Game is DEFINITELY boned

Avatar image for sometimesavowel
#1 Posted by sometimesavowel (160 posts) -

It's been out for 3 days, there's been a lot of hype surrounding it, it's even on the front end-caps at Target - but there's nary a review to be found.

Combining logic with Internet research (mainly, the Giant Bomb Quick Look) I have been able to infer that well, frankly, the game is shit. Not to be confused with THE shit of the positive connotation, but more like a steaming pile of turd matter. The plan seems to be to let the Star Trek name move units, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was the plan all along.

Avatar image for ntm
#2 Edited by NTM (9418 posts) -

Actually, there are reviews for it, and it got bad scores. The reason there aren't more reviews is because people weren't sent copies, so reviewers had to buy it themselves, which is never a good sign.

Avatar image for beachthunder
Avatar image for scientificpizza
#4 Posted by ScientificPizza (2391 posts) -

I don't know. I'm a few missions in to it and it doesn't seem THAT bad. It is just a co-op shooter, but I don't think it's as terrible as everyone is making it out to be.

But I also played through the entirety of The Walking Dead: Survival Instinct, so maybe I can just put up with a lot of garbage.

Avatar image for pudge
#5 Posted by Pudge (1139 posts) -

Also, there was hype?

DUDE! Didn't you read his post? This shit was advertised at Target son, that's HYPE CENTRAL! Gamers be straight ballin over in the Target electronics section!

Avatar image for devilzrule27
#6 Posted by devilzrule27 (1249 posts) -

They didn't send out review copies apparently. Also there was no hype.

Avatar image for monkeysdad
#7 Edited by MonkeysDad (70 posts) -

Looks like the PR's for the game were trying to jack up the user score on Metacritic, while one of the producers has been caught claiming the game's less-than-totally-broken on the PC: Whoops.

Avatar image for ghost_cat
#8 Edited by Ghost_Cat (1927 posts) -

Boned in or out?

Avatar image for metal_mills
#9 Posted by Metal_Mills (3422 posts) -

They don't care about reviews or hype. They care about the kids and teens who'll see the new Star Trek movie, get psyched and then see that cover at their local game store and buy it on impulse.

Avatar image for modernalkemie
#10 Edited by ModernAlkemie (389 posts) -

If it's at the front of big toy retailers then I'd say it is meeting Paramount's goals for the game. Namely getting kids walking into the store with their parents to go "OH MOMMY MOMMY MOMMY!!! IT'S A GAME WITH THE SPACE MAN WHICH WHAT I LIKE!!! BUY IT BUY IT BUY IT BUY IT BUY IT!!!!!"

Avatar image for twolines
#11 Posted by TwoLines (3482 posts) -

#TeamBoneless

Avatar image for h0lgr
#12 Edited by h0lgr (962 posts) -

I wouldn't classify it as "hype" if companies spread around posters and shit. Real hype comes from consumers. Anyway, the only reason places like Target give a shit is because it carries the Star Trek name. People recognize it.

Avatar image for donfonzie
#13 Edited by donfonzie (238 posts) -
Definitely boned.
Definitely boned.

It's pretty buggy. (or someones ultimate fan fiction)

Avatar image for fox01313
#14 Edited by fox01313 (5186 posts) -
Avatar image for fattony12000
#15 Posted by Fattony12000 (8196 posts) -
2474748-69224_163392040481075_781919784_n.jpg

Avatar image for philipduck
#16 Posted by PhilipDuck (642 posts) -

Never expected it to be more than what we got...

Avatar image for sterling
#17 Edited by Sterling (4015 posts) -

2014's 2013 game of the year!

Avatar image for thekitkatshuffler
#18 Posted by thekitkatshuffler (102 posts) -

As someone who has £100 of GAME vouchers left to spend, this thread title upsets me greatly.

Avatar image for shagge
#19 Posted by ShaggE (8095 posts) -

This is the only game what has Spock Lock functionality, so it can't be THAT bad.

Avatar image for the_nubster
#20 Posted by The_Nubster (3016 posts) -
Avatar image for fox01313
#21 Edited by fox01313 (5186 posts) -

@the_nubster: As a student of game design I wind up playing a ton of bad games to find out what ideas worked well & what went hideously wrong. Also as a Star Trek fan, as mixed as I still am on the reboot, there's not enough Star Trek games coming out so part of me is looking forward to playing it, just have my expectations somewhere in the middle & not expecting a great game.

Avatar image for sometimesavowel
#22 Posted by sometimesavowel (160 posts) -

I would have followed up on this thread earlier, but I had hit my posting limit by 3 AM.

Pertaining to @Pudge's comment, it's important to note that the front endcaps are paid spots. Publishers bid on them to put their games to make sure they are front-and-center. When I say the Star Trek game is there, I mean it took money to make that happen.

I guess I also define the term "hype" rather loosely. This is something that got announced a couple of years ago, and while it's been mostly quiet with sporatic updates there was a last-minute marketing push and we are certainly aware that it came out - even if it did sneak up on

some of us.

Avatar image for zenmastah
#23 Posted by zenmastah (1194 posts) -

Such a shame, the co-op seems to be broken on PC and the AI does not work properly if you want to play it by yourself.

Definetly not worth the full prize at the moment.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.