Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Apple Inc.

    Company »

    Apple Inc., originally Apple Computer, is a computer company founded in 1977 by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. Famous for creating and owning both the software and hardware of their computers, they pursued this strategy in other consumer products, with the most notable being the iPod and iPhone.

    Apple console possibilities?

    Avatar image for dalai
    Dalai

    7868

    Forum Posts

    955

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By Dalai

    Some time ago, Apple had their sights on the gaming industry... handhelds and consoles were on the agenda.  I think many of us laughed back then, but now the iPhone has become the new talk of the town with its growing lineup of games.  The DS is getting a bit jealous now of the talk the iPhone has been getting.

    I am convinced now that Apple will once again dabble in console gaming with a Pippin 2 of sorts... God help us if they made a Pippin 2.  No way will they make that mistake again... they'll put a lot of thought into this one, except for the name, maybe.  The iPad, perhaps?  The iGame or iBox... or iWii?  Eh, who knows.  What I know is Apple has a lot of resources at their disposal and I expect a next-gen console from Apple to be loaded with goodies like an iPod dock or iPhone connectivity... iTunes on your console?  Could happen.  Trust me, Apple could totally rival Microsoft at their online game, rival Sony in multimedia apps, and maybe even rival Nintendo in gaming innovation.

    Apple, next-gen could be yours if you don't relive the sins of the past and be the Apple you have been the past few years.

    Avatar image for dalai
    Dalai

    7868

    Forum Posts

    955

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    #1  Edited By Dalai

    Some time ago, Apple had their sights on the gaming industry... handhelds and consoles were on the agenda.  I think many of us laughed back then, but now the iPhone has become the new talk of the town with its growing lineup of games.  The DS is getting a bit jealous now of the talk the iPhone has been getting.

    I am convinced now that Apple will once again dabble in console gaming with a Pippin 2 of sorts... God help us if they made a Pippin 2.  No way will they make that mistake again... they'll put a lot of thought into this one, except for the name, maybe.  The iPad, perhaps?  The iGame or iBox... or iWii?  Eh, who knows.  What I know is Apple has a lot of resources at their disposal and I expect a next-gen console from Apple to be loaded with goodies like an iPod dock or iPhone connectivity... iTunes on your console?  Could happen.  Trust me, Apple could totally rival Microsoft at their online game, rival Sony in multimedia apps, and maybe even rival Nintendo in gaming innovation.

    Apple, next-gen could be yours if you don't relive the sins of the past and be the Apple you have been the past few years.

    Avatar image for brukaoru
    brukaoru

    5135

    Forum Posts

    12346

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #2  Edited By brukaoru

    iPad, lol. AppleBox!

    Although competition is a good thing, I think having 4 consoles on the market, plus two more if you add the PSP and DS, is hard enough to keep up with in terms of games. If Apple made a console, I can't really see where many people would be interested unless they somehow managed to get major exclusive titles to their system that people were eager to play.

    Avatar image for clarke0
    clarke0

    1082

    Forum Posts

    1622

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #3  Edited By clarke0

    The Wii is basically what I think Apple would make. The only good games are first-party, the system has the worst hardware and is very expensive for what you get. It's also the most durable and reliable of the consoles.

    Avatar image for coakroach
    coakroach

    2499

    Forum Posts

    27

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #4  Edited By coakroach

    Apple should focus on working with valve to make a good, reliable gaming PC with full steam support
    I think they could make something effing awesome if they worked together

    Avatar image for daniel_beck_90
    daniel_beck_90

    3243

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #5  Edited By daniel_beck_90

    if Apple do so it will lose

    Avatar image for silvur
    siLVUR

    124

    Forum Posts

    15

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #6  Edited By siLVUR

    No because gamers don't just want a nice looking  console, they want a console that can actually do something besides tell itself it looks pretty. Not to mention gamers don't want to oggle it mindlessly thinking what they think they can do with it because it's a console but only to see it can't because it's just not the same. In the end, gamers with an Apple console can only look back and wonder if that weird smell coming from the melting material of the console will cause cancer.

    Avatar image for bjorno
    bjorno

    1476

    Forum Posts

    509

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #7  Edited By bjorno
    siLVUR said:
    "No because gamers don't just want a nice looking  console, they want a console that can actually do something besides tell itself it looks pretty. Not to mention gamers don't want to oggle it mindlessly thinking what they think they can do with it because it's a console but only to see it can't because it's just not the same. In the end, gamers with an Apple console can only look back and wonder if that weird smell coming from the melting material of the console will cause cancer."
    Quality post, +1 COOL POINT.
    Avatar image for brontes_muse
    Brontes_Muse

    208

    Forum Posts

    3663

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 6

    #8  Edited By Brontes_Muse

    I think apple actually already has a console out, the Apple TV.  It does everything the MS and Sony wished their consoles achieved, streaming music movies and podcast to the living room in a functional way. Just it doesn't have games yet.  I'm sure we'll see downloadable casual games on it soon.  Just wait.  

    Their going after the super casual market.  
    Avatar image for dj_lae
    DJ_Lae

    672

    Forum Posts

    6448

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 10

    #9  Edited By DJ_Lae

    I don't think they'll bother with a console - the iPhone and iPod Touch have garnered enough attention in the four months that the app store has been out, especially now that they're getting ports of previous handheld games like Puzzle Quest (which looks on par with the PSP version with the better control scheme of the DS version). I'm excited to see what other sort of titles are released - Square has some of their previously Japanese-only mobile games and there's no reason they couldn't port DS games with better graphics.

    I'd love to see things like Phoenix Wright, Professor Layton, or Elite Beat Agents, all of which would work perfectly on an iPhone and allow for much greater detail due to the higher resolution of the screen compared to the DS.

    Avatar image for get2sammyb
    get2sammyb

    6686

    Forum Posts

    1993

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 4

    #10  Edited By get2sammyb

    I think an Apple console is highly likely. In fact I believe they'll try and make a system with download-only games. It may be a bit early for it to be possible yet though. But I totally expect an iStore (more central system for some kind of hub, linking your games, movies, music, books, etc.)

    Avatar image for plasticworld
    Plasticworld

    141

    Forum Posts

    6231

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #11  Edited By Plasticworld

    I would really enjoy this sort of thing.

    Avatar image for bonesofwar
    Bonesofwar

    266

    Forum Posts

    84

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #12  Edited By Bonesofwar

    If Apple did make a console, it would most likely be the most pretentious  thing ever. Then again, Apple has been known to do some really pretty things with graphics.

    Avatar image for purerok
    PureRok

    4272

    Forum Posts

    4226

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #13  Edited By PureRok

    Yea, well... Apple sucks.

    Avatar image for dualreaver
    DualReaver

    3790

    Forum Posts

    83

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #14  Edited By DualReaver

    iGame sounds pretty fucking badass.

    Avatar image for geno
    Geno

    6767

    Forum Posts

    5538

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 15

    User Lists: 3

    #15  Edited By Geno

    The only thing that Apple does good is iPods, its OS and hardware design is awful (they're about 4-5 years behind in terms of gaming, perhaps it's because they only JUST introduced nonintegrated graphics), therefore I don't think they'd be very successful with a console. Plus the Wii already has control of the "I don't know what this is but it's shiny and it's white and I like shiny white things" market.

    Avatar image for brontes_muse
    Brontes_Muse

    208

    Forum Posts

    3663

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 6

    #16  Edited By Brontes_Muse

    Geno;


     I don't mean to start a message board war, but apple has used non integrated graphic chips for a long time.  In the 80's they used the first non integrated graphics cards, and floating point processors, almost 6 years before they became standard components in "personal" PCs.  They used NuBus slots, but in the early 90's they moved to the PCI standard.   Macbook pro's have run a non-integrated graphic card since they debuted (As Powerbooks in 1994), and have offered both NVIDIA and ATI options.  

    You may be confused because recently apple has switched it's integrated graphical chipset.  Before they where using the basic intel chip set that most inexpensive PC notebooks use.  Ho ever apple asked NVIDIA to develop a super powerful, low energy INTEGRATED chipset.  It uses very little power and is 5 times fast than the intel chipset.  (According to apple, however most 3rd party bench marks rate it 3-4 times faster.)  What's even more impressive is that it has about 60% of the performance of NVIDIAs fastest non integrated mobile chip, at a fraction of the battery consumption.  What's most impressive is that they put this in their less expensive mac book line.  The Macbook Pro uses it too, and a non integrated card as well.  

    I agree with you, that macs don't have a lot of games.  But trust me when I say it's not because of being 4-5 years behind on hardware.  It has a lot to do with the fact that to program for a mac you have to use a language called Objective C,  While windows uses a couple different types of C programing languages. (C#, C+, C++, and others)    Objective C is a pretty tricky language, but it offers better management of memory, and can split up tasks to multiple processors easier.  However when programing a 3D game, objective C can be tedious.   So a lot of games when they final come to the mac a year or two late behave awkwardly, because the game is programed in C++ and is just being basically emulated on a mac.  

    Because of my job I run a Mac, I don't think macs are better than PCs.  Because they're not.   But I don't think PCs are so much better than macs either.  To each their own, you know. 

    PS Apple will never enter the home console market, with anything more than a box like apple TV.
    Avatar image for captain_fookup
    Captain_Fookup

    1526

    Forum Posts

    90

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #17  Edited By Captain_Fookup
    Brontes_Muse said:
    "Geno;

     I don't mean to start a message board war, but apple has used non integrated graphic chips for a long time.  In the 80's they used the first non integrated graphics cards, and floating point processors, almost 6 years before they became standard components in "personal" PCs.  They used NuBus slots, but in the early 90's they moved to the PCI standard.   Macbook pro's have run a non-integrated graphic card since they debuted (As Powerbooks in 1994), and have offered both NVIDIA and ATI options.  

    Recently apple has switched it's integrated graphical chipset.  Before they where using the basic intel chip set that most inexpensive PC notebooks use.  NVIDIA developed for them a super powerful, low energy INTEGRATED chipset.  It uses very little power and is 5 times fast than the intel chipset.  (According to apple, however most 3rd party bench marks rate it 3-4 times faster.)  What's even more impressive is that it has about 60% of the performance of NVIDIAs fastest non integrated mobile chip, at a fraction of the battery consumption.  What's most impressive is that they put this in their less expensive mac book line.  The Macbook Pro uses it to, and a non integrated card as well.  

    I agree with you, that macs don't have a lot of games.  But trust me when I say it's not because of being 4-5 years behind on hardware.  It has a lot to do with the fact that to program for a mac you have to use a language called Objective C,  While windows uses a couple different types of C programing languages. (C#, C+, C++, and others)    Objective C is a pretty tricky language, but it offers better management of memory, and can split up tasks to multiple processors easier.  However when programing a 3D game, objective C can be tedious.   So a lot of games when they final come to the mac a year or two late behave awkwardly, because the game is programed in C++ and is just being basically emulated on a mac.  

    Because of my job I run a Mac, I don't think macs are better than PCs.  Because they're not.   But I don't think PCs are so much better than macs either.  To each their own, you know. 

    PS Apple will never enter the home console market, with anything more than a box like apple TV.
    "
    Took the words right out of my mouth Brontes.
    Avatar image for liquidprince
    LiquidPrince

    17073

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #18  Edited By LiquidPrince

    iWii?

    I like the sound of that XD


    Avatar image for liquidprince
    LiquidPrince

    17073

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #19  Edited By LiquidPrince

    iWii?

    I like the sound of that XD


    Avatar image for oldschool
    oldschool

    7641

    Forum Posts

    60

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 10

    #20  Edited By oldschool

    I think that Apple should partner with Nintendo and bring out the most awesome consoles ever.  Won't happen even if it is a perfect match.

    Avatar image for sathingtonwaltz
    SathingtonWaltz

    2167

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #21  Edited By SathingtonWaltz

    What's with peoples beef with Apple? I've got a black MacBook, and it's by far the best computer I've ever owned/used. Anyways, I think that if Apple partnered with Nintendo something really interested would be born. 

    Avatar image for efwefwe
    wefwefasdf

    6730

    Forum Posts

    694

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: -1

    User Lists: 1

    #22  Edited By wefwefasdf

    Brontes Muse knows his stuff. :D

    Avatar image for seagull_feeder
    Seagull_Feeder

    13

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #23  Edited By Seagull_Feeder
    Brontes_Muse said:
    I agree with you, that macs don't have a lot of games.  But trust me when I say it's not because of being 4-5 years behind on hardware.  It has a lot to do with the fact that to program for a mac you have to use a language called Objective C,  While windows uses a couple different types of C programing languages. (C#, C+, C++, and others)    Objective C is a pretty tricky language, but it offers better management of memory, and can split up tasks to multiple processors easier.  However when programing a 3D game, objective C can be tedious.   So a lot of games when they final come to the mac a year or two late behave awkwardly, because the game is programed in C++ and is just being basically emulated on a mac.  

    I'm glad that I've got the sims on my mac book.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.