Zombie vs. Nuclear Fallout

Zombie

A term used to (inaccurately) describe the walking dead. They feed largely on the flesh of the living, but are sometimes depicted as craving brains specifically. They often move slowly, due to rigor mortis, but are extremely deadly in large numbers. Unfortunately, they're always found in groups. Shotgun time!

Zombie vs. Nuclear Fallout

#1 Posted by PaulPredator (12 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Which is better? Why?

#2 Posted by PaulPredator (12 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Continuation of this week's BOMBCASTS conversation. I would go with zombies, because you get to "smoke" fools as Jeff Gerstmann would say, lol.

#3 Posted by hungrynun (442 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Zombie Invasion.

I have a plan ready already.

#4 Posted by epic_pets (1339 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Zombie enough said

#5 Posted by tec3297 (1170 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Nuclear fallout of course.

#6 Posted by Dolphin_Butter (1871 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Zombie invasion.

#7 Posted by Foil_Charizard (345 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Zombies, 28 Days later style.

#8 Posted by Mexalen (232 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Zombies, definatly.
Actually I am rather prepared for Z-Day ..but I wouldn't know what to do if it came to a nuclear holocaust.

I guess it's just easier to fight a brain-hungry undead then deadly radiation :)

#9 Posted by Gyroz1989 (36 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Nuclear Fallout.
There is a chance that it may create radioactive zombies.

#10 Posted by AnTiPRO (93 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Zombies are much more fun. Complete anarchy and destruction in the streets=ownage

#11 Posted by PaulPredator (12 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

See nuclear fallout makes it more challenging. You wouldn't be able to go to the bakery and kill zombies with cupcakes. Dead Rising style. Plus you can haz mansions, cars, not too mention all the oil and gas in the world.

#12 Edited by Mexalen (232 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

being confined to a subterranean bunker? just not fun.

always on the run from the undead? could be worse...

also, it takes decades if not hundreds of years, till you can get back to the surface, and everything has changed and is destroyed and so on. If the Z come? Well, it might take a while, but you can fight these off, and be rid of it. And most of the world is still intact.

#13 Posted by Mr_Bauer (398 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

zombie invasion

#14 Posted by AquaGeneral (113 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Zombie Invasion, unless they are quick zombies like in 28 Weeks Later and there is no stupid airbourne spread.

A nuclear fallout would just be boring and daunting.

#15 Posted by Soulglove (143 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

I'm prepared for both already. Earth might as well reset with either.

#16 Posted by Deusoma (2854 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

I'm gonna go with nuclear fallout, if for no other reason than I hate zombies with a passion normally reserved for the love a man has for a woman.

#17 Posted by Termite (2393 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Nuclear Fallout. Zombies would give me a heart attack

#18 Posted by TheGTAvaccine (2883 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

Zombies...oooh yes zombies...

#19 Posted by MagusMaleficus (1006 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

I have to go with zombies, because we could survive a zombie holocaust. Humans wouldn't survive massive nuclear fallout.

Comment and Save