Giant Bomb Review


Star Fox 64 3D Review

  • 3DS

Star Fox 64 3D is too short and feature-deprived at $40 to satisfy newcomers while missing some of the nostalgic hooks that made its predecessor beloved.

Solar has received the most dramatic upgrade, but every level in Star Fox 64 3D looks terrific.

How much money would you be willing to pay to hear Peppy say, "Do a Barrel Roll!"?

The answer to that question will be your main signifier as to whether you should seek out Q-Games' remake of a well-regarded N64 rail shooter. Star Fox 64 3D brings a gorgeous visual shine to the game as well as some expanded multiplayer features, while keeping the game’s memorable single-player intact. But that single-player is pretty short and designed to be replayed endlessly--something that made a lot of sense back on the N64. But shifting standards give it all a very different feel today. As a result, Star Fox 64 3D comes across like a video game stuck in the past, an aging release that, for all of its lavish visual upgrades, feels archaic. Even if you're willing to pay a premium to see Star Fox 64 again, you may not get what you expect, as the port contains enough small but meaningful alterations from the original release that it loses some of its nostalgic power.

It’s too bad, because Star Fox 64 3D does faithfully recreate the original game’s single-player campaign. You won’t find any new planets to visit, new warps or power-ups. This is a pretty straight port with a few extraneous additional features and no real surprises. Enemy locations, item placement and boss battles are identical to their locations and strategies from 14 years ago. You’ll still charge your laser to destroy enemies, launch bombs to clear the screen, disarm different bombs, fight Star Wolf and, yes, even do a barrel roll or two. And that campaign is still pretty fun, constantly shifting your objectives from level to level to keep each mission fresh. You’ll traverse asteroid fields, blow up motherships, defend your mobile starbase Great Fox from missles, cut off a supply line by crashing the transport train into an enemy base, destroy a planet’s satellite defense platform, and even fight a giant brain. It was, and still is, a well-paced shooter with great variety and a silly tone that keeps the whole game feeling breezy.

Yep. You do this.

The graphical overhaul in Star Fox 64 3D is probably even more dramatic than the recently updated port of Ocarina of Time. Crisp ground textures below your ship have craggy, uneven, rocky surfaces instead of a single color painted across the map. Water and lava churn and splash with a ferocity you’d never dream of seeing on the N64. The new skyboxes are far richer and more animated than you remember. It’s a great look that does inject some new life into this fondly remembered game.

Star Fox 64 also does extremely well in 3D, which works without a hitch and enhances the game without becoming distracting. Enemies and environmental objects alike tumble through space, out of the screen and into your line of sight (and occasionally, your ship). It’s a great-looking effect that works nicely even on the highest 3D settings.

With such a cool visual makeover on top of an already memorable and fun campaign, Star Fox 64 3D seems like it does everything right to appeal to its nostalgic fan base and bring in new fans at the same time. But the high levels of reverence for the original game end there, as Star Fox 64 3D makes too many decisions that detract from its nostalgic appeal. Chief amongst those offenses--especially for fans of the original game-- is the rerecording of the game’s famous voice acting. For whatever reason, Nintendo and Q-Games opted to bring the original voice actors back into the studio to once again capture that specific mixture of silly cliches, bizarre inflections and G-rated thrills that made the original characters memorable. But apparently that magic is gone forever, because the cast just can’t hit those notes you and I remember. Inflections are wrong, lines have been changed, Falco sounds way too much like a jerk, Fox comes across like a whiner, and Andross’ crazy hyena laugh has completely vanished. Nintendo has clearly gone through a lot of work to recreate that lost voice acting with high-quality audio. But with no option to play those classic voice tracks, Star Fox 64 3D is left with a facsimile that doesn’t deliver the same thrills.

"Sorry to jet, but I'm in a hurry."

Similarly, Star Fox 64 3D’s music tracks have similarly been rerecorded and also replaced with far less memorable instrumentation that tries and fails to recreate the original N64 songs. Star Fox 64 3D could have handled either a direct emulation of those original tunes or a proper orchestral arrangement, but instead opts to emulate the sound of the N64 chip, which was in turn trying to emulate proper orchestrations. As a result, some of the game’s tracks sound like they’re coming out of a cheap keyboard, robbing them of their energy and scope.

Still, the changes to the music and voice acting are really only going to rub you wrong if you're a Star Fox purist, but that’s the group of players most likely to enjoy this premium remake. If you’re a new player curious why many have fussed about this game for so long, you’re going to wonder why this short, simple, and easy rail shooter costs $40 while other games in the genre offer more features (including online hooks) for a quarter of the price. For as much work as has gone into this re-release, the core of Star Fox 64 3D is untouched and, as such, feels shallow and lacking in content compared to similarly priced games today.

And while there are a few 3DS-specifc features in this port, none of them are substantial enough or fleshed out enough to merit the full-price investment. In true Nintendo form, Star Fox 64 3D has optional motion-based controls, allowing you to steer your jets and tanks using the handheld’s gyroscope. But the motion controls sacrifice some of the required precision needed, even on the easier difficulty, to clear each stage, along with making it impossible to use the game’s legitimately great 3D effects. The controls work, but they’re not fun to use, especially since the handheld circle pad works just fine for playing Star Fox on all the difficulty settings.

$40 for a two hour game? Can't let you do that, Star Fox.

Along with the new motion controls, Star Fox 64 3D also makes substantial upgrades to the original game’s multiplayer Battle Mode. Thankfully, the 3DS battle mode has lost the dense fog that plagued the original game’s multiplayer and enhanced the various game options. The brand new battle mode features expansive maps with some new geometry, as well as a Mario Kart-inspired powerup system that adds a few additional pickups, such as cloaking, to the expected arsenal. And, in a neat touch, the game’s multiplayer supports download play, which means all you need to get the full multiplayer options and settings across multiple players is a single cart. In a goofier, less meaningful addition, the 3DS’ front-facing camera will capture your face during your match and display it over the pilot’s aircraft as well as after a kill. It’s ridiculous in the same way that feature was in Burnout Paradise, but given the 30-foot maximum range for the wireless local multiplayer, it’s a feature that essentially duplicates the act of looking at a person’s face. It’s a silly diversion but it’s not the best reason to come to this port.

But those are the kinds of features that get added to games when the developers are stuck making a straight remake instead of adding the meaningful, substantial additions and upgrades that could have made Star Fox 64 3D a more robust package. The desire for a straight nostalgic recreation of the original game forbids the addition of the very features that would have made the game truly modern. As a result, we’re left with this rail shooter without online multiplayer, online leaderboards for single-player, new levels, new boss fights, or even a real orchestral score. Those are the kinds of features game players demand from games that cost half of what Star Fox 64 3D retails for. The game at its center may still be fun, but it’s not fun for long enough to overlook the game’s simplicity, its short length, and its lack of modern gameplay features. If you’re looking for the history lesson, you’re better off grabbing it for $10 on the Virtual Console.

  • 112 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Posted by Brother_PipPop

@Akeldama said:

Matt Kessler is a fucking intern, not a game critic. Christ guys, Space Marine and Star Fox are big titles this year. Where are the main staff reviews?

What makes interns any less qualified to review games?

Posted by Metaltron

the camera on the 3DS is shit, they should have used the ones on phones.

Posted by CptBedlam

Very well written review. Matt. Keep up the great work!

Posted by Grumbel

@jasondesante said:

@MattBodega: 4. Fuit Ninja and Star Fox 64 are obviously not being rated to the same standard of quality.

One is a cheap download, the other is a full price title, one is a remake of a decade old game, the other is not, of course they aren't held against the same standards. The problem with Nintendo these days is that they have become incredible lazy. There is nothing wrong with doing a remake of an old game, but then at least make it worthwhile. See MarioAllStars, that included not only all the Marios up to that point with graphics upgrades, but also the formerly unreleased LostLevels, that's a good way to make a remake. How about including the SNES Starfox in this one or the unreleased Starfox2? That would have made it more interesting and worthwhile, but just a graphics upgrade to an N64 title is something that you expect to be a $15 download, not a $40 full price title.

Posted by BadOrcLDR

@Akeldama said:

Matt Kessler is a fucking intern, not a game critic. Christ guys, Space Marine and Star Fox are big titles this year. Where are the main staff reviews?

Pains me to agree. Less Kessler, more... anybody. Maybe Kessler can go catch a squirrel and they can use it to replace him. If nothing else, the exercise would help him out. I would imagine that some of his muscles (if any exist) have atrophied by now, though.

Posted by MattBodega

@BadOrcLDR: Ba-zing! Pow!

Posted by Insectecutor

I like Kessler, he's all right. You people need to stop whining about him on the internet. What do you think you'll achieve other than making yourselves look like assholes?

@MattBodega: good review, man.

Posted by Norusdog

$40 is insane...for yet another Nintendumb re-re-re-re-re-re-re-release. Pathetic thing is how it's going to sell well because the drones eat the same recycled things up over and over again.

gee let me buy a 3DS so I can re-buy games I've already played years and years ago.

good review though, too bad it's wasted on this drivel.

Posted by LetsRockBaby

I agree $40 is a very steep price for a game you can get for $10 with a fresh coat of paint. Personally I found my purchase of 3D to be worth it as Starfox 64 is one of those games I hold precious to me and playing this remastered version was fun. It's a very good port of a game I never get tired of.

Good review though, Kessler.

Posted by Airickson

What gets me about the Kessler-haters is that if you didn't know this was written by an 'intern' -- and you agreed with the review -- you would think it was fine. But because you see Kessler's name and he doesn't make a review you agree with, you call his credibility, writing skill, etc. into question.

Unfortunately, I think when the GB staff treats interns in a disrespectful manner on a QL or TNT, etc., it opens this sort of thing up. People are just aping GB staff members they enjoy in piling on *insert intern name here*.

Well done, Matt Kessler.

Posted by jasondesante

Patrick's review of Bit Trip is the same score as this. Patrick mentions the $40 price at the end and doesn't make a big deal of it, when it should be a bigger deal in Bit Trip's case in my opinion.

Bit Trip games are literally one dimensional in gameplay. The definition of a shallow experience. Bit Trip has bad 3d and techinical problems (frame rate). Many one dimensional games with over long levels v.s an adventure game with a fundamental design never even attempted by anyone else, has great 3d and no technical problems. Are you kidding me, theyre equal, what are you rating, your hormone levels of the day?

My statement of "The Nintendo Curse" exists. Standards are higher and you will judge it harsher for no reasons (when it has no objective faults, just because its Nintendo) when a poorer game will get the same score and it has objective faults.

Posted by Ceremor

This was a fine review, Jesus Christ why are you people out for blood?