46 Comments
Posted by Jace

Sweet

Posted by VitaminWaterYum

Looks like a bad Army of Two clone.

Posted by Tennmuerti

Fubar pack?
Really?

Edited by Unilad

Ahh YES!!!! Another military-ish shooter!

Seriously 2K I'm not allergic to originality.........!!!!!!

Posted by cikame

I don't know, feels like it's missing something.
Maybe the future soldier beta is skewing my views of 3rd person shooters.

Posted by BlueWolverine

Too early to judge.

Posted by TryNstopME

Looks good but I wouldn't pay 60$ for it

Posted by DefaultProphet

Everything that's been said about this games SP says it's not just another military-ish shooter. I'm excited

Posted by billyhoush

The single player is what really interests me about this game.

Posted by MarkWahlberg

Looks like it'll be decent, if not particularly noteworthy. Although I doubt anyone's gonna be getting this for the multi. Still, nice that they try to justify/tie it into the story in some way.

Posted by Deathmachine117

Is it just me or is the art style a bit different to when they first announced it ?

Posted by Coafi

I noticed no difference from when they first announced it, also looks like a same old shooter.

Posted by TyCobb

That trailer makes it look like it would be a Free 2 Play MP game. I do not see myself owning a copy of this game unless I get in some Steam holiday bundle for super cheap.

Posted by Jonny_Anonymous

@billyhoush said:

The single player is what really interests me about this game.

yep

Edited by Bombzinski

The teams look kinda the same. I dunno, this seems kinda... bad? Why would they show all this awkward crappy animation in a promotion video?

I'm planning to buy this for single player anyway, but man...

Posted by MeatSim

American on American crime!

Posted by CosmicQueso

wubwubwubwubwub

Posted by Franstone

I can see the future...

And it's this game getting a 6.5-7.5 on GameRankings.com.

: )

Posted by Talis12

multiplayer looks kinda cheap to me

Posted by chilipeppersman

@TryNstopME: yea, get it for the SP when it comes down in price, multiplayer seems like it would get cheap real fast.

Posted by Cirdain

Good effort on the music. Better than the not good dubstep.

Posted by Sackmanjones

Seems ok, but single player is lookin hot!

Posted by HadesTimes

So when I saw the single player this game looked like it had incredible graphics. WTF happened? The game looks like Battlefield 1942...

Posted by iAmJohn

Man, I was so hyped for this game when that first VGA trailer came out, and yet the more it exists, the less I care.

@HadesTimes said:

So when I saw the single player this game looked like it had incredible graphics. WTF happened? The game looks like Battlefield 1942...

It kind of reminds me of a more realistic (and worse looking) Brink.

Posted by Greenshoes

It's the Northiest.

Posted by Redbullet685

Looks alright. Comes out the day after my Birthday, so if the reviews are good, I might get it.

Posted by RetroVirus

Nice to see more games including terrain kills/alterations.

Posted by Veektarius

Premise is not plausible.

Posted by G0rd0nFr33m4n

This looks on par with Crimecraft... but one of them is Free to play soooo.... :/

Posted by Mr48

The single player looks interesting thanks to the story, the multiplayer looks generic as hell

Posted by Brutal_Insanity

@Mr48: yeah, very generic,I MEAN IT EVEN HAS GUNS JUST LIKE COD...

Posted by outerabiz

Critical strike! excitement -100%

-Game over-

Posted by Napalm

@HadesTimes said:

So when I saw the single player this game looked like it had incredible graphics. WTF happened? The game looks like Battlefield 1942...

Glad to see somebody else sees this. Watch the first trailer they released, using the Bjork track, and then watch the most recent gameplay trailer.

It's literally night and day.

Edited by vinsanityv22

Looks okay, but the sand effects look cheap (both in terms of tactics and as a visual) and the animations seem soft. Being on your back and having someone kick your head onto the floor should look painful, no?

Single player looks much better. Which is awesome - that's where the focus should be.

Posted by Hero_Swe

@Napalm said:

@HadesTimes said:

So when I saw the single player this game looked like it had incredible graphics. WTF happened? The game looks like Battlefield 1942...

Glad to see somebody else sees this. Watch the first trailer they released, using the Bjork track, and then watch the most recent gameplay trailer.

It's literally night and day.

That first comment is a prime example why I think all comments everywhere on the internet should be moderated and judged.

Posted by Xyber

That just looked like a generic shooter.

Posted by sate2801

how am I going to tell the different when both team are wearing bunch of military gear and paint skulls and stuffs on their helmet/mask...

Posted by Dark_Lord_Spam

I could not tell the difference between the teams at all. Is that a style choice, or what?

Posted by Deusx

@Hero_Swe said:

@Napalm said:

@HadesTimes said:

So when I saw the single player this game looked like it had incredible graphics. WTF happened? The game looks like Battlefield 1942...

Glad to see somebody else sees this. Watch the first trailer they released, using the Bjork track, and then watch the most recent gameplay trailer.

It's literally night and day.

That first comment is a prime example why I think all comments everywhere on the internet should be moderated and judged.

Yeah man opinions just suck, am I right?

Posted by Hero_Swe

@Deusx said:

@Hero_Swe said:

@Napalm said:

@HadesTimes said:

So when I saw the single player this game looked like it had incredible graphics. WTF happened? The game looks like Battlefield 1942...

Glad to see somebody else sees this. Watch the first trailer they released, using the Bjork track, and then watch the most recent gameplay trailer.

It's literally night and day.

That first comment is a prime example why I think all comments everywhere on the internet should be moderated and judged.

Yeah man opinions just suck, am I right?

There are opinions with well formed text to back them up, and then there are just pants on head retarded posts like that.

Posted by Napalm

@Hero_Swe said:

There are opinions with well formed text to back them up, and then there are just pants on head retarded posts like that.

Says the guy who hasn't even bothered to state or even back up his opinion? Seriously. Shut up unless you're actually bringing something to the table than, "LOL PANTS ON HEAD RETARDED OPINION."

Posted by Daftasabat

Sand, sand as a pand (spoken with a cokney accent)

Posted by Hero_Swe

@Napalm said:

@Hero_Swe said:

There are opinions with well formed text to back them up, and then there are just pants on head retarded posts like that.

Says the guy who hasn't even bothered to state or even back up his opinion? Seriously. Shut up unless you're actually bringing something to the table than, "LOL PANTS ON HEAD RETARDED OPINION."

I'd assume it would be pretty evident as to what I'm commenting at, but if not then I'll just point it out, compare a model from 1942 and this and then come back to me.

Posted by HadesTimes

At this point I guess, we should stop feeding the troll. I was making a broad statement, which should also be evident to you. But since you want to take everything literally. The game looked great when it was first shown, now it looks like a rather old first person shooter. Lastly, if my comments are all you have to concern yourself about; then I feel flattered and sorry for you in equal measure.

Posted by GaspoweR

It does look pretty dated now for some reason...I actually remembered the gameplay videos to look a lot better than how it showed here.

Posted by AnotherSomebody

For some reason I remember the older footage of this game looking a lot... better? I don't know, it just seems like it took a HUGE animation/graphics hit for some reason.