I mean seriously, it's so fucking obvious it's not even funny. This needs to happen ASAP.
Game » consists of 1 releases. Released on 2013
While WarCry would make sense in light of their previous game and technology names (Far Cry, Crysis, CryEngine) as well as company name (Crytek), the real reason I suspect they went with "Warface" is probably the fact that "Warcry" is pretty generic and would, therefore, be hard to protect as an unique trademark.
Because Warface is a dumb name I can rally behind.
In terms of sheer amount of dumb, Warface wins. At least Warcry would have made sense on multiple levels.
I have no idea. Warface is such a bad title.
I think Warface is so dumb that it's great.
Actually, I think CryFace would be a much better name
@Winternet said:
Sure, because WarFace isn't generic at all.
But in terms of securing and establishing a name for their product/service WarFace was probably more unique - as strange as that name is ;)
They should call their next game CryWar and make it some sort of internet forum-simulator.
That RPS article blows me away, It's much easier to see what happened to Crysis2 when you see that Yerli is living in a fantasy land. It seems he isn't down to earth enough to focus on the important things like gameplay but not crazy enough to actually create something really unique. . . .
God I loved the first half of Crysis, I'd be fine with more of that.
@Superfriend said:
They should call their next game CryWar and make it some sort of internet forum-simulator.
That's meta
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment