Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

231 Comments

Mario Kart 7 Review

3
  • 3DS

Confident execution of a familiar formula makes for a fun multiplayer experience, when the circumstances are right.

Mario! In a go-kart!
Mario! In a go-kart!

I’m a pretty staunch subscriber to the Unified Mario Kart Alpha Theory. For the non-scholars out there, this theory dictates that, within a certain margin of error, a person’s first Mario Kart game will always be their favorite, and any subsequent Mario Kart experiences are spent trying to recapture that initial, and fairly specific, buzz of camaraderie, trash-talk, and impossible, shamelessly computer-assisted comebacks. It’s a theory that, due to constant and intensive iteration, actually applies quite effortlessly to a lot of games.

But Mario Kart serves as such a sterling example of this “first bite” phenomenon because we’re now all the way up to Mario Kart 7--though this is the first in the series to explicitly rub the number of times we’ve fallen for the exact same trick in our collective faces--and Mario Kart expectations are intensely, almost dogmatically codified, and have been for years. In a way, it makes the already subjective process of writing a game review that much more nebulous. What is one even reviewing, exactly? The variations from one Mario Kart to the next can be extremely subtle, and whether a specific modulation is good or bad rests almost entirely in the hindsight of the player. That there has never been more than one Mario Kart on any given Nintendo platform further complicates things, and comparisons to other racing games--hell, other kart racing games, not that there have been any of particular merit in quite some time--are a moot point entirely.

As someone who, in the face of the above-mentioned theory, doesn’t really have a favorite Mario Kart game, what can I tell you about Mario Kart 7 for the 3DS? Well, it’s about as good as it is familiar. Yes, it introduces brief aerial and underwater sequences to break things up, further kart customization, additional power-ups, and as many brand-new courses as courses it recycles from Mario Karts of yore. Even if it’s all incredibly safe stuff, which it most definitely is, these modifications and additions seem good, or at least, do not contribute negatively to the previously established Mario Kart formula. To put it another way, if you like red sparks and hate blue shells, Mario Kart 7 is probably for you. To put it a third way, if this is your first Mario Kart, it seems like a pretty good one to kick things off with.

First-person mode is a short-lived novelty.
First-person mode is a short-lived novelty.

The fundamental action of hop-drifting around corners, trying to capitalize on boost pads and risky shortcuts, and deciding on the perfect moment to deploy your power-up remain the still-beating heart of Mario Kart. Of course, you’ll regularly have strong performances up-ended, and weak performances propped up, by the game’s unapologetically weighted power-up system, but if you didn’t, that wouldn’t really be Mario Kart, right?

You can run single races on one of the game’s 32 tracks, or compete in four-track grand prix cups. There are battle modes alongside the pure race events, but the open arena, proto-car-combat model feels more and more vestigial with each iteration. The single-player experience feels as anemic as always, with no structure beyond those grand prix cups, and no motivation beyond the promise of unlockable drivers and kart parts to keep playing. Online play seems snappy, even with a full load of eight players, though again, similar to the single-player experience, if the person you’re racing isn’t in the same room, online victories feel hollow, and there’s no one to punch when you lose at the last possible second. Well, no one that deserves it.

Local multiplayer remains the gold standard for Mario Kart 7. Eight players, each with their own copy of the game, would be ideal. Single-cart download support--which limits who and what you race, but not which tracks you can race on--seems generous, though load times are pronounced. It’s still quite fun with less than eight, but let me be clear that I cannot in good conscience recommend this game if you don’t have anyone to play with locally.

The new tracks are pretty consistently terrific.
The new tracks are pretty consistently terrific.

As is de rigueur for Mario Kart, 7 incorporates some of its platform’s native trickery in some conspicuous manner. Now you can opt to play Mario Kart by “turning” your 3DS as though it were a steering wheel, which is precisely as awful as it sounds. Worse, actually, because moving the 3DS around all but cancels out the game’s stereoscopic 3D effects, which I found more transfixing than I have in most 3DS games I’ve played. It’s the only 3DS game where, over time, I’ve found myself turning the 3D slider up, rather than the other way around.

Regardless of your appreciation for 3D effects, this is a crisp, colorful game, and maybe it’s just a matter of scale, but it might just be the best-looking Mario Kart yet. The track designs are impressive as well, and their scale, thematic ingenuity, use of 3D space, and smart but measured incorporation of underwater and aerial segments seem that much more impressive when compared directly to the classic tracks included.

Despite the game's slavish adherence to the Mario Kart formula, Mario Kart 7 has moments where it shines simply by executing that formula really well. Still, other than your personal history with Mario Kart, your enjoyment of Mario Kart 7 will likely hinge on your continued appreciation of that formula, and friends to enjoy it with, more than anything else.

231 Comments

Avatar image for jonathanashleymoore
JonathanAshleyMoore

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Disagree completely with the theory. Mario Kart DS is the best Mario Kart game. My first game was Super Mario Kart.

Avatar image for laserbolts
laserbolts

5506

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By laserbolts

My first Mario kart was the snes one but my favorite was double dash. I guess I don't fit into your theory but good review anyways,

Avatar image for elyk247
elyk247

423

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 25

Edited By elyk247

Yep, Super Mario Kart is the best of the series still.

Avatar image for jasondesante
jasondesante

615

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By jasondesante

Everyone join my clan in Mario Kart 7.

It's called the "Shroom Clan"

26-6030-2792-2105

that is the group code.

Would have liked to make it a giantbomb clan but they didn't mention many features in the review so, w/e

Avatar image for donkey_kong
Donkey_Kong

119

Forum Posts

413

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Donkey_Kong

"let me be clear that I cannot in good conscience recommend this game if you don’t have anyone to play with locally."

Gonna have to disagree with you on this point Ryan, i'm loving the online. Just because the people online aren't in the same room as you does not take away from the satisfaction that comes with bumping them off the road.

Avatar image for hockeyjohnston
HockeyJohnston

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By HockeyJohnston

I don't really get the 'this isn't fun online' part. MK7 is probably the best handheld online game I've ever played. It's best in short bursts, but guess what -- handheld!

Avatar image for eschatonik
eschatonik

23

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By eschatonik

Good read. Feels more like a 4 star, but oh well. I'm digging it right now (but us 3DS owners are HUNGRY).

Avatar image for afroman269
Afroman269

7440

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Afroman269

Most of the time I wish that the comment section would be removed for reviews, but then I wouldn't be able to enjoy reading all of these great comments.

Avatar image for mormonwarrior
MormonWarrior

2945

Forum Posts

577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 21

Edited By MormonWarrior

Hate to be one of "those guys" but...there have been five largely identical Call of Duty games since 2007 (all following the structure of CoD4) that have been getting less and less interesting with each iteration, and you complain that you've played Mario Kart seven times now including this game, while they've changed pretty dramatically game to game? The fact that you don't recognize the differences in the games just shows me that maybe somebody else (like Brad, for example) should have reviewed this game. The SNES game is totally different from the N64 game which is way different from Double Dash...they're essentially the same kind of game, but have very different styles to their tracks. The Wii game was generic and bad and the N64 game had horrible visuals and basic geometry, but besides those they've all been fun. Seven games since 1992 is not overkill in any way, especially since three of those have been portable versions.

That said, they really need to flesh out the options and the single player modes to keep the series fresh.

Avatar image for pwnmachine
pwnmachine

431

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By pwnmachine

Last good Mario Kart game was the SNES version...

Avatar image for pikapichu
Pikapichu

79

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Pikapichu

SMK on the SNES was my first and still most favorite in the series. I liked the DS version, but hated its reliance on snaking in multiplayer. Anyone know if that stupid technique is still the way to play in this 3DS version?

Avatar image for gamerpigeon
gamerpigeon

580

Forum Posts

55

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By gamerpigeon

my first was the snes , my favourite tho was 64 until the wii version came out. Despite this i have seen the first is best mentality alot amongst friends and family

Avatar image for jasondesante
jasondesante

615

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By jasondesante

Heres a suggestion, always get a kid whos experiencing the game/franchize for the first time to also contribute to the review. Maybe film it then write down what they say or whatever.

I think that having someone without biases also being incorporated into the review would actually make it easier to understand what one's own genuine reaction might be closer to, because it seems like everyone has a hard time reviewing any Nintendo game properly nowadays.

Someone who's never played mario kart wouldn't understand the sentence, "though this is the first in the series to explicitly rub the number of times we’ve fallen for the exact same trick in our collective faces". I think that quote shows these reviews aren't even designed to inform anyone, and instead be an editorial in disguise, targeted at a likeminded reader.

Never mentioned the Community featuresin this review. In the Mario 3D review, Jeff never mentioned the new 3d rendering modes which I thought were a big deal. Why are technical objective qualities omitted from the reviews and replaced with emotional manipulative filler regularly?

Someone holla back!

Avatar image for king9999
King9999

663

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

Edited By King9999

I don't know about that theory. I've played Mario Kart since the beginning and my favourite one is MKDS.

The review could have been written better. No mention of the Communities features, and how good/bad it is.

Avatar image for thamilkman
ThaMilkMan

402

Forum Posts

458

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By ThaMilkMan

Big Mario Kart 64 fan here to say that this review is actually really well written. I'll probably end up getting the game and a 3/5 for Mario Kart seems fine since the game is kind of the same it's been since 64 (minus the two people in one kart thing of double dash) so why are people upset...oh nintendo fans, get older than 16 and then post in the comments section lol. Keep up the good work Ryan & crew.

Avatar image for edeo
edeo

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By edeo

Nintendo usually gets a total pass by the critics every time. Especially with Zelda games. Skyward Sword is good, but it is certainly very awkward and annoying for large parts.

Avatar image for liako21
liako21

566

Forum Posts

270

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By liako21

I was going to blindly buy this because I have been enjoying mario 3d land so much. but unfortunately I dont have anyone locally to play with and it seems thats where the fun is really at.

Avatar image for chinakat
chinakat

52

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

Edited By chinakat

@DrDarkStryfe: THANK YOU! Finally someone understands. 3 stars is not 6/10. It means that he recommends it to a very specific audience, meaning that you meet the "criteria" for enjoying the game. If you meet the criteria (i.e. you have friends to play with, and you're either a hardcore fan or uninitiated) than get it. If not, don't bother. He's not saying it's mediocre.

Avatar image for drdarkstryfe
DrDarkStryfe

2563

Forum Posts

1672

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By DrDarkStryfe

The biggest problem is that gamers are wired to thing 3/5 stars to equal 6/10. They are not the same scale.

Avatar image for wsowen02
wsowen02

353

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By wsowen02

@ArbitraryWater said:

@Jensonb: So instead Giant Bomb should hire someone who gives every first-party Nintendo game 5 stars, in order to avoid TEH BIAS? Naw son. If you want that, go to IGN. They'll hook you up with your perfect 10s and your nostalgia-fueled hyperbole.

Word. You can predict the review scores on that site based on the publisher of the game.

Avatar image for bluehulk11
bluehulk11

15

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By bluehulk11

@Deusoma said:

My first Mario Kart was MK64, and I actually thought it kind of sucked. Double Dash is probably my favourite, it was a major improvement, but the game at the core of the franchise is still just kind of boring, you know?

what do you think of NASCAR ? same thing see

Avatar image for deusoma
Deusoma

3224

Forum Posts

128695

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 4

Edited By Deusoma

My first Mario Kart was MK64, and I actually thought it kind of sucked. Double Dash is probably my favourite, it was a major improvement, but the game at the core of the franchise is still just kind of boring, you know?

Avatar image for willy105
Willy105

4959

Forum Posts

14729

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

Edited By Willy105

@StriderNo9 said:

Unified Mario Kart Alpha Theory is awesome.

And it's correct, too.

Avatar image for jscro
jscro

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By jscro

I'm definitely in Ryan's camp on this one. The review itself was fine. The score was fine. Nobody is looking to a Mario Kart game for jaw-dropping set pieces and innovative gameplay. In fact, I would argue the opposite is true. They go back to each Mario Kart game because it's always a consistently enjoyable and comfortable experience updated and tweaked for Nintendo's newest hardware. There is nothing wrong with that. It doesn't drastically alter or reimagine a player's initial Mario Kart experience, whether it was Super Mario Kart, Double Dash, or Wii. It's basically the same game, hence the three star review. It gives you exactly what you expected...nothing more, nothing less. And that's a good thing.

Avatar image for lively
Lively

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Lively

I agree with the poster that says "polish" isn't enough to warrant 5 stars, or even 4 stars, if the underlying gameplay is stale.

I think a non-broken game with polish and a proven concept probably deserves 3 stars out of the door, but those two extra stars need to be earned through some degree of innovation or great gameplay.

Avatar image for mexican_brownie
Mexican_Brownie

257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Mexican_Brownie

I played the shit out of Mario Kart DS and I can't wait for this one. Everyone I know loves Mario Kart and this one looks fantastic. It will be one hell of a Christmas present.

Who's starting the Giantbomb Community? Let's show them Forza folks a thing or two about community racing :P

Avatar image for shabs
Shabs

906

Forum Posts

312

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Edited By Shabs

I'm with Ryan on the theory.

Though I'd played older ones, the first Mario Kart I owned was Double Dash and I still prefer that to any other. In fact, the new non-backwards-compatible Wiis seem useless to me because you can't play Double Dash on them.

Avatar image for boiglenoight
Boiglenoight

605

Forum Posts

154

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By Boiglenoight

@GetEveryone said:

Mario Kart 64 was, as most will agree (agree with me!), the best.

Crash Team Racing is a worthy clone, which legitimately did its own thing. I think I may prefer that to any other entry in the Mario Kart series.

Don't agree. Mario Kart 64 was arguably the most fun due to 4 player, but Super Mario Kart was the best. If they took that game, modernized the presentation with online multiplayer and resold it, I'd buy it. Twice.

Avatar image for bollard
Bollard

8298

Forum Posts

118

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 12

Edited By Bollard

Review reads a lot more like a 4 than a 3, but eh video game scales, who cares.

Avatar image for dropabombonit
dropabombonit

1543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By dropabombonit

Yeah the first paragraph is spot on, ever since Mario Kart 64 I have liked each entry less and less, may pick this up when it's cheaper

Avatar image for msg
MSG

214

Forum Posts

80

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 4

Edited By MSG

Here's the real issue:

The industry has become so competent at making games that truly bad ones are a rarity. Polish is no longer valid reason to give a game anymore than an average score.

More importantly, we need to remember that an 8 (4-star) or even a 7 IS NOT an average score. It is above average, and if a game doesn't do enough to rise above the status of polished but boring, it deserves an average score.

In this era where most games are good, we need to change our standards and promote the ones that are truly special. That means analyzing games based on more than just how they look, play and sound.

Games have changed and reviewers need to follow suit.

Avatar image for ltsquigs
ltsquigs

310

Forum Posts

5000

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Edited By ltsquigs

@Jensonb: Sorry I didn't respond to this last night, had to sleep.

Anyways my response would be this: The reason you don't think the text has anything interesting or meaningful to say is because your cultural, preconceived opinions, and other such factors make it such that its not very useful to you. That's fine, not all reviews are going to be useful to all people and they never can be due to it being an inherently subjective medium. For many people though, the text of this review is actually useful and is a good review to use in their decision to buy a game.

As an example of what I mean, lets take your example explaining things such as tweaks in Modern Warfare 3 as part of a review. The difference here is twofold: first off even in a Modern Warfare 3 review talking about tweaks between games for a lot of people is not very useful. The only people interested in such information like that are people who have more than likely already made their decision for buying or liking a game before it has come out, and as such a review isn't exactly going to be useful to them. Of course that information can be useful to people outside of that group, but I would say that there is a different standard between modern shooters and cart racers. Part of the general gaming culture when it concerns shooters is that minor tweaks have important consequences (this is a result of its PC origins) on the other hand cart racers do not have the same general status in gamer culture. That is to say that only a small portion of people really care about things like minor tweaks in Mario Kart, and far less people than the number that care about tweaks in modern shooters.

I want to note, that doesn't mean I'm saying that mentioning things like tweaks in Modern Warfare 3 is a good review tactic either: there are plenty of people for who that information is meaningless. However, my point is when you write a review you have to consider who you're writing for. It is impossible to write a review that will be useful to everyone who reads it, there are just too many factors involved in the readers own preferences to make that possible, so you have to make considerations about what to include and what to focus on in a review. This is more or less what snide was trying to point out: This review is written in such a way to be useful for the average person that visits Giant Bomb. The best you can do, as a reviewer, is be honest about your preferences, honestly describe what playing the game was like for you, and hope that people end up finding that information useful. It's a shame it may not be useful to you, but that's the nature of reviews.

Basically what I'm saying is while you may not be satisfied with this review because it doesn't go more in depth, the reason it doesn't go more in depth is because for most visitors who come to this site going any more in depth would be meaningless information. If you want a deep critical analysis of Mario Kart 7 I'm sure someone out there is providing that information, but that's not the goal of this review. The goal of this review is to be buying advice that the average viewer of the site finds useful when making the decision to go buy a game or not.

Avatar image for striderno9
striderno9

1362

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 6

Edited By striderno9

Unified Mario Kart Alpha Theory is awesome.

Avatar image for rekt_hed
Rekt_Hed

958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 8

Edited By Rekt_Hed

I dunno about that theory cause my first Mario kart was on the Snes but for me I could play Mario kart 64 again and again and again.

Good review Ryan. Number 7 .....wow

Avatar image for freakhead
freakhead

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By freakhead

3 stars is low for what is highly polished quality game. The argument that it doesn't change enough is weak given that no franchise changes much. Hell developers say consumers do not want much change. CliffyB said ~10% innovation is about right. Face it the reviewer is just tired of looking at Mario's mug. And docked it a star or two just for that. Make the same game with different art and it gets 5 stars me thinks.

Avatar image for lyfeforce
Lyfeforce

450

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Lyfeforce

It almost feels like Ryan had an existential crisis over reviewing this!

Great review, agree with every point made, probably won't pick this up, but it does look fun.

Avatar image for shaka999
Shaka999

550

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Shaka999

@sgt_waffles: Great game. One of my favorites among my friends.

Avatar image for tesla
Tesla

2299

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By Tesla

Butt hurt Nintendo fans...it's still hilarious to read your pathetic comments. Never change.

Avatar image for acoustic
Acoustic

23

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Acoustic

3 Stars? Yeah that sounds about right. Good review, Ryan.

Avatar image for theht
TheHT

15998

Forum Posts

1562

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Edited By TheHT

Great scott, there are seven?

Avatar image for amir90
amir90

2243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By amir90

I miss the N64 days.

Avatar image for catthebig
catthebig

24

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By catthebig

Roooling mario KAaRRT!

Avatar image for gosukiller
gosukiller

2344

Forum Posts

80

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By gosukiller

@GetEveryone said:

Mario Kart 64 was, as most will agree (agree with me!), the best.

Crash Team Racing is a worthy clone, which legitimately did its own thing. I think I may prefer that to any other entry in the Mario Kart series.

I subscribe to Ryans' theory and say that the SNES version was the best one of the bunch. There really was no game at the time as fun to have a rivalry with a friend about it.

Avatar image for thecheese33
TheCheese33

399

Forum Posts

1246

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Edited By TheCheese33

@SpudBug said:

I'm cool with ryan's opinion on the game.

The review was very focused on the game not doing much new, even though it does what it does very well.

I kind of wish Jeff would have taken the same view on MW3.

I feel like Jeff did take that same view in Modern Warfare 3. They just had varying degrees of reaction toward the similarity. Jeff's review was more like "This is still very awesome, but seriously guys, this is the last time," while Ryan's review went like "We've given you enough chances and there still isn't anything new here, so down goes your score." Nothing wrong with either method, really, as reviews are first and foremost based on the sole opinions of the particular writer.

Avatar image for mshaw006
mshaw006

602

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By mshaw006

Excellent review from Ryan, as always.

Avatar image for sgt_waffles
sgt_waffles

76

Forum Posts

120

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By sgt_waffles

So many hard-headed folks up in this bitch...

Anyway... Mario Kart 64 was my first and favorite... It's rare that my friends and I bust it out anymore, but when we do, we play a little game called "Drunk Driving."

Open a beer. Start a race. The beer must be finished before you cross the finish line, and you can't drink any beer while holding the controller. Rinse and repeat.

Fun shit.

Avatar image for deactivated-57beb9d651361
deactivated-57beb9d651361

4541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Mario Kart 64 was, as most will agree (agree with me!), the best.

Crash Team Racing is a worthy clone, which legitimately did its own thing. I think I may prefer that to any other entry in the Mario Kart series.

Avatar image for nekroskop
Nekroskop

2830

Forum Posts

47

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Nekroskop

A fitting punishment for Nintendo's rehashing.

Avatar image for jost1
Jost1

2226

Forum Posts

1275

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 17

Edited By Jost1

Anyone want to play some Mario Kart SNES? Still the best one.

Avatar image for spudbug
SpudBug

713

Forum Posts

663

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 3

Edited By SpudBug

I'm cool with ryan's opinion on the game.

The review was very focused on the game not doing much new, even though it does what it does very well.

I kind of wish Jeff would have taken the same view on MW3.