Sorry, I voted nothing because I don't want this. It's just a more glorified version of an eyetoy..

I honestly think the games will be dumb but have their place, but moving threw the menus and all the other crazy stuff they say it will do hell ya sign me up. welcome to the FUTURE!

I don't even care about it. But if I got it I would probably be willing to pay $60 or less.

nothing unless a dev surprises me with a really good looking game. 
Since Bethesda and bungie are apparently both experimenting with it, this may happen, but until we see an actual game being played with Natal, I'm going to say i wont get it.

not a damn thing

I won't pay anything for it.

60 but I know it will probably hit around 100 or 120.

I voted B (maybe if they gave it to me) because the only way this will end up on my system is if they package it in with a title I'm purchasing anyway. If it comes with Fable 3, Halo Reach (yeah right) or a few other select fall '10 titles, then I'll own one. If it's packaged with a wii sports clone, then forget about it.

I refuse to have natal in my house, its retarded.

Im English

" I voted nothing because the only way this will end up on my system is if they package it in with a title I'm purchasing anyway. If it comes with Fable 3, Halo Reach (yeah right) or a few other select fall '10 titles, then I'll own one. If it's packaged with a wii sports clone, then forget about it. "

For me it's going to heavily depend on the games available.  If it's nothing but casual marketed crap, then I have nothing against them trying to capture that market, but I'm 100% not interested.
There's definitely some aspects of it that seem very interesting, and the people immediatly writting it off, or calling it a glorified eye toy are really missing the big picture.
 
Give me a Black & White 3 on the thing, and I'll gladly pay the asking price no matter what it is.

It really depends on what capabilities the production version ACTUALLY has and on how developers use those capabilities to make games.  Until I see games, I'm not sure how I can determine what it is worth to me.  Currently my interest is low.  However, if games come out using it in interesting ways, I would pay for it.  How much I would pay really depends on the quality of the software available.    

I would pay up to $100 if it had interesting games on it and it actually worked as they say it's going to work.

I'd pay $80 for it.  But it's all but been confirmed that it'll retail for about $60.

" I'd pay $80 for it.  But it's all but been confirmed that it'll retail for about $60. "

i would pay 60 for it and 1 game.

It's realistic for us to predict Natal to be $50-$60. But I would pay $1,000 for it, or a penny. We still don't really know what Natal is, and its level of awesomeness.

Nothing. I have no interest in waving my arms and legs about like a monkey in front of the TV. If I wanted to do that I'd join the circus.

"Sorry, I voted nothing because I don't want this. It's just a more glorified version of an eyetoy.. "

I chose "maybe if they gave it to me." I have no interest in NATAL and I think its rather stupid that Microsoft is pushing it so much. The audience that owns their console I would argue in the majority, doesn't really care about this. 
 
If it somehow ends up being just amazing and revolutionary I may get on board but I am highly skeptical that it really is going to do much in the way of games. I'm sorry, but I want a controller, want to feel that weight and control in my hand.

While I was totally stunned by it's presentation at E3, I really can't imagine it panning out that well. Really, just look at the Wii. I like Natal's concept, just like I liked the Wii's concept, but MS really needs to show how well Natal can execute it's abilities in games before I'll consider buying it. The technology is no doubt impressive, but how well will that translate to gameplay? Time will tell. 
 
I wonder how Microsoft will sell it. Many thing they'll start bundling it with 360s, but then that'll force everyone else that already has a 360 to buy one separately, which doesn't seem fair. They could end up bundling it with Halo Reach or something...

They had to pay me to act like an idiot in my living room. 
 
... Okay, maybe the Wii does that already, but Natal, besides being just plain stupid, takes that concept to a whole new level.

i'll decide when it gets out in the wild, and if it works as good as they say... i'd probably pay $120 for it.

" @FluxWaveZ said:

" I'd pay $80 for it.  But it's all but been confirmed that it'll retail for about $60. "

I thought that was still a rumor, I know Michael Pachter seem to believe it's only going to sell for $50, I think at least $60 or $80 "

$80; until I am loaded with money that's the final mark.

Like ANY consumer product it depends entirely on the quality of the product.  I don't have a ton of hope for NATAL being any good, but if it turned out incredibly awesome and outrageous I'd probably put down a few hundred.  That's the way it is with anything.

I like the concept, and if a few 3rd party devs hop on, then I think this is definitely worth dropping $80. Not to much over that at start, but hey, who knows anything, really?

$60 bundled with Mass Effect 2.  Pew pew pew.

Nothing.  But if they were to give it to me for FREE...

It seems like it will be cool at first, but it will just end up like the Eye Toy.

That is the ugliest peripheral I've ever seen...what, do you get a free bowl of soup when you buy Natal?  
 
I don't know. I'm not a fan (yet). I'd like to see what they do with it. The amount of good stuff they make for it is directly related to how much I'd pay for it.

i would pay up to $100 for it. 80 was the closest to 100. i'm not to interested in it as i can see that it won't be good. it is going to need some good games that the controls are also good.

I say the price a game. May be more if it really launches with some good software. 

$60.  If it gets bundled with a game I give a shit about, I'd probably pay up to $100.

I voted nothing , because thus far I have seen no games in motion that are utilizing natal that interest me in away or targeted towards me. Show me some games and than will can speak on pricing , till than blah 

60 bucks with a couple of Rare mini-games.

I'd buy that for a dollar.

Sorry, but the correct option would have been "I'd buy that for a dollar!"

" i would pay up to $100 for it. 80 was the closest to 100. i'm not to interested in it as i can see that it won't be good. it is going to need some good games that the controls are also good. "

 I'm not interested in it right now so zippie. Nothing I've seen thus far has sold me on the product. Not sure where all of the excitement is coming from to be honest.

$0.00

Shouldn't cost more than a game unless it come packed with a bunch of mini games. Would not pay over $100 for it.

As much as it takes for them to put the discrete processor back in it.

with all the tech thats inside it, i really doubt it will be less than $60.

Don't want it, don't care about it. I just don't see how a game not completely based around a gimmick could work on the thing. Seriously, has anyone seen an actual game for this thing besides that virtual goalkeeper thing? I predict shovelware minigame collections in Microsoft's future.

" Sorry, I voted nothing because I don't want this. It's just a more glorified version of an eyetoy.. "