Hey guys, I'm 28 and haven't played Twilight Princess yet. I have the opportunity to buy it used for a good price and was wondering - is this game worth playing? I love Ocarina and I liked Wind Waker. Link to the Past is probably my favorite.
Will I enjoy TP?
The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess
Game » consists of 19 releases. Released Nov 19, 2006
The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess once again sees Link exploring the vast kingdom of Hyrule, this time in an attempt to dispel an evil twilight that has settled over the land.
Does Twilight Princess Hold Up
It felt old when it came out so it will definitely feel very dated. It would actually probably be better on the GameCube version.
"No" springs to mind. If you want to play TP, just play Okami. It's where Twilight Princess stole most of it's ideas from. "Link turns into a wolf", Gee, I wonder where they came up with that idea from?
"No" springs to mind. If you want to play TP, just play Okami. It's where Twilight Princess stole most of it's ideas from. "Link turns into a wolf", Gee, I wonder where they came up with that idea from?
Maybe one of the many other Zelda games where Link changes into forms that have different abilities, like Ocarina, Majora, Link to the Past, etc. Or you know, I guess Okami... which was just released a few months earlier (and Twilight Princess was being worked on longer, and originally scheduled for a release a year earlier.) I'm sure they just tossed in the wolf stuff in those last months to steal from Okami despite all the wolf information that had been released to the public long before Okami came out.
It's definitely worth playing, but it's not one of the best in the series.
it's entertaining enough but feels far too similar to OoT in a lot of places
some standard zelda problems like the items you get in dungeons being largely useless anywhere else, and the treasure chests you can finally get to at some point inevitably being full of rupees when your wallet has been full forever. there's only one big thing to spend them on in the whole game.
Hahah... Because Okami was the first game to ever feature a wolf character."No" springs to mind. If you want to play TP, just play Okami. It's where Twilight Princess stole most of it's ideas from. "Link turns into a wolf", Gee, I wonder where they came up with that idea from?
@HumanityPlague: Many games borrows from Zelda, only fair to take a little back. :)
Yeah, but Okami came out just a few months before Twilight Princess, and TP was originally scheduled for release a year earlier. So, his logic is incredibly flawed. The wolf stuff had been shown off for a while by that point.
Yep. It's got some problems (the wolf sections can be a little tedious) but overall it's still a great game.
Okami is tedious as shit. Its a longwinded game. Twilight Princess stays fun throughout. Mechanically there's no comparison at all unless you're a hipster weirdo who canonizes every goddamn thing Clover ever made. The idea that Zelda stole from Okami, that someone can say that straight faced, is fucking priceless though. Internet, never change.
Dunno why you mentioned your age... have you taken such a long hiatus from gaming that you don't know what games play like in the past few years? But yes if you liked Ocarina and Wind Waker, it just plays like an updated version of those games. You might even like Darksiders if you want more zelda similar goodness.
Such a dumb, uninformed comment to make. Anyways yeah it's definitely worth playing if you're a fan of Zelda games."No" springs to mind. If you want to play TP, just play Okami. It's where Twilight Princess stole most of it's ideas from. "Link turns into a wolf", Gee, I wonder where they came up with that idea from?
hijacking this thread
what handheld zelda games should i play? i havn't played any since link's awakening
This seems like an odd question. It's the same Zelda game they've been re-releasing for years. The formula was about a decade old when it was released, so a couple of years could hardly make any difference. I suspect it plays out exactly like all of the others do and exactly like the next one will. The Zelda games would have to improve and evolve for one to suddenly feel dated.
It's obviously dated in a graphical sense, but no more so than the newest Wii games are. All in all, I can't see how there would be any difference between playing the game today and playing it when it was released. You know exactly what it is and how it plays.
That said, the Gamecube version might be best, though. I forget if the Wii allowed the player to use a proper controller, and the waggle shit is just awful. You may play/enjoy the Wii and tolerate the controls more than I, but I think few would disagree that the Gamecube control is far superior an option. The graphical differences between the two are virtually non-existent.
Minish Cap. Also GBA version of Link to the Past if you have never played Link to the Past.hijacking this thread
what handheld zelda games should i play? i havn't played any since link's awakening
@css_switchfoot said:
hijacking this thread
what handheld zelda games should i play? i havn't played any since link's awakening
The two Oracles games are the best handheld games aside from Link's Awakening and Link to the Past (which doesn't really count).
@Wrighteous86 said:
@css_switchfoot said:
hijacking this thread
what handheld zelda games should i play? i havn't played any since link's awakening
The two Oracles games are the best handheld games aside from Link's Awakening and Link to the Past (which doesn't really count).
Interesting I hadn't heard of them. Are they the same game like pokemon blue/red or are they completely different?
@css_switchfoot said:
@Wrighteous86 said:
@css_switchfoot said:
hijacking this thread
what handheld zelda games should i play? i havn't played any since link's awakening
The two Oracles games are the best handheld games aside from Link's Awakening and Link to the Past (which doesn't really count).
Interesting I hadn't heard of them. Are they the same game like pokemon blue/red or are they completely different?
They're made by Capcom, but I think they're better than Minish Cap (also made by Capcom). They are two separate games and stories (one emphasizes Zelda puzzles, the other Zelda combat, but both are good). When you beat one, you get a code that you can enter into the other, and characters, items, and plot points will cross over. If you play through both games, the second one has an additional ending dungeon and boss that ties the two games together even more.
Those two games take more from Link's Awakening than any other Zelda game, while Minish Cap is kind of more like a 2D Wind Waker-styled game.
It may seem odd to you because you assume I know stuff about Twilight Princes, but I don't - hence this thread. I played WW in 2k3 so it's been a while.This seems like an odd question. It's the same Zelda game they've been re-releasing for years. The formula was about a decade old when it was released, so a couple of years could hardly make any difference. I suspect it plays out exactly like all of the others do and exactly like the next one will. The Zelda games would have to improve and evolve for one to suddenly feel dated. It's obviously dated in a graphical sense, but no more so than the newest Wii games are. All in all, I can't see how there would be any difference between playing the game today and playing it when it was released. You know exactly what it is and how it plays.
Thanks for the advice everyone, I just got back from buying it for GC.
Are you seriosuly try to say that Zelda is an Okami rip off? Because if you are..."No" springs to mind. If you want to play TP, just play Okami. It's where Twilight Princess stole most of it's ideas from. "Link turns into a wolf", Gee, I wonder where they came up with that idea from?
Anyway, I think TP is an amazing game, but I haven't played it since it came out. Though when it came out I played it for 25 hours in a 48 hour period. It was bliss.
minish cap is fantastichijacking this thread
what handheld zelda games should i play? i havn't played any since link's awakening
Tried playing it the other day on the Wii, it was atrocious, I couldn't even look at it, and goddamn the Wii controls are so dumb
@Wrighteous86 said:
@HumanityPlague said:Maybe one of the many other Zelda games where Link changes into forms that have different abilities, like Ocarina, Majora, Link to the Past, etc. Or you know, I guess Okami... which was just released a few months earlier (and Twilight Princess was being worked on longer, and originally scheduled for a release a year earlier.) I'm sure they just tossed in the wolf stuff in those last months to steal from Okami despite all the wolf information that had been released to the public long before Okami came out. It's definitely worth playing, but it's not one of the best in the series."No" springs to mind. If you want to play TP, just play Okami. It's where Twilight Princess stole most of it's ideas from. "Link turns into a wolf", Gee, I wonder where they came up with that idea from?
Logic is flawed, on that I agree.
However, he's right in saying that Okami was a vastly superior game and totally out Zelda'd Zelda. At least, I thought so. But then, I found TP somewhat disappointing and dated at the time. Didn't manage to recreate that amazing sense of discovery I'd felt with Wind Waker.
I wonder what the good price used is? I mean it's in the "Nintendo Selects" category. So I would just buy it new for $20 if I was interested in it.
To answer the OP, it's not bad. It's worth playing if you like Zelda games.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment