@pepsimaxofborg said:
Well that's kinda sad but also expected. :<
However the PC version might look when this game is published, I can guarantee that the huuuge mod community will make everything look better .. and in some cases more interesting.
.. Unless the construction kit has been removed. Which I hope it hasn't!
Fallout 3 had pretty good textures on PC (in places, the ground detail was always pretty sharp for example) and I doubt Skyrim is going to look any worse than Fallout 3 did.
@Rowr said:
@CL60 said:
@Rowr said:
Well considering RAGE has the same publisher, i'm going to go ahead and believe the low texture stuff - and on that basis I doubt the PC version is any different.
The hell does the publisher have to do with anything? And they've shown lots of footage of the PC version and the textures aren't that bad.
@themangalist said:
@Rowr said:
Well considering RAGE has the same publisher, i'm going to go ahead and believe the low texture stuff - and on that basis I doubt the PC version is any different.
Well two entirely different developers known for doing entirely different things on two entirely different engines... i don't think that factors into anything.
Yeh ok granted the PC version is bound to look much better.
But do you think ID voluntarily made a console game with a shitty pc port?
That was surely Bethesda's call.
Edit = i guess what i'm trying to say, is after seeing what happened to rage it would not at all suprise me to see that the PC version of Skyrim is mostly a console port. The low resolution issue is something that has surfaced on PC for RAGE.
I don't really care about what ID did or whatever they do, they haven't made a good game since Quake III.
I'm not sure what you are talking about anyway, as RAGE on PC has MUCH better textures than the console version, you'll want to open these in a new tab for full size:
http://www.gamereactor.eu/media/92/grafikduell_259231b.jpg
http://www.gamereactor.eu/media/92/grafikduell_259233b.jpg
Log in to comment