No. Superman is incredibly lame.

"No. Superman is incredibly lame. "

It would be very tough for them. Developers of Infamous may be able to make a decent Superman game.

I probably wouldn't buy it, even if they did. I have no interest in Superman whatsoever.

Rocksteady so far made ONE good game, so don't hype yourself too much. Also, the fact that they made a Batman game doesn't mean they are superhero-experts.

" No. Superman is incredibly lame. "

I'm not sure if they should, but I'm open to the idea if they decide to make one.

" @nanikore said:

"No. Superman is incredibly lame. "

He wasn't lame until Superman 64 made him lame! "

  Superman Is the hardest hero to work with. He has too many power and unless the story is good, he and his villains are very thin and not compelling. The story would need to be great and  i have no clue how they would handle the gameplay.  I would love to see a good Superman game (other than the one on SNES) and it would be nice to see a new movie too   

I like Batman because he's a dark, edgy character and the Batman mythos is full of interesting and rather deep villains, I don't feel the same way about Superman. Besides, games based around things for the sake of games based around things are never good ideas.

They should make a Punisher game

" They should make a Punisher game "

Yes they should.

I should agree that they should make a Superman game, but should they do it, it would suck, cuz superman should suck.

He's too damn powerful for a game. There would be no threat unless you did some nonsense with kryptonite or magic. Either you have a powerful Superman in a boring game or a weak Superman that isn't the character people would want to control.

Nah, he's too powerful and the only way to be challenged in the game would be to have every enemy shoot bullets made of kryptonite.

" @K0rN said:

" @nanikore said:

"No. Superman is incredibly lame. "

He wasn't lame until Superman 64 made him lame! "

He was always lame. "

why bump?

I think we all know the true question here: Should Rocksteady should not should make a Superman game?
 
And the answer to your question is yes, but only if they completely revamp the entire atmosphere of the comic. Like, entirely. Wait a sec... isn't that Batman?

The problem with the Man Of Steel is that he is too powerful, so in order to make the game a game and not just "Press Start and push A to win" they have to hadicap him in some way therefore killing the reason we wanted to be Superman in the first place.  Let us see a good Deadpool game instead.

" Nah, he's too powerful and the only way to be challenged in the game would be to have every enemy shoot bullets made of kryptonite. "

" Nah, he's too powerful and the only way to be challenged in the game would be to have every enemy shoot bullets made of kryptonite. "

i dont think superman is cut out for games

" why bump? "

" @hedfone said:

" why bump? "

why bump? "

I'm sure they'd do something dumb like "Metropolis has been bombarded with kryptonite!" just so that you could start off weak enough to fight thugs or whatever, which kills the whole point of being Superman.

" No. Superman is incredibly lame. "