The first two games are still completely playable, contrary to what I said only a couple of weeks ago. There may be something of an adjustment period if you are jumping backwards through the series, the targeting system as you know it is almost non-existent in the first game. Also the English localization is fairly spotty, the game really does not lend itself well to an English voice cast, especially when they do a bad job to begin with.
Yakuza 2 is great, it seems to strike the balance between game-play and story the best out of the entire series. Osaka is a great location, looking back now it really freshens things up. The lack of a new locale is a complaint I'd use against 4.
Yakuza 3 has an odd pace to it as mentioned, its mainly because very little game-play takes place for an hour or two after the initial tutorials. Things definitely pick up, but in the grand scheme of things the story you could really placed on the fringes in comparison to the others. Still if you liked it, that's a good indicator you will definitely like what's to follow in regards to the other games.
Yakuza 4 is great, not all the characters were a hit for me (Saejima) but they really helped to change what had been a well-worn formula at this point, both in story as well as gameplay. The variety is its key strength, doing everything that is on offer will take a long time (coming from someone who has the platinum trophy). Also the storyline and side-quests have numerous nods littered throughout to the earlier games. The length of the main game is definitely comparative to 3.
The only warning I would give is that the games could become something of a grind if you play them so close together, especially if you are set to complete as much as you can. Going back in the series should be a nice experience if you an interest in the overall lore, the series has always had an interest in its overarching continuity.
Log in to comment