Its kind of funny, but It is nothing new. I'm going to add in some of my comments on the score (because I like wasting my life). 
 
Original Article  
 
Presentation 5.0 
"Even the menus and options of the game are dated. Playing this game makes you feel like you're playing a retro game. Sadly, you're not." 
 
This is the begging of this guy's trolling. It is clear as day, and clear as night. The menus look very well, are easy to use, and actually have different things on screen when going through them.
 
Graphics 3.5 
"This game is ugly even with platform considerations. You may have a lot of guys on screen, but they all largely look like the same ugly dude." 
 
Now, the game is on the Wii, and the Wii can produce good visuals. I want to say that, tho the game doesn't look like Gears of War 2, it does present itself nicely, it does have a lot of characters on screen, and the colors are very vibrant for all the different levels, and special effects look crisp. Also, enemy appearances are actually randomly generated. So if the reviewer actually took the time, he would notice that enemies without helmets have different hair types and faces. 
 
Sound 3.0
"The voice acting and music is awful. If you insist on playing this game, I'd recommend doing it with the TV muted." 
  
I'll agree with the English voices, who sound dull or coming straight from the Generic Anime stereotype. The narrator sounds good, but I can't make any comment on the Japanese voices. The music is music, and fits with the game. 
 
Gameplay 3.0
"While many gameplay formulas stand the test of time, the Warriors one is not among them. This game is so repetitive and mindless that making it just might actually make you dumber." 
 
Reading this review has made me dumber. Every game is repetitive. If the gameplay for the Warriors game hasn't stood the test of time, then why the fuck are they still coming out and why the fuck are they still selling? I mean, what can you expect from Hack and Slash? At least there is a combo system. At least there's character, armor, and weapon leveling. Maybe if it had trophies or achievements it would have been a far more amazing game, right? 
 
Lasting Appeal 3.5
"Sure, there's a lot of game here, but why would you want to play this over and over unless you were forced to?" 
 
Ok, so this troll just admitted that Samurai Warriors 3 has a lot of game play in it. Fucking hilarious. Not only is there Story Mode, Historical Mode, and Free Mode, but there's also that friggin Mystery of Murasame Castle mode where you can play online with a chap to fight ZOMBIE samurai and help poor ol' Tanooki spirits who are trapped in statues. 
 
Personally, I think it is a really solid game. I mean, people love to hate on these games, and I know I'm not a huge fan of the flamboyant presentation (really wished these series went for a more realistic route) but, shit man, hackin n slashin is fun. A "review" like this is why I always highly encourage people to NOT listen to any reviews. I can't begin to imagine the countless games that have gone ignored because some person looking for a good time was swindled by someone else's written opinion. I'm sure this same guy was on the Modern Warfare 2 cock, praising innovation and shit.
 
Want to know what game WILL already be dated by the time it comes out? EVERY FUCKING GAME. 
 
Psyche, guys, I hope you didn't read this.

So who's opinion do I listen to? A guy from IGN or an obviously offended fan? 
 

"Psyche, guys, I hope you didn't read this. "

Wait what?
 
Also a good Samurai Warriors is a dead Samurai Warriors.
 
Fucking Koei.

It is just an opinion man. If you love the game, go make your own review. Oh and no need to bring up MW2 since it seems more people actually hate that game now than they do love it.

It's just an opinion. As it is, the game has a rating in the 50s on metacritic, so I guess a lot of video game reviewers out there are just 'trolling'.

Ah, Anthony Gallegos wrote this.  He knows how to play games, man.  As long as they aren't developed by Bizarre Creations and stuff.

" So who's opinion do I listen to? A guy from IGN or an obviously offended fan? 
 

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Neither, it's a fucking Warriors game on the Wii.

"

Or it just sucks and you regret spending money on it but don't want to admit it.

Way to analyze the only part of the review that doesn't matter. I'm glad they're getting rid of the scoring section soon, now people will have to read the actual review before bitching about it.
 
Also, Mr. Gallegos didn't review Modern Warfare 2.
 

Dude, a Warriors game on Kinect.  I could loose 100 pounds in one week playing that shit.

" @Octaslash:  
I did read the actual "review". The guy should have at least explained why he hates the games so much. I mean, saying they have not evolved explains nothing. Also, I know he didn't review MW2. I actually looked this up before posting. 
 
@Manhattan_Project:  C'mon, you know what I mean. But tell me, have you ever played a game similar to RDR or ME2?  "

It's a Wii game.  Who cares?

Oh....so you're the guy round here who defends the Warriors games, eh? :| Ever feel like you're fighting a battle you lost 5 years ago?

" Oh....so you're the guy round here who defends the Warriors games, eh? :| Ever feel like you're fighting a battle you lost 5 years ago? "

" It's a Wii game.  Who cares? "

" Oh....so you're the guy round here who defends the Warriors games, eh? :| Ever feel like you're fighting a battle you lost 5 years ago? "

I trust Anthony Gallegos much more than I do you

Having read the review and having never played a Warriors game ever, I found that review lacking.  Now the reason could be: 
 
A. This game really is bad and had no substance 
B. The reviewer himself failed to better articulate what was wrong with the game 
C. All of the above 
 
Either way I did not like the review.  Going slightly off topic, what Warriors game is a good one to start with?

" I trust Anthony Gallegos much more than I do you "

" Having read the review and having never played a Warriors game ever, I found that review lacking.  Now the reason could be:  A. This game really is bad and had no substance B. The reviewer himself failed to better articulate what was wrong with the game C. All of the above  Either way I did not like the review.  Going slightly off topic, what Warriors game is a good one to start with? "

This is the classic example of "this reviewer gave a game I like a bad score, so therefore the reviewer doesn't know anything about games!!!" 
 
#sigh#

" This is the classic example of "this reviewer gave a game I like a bad score, so therefore the reviewer doesn't know anything about games!!!"  #sigh# "

It's a Wii game, of course its bad.

" @schizogony:  
Me cares. :( 
 
@Castiel said: 

" This is the classic example of "this reviewer gave a game I like a bad score, so therefore the reviewer doesn't know anything about games!!!"  #sigh# "

its not about the score, its about the half-assed review! "

That game sucks dick. 
 
This genre died out 10 years ago, 
Only crazy kids from japan get this and people who still don´t have a xbox360 to play some real good games.

Dude, the game is bad. Deal with it.

ITT: trolls who can't afford more than an xbox arcade trashing the wii. Grow up please.
 
My personal opinion on DW/SW is that they are perfectly decent as mindless entertainment, although they do wear out their welcome. The attacks on it seem a tad hypocritical as all games are structured by repetition and there are many franchises that churn out sequels.

The review of this review lacked depth substance and style.   Ok, so this troll just admitted that the review has reviewing it. Fucking hilarious.
 
Hey I know what would make a good review.  ALL CAPS

You bought a shit game, deal with it. 

" So who's opinion do I listen to? A guy from IGN or an obviously offended fan? 
 

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Neither, it's a fucking Warriors game on the Wii.

"

Does this game have Lu Bu?
 
Also here's a better review.

" It's a Wii game, of course its bad. "

The Rebel Fm guys are the only thing I like about ign, so yeah I trust their opinion.

The Warriors games are a bit of a guilty pleasure of mine. That said, I don't have to play this anytime soon. Because the only Koei game worth talking about is the upcoming Fist of the North Star game.

It seems more like you are the troll.

What the fuck is Samurai Warriors?!

" What the fuck is Samurai Warriors?! "

Those games are bad and repetitive. At least most fans are aware they're garbage and play them as a guilty pleasure.