I dont know whats so rewarding about these achievements... since they dont really offer much besides bragging rights, but i know most people like them and gives games some sort of replay value for people.

Oblivion for PC didn't have achievements, but thats probably because bethesda didn't bother adding them after the original PC & 360 launch back in 06.

So yea... do you want steam achievements in skyrim?

yes please.(:

Why not? They don't do any harm, and Steam has the least invasive achievements of all time, there's no noise, and the indicator is really small once you get to 1080p and higher resolutions. 

As long as it doesn't take time and money better spent making sure the game runs without issues, I'm all for it.

Well, the Xbox achievements in Oblivion were pretty stupid, but I think with Fallout 3, Bethesda showed that they can do better, so sure, why not.

Couldn't care less about achievements, be it on Steam, XBL, or PSN.

May as well, ain't no harm in it.

" As long as it doesn't take time and money better spent making sure the game runs without issues, I'm all for it. "

Steam achievements means Steamworks support, and I'm all about Steamworks, so sure.

I couldn't care less.

They don't really do anything, so no, I don't want achievements.

Yes please

" I couldn't care less. "

I actually do not want achievements for a game like Elder Scrolls. I want to be able to enjoy the open world without having to worry about getting useless achievements.

I could be down for some steam achievements.

I really don't care about Achievements, which is why I like Steam achievements: no numbers attached.

I couldn't care less about achievements, so I don't care either way. But sure, why not? Most people seem to like them :)

The game certainly doesn't need them, but if they want to take the time to add them, then i don't mind them.

Don't really care to much.

If I can switch them off, I don't care whether they're there or not.

Like it or not I'm pretty sure they'll be there.

I'd like to have them but its not gonna be a factor . I'll get the game anyway.

Sure.
Then we can proceed to console command them in just like in F3/F:NV

Sure why not.

No!  Achievements ruin games!  Keep them away from me!

See, sounds stupid doesn't it?

" @VelociraptorBill said: " I really don't care about Achievements, which is why I like Steam achievementsIs it just me, or does that comment make absolutely no sense at all?I'll probably end up playing one of the console versions since I doubt very much if my laptop will be able to run this game, but it would be cool if more games offered cross-platform achievements like Portal 2 did.  "

It will probably be one of the few games that I won't even think about achievements, since oblivion and morrowind had such a great feeling of achievement from one moment to the next.. but sure, why not.

I turn off achievement notification for all my games, don't care either way.

" Steam achievements means Steamworks support, and I'm all about Steamworks, so sure. "

I want achievements EVERYWHERE.

Sure, why not?

If it's on it's own like the achievements were in Spore I'd say no, but if it's tied to Steam & the game is coming out to the 360/ps3 as well then sure. They sure as hell don't hurt any.

As long as when I eventually cheat the ability to gain them isnt disallowed then yes, Im all for them.

Why does this matter?

It would be nice, but I don't care too much.

I use achievements as an in-game To-Do list and a bonus activity. On the console, it helped me discover the faction quests in Oblivion IV, which provided 70+hours of value.

Seeing as I use Steam for nothing idc, but if it has some then so be it.