75 Comments
  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2
Posted by OldGuy

GAAAH! Zombie face!

Online
Posted by Swick

Wayne Newton? Really?

Posted by RE_Player1

Remember how Crackdown 2 came and went and was kinda a letdown... ya expect this to do the same. 

Posted by Darksnughero

Poppy, tries to hard to appeal to console kiddies, over all not getting me into the new game.
 
Might rent this one and considering their pedigree.  Unlikely to finish it. 

Posted by Nave
@RE_Player92: Because?
Posted by MeatSim

Should have shown more Wayne Newton.

Posted by RE_Player1
@Nave: It just looks like an expansion pack that doesn't address any of the issues Fallout 3 had. Don't get me wrong I love Fallout 3, I got a platinum trophy in it, but this just looks like more of the same. 
Posted by Newjack

Look at the guy a minute in. Who naturally stands with their legs that far apart?

Posted by Aronman789
@RE_Player92: Fallout New Vegas is actually pretty much the real Fallout 3, as it continues parts of the stories from Fallout 1 & 2, is made by the same team, and set  in the American west, just like those games, Fallout 3 is the one that is just a side tracked point to tell you what happened in the east.
Posted by Vigil80

Whew, GBers are determined to dump on New Vegas. I don't get it.

Posted by kms_md

oh no - a ghoul!  the post apocalypse is here ...

Posted by afrokola
@Newjack said:
" Look at the guy a minute in. Who naturally stands with their legs that far apart? "
I was thinking the same exact thing.
Posted by rjayb89

Oh hey, they made new animations!

Posted by Hoshnasi

How much work has Wayne Newton had done to his face?

Posted by JoelTGM

I don't know what the point of another Fallout game is if you're not actually going to freshen it up and improve it.

Posted by Warchief

wtf   Wayne lay off the botox. 

Posted by Bennyishere

I am 99 years old.

Posted by djaoni
@DOUBLESHOCK said:
" I don't know what the point of another Fallout game is if you're not actually going to freshen it up and improve it. "
Cause the only things to improve are graphics and animations, right?
Posted by Silock
Gotta be honest, it really doesn't look like they have improved the graphics at all other then added a few more flashing lights. I don't wanna bash the game for it, I loved Fallout 3 but I just wish they could of done more with the graphics, considering how far we have come graphically with games, this one kinda looks.. well..dated, 
Edited by TorMasturba

I always hate in-game games! 
The only games that have managed to succeed in even creating a usable in-game game, in my experience, are GTA IV and Red Dead: Redemption. 
Other than these two I tend to get really bored very quickly and carry on with the actual game. 
 
Ah well, More fallout is a good thing in my books. Especially since I'm dropping £70 for the CE.
Let's hope Obsidian have made a good game this time round. 
 
(They worked heavily on Neverwinter Nights, and many, including me, loved that game. So they're not entirely bad at finding gold in the games designing area.)

Posted by Bones8677
@RE_Player92 said:
" Remember how Crackdown 2 came and went and was kinda a letdown... ya expect this to do the same.  "
Except that this game has an entirely new location, not just a slight reskin of an old city. So no...
Posted by Peacemaker

I wasn't the biggest fan of Fallout 3.  I don't know if it's because I didn't give it enough time.  Maybe I'll try this out, even if it doesn't seem to be that different.

Posted by dsd21

Fallout 1 and 2 weren't exactly the shit in the graphics department. For me it all comes down to gameplay really, and what they are promising in New Vegas is very interesting and cool. I'm calling it, when Rage comes out you will all be drooling at the graphics, but gameplay wise it is going to be trash. Just like everything ID released after John Romero (lazy fuck, but you can't take away his contribution to video game industry) and others split. Needless to say I pre-ordered FO:NV and excited to play it. /rant

Posted by gike987
@Silock said:
" Gotta be honest, it really doesn't look like they have improved the graphics at all other then added a few more flashing lights. I don't wanna bash the game for it, I loved Fallout 3 but I just wish they could of done more with the graphics, considering how far we have come graphically with games, this one kinda looks.. well..dated,  "
It's not possible for them to improve the graphics as they are forced to use the same engine. The Oblivion/Fallout 3 engine just can't handle better graphics and still be able to run smoothly on the same console.
Posted by samcotts

I don't mind the graphics, in fact I like them. 
 
But the colours look really off for some reason. Everything looks a bit soft, too pastel and not enough neon and harsher colours filling the world, it needs to look darker, grimmer. I'm trying not to think about it too much.

Posted by Ghostfish

It's nice to see Mickey Rourke, but I thought Wayne Newton was gonna show up.  Weird.

Posted by JoelTGM
@djaoni said:
" @DOUBLESHOCK said:
" I don't know what the point of another Fallout game is if you're not actually going to freshen it up and improve it. "
Cause the only things to improve are graphics and animations, right? "
Well those things you mentioned looked the same yes, along with the shooting, and Fallout 3 had really bad shooting control.  The whole game looks outdated.
Posted by samcotts
@DOUBLESHOCK: No one played Fallout 3 for the shooting, or the graphics, or the animation. 
 
They came for the story and exploration, and New Vegas is offering a whole new lot of that. And for most fans of Fallout 3, that's all they want.
Posted by Nautilus1515

people shouldnt dump on it till it is played or reviewed. sure the graphics look like shit, but fallout 3 wasnt exactly turning heads two years ago either.  it looked the same as oblivion. so everyone chill out and wait to see what happens on tuesday
Posted by JoelTGM
@samcotts:   Good point.  For me though, I couldn't get into Fallout 3 because it was so ugly and controlled so clunky.  It was a real turn off.  I really loved Oblivion though, and even Morrowind before that, so I can play games with clunky controls like that for sure, as long as they don't actively try to look ugly.  By the time Fallout 3 came out, I kinda felt like all the NPCs looked like statues and the faces started to look super outdated by then.  I just wish it looked better, like if it could have some more contrast so the visuals popped more, and were more vibrant, instead of everything just looking plain brown.
Posted by Sacerdos87
@Ghostfish:  I saw what you did there.
Posted by paulosaurus
@Vigil80 said:
" Whew, GBers are determined to dump on New Vegas. I don't get it. "
Haters gonna hate. I do think the lighting looks totally fucked, though. But that can be easily fixed on the PC. I'm excited.
Posted by Napalm

Wayne Newton looks like a fucking creepy full-size doll.

Posted by JerichoBlyth

-_- 
 
Obsidian, you've done it again. You guys suck.

Posted by Koobz

Wayne Newton looks about as lifelike as the characters in Fallout.

Edited by Daftasabat

Wayne Newton was made using the Unreal Engine. Also, to me this looks like nothing more than more DLC

Edited by Zimbo
@JerichoBlyth said:

" -_-   Obsidian, you've done it again. You guys suck. "

I assume you have played the game and can come to this conclusion logically and with plenty of facts to back yourself up amirite?

I don't get all the hate against this game specifically on these forums. So what if the graphics have not really changed. Neither Oblivion nor Fallout 3 had spectacular graphics. Also, Obsidian have made changes to the gameplay if you actually go and check out some of the interviews/previews. I am hopeful the story/script should be stronger in this game considering Obsidians pedigree for at least writing good stories. The inclusion of some of the lead devs from the original Fallouts means that they do have some experience working on this franchise as well.

Wayne Newton is creepy.

Edited by AxleBro

i used to think this community was different from other game sites "good graphics or gtfo" ...really GBC? come on guys.
pre-ordered my special edition months ago, can't wait for this game, bad graphics and all.
if the graphics looked nice, it wouldn't be the same.

Posted by Bongos

Fallout 3 without the terrible and filled with awesome? I'll take ten please.

Posted by 2HeadedNinja

I will never forget that one time in Fallout 3 when I was sneaking through a creepy, ghoul infested house while my Pipboy was playing " I don't want to set the world on fire" ... if this game gives me anything close to that im sold on it.

Posted by 234r2we232
@TorMasturba: How ironic, because I find GTAIV and RDR to be very boring as games! :)
Posted by Afroman269
@Napalm said:
" Wayne Newton looks like a fucking creepy full-size doll. "
Posted by samcotts

I think the DLC comparison is fucking mental. Seriously. This is going to offer over 100 hours of gameplay, how can you even compare it to DLC. Yeah, it looks and probably plays mostly the same, but it's the story and exploration that make a Fallout game great, and when you're offering as much as New Vegas promises too, you're getting more than enough content for $60/£40.
 
I'm getting internet ragey over here.

Posted by Scooper

Wayne Newton looks like a fucking beanbag that's been flattened with a iron.

Posted by jpe

I'm looking forward to this game, but it seems pretty disingenuous when one of the guys said there'll be "load of people milling around" and the video shows maximum 5 people.

Posted by HydraHam

His face.. Cannot unsee.

Posted by NekuSakuraba
@samcotts
@DOUBLESHOCK: No one played Fallout 3 for the shooting, or the graphics, or the animation. 
 
They came for the story and exploration, and New Vegas is offering a whole new lot of that. And for most fans of Fallout 3, that's all they want.
Wow, really? I mean I love Fallout 3 but the shooting was fun and tight in my opinion.

What didn't people like about it? I thought it played great.

Only thing I am worried about New Vegas is that I haven't played Fallout 1 and 2 and I here the stories tie to this...
Posted by NekuSakuraba
@NekuSakuraba
@samcotts
@DOUBLESHOCK: No one played Fallout 3 for the shooting, or the graphics, or the animation. 
 
They came for the story and exploration, and New Vegas is offering a whole new lot of that. And for most fans of Fallout 3, that's all they want.
Wow, really? I mean I love Fallout 3 but the shooting was fun and tight in my opinion.

What didn't people like about it? I thought it played great.

Only thing I am worried about New Vegas is that I haven't played Fallout 1 and 2 and I here the stories tie to this...
Hear*

Goddamit, can't edit post on the mobile site. >__>
Posted by samcotts
@NekuSakuraba: I really enjoyed the shooting too, but it wasn't Fallout 3's main draw. The exploration made that game so good for me.
Posted by NekuSakuraba
@samcotts Yeah I can agree with that, the story, exploration and just about everything made the game so good.

New Vegas looks to be Fallout 3 but better.

Can't wait to get my collectors edition on launch day! :D
  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2