208 Comments
Edited by Vlad_Tiberius

@CrazyBagMan said:

@Vlad_Tiberius: You mad. If people want to find out which console has the best version it's not hard to do a little searching on the internet. If you care that much about your money, it's very little work.

You're telling me I shouldn't visit GB for news and info about videogames? Did you hear that, GB guys? This guy says your work is crap!

@Afroman269 said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Afroman269 said:

@TepidShark

@penINC said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

Jesus fuckin' Christ - you guys actually did a QL of a multiplatform title on a PS3! Wow! Now that's a premiere on GiantBomb!

It's Playstation only, dude.

Also the Dark Souls Quick Look was on PS3 & that was multiplatform.

People still continue to care which platform a game is being played on? Must be some weird thing with people who only have one console.

No, genius, it's because people wanna know which platform has the best version to buy it for, since they don't wanna buy the same game for all the consoles they have.

Yeah, it's a "weird thing" to see people care about their money...

Who said anything about buying the same game for every console? If there are any significant issues with a specific platform version of a game, GB will be sure to point them out.

I really want to take default avatar users seriously but then I read comments like this.

Dude, what don't you understand? When a multiplatform game is released and you own more than one console, how exactly do you know which version to buy? Don't you, by chance, look up for comparisons and reviews in the media? It's not like I have a "default" console, for fuck sake!

Edited by kmg90

@Dagbiker said:

so you can get splinter cell caos Theory for $40 on the 3ds or you can get all 3 splinter cells that ever existed for the ps3 for $40.

Tough choice.

Also SC Collection has 3-D Support in all three games, if that's something you really fancy...

Posted by Dynamitekyle

"I feel tingly Lambert."

Posted by Tan

uhh... Weird!

Posted by firecracker22

@MisterSamMan: Yes. I believe that the PS2 had to be cut down, and saw changes to level design because of the hardware. I think the PC and Xbox versions didn't need to get cut down, though.

Posted by churrific

Wait, is lambert voiced by the allstate insurance guy?

Posted by Afroman269

@Vlad_Tiberius: I'm more inclined to always choose 360 because of the online preference and having a larger friend's lists on that side. I'll go PS3 if there are serious issues with the 360 version or if the PS3 comes with more content. I'll go PC if I can run the game better than consoles. You seem to have trouble reading because I have already said that if a certain issue is plaguing a specific version of a game, GB will say what it is. If there's no real difference then it doesn't matter what fucking version they play in a quick look. I'm not going to get butthurt just because they don't play my preferred console version of a game.

I didn't know picking which version to go with was such an arduous task....oh wait...maybe because it isn't.

Posted by Afroman269

@churrific: Probably only in Pandora Tomorrow. There's a noticeable difference between that guy and the guy voicing Lambert in 1 and 3.

Posted by WickedCobra03

It has been said, but... "Who turned out zee lights?!?".

I love Vinny at the end looking around the menus and Ryan just says no to the Biography section, lol!

Posted by TheHT

Night vision needs to always be on.

Online
Posted by DougQuaid

I have such fond memories of the original Splinter Cell on Xbox and I remember it looking a lot better than that.. Vinny and I probably have the same prescription rose-tinted glasses though.

Edited by Pr1mus

Wow major face palm at all the people complaining about which version they choose to show for a quicklook of a game which is PS3 ONLY as of this moment.

Posted by Nizzleworth

tutorializing.

Posted by TheEvilCory

I never played these back in the day, but they look kind of interesting. I don't really have much experience with pure, "rigid" stealth games. Might have to pick the first and third ones up on steam when they go on sale.

Posted by DougQuaid
@TheEvilCory said:

I never played these back in the day, but they look kind of interesting. I don't really have much experience with pure, "rigid" stealth games. Might have to pick the first and third ones up on steam when they go on sale.

Chaos Theory is definitely the best of the classic Splinter Cell games and it still looks pretty damn good to boot.
Posted by bombHills

Loved all the Splinter Cell's back in the day and this really brings back the memories. I played them on the original Xbox, wasn't the first Splinter Cell an xbox exclusive for a while? I remember it coming to the PS2 later on, I just wonder if this will be available on the Xbox marketplace anytime soon?

Posted by csl316

Meh, I don't regret my decision of bypassing these games so I could play Tenchu: Wrath of Heaven over and over again.
 
Oh, and MGS 3.

Posted by Ghosthead84

God I love Fisher's voice sooo much.

Posted by Ketchupp

Mother fucking memories.

Posted by Ketchupp

Also, "I took that spray to the face earlier". Thank you Ryan Davis.

Posted by Irishranger

"You get the gist of that one?"

-Ryan Davis

Hilarious as usual, what a great way to start the week.

Posted by HerbieBug

No Chaos Theory multiplayer? What the hell Ubisoft? That multiplayer was both unique and fun.

I also don't recall any of the original games hitching like that when you quick saved.

Posted by Cybexx

Vinny your memory isn't that foggy, the version of the original Splinter Cell they used is defiantly the PS2 version. In the PS2 versions they split up each mission into multiple levels, reduced the size of the levels and a lot of the cool looking shader effects were gone. The PS2/Gamecube versions came out a while after the Xbox/PC versions, they did add pre-rendered cut-scenes with a more fleshed out story and an extra mission but its not really the iconic version of Splinter Cell since the graphics and level design are compromised.

Posted by Errordotocx

I swear that Lambert guy sounds like the State Farm dude. lol

Posted by DirtyEagles

air crouching

Edited by Peacemaker

@Errordotocx: because he is.

Edited by Vlad_Tiberius

@Afroman269:I don't have a problem reading. I just wanted you to finally spit it out and prove the point I was trying to make. Choosing a specific console as the default console for which to play most games, while choosing only certain titles in some special cases to play on the "other" rig proves you're biased towards a certain console. Your story with the 360 is exactly like mine, only with the PS3 instead.

And all that is fine if you're only a simple listener or a fan of the site, but it's not OK if you're claiming to be a journalist and inform the people. That was my point.

Let's say I'm making a show about cars and that I'm a big Toyota fan in private. Would you, in 2011 nonetheless, consider me professional and objective if I were presenting only Toyota-labeled automobiles in the show?

Or if I were a German guy making a show about cars, would you consider me a professional, especially in this day and age, if I were presenting only Wolkswagens or Opels to the audience, even if that audience is mostly German?

That's the issue here.

Posted by LaszloKovacs

"A fake leg-"

"YES!"

Posted by Delta_Ass

@Errordotocx said:

I swear that Lambert guy sounds like the State Farm dude. lol

That's because he is.

Posted by thebigJ_A

Man I used to love these games. Then they got real bad, real fast. Still waiting on them to get good again...

Posted by Hoffer

I wish this was coming to Xbox 360. I'd love to get achievements for playing these games again.

Posted by Afroman269
@Vlad_Tiberius *sigh* there is no point in showing every version of a game if there are insignificant differences between them. You're blowing this shit out of proportion. Go watch the Rage quick look. It's played on 360 and the other versions are mentioned and there are no significant issues with the other ones. It's a waste of time to show all the versions. It would not have a mattered if they only played the ps3 version either and with that, I'm done talking to you. This shit is getting ridiculous.
Posted by defcomm

I'm guessing this a port of the PS2 versions? A bunch of things seem off for sure.

Edited by Pr1mus

@Afroman269 said:

@Vlad_Tiberius *sigh* there is no point in showing every version of a game if there are insignificant differences between them. You're blowing this shit out of proportion. Go watch the Rage quick look. It's played on 360 and the other versions are mentioned and there are no significant issues with the other ones. It's a waste of time to show all the versions. It would not have a mattered if they only played the ps3 version either and with that, I'm done talking to you. This shit is getting ridiculous.

it isn't just ridiculous like you said but there's also the simple fact they probably show the version the publisher sent for free. I doubt most publisher ask which version they want or send more then one. But yeah its ridiculous and since 2009 came in games that have been significantly better on 360 compared to the PS3 version or vice versa are a tiny minority.

Anyway the Space Marine review having two different scores on PS3 and 360 renders all accusation of GB not being professional irrelevant.

I guess what i mean is fuck that guy don't waste your time.

Posted by RobertOrri

This is such a weird compilation. On the one hand, Ubisoft said that they were basing these ports on the PC versions, but I'm not quite so sure. The PC versions of Splinter Cell and Chaos Theory were the best, but Pandora Tomorrow on PC was pretty bad.

I'm trying to compare screenshots of the various versions with this video and while the first two games have all the geometry intact, I can't help but think that some of the graphical effects are missing or wonky. The interface is also completely redone for both Splinter Cell and Pandora Tomorrow, trashing the calm, cool color gradients and replacing them with pretty damn ugly stuff.

Chaos Theory seems more like a straight port from the PC, which is nice.

Also, this is yet another case of a PS3 release lacking anti-alasing.

Posted by GeneralDAS

Weerd!

Edited by Vlad_Tiberius

@Afroman269: Dude, I'm wasting my time with you, really...

Have I asked them to show us each version of the game? No, I was just asking them to show us the BEST version of a game, whether it's 360, PS3, PC or even Wii. Is this such a rocket science of a matter that it's so difficult for you to comprehend?

And if you think that ALL the multiplatform games ever presented on this website have their best versions on the 360, then keep on hallucinating. I already gave the current MK game as an example out of many others. And furthermore, it wasn't about graphics, framerate and other technical stuff that usually differentiate console versions about MK in particular. No, it was much more than that- it was CONTENT! And yet, they still presented us the 360 version. If you don't have a problem with that, then you probably can't differentiate night from day also, pal.

And I'm not accusing anyone of anything, so stop creating false problems. I'm just curious to know about this manner of presenting me, a guy from their audience, multiplatform titles played only on the 360 for some strange reason, even when there are known substantial differences between versions.

Apart from that, sure, anyone is entitled to have their own private tastes, opinions, biases and such, and nobody should question or, worse, deny them those things, because I think we're all sensible and civilized people here, not corporate ass-kissers and fanboys, right? Right?!

Posted by Meowshi

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Afroman269: Dude, I'm wasting my time with you, really...

Have I asked them to show us each version of the game? No, I was just asking them to show us the BEST version of a game, whether it's 360, PS3, PC or even Wii.

Why would they do that? The Giantbomb audience isn't really PC-centric. There are other websites for that. They review the version of the game the majority of their audience will play.

Posted by YukoAsho

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Afroman269: Dude, I'm wasting my time with you, really...

Have I asked them to show us each version of the game? No, I was just asking them to show us the BEST version of a game, whether it's 360, PS3, PC or even Wii. Is this such a rocket science of a matter that it's so difficult for you to comprehend?

And if you think that ALL the multiplatform games ever presented on this website have their best versions on the 360, then keep on hallucinating. I already gave the current MK game as an example out of many others. And furthermore, it wasn't about graphics, framerate and other technical stuff that usually differentiate console versions about MK in particular. No, it was much more than that- it was CONTENT! And yet, they still presented us the 360 version. If you don't have a problem with that, then you probably won't have an issue differentiating night from day also, pal.

And I'm not accusing anyone of anything, so stop creating false problems. I'm just curious to know about this manner of presenting me, a guy from their audience, multiplatform titles played only on the 360 for some strange reason, even when there are known substantial differences between versions.

Apart from that, sure, anyone is entitled to have their own private tastes, opinions, biases and such, and nobody should question or, worse, deny them those things, because I think we're all sensible and civilized people here, not corporate ass-kissers and fanboys, right? Right?!

I'm with you, Vlad. Jeff's a clear Xbot, and that mindset has bled into the rest of the site. It's unfortunate, really, especially in terms of 2D fighting games, which are just total ASS on the default Xbox 360 pad. A stick or Hori pad are all but mandatory if you buy fighters on the 360, but they'll never tell ya that.

Posted by Afroman269

@YukoAsho said:

I'm with you, Vlad. Jeff's a clear Xbot, and that mindset has bled into the rest of the site. It's unfortunate, really, especially in terms of 2D fighting games, which are just total ASS on the default Xbox 360 pad. A stick or Hori pad are all but mandatory if you buy fighters on the 360, but they'll never tell ya that.

Oh man...I thought this was a sarcastic comment but oh god...he's actually serious...and people still say xbot? I'll just point out that the bomb crew have stated many times that the PS3's pad is far superior but someone who still says xbot would probably miss that statement.

xbot...pff hahahaha
Posted by TatsurouXIII

looked like jason statham on that thumbnail.

Posted by solidejake

Not very good at Splinter Cell, are you?

Edited by Vlad_Tiberius

@Meowshi said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Afroman269: Dude, I'm wasting my time with you, really...

Have I asked them to show us each version of the game? No, I was just asking them to show us the BEST version of a game, whether it's 360, PS3, PC or even Wii.

Why would they do that? The Giantbomb audience isn't really PC-centric. There are other websites for that. They review the version of the game the majority of their audience will play.

So you're saying that their audience is 360-centric instead? That would be insulting if it was real.

@YukoAsho: No, that's an exaggerated statement and I believe Jeff has enough experience with videogames to be called that. There are indeed a lot of fanboys in the videogame media, ex-PR guys and other corporate ass-kissers, jerk-offs and nobodies. Jeff is not one of them. Sorry, but I can't agree with what you've said.

Posted by Meowshi

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Meowshi said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Afroman269: Dude, I'm wasting my time with you, really...

Have I asked them to show us each version of the game? No, I was just asking them to show us the BEST version of a game, whether it's 360, PS3, PC or even Wii.

Why would they do that? The Giantbomb audience isn't really PC-centric. There are other websites for that. They review the version of the game the majority of their audience will play.

So you're saying that their audience is 360-centric instead? That would be insulting if it was real.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. These site has a control-centric audience, with 360 users making up the vast majority. I'm not sure what is "insulting" about that. It's just a fact. When they play multiplatform games it is almost invariably the 360 version. Still, you'll always here them say, "I haven't got a chance to touch the PC version yet, I'm sure it looks and preforms much better!" It's not like they ignore the superior version. They just cover the version that is more relevant to their audience and own gaming preferences.

Posted by shodan2020

All I wanna know is, "Who turned out dee-lights?"

Posted by Kosayn

That "Tom Clancy's!" splash screen bookending the Quick Look. So tacky.

And I mean, It's already bad enough how the whole brand is the name of a dude who wrote some authoritative but not very significant combat fiction back in the 80s.

Not knocking the games though, I love a little stealth.

Edited by Vlad_Tiberius

@Meowshi said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Meowshi said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Afroman269: Dude, I'm wasting my time with you, really...

Have I asked them to show us each version of the game? No, I was just asking them to show us the BEST version of a game, whether it's 360, PS3, PC or even Wii.

Why would they do that? The Giantbomb audience isn't really PC-centric. There are other websites for that. They review the version of the game the majority of their audience will play.

So you're saying that their audience is 360-centric instead? That would be insulting if it was real.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. These site has a control-centric audience, with 360 users making up the vast majority. I'm not sure what is "insulting" about that. It's just a fact. When they play multiplatform games it is almost invariably the 360 version. Still, you'll always here them say, "I haven't got a chance to touch the PC version yet, I'm sure it looks and preforms much better!" It's not like they ignore the superior version. They just cover the version that is more relevant to their audience and own gaming preferences.

How do you know that the vast majority of people here play on the 360? Have you made a poll or research on that? Do you realize that it sounds like saying everybody here drives a Toyota? That's ridiculous, simplistic and even insulting, reducing your audience to a bunch of sheep.

Come on, people come here from all over the world ( it's the internet! ) and play games on all the current consoles, old consoles, PC, handhelds, even old arcade cabinets. To say the vast majority of them have the same habits or tastes and play only on one and the same console it's too much.

If you run a serious, professional videogame website, you address all the gamers, not just a particular kind. And they proved that by discussing a variety of games on all the platforms on the Bombcast, not just the 360.

That's why I'm wondering why are they presenting multiplatform games only on the 360, since they don't have any restrictions approaching every console and games in their discussions.

I just hope it's not another "buy American" crappy nationalist attitude behind it, 'cause that will be ridiculous in this day and age.

Posted by Meowshi

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Meowshi said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Meowshi said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Afroman269: Dude, I'm wasting my time with you, really...

Have I asked them to show us each version of the game? No, I was just asking them to show us the BEST version of a game, whether it's 360, PS3, PC or even Wii.

Why would they do that? The Giantbomb audience isn't really PC-centric. There are other websites for that. They review the version of the game the majority of their audience will play.

So you're saying that their audience is 360-centric instead? That would be insulting if it was real.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. These site has a control-centric audience, with 360 users making up the vast majority. I'm not sure what is "insulting" about that. It's just a fact. When they play multiplatform games it is almost invariably the 360 version. Still, you'll always here them say, "I haven't got a chance to touch the PC version yet, I'm sure it looks and preforms much better!" It's not like they ignore the superior version. They just cover the version that is more relevant to their audience and own gaming preferences.

How do you know that the vast majority of people here play on the 360? Have you made a poll or research on that? Do you realize that it sounds like saying everybody here drives a Toyota? That's ridiculous, simplistic and even insulting, reducing your audience to a bunch of sheep.

Come on, people come here from all over the world ( it's the internet! ) and play games on all the current consoles, old consoles, PC, handhelds, even old arcade cabinets. To say the vast majority of them have the same habits or tastes and play only on one and the same console it's too much.

If you run a serious, professional videogame website, you address all the gamers, not just a particular kind. And they proved that by discussing a variety of games on all the platforms on the Bombcast, not just the 360.

That's why I'm wondering why are they presenting multiplatform games only on the 360, since they don't have any restrictions approaching every console and games in their discussions.

I just hope it's not another "buy American" crappy nationalist attitude behind it, 'cause that will be ridiculous in this day and age.

I haven't done any research or polling. It's just something I've personally noticed. You know; from posting on the forums, reading the comment sections, and looking at the colors that correspond with people's names. I'm more than aware that a lot of people play on PC, Wii, PS3, and many other platforms. I'm not saying they aren't important. I just feel like you're misunderstanding something about this website. Giantbomb is not a large site like Gamespot or IGN. They've been pretty open about their goal being to play the games they want to play and cover the games that they are personally interested in. That's why coverage of certain genres, like JRPGs and sports titles are so lackluster. They don't have the manpower to cover everything, and so they focus their attention on the things they can. It's been like that from the beginning.

They present multiplatform games on the 360 because, like I said, that's what the majority of their audience games on. Brad and Jeff have also stated on separate occasions that publishers will often only send the 360 version of a game. Nevermind the fact that it's no secret that the 360 is the preferred console of the Giantbomb crew. Whenever there is a significant difference between the PS3 and 360 versions of a game, they will make it known (and sometimes even write two reviews). As for always covering the "best" version of the games, i.e. the PC version - well, that simply wouldn't work. When you compare the combined number of console players on the PS3 and 360 to PC players, it's just not a feasible suggestion. There are other sites which tailor to PC gaming. If you think it's unprofessional for them to not go out of their way to cover every version of every game, then maybe this isn't the site for you?

The guys aren't biased. They just are low in number, and let's be honest, the site is great because there's only a handful of recognizable faces reviewing everything. I rarely find that they actively ignore other versions of multiplatform games. For example, look at the Rage quick look. We have Brad/Jeff playing on 360, Patrick playing on PS3, and Brad promising to check out PC version. That's pretty all-inclusive I'll say.

Edited by Vlad_Tiberius

@Meowshi said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Meowshi said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Meowshi said:

@Vlad_Tiberius said:

@Afroman269: Dude, I'm wasting my time with you, really...

Have I asked them to show us each version of the game? No, I was just asking them to show us the BEST version of a game, whether it's 360, PS3, PC or even Wii.

Why would they do that? The Giantbomb audience isn't really PC-centric. There are other websites for that. They review the version of the game the majority of their audience will play.

So you're saying that their audience is 360-centric instead? That would be insulting if it was real.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. These site has a control-centric audience, with 360 users making up the vast majority. I'm not sure what is "insulting" about that. It's just a fact. When they play multiplatform games it is almost invariably the 360 version. Still, you'll always here them say, "I haven't got a chance to touch the PC version yet, I'm sure it looks and preforms much better!" It's not like they ignore the superior version. They just cover the version that is more relevant to their audience and own gaming preferences.

How do you know that the vast majority of people here play on the 360? Have you made a poll or research on that? Do you realize that it sounds like saying everybody here drives a Toyota? That's ridiculous, simplistic and even insulting, reducing your audience to a bunch of sheep.

Come on, people come here from all over the world ( it's the internet! ) and play games on all the current consoles, old consoles, PC, handhelds, even old arcade cabinets. To say the vast majority of them have the same habits or tastes and play only on one and the same console it's too much.

If you run a serious, professional videogame website, you address all the gamers, not just a particular kind. And they proved that by discussing a variety of games on all the platforms on the Bombcast, not just the 360.

That's why I'm wondering why are they presenting multiplatform games only on the 360, since they don't have any restrictions approaching every console and games in their discussions.

I just hope it's not another "buy American" crappy nationalist attitude behind it, 'cause that will be ridiculous in this day and age.

I haven't done any research or polling. It's just something I've personally noticed. You know; from posting on the forums, reading the comment sections, and looking at the colors that correspond with people's names. I'm more than aware that a lot of people play on PC, Wii, PS3, and many other platforms. I'm not saying they aren't important. I just feel like you're misunderstanding something about this website. Giantbomb is not a large site like Gamespot or IGN. They've been pretty open about their goal being to play the games they want to play and cover the games that they are personally interested in. That's why coverage of certain genres, like JRPGs and sports titles are so lackluster. They don't have the manpower to cover everything, and so they focus their attention on the things they can. It's been like that from the beginning.

They present multiplatform games on the 360 because, like I said, that's what the majority of their audience games on. Brad and Jeff have also stated on separate occasions that publishers will often only send the 360 version of a game. Nevermind the fact that it's no secret that the 360 is the preferred console of the Giantbomb crew. Whenever there is a significant difference between the PS3 and 360 versions of a game, they will make it known (and sometimes even write two reviews). As for always covering the "best" version of the games, i.e. the PC version - well, that simply wouldn't work. When you compare the combined number of console players on the PS3 and 360 to PC players, it's just not a feasible suggestion. There are other sites which tailor to PC gaming. If you think it's unprofessional for them to not go out of their way to cover every version of every game, then maybe this isn't the site for you?

The guys aren't biased. They just are low in number, and let's be honest, the site is great because there's only a handful of recognizable faces reviewing everything. I rarely find that they actively ignore other versions of multiplatform games. For example, look at the Rage quick look. We have Brad/Jeff playing on 360, Patrick playing on PS3, and Brad promising to check out PC version. That's pretty all-inclusive I'll say.

Fair enough, I agree. It's just that I don't see why it's so difficult presenting a multiplatform game in it's best version (again, not each and every version, but the BEST version on the market).

If the best version is on the 360, present it on the 360, but if it's on the PS3, present on the PS3 then! You have the tools and the equipment, therefore where's the problem?

Again, if MK had more content for the PS3, therefore being the superior version, then why they presented it on the 360?

Also, Need for Speed Hot Pursuit: why haven't they shown the crappy Wii version, since Wii is more popular than every other console and everybody has one? No, they showed it on -what a surprise- the 360! Why?

Also, since you claim that Brad and Jeff play it on 360, Patrick on PS3 and Brad also promising to check out the PC version, then why they choose to present the 360 version? Is the 360 the lowest common denominator in videogame journalism today? Because I always thought the PC gaming was, since it covered almost every game on the market...

I don't know about you, but when I mention "professionalism" regarding videogame journalism, I don't necessarily expect huge articles covering in detail every J-RPG game or Angry Birds clone on the market. No, I expect just the basic common sense and courtesy to acknowledge, respect and adjust to the simple fact that not all of us here have the same gaming habits, play games just on one console, and that the 360 is not the default console of choice for all of us, not even for the "vast majority".

Need I tell you , since you pride yourself on checking avatars and all the discussions and opinions on this website, that many people here, like myself, are from Europe, where the 360 barely has a market?

Sorry, but your shit is on the internet, guys, therefore, like it or not, it's global, worldwide, visible and available for everyone and anyone, even for people in Somalia, for fuck sake. The internet, no matter how hard you try, because of its global nature, it doesn't provide niches. Even if you try something like talking on the podcast about the latest pick-up line in Kansas or about eating some greasy cheeseburger in Missouri, expect some guy from Japan, Poland or Argentina to know and remember that meaningless shit, because it was public, available worldwide.

And if "unprofessional" sounds too heavy, how about "lazy" then? Don't get me wrong, if I had something deep against these guys and this website, I would have been long gone by now and wouldn't waste my time with this issue here and replying to you. But, since I care about their opinions and this website, I think I'm entitled to make some constructive criticism, just like everybody else, don't you think so? I mean that they wouldn't allow comment boards and forum discussions if they didn't care about opinions, right? Sure, some other websites allow only praises, "politically correct" and positive, cheerful messages, but I always thought GB is above that and certainly above IGN or the current Gamespot.

Those are my 2 cents...

Posted by MrKlorox
@Pr1mus said:

@Afroman269 I guess what i mean is fuck that guy don't waste your time.