@gordoa said:
"@The_A_Drain said:
""The Virtua Fighter games {Except for the first one} are the deepest and balance fighting games of all time, it takes serious skill to play and it's not a n00b friendly button masher " Stopped reading here, basic tactics and a 3 button setup do not = depth, balance or strategy. Virtua Fighter contains only a small amount of these things, this is coming from someone who made great efforts to play the most recent release, and to research and understand it's mechanics. My conclusion was that it was in fact rather shallow, and much like other 3D fighters too focused on the memorisation of lengthy combos over strategic thought to be a decent fighter. It's better than Tekken, DoA and other 3D fighters for sure, but theres no way in hell it compares to Soul Calibur II or almost any 2D fighter around. the rest of your comment is misinformed garbage as well, it does not dominate the arcade scene, nor the competetive fighting scene. Nor does being the first series of 3D fighter automatically mean it's the 'best'. Also, for your information, other fighters used 3D before virtua fighter. "
Yeah, after all not using brain power doesn't take skill in any shape or form. Critics beg to differ as Virtua Fighter 4 currently holds a 94 rating on metacritic.com "
You're quoting me metacritic in order to back your opinion that Virtua Fighter has merit on the competitive scene? Wow, give me that facepalm.jpg, I need to use it more than you do.
The competetive scene and the critical scene judge fighters on two completely different sets of criteria, they aren't even comparable.
How about you link me to a thriving tournament and competetive play community instead? Oh wait, you can't, because there isn't one, because the game has no competetive merit. It certainly has more than other popular 3D fighters, but nowhere near enough that any serious competetive community bothers with it.
It's ok to be a fan of Virtua Fighter, noones denying you that, but you can't come up in here claiming it's "Teh bestest" spouting factually incorrect information about it's popularity on the competetive scene and the arcade scene without expecting a volatile response. It's not popular in the arcades or on the competetive scene for a reason, reason being depth, strategy and balance are important to those scenes, Virtua Fighter has very little of those things, whether you want to see it or not. If it did, it would have a thriving tournament scene, after all it's not like tournament scenes die out because a game is old, if VF4 really was 'teh bested evar' it would still have a thriving tournament scene, like many other older fighters (much older fighters).