Video Blog: Playing Through StarCraft II
And also, lol Brad. If you wanna know why the con is in the suit all the time, you can simply watch the very first first cinematic! Something that Blizzard is doing extra fucking brilliant. If people aren't sure about buying the game and afraid of getting constantly stabbed in the multiplayer - simply pick this game up just to play the singe player campaign on casual-normal and watch all the cool movies. I would honestly pay blizzard $5-10 just for the cinematics alone.
If I had a PC that could run games with release dates past 2001, I would get this game. I have never been good at RTS and that has turned me off of the genre, but this game looks designed to cater towards that audience in the same way that Forza 3 was for people who don't play sim racers. All of that campaign stuff sounds super neat, and the story seems interesting to me and I barely even know the story of SC1. Jim Raynor seems like a great character.
My question has to be.. as someone who is very casual in the RTS realm, is this a game that I have to know the in's and out's for? Or can I just jump in and have fun while being a total noob? I loved company of heroes but I felt like that was pretty shallow in terms of depth. I should also note that I've never touched the first SC. Anyway, I LOVE the video brad (is there anything GB does that's not fantastic?)
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.