When someone rewrites your article to make it sound more intelligent, the proper response is not to roll it back to a version that you wrote. That version had a huge number of structural and grammatical problems. I corrected the entire page. There will be people that add to what I've written and as long as it's better, I don't see fit to complain about it or a reason to roll it back.

Bottom line: your version is not the only one, nor the best one. We need to have community involvement to make this work; rolling articles back is not a proper way to build such a place.

PS - The part about Cluex breaking the fourth wall ruins the payoff of defeating that boss, I considered it to be a spoiler, and removed it in my edit.

sign.
yerp im with you 100%, its not about getting your info on the net, its about getting the best info out on the net.

^^^ Love your username btw, calf exercises hurt like a mofo.

Hopefully, this sort of thing is covered under the new zero-tolerance policy towards "points gaming" (to me, what this person is doing to the article is the very definition of points gaming--re-editing something in a manner that doesn't help the site, but rather helps the individual user earn more points).

Ok, my new edits have gone through. I hope i caught everything. I think we can use this forum to propose segments and stuff for this article.