Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

60 Comments

Sid Meier's Civilization V: Gods & Kings Review

4
  • PC

Civ V's first real expansion is no revolution, but it's as good an excuse as any to take the plunge back into Firaxis' wonderfully addictive strategy game.

I'll spare you the big overarching explanation of why Civilization V, and frankly the Civilization series in general, is a delightfully soul-devouring time suck. Many words have already been written on this subject, many of which are likely to be more eloquent than my own. All I will say on the subject is that if you have extricated yourself from Civ V in the time since its release in 2010, and hope to avoid plunging headfirst back down that rabbit hole of "just one more turn" addiction, then by all means, avoid the newly released Gods & Kings expansion back. Because if you don't, you're going to be sucked down that hole yet again, and God only knows when you'll find yourself able to wrest free of it again.

Choosing your religion is kinda arbitrary, since you'll be formatting it to fit your own style anyway. Just like real life!
Choosing your religion is kinda arbitrary, since you'll be formatting it to fit your own style anyway. Just like real life!

It's not that Gods & Kings does anything to especially revolutionize, or even dramatically improve Civilization V. In fact, for an expansion coming nearly two years after the game's original release (with only some DLC civilizations and map packs to supplement the time in between), it's actually a bit lighter on content than you might be expecting. However, the content that is in there is unquestionably good, making this expansion as devious a gateway back into the throes of Civ V addiction as you're likely to find nowadays.

The biggest addition to Gods & Kings is the religion mechanic. Though religion has existed in the series previously, the version of religion built for this expansion is far more detailed and involved than anything previously seen. It's in keeping with the spirit of the game in that it is a concept that can be built out in a variety of different ways that suit your particular play style. All religion is predicated on faith, which like science, production, and gold, you'll earn over time by building items and structures that increase it over time. Early in a game, you'll have the option to choose a "pantheon," a culture-specific religion that allows you one statistical benefit. This could be something as simple as more gold attained from spaces that generate faith, or more rapid border expansion via the "religious settlements" option. Once your pantheon is founded and your civilization begins to grow, you'll eventually spawn a great prophet, a unit that can be used multiple ways down the road, but initially will be consumed to create your religion.

Religion is non-specific in Gods & Kings. Which is to say that there are religions pre-made in the game that run the gamut from Christianity to Zoroastrianism, but it's not as though choosing Christianity will suddenly grant you a Jesus unit you can use to turn lakes into wine vineyards and eventually sacrifice for the sake of some kind of martyrdom boost. The names are just templates. You can name them whatever you want, actually, and the additional benefits you reap from the religion don't have any specificity to the religion itself. They're chosen by you when you first found, and then eventually improve your religion. Again, it's all tailored to how you want to play.

Like all things in Civilization V, religion is really more about expansion and diplomacy than anything especially holy. You can build prophets, missionaries, and even inquisitors to spread your religion and stamp out opposing religions. Making other cities and city states fall under your religious banner helps build influence with them. Likewise, pushing enemy cities into your kind of faith helps reduce resistance should you decide to conquer them. It doesn't mean they won't put up a fight, and in fact it may rile up the opposing leader to do something drastic against you. But if you use religion correctly, you'll be dominating the world in no time.

The other big mechanical change is espionage, a more passive mechanic that allows you to plant spies in rival civilizations' cities and city states. The key benefits to espionage are technology and alliances. Planting a spy in a city state ensures that your spy will continuously rig elections in your favor, and even conduct coups if the city state is loyal to another civilization. For major civs, you can place spies in key cities to both keep an eye on what rival leaders are planning, as well as potentially steal the technologies they develop. It's a helpful boost that gives you a bit more diplomatic interaction with your opposing civs, but truthfully it doesn't do a whole lot to change the overall flow of the game. It's just a nice little bonus that, frankly, you might just forget about as the game goes along.

The nine new civilizations bring the total number up to 34. Which is kind of a lot.
The nine new civilizations bring the total number up to 34. Which is kind of a lot.

Most of the other changes come in the form of tweaks to the existing game and in the form of new civs and items. There are nine new civilizations in Gods & Kings--including the Celts, Swedes, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, and more--each with their own unique units and abilities. In-game, you'll play Gods & Kings pretty much exactly as you did in the main game, though a few adjustments have made for a smoother experience, especially in combat. Ground units can now be stacked with naval units, making it easier to attack sea-adjacent cities, and combat in general has been switched from a 10-point system to a 100-point system. Opposing A.I. has definitely been improved a bit, though other civs can still be oddly non-aggressive when it's clear that you're about to start wrecking shop all over them. Their strategies have improved in some key areas, but with all the additional tools at your disposal to help depose your enemies, odds are you'll want to stick to some of the tougher difficulty levels if you want a noteworthy challenge.

All of this, plus three new scenarios, including the steampunk-themed Empire of the Smoky Skies (which I've detailed previously here) makes up this add-on. It's a good chunk of content that probably would have looked a lot more impressive a year ago. Given how much time and piecemeal DLC has passed since Civilization V first hit store shelves, Gods & Kings suffers only by virtue of not being overwhelming in its revamping of the Civ V formula. And yet, neither is it underwhelming, given that the things it does add are all distinct improvements, and some are even pretty fantastic. This is a useful and enjoyable expansion to a game that's still one of the great time-stealers of this generation. To put it succinctly: it is more Civilization V to add to your copy of Civilization V. If you still have even a flicker of a desire to play more Civilzation V, that news should be all you need to justify picking up Gods & Kings.

Alex Navarro on Google+

60 Comments

Avatar image for raidingkvatch
raidingkvatch

1216

Forum Posts

5743

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 14

Edited By raidingkvatch

Not being able to get this provoked me to play Civ III again. Spent 8 hours playing the day I installed it.

Avatar image for onekumar
Onekumar

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Onekumar

Well this review convinced me to buy Civ 5 and the expansion pack

Avatar image for mekon
mekon

705

Forum Posts

56

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By mekon

Good to see Alex getting something decent to review.

Avatar image for krystal_sackful
Krystal_Sackful

804

Forum Posts

504

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Krystal_Sackful

I like it better than Civ V. But, it didn't blow my mind. 30 dollars is a bit much.

Avatar image for granderojo
granderojo

1898

Forum Posts

1071

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

Edited By granderojo

I have been playing this game since the minute it unlocked on Steam until now, I really enjoy the changes they've made, although it sort of feels like this should have been what the original game was. When they announced Civ 5 I expected as many civs as we have now with this expansion in the vanilla and this faith mechanic feels like something that was in vanilla originally that they scrapped due to time constraints of the development process. That said I won't bitch because as I said, I've been playing this for something approaching over 12 hours straight. I need to sleep.

Avatar image for xymox
xymox

2422

Forum Posts

2520

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 8

Edited By xymox

So what you're saying is no work and no studying.

Gotcha.

PS: it's 10% off on steam right now

Avatar image for andrewb
AndrewB

7816

Forum Posts

82

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 16

Edited By AndrewB

Can I just chime in here?

I'm a huge detractor of DLC, but every Civilization V DLC pack added a bonus in play hours of whatever length in game time that you were willing to choose, plus a certain amount taken into consideration as that civilization could also be your enemy and require interesting strategies to overcome.

Keep in mind that the base game, without DLC civs, could have potentially run you into the hundreds of hours on its own.

Now, if you're a skeptic of the hour to dollar conversion, let me just say that it's a heck of a lot of fun. In fact, bordering on game of the year quality for anyone interested in games of strategy.

With that in mind, if you were already a fan of the game, the added civilizations plus changes to many of the underlying systems of the game (differences in the tech tree ranging from subtle to insane, religion, I guess espionage... but I've never been a fan of it myself, new resources, new tech routes for ranged and naval units, and Great Admirals are some of the changes I've spotted in an hour or so with the game so far) make it well worth the cost, especially if you haven't bought any DLC prior (because it includes a little bit of that content including Spain, which is one of the more interesting, if challenging, civilizations to play).

If you havent played Civ V or played very little, you definitely *shouldn't* be buying this, because you already have a ton of content you should explore first.

For fans of the game that are growing tired of the same old strategies, you really should get it.

Avatar image for theht
TheHT

15998

Forum Posts

1562

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Edited By TheHT

God damn Alex, you're working hard over there in New York aren't you?

I don't think I've even played enough of Civ V to warrant buying an expansion yet. Great game.

Avatar image for onno10
Onno10

394

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Onno10

@sear said:

@darukaru said:

No offense, but when the final verdict on one of the expansion's two major bullet points (in this case, espionage) is that it has little impact on the game and is forgettable, it sounds like the expansion isn't delivering what it promised. It definitely doesn't sound like a 4/5.

Welcome to the world of Professional Game Journalism(TM), where the goal is to put out editorial content as quickly as possible and provide scores and opinions that aren't necessarily informative, but safe. I see this a lot in genres that reviewers don't have real experience with - sports games, strategy and tactics, wargames, more traditional RPGs, etc. - and they tend to go with the almighty 8/10 in those cases because it's a good, inoffensive default that won't anger anyone and hides the fact they might not really know what they're talking about.

With a ton of extra civs (which people care a lot more about then religion and espionage combined) , 3 scenarios (that probably last around 10 hours each) and major new gameplay elements you really get a ton of content for a great price. The return of espionage actually annoyed quite a bit civ fans, it makes sense that it got a small role.

Avatar image for supervhs
SuperVHS

47

Forum Posts

598

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By SuperVHS
Avatar image for jace
Jace

1154

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Jace

"Choosing your religion is kinda arbitrary, since you'll be formatting it to fit your own style anyway. Just like real life!"

Alex just became my second favorite member of GB. You're fucking awesome.

Avatar image for willbo
Willbo

4

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Willbo

But did they fix the issues with the vanilla release? Game ran terribly, the city states acted like they were run by small children, the AI didn't know how to control the game and the multiplayer was broken. Not to mention there just wasn't a lot of choice in how to play Civ 5. For everything they added in five it felt like they took two things out that previously worked well. It's a lot to ask to pay for what seems like an incremental update.

Avatar image for arc209
Arc209

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

Edited By Arc209

@Stromko said:

@Arc209 said:

great review, super stoked...come on midnight

Yeah I noticed they're releasing it at 9 PM PST. Just when I'd gotten to sleeping at night again, they have to go and release a Civ 5 expansion before I go to bed tonight ...

hahah yep, my thoughts exactly.

Avatar image for stromko
Stromko

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Stromko

@Arc209 said:

great review, super stoked...come on midnight

Yeah I noticed they're releasing it at 9 PM PST. Just when I'd gotten to sleeping at night again, they have to go and release a Civ 5 expansion before I go to bed tonight ...

Avatar image for otzlowe
otzlowe

339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By otzlowe

@sear said:

... even though most people in the Civ community agree the game is a massive step back from the previous ones in the series.

I think you may be spending too much time listening to the Civ "community." All I've seen is people whining without explanation and blowing things out of proportion - as they do with every new installment.

That said, my experience of the UI must be different than yours. Yes, it's not as intuitive, but only by small degrees. Nothing about Civ V is "way, way" worse, so much as it is different and takes some adjusting to when coming from earlier versions. Hell, I've seen people complaining about the lack of unit stacking in this game.

Avatar image for authenticm
AuthenticM

4404

Forum Posts

12323

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By AuthenticM

@Draxyle said:

Whelp, there goes my summer.

Choosing your religion is kinda arbitrary, since you'll be formatting it to fit your own style anyway. Just like real life!

Alex laying down the harsh social commentary!

Gotta love Alex. :)

Avatar image for cybexx
Cybexx

1697

Forum Posts

1458

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Edited By Cybexx

Religion sound a bit more advanced than CivIV where all religions granted exactly the same benefit.

Really I was just looking for a decent excuse to play more CivV, this will do.

Avatar image for vinsanityv22
vinsanityv22

1066

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By vinsanityv22

Can we please get a Brad/Dave/Vinny Quick Look of this? Any combination of those guys. Vinny and Dave are awesome, and Brad is always good to bring around to strategy game Quick Looks because of his Starcraft perspective. Oh and Drew! PC Quick Looks need the two "D" members of Giant bomb!

The point is, let's Quick Look this baby!

Avatar image for jchenderson
jchenderson

146

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By jchenderson

It's 50 bucks here in Australia. Which seems very expensive for what is described in the review. Especially when the last Total War expansion was a stand alone and about the same price.

Avatar image for arc209
Arc209

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

Edited By Arc209

great review, super stoked...come on midnight

Avatar image for deactivated-631f5ebbad058
deactivated-631f5ebbad058

263

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

@Wuddel said:

@sear: Yes. It actually is. Since it works similar to the Civ4 state-sytem as it has several (6-7) perks combined for founders and followers. You can choose from a long list of perks. You can also gain Faith from wonders etc. It is a similar rssource like culture. How much Civ5 is a step backwards is really only determined by your level of hate for the "stack of doom" and its retarded diplomacy (well, which is equally retarded in Civ5). Really a matter of taste, what simplification you like more. I sunk 1200h in Civ4 and 5 combined, and I think G&K has a got shot of being the best to date.

GB is not really a PC crowd.

Thanks for the details, appreciate seeing information about the mechanics of religion. I'm sure I could find them elsewhere, I guess my issue was with the quality of the review (i.e. lack of details) rather than the game itself, I haven't played it yet of course.

@darukaru said:

No offense, but when the final verdict on one of the expansion's two major bullet points (in this case, espionage) is that it has little impact on the game and is forgettable, it sounds like the expansion isn't delivering what it promised. It definitely doesn't sound like a 4/5.

Welcome to the world of Professional Game Journalism(TM), where the goal is to put out editorial content as quickly as possible and provide scores and opinions that aren't necessarily informative, but safe. I see this a lot in genres that reviewers don't have real experience with - sports games, strategy and tactics, wargames, more traditional RPGs, etc. - and they tend to go with the almighty 8/10 in those cases because it's a good, inoffensive default that won't anger anyone and hides the fact they might not really know what they're talking about.

Usually the finer details of that score will change based on hype and marketing - if a game isn't from a big publisher or franchise, for instance, or is lacking in polish (what makes up for 80% of most review scores) then chances are closer you'll see 6-7/10 instead. When it comes to these sorts of titles, mechanics and gameplay specifics have almost no bearing whatsoever on the review score or impressions written.

Avatar image for little_socrates
Little_Socrates

5847

Forum Posts

1570

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 23

Edited By Little_Socrates

So even reading this is enough to make me want to play Civ V.

Just wait until I buy it later on...

Avatar image for r3dt1d3
r3dt1d3

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By r3dt1d3

I know this is fairly specific for a review but there was no mention of the city-state revamp that's been shown. The change from just buying loyalty and how missions work plays a much bigger role than much of the smaller changes that I still think it bares mentioning.

Avatar image for foxtrot0245
Foxtrot0245

325

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Foxtrot0245

Thanks for the review Alex, my time between now and the Fall release boom has officially been committed to Civ V!

Avatar image for san_salvador
san_salvador

224

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By san_salvador

Austria is in it.

I am from Austria.

Instabuy.

Avatar image for cav86
cav86

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By cav86

@damnable_fiend said:

huh. is the cn tower in this game? *wondering about the cover image for the review*

Seriously, I was wondering the same thing

Avatar image for nomin
Nomin

1004

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 9

Edited By Nomin

stack of doom vs carpet of doom...

hmm...I guess I'll stick with beyond the sword.

Avatar image for falling_fast
falling_fast

2905

Forum Posts

189

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

Edited By falling_fast

huh. is the cn tower in this game? *wondering about the cover image for the review*

Avatar image for undeadpool
Undeadpool

8418

Forum Posts

10761

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 18

Edited By Undeadpool

Oh God...my weekend...

Avatar image for wuddel
Wuddel

2436

Forum Posts

1448

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By Wuddel

@sear: Yes. It actually is. Since it works similar to the Civ4 state-sytem as it has several (6-7) perks combined for founders and followers. You can choose from a long list of perks. You can also gain Faith from wonders etc. It is a similar rssource like culture. How much Civ5 is a step backwards is really only determined by your level of hate for the "stack of doom" and its retarded diplomacy (well, which is equally retarded in Civ5). Really a matter of taste, what simplification you like more. I sunk 1200h in Civ4 and 5 combined, and I think G&K has a got shot of being the best to date.

GB is not really a PC crowd.

Avatar image for darukaru
darukaru

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By darukaru

No offense, but when the final verdict on one of the expansion's two major bullet points (in this case, espionage) is that it has little impact on the game and is forgettable, it sounds like the expansion isn't delivering what it promised. It definitely doesn't sound like a 4/5.

Avatar image for freakache
FreakAche

3102

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By FreakAche

@sear said:

I dunno, I guess I find that the vast majority of sites that cover games like Civ are written from the perspective of people who may have played the games once or twice but don't really go deep into the mechanics or history of the series. This was extremely apparent with Civ V and Ryan's review, which was basically just faffing about how good the graphics are and why the UI is "better" (even though it's actually way, way worse than Civ IV's, hiding crucial information and requiring far more clicks to perform basic tasks, without fixing issues remaining from Civ IV).

Really? As someone who played a decent amount of Civ III, I was really turned off by Civ IV's interface. Concepts that I understood in Civ III seemed much more complicated in Civ IV just because the underlying numbers and mechanics were presented poorly. It also felt complex for the sake of being complex. For instance, why did the game need a convoluted religion system, whereas Civ III handled religion just fine by having it just be a part of the larger culture system.

Now I only played the demo of Civ V, but to me it seemed like a welcome return to the more simplistic, but still strategic style that I liked about Civ III.

Avatar image for kerse
kerse

2496

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By kerse

cant wait to play it, been looking for an excuse to play this again

Avatar image for aaron_g
Aaron_G

1694

Forum Posts

3259

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 6

Edited By Aaron_G

Already purchased on Steam. Can't wait until I get to playing it!

Avatar image for tourgen
tourgen

4568

Forum Posts

645

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 11

Edited By tourgen

great review

kind of a missed opportunity to model the religion game mechanic as a means to control population and build empires, but also as an unnatural and unpredictable time-released disaster.

Avatar image for deactivated-631f5ebbad058
deactivated-631f5ebbad058

263

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 2

The biggest addition to Gods & Kings is the religion mechanic. Though religion has existed in the series previously, the version of religion built for this expansion is far more detailed and involved than anything previously seen.

Is this actually true? Everything you've described seems just about the same as religion in Civ IV for example, and Civ IV also had religious buildings. Can I get some clarification on why religion is "more detailed and involved than anything previously seen", like an actual comparison with past Civ games based on play experience? Because to be honest this review doesn't actually offer any interesting discussion, evaluation, or criticism about, say, how religion integrates into existing play strategy or allows for new ones.

I dunno, I guess I find that the vast majority of sites that cover games like Civ are written from the perspective of people who may have played the games once or twice but don't really go deep into the mechanics or history of the series. This was extremely apparent with Civ V and Ryan's review, which was basically just faffing about how good the graphics are and why the UI is "better" (even though it's actually way, way worse than Civ IV's, hiding crucial information and requiring far more clicks to perform basic tasks, without fixing issues remaining from Civ IV).

It just seems like nobody at Giant Bomb really seems to go into any detail about the games because they don't actually play the genre, and it comes across as a bit dishonest. The same can be said of most other mainstream sites that cover games like Civ - it's bigger and better because the marketing says so and because the graphics are great, 9/10! - even though most people in the Civ community agree the game is a massive step back from the previous ones in the series.

Avatar image for charlesalanratliff
CharlesAlanRatliff

5763

Forum Posts

13647

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 34

I love that first picture caption.

Avatar image for hardtarget
Hardtarget

389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

Edited By Hardtarget

woooo living on best coast, comes out at 9pm for me tonight

Avatar image for vodun
Vodun

2403

Forum Posts

220

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Vodun

Awaiting this and reading about that guy who'd been playing the same Civ game for nearly 10 years got me playing again...MY SLEEP! I NEEDS IT!

Avatar image for thepickle
ThePickle

4704

Forum Posts

14415

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Edited By ThePickle

Can't wait to start playing.

Avatar image for bnb82
BNB82

53

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By BNB82

Here's my excuse to take a break from Diablo III. Down the rabbit hole indeed.

Avatar image for draxyle
Draxyle

2021

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Draxyle

Whelp, there goes my summer.

Choosing your religion is kinda arbitrary, since you'll be formatting it to fit your own style anyway. Just like real life!

Alex laying down the harsh social commentary!

Avatar image for smilingpig
SmilingPig

1370

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By SmilingPig

It still feel as if it’s a step behind civ 4.

Avatar image for kinghippp0
KingHippp0

139

Forum Posts

304

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 4

Edited By KingHippp0

Must... not.... reward.... punny... byline...

Avatar image for peasantabuse
PeasantAbuse

5098

Forum Posts

256

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By PeasantAbuse

Have they fixed the multiplayer with this expansion? Whenever I try to play with friends the game gets stuck and won't advance after a few turns.

Avatar image for mordeaniischaos
MordeaniisChaos

5904

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

Edited By MordeaniisChaos

I've been playing with friends a lot lately, and I'm looking forward to getting this and finally introducing my friends to non-cooperative civ games.

Avatar image for zombie2011
zombie2011

5628

Forum Posts

8742

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By zombie2011

Huh i think i will finally play Civ 5 now, i'm really in the mood for a slow paced game, and if i like Civ 5 i'll pick this up too.

Avatar image for falk
Falk

153

Forum Posts

205

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By Falk

What about the changes to multiplayer? Would be interesting to know if the expansion finally fixes what was pretty much broken in the original release. Also, when are mods gonna work in multiplayer?

Avatar image for bishna
bishna

340

Forum Posts

247

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By bishna

Midnight can't come soon enough. To be honest this was one of the reasons I chose not to take any summer classes.

Avatar image for droop
droop

1929

Forum Posts

710

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By droop

It nice to see more games in the Steam Workshop.