8?

I loled <3

Avatar image for dragonzord
dragonzord

846

Forum Posts

362

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By dragonzord

@Marino said:

@hagridore said:

The best Mario Kart is Crash Team Racing.

Boom.

I would find it hard to argue with this.

Here's an easy way. Lego Racers is better than Crash

Avatar image for mormonwarrior
MormonWarrior

2945

Forum Posts

577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 21

Edited By MormonWarrior

Was gonna leave this comment on a Quick Look for this, but since it's not up yet (ever?) I'll put it here: reading Ryan's reviews for two Mario Kart games (Wii, 7) shows me very clearly that he does not understand Mario Kart at all, or what makes it better or worse. I'm usually on board with GB's opinions of Nintendo games (especially with my personal falling out with the Wii, etc.) but this just shows base ignorance. This game, just from seeing the footage and what features are in the game, is WORLDS better than the Wii game, which received the same score.

The Wii game was incredibly stripped down, badly designed and missing features, modes, and all sorts of things that had been in every game up to that point. It felt slow, unnecessarily added four players and widened levels making them more barren and stale...

This game looks like a new, excellent version of the DS game, which is still the best-designed game in the series. Despite its existence as a portable game, it's simply the best game in the series. And like I said before, I've played them all in order since their release, SNES game being my first.

I like a good, well-made Mario Kart game because it's so much fun with friends and it's the one racing series I can really get behind. Blue Shells are annoying (could be toggled off in Double Dash, along with other items) and there's always issues here and there, but there are a few great games in the series that are really, really neat. The DS game is still my most-played DS game and I've played a LOT of them.

Avatar image for bluehulk11
bluehulk11

15

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By bluehulk11

can we stop it the game is good not great but steal a big seller and if it's just a good game to kids and adults alike way doe's it matter have fun thats way games are here in the first pleas.

I mean pleas like this site and others take the out of video games more and more we shude just stop listning to them

and just make review are selfs with are own eyes

Avatar image for karlpilkington
KarlPilkington

2844

Forum Posts

824

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Edited By KarlPilkington

@Marino said:

@hagridore said:

The best Mario Kart is Crash Team Racing.

Boom.

I would find it hard to argue with this.

Yep, CTR is pretty great.

Avatar image for jensonb
Jensonb

2092

Forum Posts

3407

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 8

Edited By Jensonb

@zoner said:

@Marino said:

@hagridore said:

The best Mario Kart is Crash Team Racing.

Boom.

I would find it hard to argue with this.

Here's an easy way. Lego Racers is better than Crash

Oh man, Lego Racers was so freaking rad. Damn I'd like to get in on some of that right now.

Avatar image for heimdal
Heimdal

67

Forum Posts

81

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Heimdal

@snide said:

@Jensonb said:

I'm a Mario Kart nerd...

....WOULD YOU PLEASE HIRE A REVIEWER WHO ACTUALLY LIKES NINTENDO GAMES?...

...This isn't some fanboy rant either, I'm platform neutral...

Sorry Jesnonb, love ya tons, but your comment seemed a bit illogical so I had the team whip up some quick stats.

Average Review scores by platform.

PlatformAverage Score
X360 / Marketplace3.47
PS3 / PSN3.56
Wii / Wii Shop3.51
DS / 3DS / Dsi3.53

Average Review score of games developed by Nintendo.

DeveloperAverage Score
Nintendo / Nintendo EAD, Nintendo SPD3.9

What IS true is that we tend to review a lot more X360 / PS3 games than Nintendo games. That's partially due to audience, but (I hope Jeff will allow me a slight editorial opinion here) mostly due to higher amount of shit out on the Wii platform that really nobody in our audience really cares much about other than the occasional comedy quick-look. Don't worry, from my observations they tend to treat the Kinect the same way. All fairsies and what not.

This of course has nothing to do with your opinion about Ryan's review of THIS game, but I thought your generalizations were curious enough to look up.

For me personally, I think Ryan's Alpha theory pretty much sums up the series for the majority of people of an adult age. For you, my guess is that your early statement is what people need to know about your opinion. You are a Mario Kart nerd. That's ok, but it makes you susceptible to your own argument of bias when making accusatory comments.

Actually, Dave, what this highlights is that the crew is a little too harsh on the 360. Where's the Microsoft love?

Nah, I kid. Love that you guys (staff) can jump into discussions with completely informative contributions like this and just chat with users. One of the many reasons I love this site.

Avatar image for corganmurray
corganmurray

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By corganmurray

This was a really great review. The Unified Mario Kart Alpha Theory is hilarious, and in my case (SNES), totally true.

Avatar image for vinsanityv22
vinsanityv22

1066

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By vinsanityv22

Good job Ryan! I'm sick of this game getting such high scores - I mean, you know it's quality, but Mario Kart has spent far too long NOT being better or more ambitious than Diddy Kong Racing, let alone newer games like SEGA All Stars Racing or ModNation Racers. Time was, Mario Kart was the only game that nailed the "feel" of a good cart racer, but all those listed above also nail it. And MNR brought combat with depth and balance, a great online community, and those genre-shattering customization tools. It's going to be GENERATIONS before MK can match that, let alone better it. This is a fine, fun game, but Mario Kart is no longer an instant 5/5. Not when Sony has MNR. And frankly, I'm tired of Nintendo getting that "free pass" from people when it comes to anything with Zelda or Mario on the box.

Avatar image for krakn3dfx
Krakn3Dfx

2746

Forum Posts

101

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 3

Edited By Krakn3Dfx

@Cloudenvy said:

@Sjupp said:

@Shayera

@Buckfitches said:

@hagridore said:

The best Mario Kart is Crash Team Racing.

Boom.

This guys knows what's up.

Nope. The best Mario Kart is Snowboard Kids. That's fact.

Sorry, CTR is boss.

Oh man, CTR was the best.

Fo sho.

Avatar image for sagesebas
sagesebas

2465

Forum Posts

579

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

Edited By sagesebas
@Shrat Ryan loves nintendo, look at his review for mario galaxy 2. One of his favorite games is Mario bros 3.
Avatar image for krakn3dfx
Krakn3Dfx

2746

Forum Posts

101

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 3

Edited By Krakn3Dfx
No Caption Provided
Avatar image for sagesebas
sagesebas

2465

Forum Posts

579

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

Edited By sagesebas
@Jimbo_N Im pretty sure methodist was being satirical
Avatar image for bluehulk11
bluehulk11

15

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By bluehulk11

@vinsanityv22: gamerader 10/10 ign 9/10 gameiformer 8.5/10 gamepro 4/5 computer and video games 9.4/10 joystiq 4 .5/5 famitsu 37/40 1up B-

VGChartz 3. mario kart 7

it still got a 5/5 or 10/10 or close by a minority so sorry dude in my book thats still a free pass you lose

Avatar image for jmfinamore
jmfinamore

1092

Forum Posts

16

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jmfinamore

Since everyone has been complaining of franchises not evolving enough or being different enough from their predecessors in recent years this kind of begs to question: Is it better to beat a franchise into the ground over a few years or many years? While people complain endlessly about CoD being a yearly rehash, it still gets high marks for being well made. Here, though, Mario Kart seems like its being punished more sternly for not changing, despite being a well made game. I'm not saying you can directly the two reviews, but it just raises an interesting question.

One thing I'd like to see is more reviewers punishing rehashing. They complain about it all the time, but rarely actually review these types of games poorly.

Avatar image for msg
MSG

214

Forum Posts

80

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 4

Edited By MSG

Thanks for the great review, Ryan. I'm getting a little fed up with reviewers giving Nintendo a free pass. It's a serious problem that has really come to light this season.

Avatar image for legalbagel
LegalBagel

1955

Forum Posts

1590

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 7

Edited By LegalBagel

The Unified Mario Kart Theory doesn't work for me, if only because I played a ton more multiplayer 64 than I did SNES, and feel the 64 version was a big jump up in that respect.

Paid only a passing attention to Double Dash and Wii, and bought the DS game only to discover that it's the same Mario Kart that I played 10+ years ago and I'm done with it. So don't think I'll be buying this.

Avatar image for beard_of_zeus
beard_of_zeus

2021

Forum Posts

4665

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 37

Edited By beard_of_zeus

Thanks for the review, Ryan. Sounds like some solid Mario Kart action (which isn't all bad), but it's still Mario Kart, ya know. Glad to hear the online is solid, though, that's what I was most interested in. Maybe I can convince my friend from back home to pick this game up, if not, I'll probably pass for lack of people to play with.

Avatar image for nickydubz
NickyDubz

380

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By NickyDubz
@Jensonb

You're all wrong, the best Mario kart so far was Mario Kart Advance: Super Circuit. I'm a Mario Kart nerd, I've played them all extensively enough to say no other Mario Kart has executed on the formula as well as Super Circuit. I can't wait to see how 7 does though. By nerfing the Blue Shell back to MKDS levels, restoring MKDS handling (But with mini turbos nerfed to prevent snaking), restoring coins and adjusting the balance so that racing well is actually the best way to win, there's a strong chance the folks behind Seven have made a game which is a match for Super Circuit.

That out of the way, I have to address this review. Really, Ryan? REALLY? I saw your three stars, rolled my eyes as the "Giant Bomb: Home of the 3 Star Review" joke drifted across my mind & decided to take a look at your body text to see what the problem is. But there isn't one. The text of this review could just as easily have a 4 Star score slapped on it and it would work just as well.

Now here's the thing, I know Giant Bomb reviews are meant as personal opinions, not authoritative assessments like those pretentious dweebs at 1UP's reviews, but at this point I have to say the review system here has devolved into a circle jerk. Outside of the occasional outlier like an Alex Navarro penned review, the Giant Bomb editorial reviews are a monoculture. And this review typifies the biggest problem:

WOULD YOU PLEASE HIRE A REVIEWER WHO ACTUALLY LIKES NINTENDO GAMES?

I mean, seriously, WHAT is the value in a bunch of guys who sit around waxing lyrical about the Uncharted franchise or Gears of War 3 but whose reaction to pretty much everything Nintendo does "is lol it has bright colours and is for kiddies and it has Mario lol therefore it's dull and Nintendo have no innovation" reviewing Mario Kart? What is the point in that? What does it achieve? Outside of the occasional outlier like Jeff (almost begrudgingly) admitting he likes Super Mario 3D Land, it's like you guys don't even WANT people who like Nintendo games to come here.

This isn't some fanboy rant either, I'm platform neutral. I love me some damn Halo, Killzone 2 was a GOTY for me, my PS3 is my most used console and my Xbox 360 is a special edition. This is about the fact that I like Nintendo games - particularly Mario Kart - and I pay you guys money and all you seem to do is sit there and laugh "hahaha, why would someone like NINTENDO? That's for fags". It's like paying money to keep them producing fucking Sega Genesis ads. So for the love of all that is holy, could you please do us all a favour and find someone on staff who actually likes Nintendo games?

It shouldn't be this hard.

This dude is way to in to cart racers....
Avatar image for fozimuth
Fozimuth

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Fozimuth

As long as it doesn't have horrible item balance like the Wii Mario Kart, sounds fine.