Edited by TaoistToast

Ugh, so close.  
This game looks pretty dull. Not for me. 

Posted by Cypholis

I guess

Posted by troyx

i can't understand why would anyone play this crap over civ 5 and starcraft 2

Edited by MarkWahlberg

Wonder how this holds up on the iPad.

Posted by armaan8014


Posted by kollay

I raff, I R.U.S.E.?

Posted by beef209

long time coming

Posted by Tebbit
@kollay said:
" I raff, I R.U.S.E.? "
Good lord
Posted by Daveyo520

This looks pretty cool. I may have to get it.

Posted by Fubar

Is it a trap?

Posted by scarace360

maybe they should have put this out before starcraft 2.

Posted by Tikicobra

Why do all the menus look so futuristic if it's a WWII game? 
I also don't like the table-top aesthetic. It's weird and unnecessary in my opinion.

Posted by EveretteScott
@troyx said:
" i can't understand why would anyone play this crap over civ 5 and starcraft 2 "
People like different games?
Your opinion is bad.
Posted by FrostyHerpiez

meh starcraft 2 and civ 5 coming? ill pass

Posted by MiamiRedHawks

I'll pass.

Posted by Llama

shouldve played a multiplayer game, gives a much better idea what the game is about

Posted by Rhombus_Of_Terror
@kollay said:
" I raff, I R.U.S.E.? "
Posted by Kbohls
@troyx said:
" i can't understand why would anyone play this crap over civ 5 and starcraft 2 "
Because it looks very interesting and completely different and from those two games.
Edited by Milkman

This seems a lot cooler than I remember from the beta.

Posted by Yodzilla

As someone who isn't generally a fan of RTS game I think this looks kinda neat.

Posted by Donos

I'm interested but.... Civ V.


the PS3 version has MOVE support no? Should have mentioned it in the Quick Look but well this is Giant Bomb - BURN!!!!!!! :D

Posted by brocool


Posted by MisterSamMan

I wish, they went into the psychological warfare part of the game. It was a pretty interesting mechanic in the beta.

Posted by daggity

It's too bad the single player will be hampered by Ubisoft's insane DRM.

Posted by Wacomole

Brad's comment at the end that they've managed to make a WWII game without a "blank of blank" title has a slight flaw... 
A look at the box art shows the subtitle "The Art of Deception"  (OK so it has a "The" before it, but still)

Posted by trophyhunter

I thought for a while that ruse was a raceing game

Posted by Vigorousjammer

I... remember playing this a while ago... maybe it was the beta?

Posted by TheManiacsGnome
@troyx said:
" i can't understand why would anyone play this crap over civ 5 and starcraft 2 "
Because RUSE is so similar to SC2 and CiV5 right? I played in the beta before the delay and the free weekend/beta thing afterwards and came away impressed with RUSE. 
Posted by JAH_Donuts
Posted by ICryCauseImEmo

It looks "interesting" thats all I can really say for it, the path finding issues piss me off especially in RTS's and when you arnt really given the ability to build units each unit is critical. The table top view, seems alright, but I do agree the scaling seems a bit strange at least when you zoom in.

Posted by Vitamin_Dei

Meh. Starcraft 2, Civ 5, Elemental, and an utter distaste for Ubi's PC DRM mean I won't be giving this one a look beyond what I've seen in this video.

Posted by DG991

The month of rts...

Posted by RagingLion

The presentation looks pretty cool and interesting to see story interweaved into the actual strategising so seamlessly.  Still has to prove it has depth and the RUSE stuff actually feels right.
The main thing it left me pondering was if it should slow time down when you zoom in to make it make sense for the scale and vice-versa (I think Inception was showing a bit of influence in my thinking there).

Posted by adoggz

wait a minute. maybe I misheard but did Brad just ask the question "do the units move?"

Posted by bcjohnnie

So.... this looks interesting, but this Quick Look doesn't make much sense to me.  I get the need to get this video out early, but for Ryan to demo what is essentially a tutorial mission seems kind of silly, especially since he can't answer any questions about a lot of the game's mechanics yet.  This QL could have given a much better picture of the game without involving too much more work.
Or, you know, just have Snide do it, since he is more of a go-to guy on PC strategy.

Posted by KillaMaStA

seems kinda boring, potential though. R.U.S.E 3 could be totally awesome

Posted by Grissefar

The idea of all macro - Cool bro!!
The execution - Not too cool bro :(

Posted by Mystyr_E

is this just a crummy video player or am I seeing some big screen tearing?

Posted by Psych0Penguin

Considering the Americans hadn't entered the war until 1941, I find this insulting!!!! But really now, game looks interesting.

Edited by gike987

Looks kinda fun. Too bad I won't buy this as long as Ubisoft  use their crazy always online DRM.

Posted by Jeffk38uk

Tried the beta on Steam when it was up. It was alright, certainly quite different from typical RTS but it didnt grab me. Can't help but feel its the WW2 setting. Still, its on my watch list and the campaign does seem more interesting.

Posted by PosableActionFigure
@kollay said:
" I raff, I R.U.S.E.? "
Posted by Jacob816

Is the mad screen tearing the game, or just the video player?

Posted by bigsmoke77
@Psych0Penguin:  Kasserine Pass was a battle during 1943, you can see that at 0:40, ryan was just mistaking
Posted by Psych0Penguin
@bigsmoke77: Last time I trust Ryan with his WW2 history!
Posted by Bollard
@KillaMaStA said:
" seems kinda boring, potential though. R.U.S.E 3 could be totally awesome "
You mean, R.U.S.3??? 
Think of the potential for R.U.S.E 5 as well!
Posted by SunKing

Still waiting to see the strategy part of this RTS. Oh, well.  
Probably didn't help that this has gotta be one of the earlier missions, but it looks dull.

Posted by elko84


Posted by helloimamlet
@Vitamin_Dei:  Doesn't Starcraft 2 have the same DRM if i am not mistaken? Anyway this a game i would want to play online so tat type of DRM doesn't bother me but i see your point.