Follow

World of Warcraft

Game » consists of 8 releases. First released on Nov 23, 2004

World of Warcraft is an MMORPG that takes place in Blizzard Entertainment's popular Warcraft universe; at its peak, it boasted a player base of over 12.5 million subscribers, making it the most popular MMO of all time.

Duncan Jones Taking Reins of World of Warcraft Movie

  • 147 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
#101 Posted by Sumna (6 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Moon is an amazing movie. Sam Rockwell should play Arthas.

#102 Posted by Hunter5024 (2706 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

So my knowledge of movie budgets is relatively limited, but isn't 100 million somewhat low for a movie that will need lots of effects like this one?

Online
#103 Posted by LarryDavis (264 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

@Zuldim said:

@LarryDavis said:

@Zuldim said:

Ok, sure, I loved Moon, and The Source Code was pretty good, even if the ending didn't make much sense.

spoiler, none of source code made sense. :V

It was a fun, soft sci-fi thriller until the end, but in the last ~15 minutes it started contradicting the rules it set up earlier on how the "time travel" actually worked.

Not sure what you thought didn't make sense other than the end, I'd love to hear it.

Wasn't the "time travel" based on the remnants of memories the people on the train had? If that was the case, he shouldn't have been able to see anything that they couldn't like the bomb, or their reactions to things he did that never happened.

I dunno, I liked the movie overall, but that was kind of bugging me. If they hadn't bothered to give that explanation, and did just go "you're Quantum Leaping, whatever", it would have been fine.

#104 Posted by eulogize_my_baked_goods (117 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

This is the craziest thing I've heard in ages. I love Jones' work but leading up a WoW movie? On the surface it seems an odd fit. Still, maybe this will be one of those gigs that will fund the kind of stuff he really excels at (read, thought provoking Sci-Fi) so is worth being attached to.

#105 Posted by GinjaAssassin (121 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

@Wampa1 said:

@Branthog: I wouldn't this'll be his payday movie so he can go and make whatever he wants afterwards. And if it makes cash I bet he can pull an Nolan and mold his vision into big films.

Glad you made that point as I was having the same feelings as @Branthog. Worst comes to worst, it gives Jones more exposure - hopefully more good than bad.

#106 Posted by Hunter5024 (2706 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

@eulogize_my_baked_goods said:

This is the craziest thing I've heard in ages. I love Jones' work but leading up a WoW movie? On the surface it seems an odd fit. Still, maybe this will be one of those gigs that will fund the kind of stuff he really excels at (read, thought provoking Sci-Fi) so is worth being attached to.

The skills required to do good sci-fi and good fantasy are relatively similar. They both fall under the banner of speculative fiction, and while they are the opposite of each other in many ways, they are still more closely related than most genres are.

Online
#107 Posted by flippyandnod (76 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Duncan Jones was just getting too many kudos for making good movies. It was inevitable Hollywood would tap him to make a piece of shit.

So Jones decides to go big and go all the way to the limit and make a video game movie.

Such a horrible way to turn from wunderkind (aka early M. Night Shamayalan) to peddler of pap (aka current M. Night Shamayalan).

#108 Posted by Doppelgamer (217 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

I really don't see this movie working out. The games were great fun, but the odds seem horribly set against films of this nature (game-based) doing well.

#109 Edited by stinky (1531 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

if its blizzard CG or better i'm in. 
hope the middle of the film isn't a grind though. 
 
vote is for Nefarian being the villain or the "you are not prepared" guy (BC) whose name i can't remember.  
 
ending credits should list loot won at the end as well. 

#110 Posted by CH3BURASHKA (3918 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Can't we all just admit this ain't happening?

#111 Posted by DeviTiffany (329 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

The cynicism toward video game movies before we even see a second of footage makes me sad. It just continues to propagate a self fulfilling prophecy. No one will see the movie because they've already decided it's crap before it comes out so it doesn't make any money, and if studios don't think the movie will make money then they won't put any effort into it. I like waiting for a trailer or something before start getting all cynical about it.

#112 Edited by frankfartmouth (907 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Pppppbbbbbttt. Source Code and Moon were both good. I hate to see a skilled director go the way of the gaming movie. Someday somebody will crack the code, but until then, I'll safely assume it's going to suck shit.

EDIT: I'm glad Raimi backed out. Not a good sign for the movie though.

#113 Edited by Darkstorn (343 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Regardless of the quality of the film, is WoW still culturally significant enough for this movie to be successful?

I feel that apart from a few million addicts, the mainstream games press has moved on from WoW as a cultural touchstone, as has pop culture in general. Am I wrong?

EDIT: Just read that this is specifically a Warcraft movie, not a WoW movie. I don't think most of the moviegoing public distinguishes between WCII, WCIII and WoW, largely because those games are even older! Not to mention that they made much less of a mark on mainstream culture.

#114 Posted by subyman (334 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Live action?

#115 Posted by Zuldim (282 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

@LarryDavis said:

@Zuldim said:

@LarryDavis said:

@Zuldim said:

Ok, sure, I loved Moon, and The Source Code was pretty good, even if the ending didn't make much sense.

spoiler, none of source code made sense. :V

It was a fun, soft sci-fi thriller until the end, but in the last ~15 minutes it started contradicting the rules it set up earlier on how the "time travel" actually worked.

Not sure what you thought didn't make sense other than the end, I'd love to hear it.

Wasn't the "time travel" based on the remnants of memories the people on the train had? If that was the case, he shouldn't have been able to see anything that they couldn't like the bomb, or their reactions to things he did that never happened.

I dunno, I liked the movie overall, but that was kind of bugging me. If they hadn't bothered to give that explanation, and did just go "you're Quantum Leaping, whatever", it would have been fine.

So that's a good point. The way I figure it (and the only thing which makes the ending make any sense at all) is that the scientist who made the machine didn't understand how it actually worked (I know that's stupid, but bear with me). He thought that it let you live out the memories of this other guy, Assassin's Creed style, but it actually did Quantum Leap you into this person, in another possible dimension. Thus, every time the train exploded, that train really exploded in another dimension, and then shocked What's-His-Name back, to go to another dimension.

At the ending, he actually makes a "perfect run" of the level, and so he doesn't die, and gets to continue on in this universe, living out some shmuck's life. The train never explodes, so the project never uses him to stop it in this dimension, and they wait for a disaster to use him with. (End film.) Eventually, another disaster happens, they use him to stop it, the same thing happens, he makes a "perfect run" of that dimension, and lives out some other regular shmuck's life (thus there are now two What's-His-Face's walking around in other people's bodies.

Now admittedly, that doesn't make total sense either, but it's the only thing which makes the ending anything other than nonsensical.

So yeah, you're right, that was a weird leap of logic, I'd rather they had just been quantum leaping properly instead.

#116 Posted by probablytuna (2529 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

I'd prefer Duncan Jones to focus on making his own materials cause Moon was freaking fantastic. I liked Source Code but not as much as his debut film. This isn't getting me very excited for the project.

#117 Posted by Voysa_Reezun (21 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Hey, I am all for this because I really like Duncan Jones. If this is a hit and it gives him enough cache to finally get funding for Mute, it will have been worth it. I might even see it, as much as I don't car about Warcraft at all, just because he's shooting it.

#118 Posted by TooWalrus (11836 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Coming to theaters in twenty-oh-never.

#119 Posted by msavo (7277 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

This will never get made.

#120 Posted by hidys (848 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

say WHAT?????

#121 Posted by Doctorchimp (3978 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

@rebgav said:

@Undeadpool said:

@rebgav said:

@Undeadpool said:

Well he's a better director, so it's a step in the right direction. And I really never noticed HOW MUCH he looks like his dad...

@rebgav said:

@Hailinel said:

@zeekthegeek

@Doctorchimp said:

This better just end up being Labyrinth 2.

Well he is David Bowie's son.

That's the joke.

Nah, the "joke" is that Duncan Jones can't have a career or reputation of his own because his father was so successful.

"Hi, I'm Duncan Jones, director of 'Moon'."

YOU USED TO BE IN DAVID BOWIE'S BALLS!

It's a sadness.

As Max Landis pointed out: the idea of nepotism in Hollywood is somewhat overblown, no producer or company is going to let you make an entire movie just because you're someone's kid, they might as well buy you a HOUSE.

The fuck are you talking about? I was referring to the fact that, much as is on display in this thread, you can't say the man's name without everyone immediately blathering on about his father.

Duder, dial back a notch, I was AGREEING with you saying that it's sad that people think you could launch such a fantastic directing career just cause your dad's a famous singer (who you distanced yourself from by changing your name).

I was confused, not angry :p

I don't know if people think he's benefiting from being Bowie's son, they just seem to completely diminish or ignore him in favor of making Bowie references. I do wonder if it would be different if he used the name, it might mitigate some of the chatter 'cause there'd be little point in smugly pointing out who his family are.

Yup, I totally didn't support Moon and Source Code by tracking it down in the theaters and then buying the blu rays. I'm just making David Bowie jokes and diminishing this man's entire existence.

Sorry, but nothing this kid will do will top Major Tom...

How's that? Are you crying for the spawn of David Bowie now?

This message was deleted
#123 Posted by Evercaptor (336 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Makes a change from them just ripping off movies like Kung Fu Panda, am I right?

#124 Posted by Grixxel (536 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Oh look, four years later and we're still talking about -maybe- making the movie! Phew! Here I thought it was never going to be made.

#125 Posted by MeatSim (9315 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

I can't believe someone is still trying to make this movie happen after all these years.

#126 Posted by hollitz (651 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Wonder if the movie will look like a PSONE game.

#127 Posted by LarryDavis (264 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

@Zuldim: Actually, this is precisely what I was expecting the end twist to be, and I guess you could still interpret it that way. It just ended up going in a way stranger direction.

Dr. Jake Gyllenhaal never returned home.

#128 Posted by Bourbon_Warrior (4525 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

The guy that is famous for being David Bowies son.

#129 Edited by Bourbon_Warrior (4525 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

@Darkstorn said:

Regardless of the quality of the film, is WoW still culturally significant enough for this movie to be successful?

I feel that apart from a few million addicts, the mainstream games press has moved on from WoW as a cultural touchstone, as has pop culture in general. Am I wrong?

EDIT: Just read that this is specifically a Warcraft movie, not a WoW movie. I don't think most of the moviegoing public distinguishes between WCII, WCIII and WoW, largely because those games are even older! Not to mention that they made much less of a mark on mainstream culture.

Doesn't matter it's a fantasy movie, people will go. 10+ million subscribers will probably see it multiple times, plus buy the collectors edition Blu Rays and Merch. It just has to be a good movie, that is different enough from Peter Jacksons vision of middle earth or else it will just look like a LOTR rip off to the general public.

#130 Posted by iainfarrell (22 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

I can't think of a better choice. I have high hopes, his previous work was creative, successful and I think he respects his stories.

#131 Posted by Mushir (2324 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Moon was amazing. Source Code was shit. I don't completely trust this director yet.

#132 Posted by moywar700 (174 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

Where is my Runescape movie?

#133 Posted by SamDrugbringer (992 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

@Bourbon_Warrior said:

@Darkstorn said:

Regardless of the quality of the film, is WoW still culturally significant enough for this movie to be successful?

I feel that apart from a few million addicts, the mainstream games press has moved on from WoW as a cultural touchstone, as has pop culture in general. Am I wrong?

EDIT: Just read that this is specifically a Warcraft movie, not a WoW movie. I don't think most of the moviegoing public distinguishes between WCII, WCIII and WoW, largely because those games are even older! Not to mention that they made much less of a mark on mainstream culture.

Doesn't matter it's a fantasy movie, people will go. 10+ million subscribers will probably see it multiple times, plus buy the collectors edition Blu Rays and Merch. It just has to be a good movie, that is different enough from Peter Jacksons vision of middle earth or else it will just look like a LOTR rip off to the general public.

There are not 10 million WoW subscribers anymore, much less in North America (And I'm not sure what ticket prices are in places like China.) AND I doubt they will see it multiple times unless it is really great.

#134 Edited by Bourbon_Warrior (4525 posts) - 3 months, 24 days ago

@SamDrugbringer said:

@Bourbon_Warrior said:

@Darkstorn said:

Regardless of the quality of the film, is WoW still culturally significant enough for this movie to be successful?

I feel that apart from a few million addicts, the mainstream games press has moved on from WoW as a cultural touchstone, as has pop culture in general. Am I wrong?

EDIT: Just read that this is specifically a Warcraft movie, not a WoW movie. I don't think most of the moviegoing public distinguishes between WCII, WCIII and WoW, largely because those games are even older! Not to mention that they made much less of a mark on mainstream culture.

Doesn't matter it's a fantasy movie, people will go. 10+ million subscribers will probably see it multiple times, plus buy the collectors edition Blu Rays and Merch. It just has to be a good movie, that is different enough from Peter Jacksons vision of middle earth or else it will just look like a LOTR rip off to the general public.

There are not 10 million WoW subscribers anymore, much less in North America (And I'm not sure what ticket prices are in places like China.) AND I doubt they will see it multiple times unless it is really great.

More than 10 million subscribers when Panda expansion was released last year, movies are released to more countries than USA and Canada.

Budget is 100 million dollars, meaning they would only need each subscriber of WOW to watch it once to be close to making back it's budget, plus other people than just WOW players will watch it, it's a fantasy movie.

#135 Posted by Sharpless (396 posts) - 3 months, 23 days ago

@moywar700 said:

Where is my Runescape movie?

Direct-to-YouTube.

#136 Posted by Discoman (122 posts) - 3 months, 23 days ago

Well I think the success of the movie hinges on if its more of a Warcraft movie than a WOW movie. Jones is a superb director and I hope he does well with this so he can get his Mute movie off the ground.

#137 Posted by benpicko (1515 posts) - 3 months, 23 days ago

@Bourbon_Warrior said:

The guy that is famous for being David Bowies son.

Have you actually seen any of the films that he's directed?

#138 Posted by nerdsbeware (223 posts) - 3 months, 23 days ago

@Efesell said:

I (still) love WoW, but I'll never be interested in a movie unless its Blizzard CG.

Yea, this. But like others are saying, way past it's prime.

#139 Posted by SamDrugbringer (992 posts) - 3 months, 23 days ago

@Bourbon_Warrior said:

@SamDrugbringer said:

@Bourbon_Warrior said:

@Darkstorn said:

Regardless of the quality of the film, is WoW still culturally significant enough for this movie to be successful?

I feel that apart from a few million addicts, the mainstream games press has moved on from WoW as a cultural touchstone, as has pop culture in general. Am I wrong?

EDIT: Just read that this is specifically a Warcraft movie, not a WoW movie. I don't think most of the moviegoing public distinguishes between WCII, WCIII and WoW, largely because those games are even older! Not to mention that they made much less of a mark on mainstream culture.

Doesn't matter it's a fantasy movie, people will go. 10+ million subscribers will probably see it multiple times, plus buy the collectors edition Blu Rays and Merch. It just has to be a good movie, that is different enough from Peter Jacksons vision of middle earth or else it will just look like a LOTR rip off to the general public.

There are not 10 million WoW subscribers anymore, much less in North America (And I'm not sure what ticket prices are in places like China.) AND I doubt they will see it multiple times unless it is really great.

More than 10 million subscribers when Panda expansion was released last year, movies are released to more countries than USA and Canada.

Budget is 100 million dollars, meaning they would only need each subscriber of WOW to watch it once to be close to making back it's budget, plus other people than just WOW players will watch it, it's a fantasy movie.

That was a LONG time ago. Most estimates are the player base has dropped even faster then it did during Cata. It's not 10 million.

And again, I really don't think every single person who plays the game will see a movie about it.

I mean, I'm not trying to say I don't think it'll make it's money back, I think there's a good chance, I just don't see WoW players being the driving audience for it anymore. Maybe ex-wow players, of which there are a LOT of, and fantasy movie fans in general like you said.

#140 Edited by EXTomar (2236 posts) - 3 months, 23 days ago

Even at 5 million that would make WoW the biggest MMO by a big margin.

As for a movie, as long as it is couched as a solid movie that just happens to be founded on WoW it can do fine. Stay away from the tin foil hat stuff and just do "evil bad guys want to rule the world but elves, dwarves, humans and orcs beat them up!" and it will be fine.

#141 Posted by Coombs (3436 posts) - 3 months, 23 days ago

Son of a bitch

If this movie re-ignites a desire to play WoW I am going to be very upset

#142 Posted by Meltac (1890 posts) - 3 months, 22 days ago

I thought he was waaay younger than 41, don't know why.

#143 Posted by ahaisthisourchance (1663 posts) - 3 months, 22 days ago

Does watching the movie require a monthly subscription?

#144 Posted by Mikular (131 posts) - 3 months, 22 days ago

I like this guy's movies, and the fact that he's the spawn of Bowie only sweetens the pot. Here's hoping he pulls something worthwhile out of this crap. Who knows, maybe I'll get an adaptation movie that I love unironically this time.

#145 Edited by Krakn3Dfx (2089 posts) - 3 months, 22 days ago

So this is that Choose Your Own Adventure Movie they were talking about.

I wonder if the first scene will be the main character beating sleeping peons with a blackjack.

#146 Posted by horseman6 (117 posts) - 3 months, 22 days ago

@Zuldim said:

@LarryDavis said:

@Zuldim said:

Ok, sure, I loved Moon, and The Source Code was pretty good, even if the ending didn't make much sense.

spoiler, none of source code made sense. :V

It was a fun, soft sci-fi thriller until the end, but in the last ~15 minutes it started contradicting the rules it set up earlier on how the "time travel" actually worked.

Not sure what you thought didn't make sense other than the end, I'd love to hear it.

There wasn't any time travel so it didn't really contradict itself.

#147 Posted by Zuldim (282 posts) - 3 months, 22 days ago

@horseman6 said:

@Zuldim said:

@LarryDavis said:

@Zuldim said:

Ok, sure, I loved Moon, and The Source Code was pretty good, even if the ending didn't make much sense.

spoiler, none of source code made sense. :V

It was a fun, soft sci-fi thriller until the end, but in the last ~15 minutes it started contradicting the rules it set up earlier on how the "time travel" actually worked.

Not sure what you thought didn't make sense other than the end, I'd love to hear it.

There wasn't any time travel so it didn't really contradict itself.

According to the end of the movie it really was time travel after all though.
#148 Posted by Stubee (366 posts) - 3 months, 21 days ago

Great Director but more importantly, he is David Bowie's son!

#149 Posted by fisk0 (2123 posts) - 3 months, 21 days ago

@Discoman said:

Well I think the success of the movie hinges on if its more of a Warcraft movie than a WOW movie. Jones is a superb director and I hope he does well with this so he can get his Mute movie off the ground.

Yeah, I'm not sure about this. The WarCraft series have always had this weird contrast between the cutscenes and the tone in-game. Pretty serious and Warhammer derivative cutscenes, and then the kinda jokey in-game voice acting. The first three games were still pretty serious and story heavy over all, but WOW pretty much degraded into a collection of pop culture references set amongst the setpieces of a fantasy game.

I'm not quite sure what's even disctinctively WarCraft anymore, the RTS games are getting quite old at this point, and are probably unrecognizable as WarCraft for the current WOW fans, and if the movie follows in the footsteps of WOW it would pretty much just become an Seltzer/Friedberg Lord of the Rings parody movie.

#150 Posted by Svenzon (552 posts) - 3 months, 21 days ago

Half of the dialogue will be quotes from other media, if Blizzard's own writing is anything to go by. All the obnoxious references had a huge part in me not sticking with World of Warcraft.

If you look at it from the bright side, however, this will probably make a lot of money for Jones and he'll be able to make that loose sci-fi trilogy he's been talking about. Moon is supposed to be the first, with one direct follow-up and one "spiritual" sequel set in the same universe.

Please Log In
  • 147 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.

Use your keyboard!

  • ESC