Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

87 Comments

ESRB Changes Rules for Marketing Mature-Rated Video Games

Publishers allowed to cut general audience trailers for Mature-rated games, a la movies, and restrictions relaxed for cross promotions.

The Entertainment Software Ratings Board has, as of this morning, implemented changes that will hugely impact the way Mature-rated games are advertised on the Internet. A three-page document from the ESRB outlining the changes was sent to game publishers today, and it was passed onto me.

The ESRB has confirmed the document is legitimate.

Most notably, video games marketing will be following the lead of film. Publishers now have an opportunity to produce and distribute trailers for Mature-rated games and games expected to be issued a Mature rating at a much larger “general” audience. These specifically cut trailers will have a green “slate” that airs before the trailer rolls, and is required be on-screen for at least four seconds.

It’s very much like the green “the following preview has been approved for appropriate audiences” bit that appears in front of most movie trailers. Here’s the ESRB’s example:

No Caption Provided

Trailers intended for this “general” audience will not require an age gate on websites, but such trailers must be approved by the ESRB prior to release. It will be business as usual for trailers that fully depict the game’s included violence and sex, age gates and all. The ESRB describes the process this way:

"A trailer, demo, or video (of any length) for a Mature-rated game that has been deemed suitable for a general audience through the ESRB pre-clearance process will not require an age-gate. Please note that pre-clearance of Mature-rated game trailers posted without an age-gate is mandatory and must be submitted to [the ESRB]."

To no one’s surprise, there are no changes for Adults Only-rated games, of which there are few.

Another potentially big change impacts the “cross-selling” of products. Cross-selling is, in essence, using one product to help sell another. It’s why Sony’s including early access to an upcoming demo for The Last of Us through this week’s God of War: Ascension. One game is Mature-rated, and the other is likely to be, so the ESRB signed off on cross-selling The Last of Us through God of War.

No Caption Provided

The two examples given by the ESRB are “a promotional insert for a game placed in another game's packaging or a banner ad for another game on a publisher-controlled 'official' game website.”

Under the new ESRB guidelines, it’s now possible to promote a Mature-rated or potentially Mature-rated game within a game that's been assigned a lower rating. The only way for this to happen, however, is through explicit approval from the ESRB. Here’s how the ESRB outlined it:

“On a case-by-case basis a company may obtain approval prior to public release via the ESRB pre-clearance process to cross-sell a Mature-rated game with a less restrictively rated game. Supporting documentation (e.g., media and/or marketing plans, demographic data) will be required to demonstrate that the games being cross-sold have the same intended audience and, where audience demographics can be verified, that the cross-sell is in compliance with the ESRB’s target marketing guidelines.”

When asked about these changes, the ESRB released a brief official statement.

"This policy addresses cross-marketing of games, not bundling products together," said the organization. "The fundamental goal is to ensure that the cross-promotion of products is appropriately targeted. In doing so we may consider a variety of factors including the nature of the product, audience composition of the media vehicle being used, the intended audience of the game, whether registered users are of a certain age, whether an age-gate is employed, etc."

There are two other changes outlined in the documentation, as well.

One, the ESRB previously required demos (both standalone and full game unlocks) to have a game’s rating displayed a period of four seconds before the game begins. This is no longer required, so long as the demo's download page includes the rating information and is “clearly visible prior to access.” Publishers are asked to “use their best efforts” to display the ratings information at store kiosks with demos. This does not change the requirement for trailers--those must always display before the trailer.

Two, the ESRB currently has a rule where ESRB ratings and ratings from international organizations, such as Europe's PEGI, cannot be displayed next to one another on publisher websites and social media. Most likely it's because the ratings are not considered equivalent. The ESRB has noticed some publishers choosing to display no ratings at all, so the ESRB has ditched that rule for websites and other areas where geo-segmentation (what’s displayed changes based on your location) isn’t possible.

All of the above changes are, according to the ESRB documentation, effectively immediately.

Patrick Klepek on Google+

87 Comments

Avatar image for geraltitude
GERALTITUDE

5991

Forum Posts

8980

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 2

Percentage of unnecessary rules surrounding games drops 1%.

Reading Patrick's headline was almost like reading into an alternate reality, and then I remembered it's not. Our reality is the fucked up one where movies and books are pieces of magic that can't be controlled like games are.

Avatar image for brighty
Brighty

276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Brighty

this is a good thing

Avatar image for bd_mr_bubbles
BD_Mr_Bubbles

1850

Forum Posts

7791

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Well, these are actually fairly reasonable reforms. I would have expected more bizarre red tape out of some knee-jerk fear of Washington, but this is the opposite common-sense direction.

Avatar image for patrick
patrick

583

Forum Posts

1136

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

Edited By patrick

@zevvion said:

I actually didn't realize any of this. I don't really see any benefit in this though.

Kids who want to watch the new GTA trailer will - and always have done - just that. But now that it's legal to push their product to a 'general' audiance, I can only see the parents flipping out again how they're trying to market to kids.

So if you ask me, the same people get to watch the trailer as before, except there is now a flipping-out-parent variable.

There are no legal restrictions for publishers releasing any kind of trailer, the ESRB is a self regulating board within the industry.

If anything, this is getting trailers more in line with how the MPAA regulates trailers, which parents probably already understand to an even better extent. It also essentially watermarks videos so they have a standardized warning instead of content distributors having to cope with following the old guidelines and putting up their own age gates which is basically non-existent on sites like YouTube.

Avatar image for mistasparkle
MistaSparkle

2293

Forum Posts

999

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 7

If this means I get to see more commercials about games and less about weight loss then I'm kind of excited.

Avatar image for ockman
Ockman

227

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

So they'll take some cues from the movie industry...when are people in the game industry gonna start having job security like the movie industry?

Avatar image for coldwolven
Cold_Wolven

2583

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Cold_Wolven

Sure whatever, I'm not quite sure what impact this will have but it's there to keep the politicians happy.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c7ea8553cb72
deactivated-5c7ea8553cb72

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@branthog said:

Good for them, but the scammy scheming ESRB scumbags can still suck my dick, right along with the MPAA and any other organization that does "the lord's work" (and the government's) under the guise of self-regulation and protecting the children, without any of the legal culpability of the government actually hands-on doing it.

When the government does it, directly, there is legal recourse. When "we" regulate "ourselves" under the bullshit threat that the "government will do it for us" if we don't, then we have de-facto government censorship, anyway.

I agree with you, and I must ask: would you be okay with there being no rating system whatsoever or perhaps a rating system with no restrictions on content that people will see (e.g. AO games getting just as much attention as Mature games)?

Avatar image for meatball
MEATBALL

4235

Forum Posts

790

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Sounds like a bunch of smart changes. This was a really interesting read.

Avatar image for deadmoscow
deadmoscow

287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

No more annoying age gates for trailers! Hooray!

Avatar image for psyael
Psyael

45

Forum Posts

92

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By Psyael

@branthog: Market economics are going to do far more to determine the contents a product than the rating. To look at the extreme end, the market for SexFuckUtopia 5000 is very small regardless of a rating system, so a lot of retailers would pass on stocking inventory of it.

Avatar image for gildermershina
Gildermershina

411

Forum Posts

361

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

As someone who grew up in the UK with the BBFC's mandatory age restrictions (if it says 18 for example, they can't legally sell it to anyone under 18) for films and some games, I have never understood America's outrage at a classification system. It in practice it usually means parents will decide on a case by case basis whether or not a piece of content is suitable for their children and purchase it for them.

It was never a major hassle when I was growing up, in fact it was kind of a thrill to be 12 years old watching a 15 rated movie because your parents said yeah go ahead. Or because you didn't tell them, and waited until they were asleep.

Avatar image for trelution
trelution

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By trelution

At first I thought it was kind of silly, but in the end I think it may help things a bit. Just have to slap the ole "red band" on the M game trailers. Maybe this will give games some extra defense when they get blamed for all the woes of this world. I doubt it, but a man can hope. This Also only mentions internet did TV get any more restrictions? Also the Cross selling language is that set up for the silly double XP drink/food things they do too? It still seems like a bunch of hooplah for nothing though. I mean I know kids are stupid these days, but I'm fairly sure they can still figure out how to lie enough to make themselves 17/18/whatevertheyhavetobe or else Internet porn would have never taken off.

Avatar image for fiercedeity
FierceDeity

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@neonie said:

Since when did the ESRB have the right to set mandatory for anything not explicitly involving just rating games? Aren't they an opt-in group that publishers go along with to put the age rating on their box? They really have no right to say what publishers do with their games or marketing otherwise, they are not legal regulators...

When someone opts in they agree to obey the guidelines the ESRB sets. They aren't mandating that everyone obeys their rules, just that those who have opted in do. Thing is, virtually everyone opts in since otherwise there would be calls for the government to set up a regulatory body. I can't believe people are bitching about the ESRB in here, and acting like the government would do a better job. Unbelievable.

Avatar image for joshs
joshs

440

Forum Posts

1762

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By joshs

If this means I get to see more commercials about games and less about weight loss then I'm kind of excited.

This, if I watched TV. I stopped watching because of stupid commercials for egg crackers and drying towels.

Avatar image for arch4non
arch4non

472

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Coming soon to an EA title near you: Unskippable trailers shown before the title screen!

Avatar image for kycinematic
kycinematic

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

A good change, I think. America has an older populace now more than ever, and the average age of a "video gamer" (like "music listeners" or "movie goers") is somewhere in their 30's.

Avatar image for kkotd
kkotd

364

Forum Posts

36

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm really confused by their thought process on this one. On one side, not forcing an age gate, allows trailers to be shown to more people, on the other, it shows people the trailer who aren't or shouldn't be the target audience of the game in the first place. That said, go on Youtube, none of those trailers are age gated, nor rated mature. I see two negative outcomes from this, 1. Companies purposefully strip out game play footage from their trailers and we go back to the age of all pre-rendered trailers, or in engine trailers that aren't actually indicative to the game you are purchasing, 2. M rated games become even more desensitized than they already are... I know quite a few of you are of the mind set that ratings really shouldn't matter, kids can play whatever. But working for a retailer, it makes me scratch my head when a parent buys their 6 or 7 year old Call of Duty, Crysis, Medal of Honor, Dead Space... ect. And I'm not exaggerating on the age either...

There are alot of parents out there, if not the majority, who are fucking clueless of what they're buying their kid. And 9 out of 10 times, if you try to tell the parent what the game's about, either they verbally bitchslap you for questioning their decision or their kid starts lying up a storm, "O but mom, in Deadspace, you play a space hero! You save a bunch of people! It's like Superman!" And yes, I've heard a kid try to con his mom that way about buying Deadspace 3. She ended up not getting it because I pointed out the word Dead before the kids fantastical Superman word, 'space'. I believe we should have freedom to parent your child how you want, but ffs, there needs to be a limit. Then again, maybe I'm just old... Back in my day, we snuck around trying to play Samurai Shodown, and we thought we were bad ass for playing it at 10. Back then MA was 13 though so... -shrugs-

Avatar image for undeadpool
Undeadpool

8418

Forum Posts

10761

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 18

Edited By Undeadpool

@godlyawesomeguy said:

@branthog said:

Good for them, but the scammy scheming ESRB scumbags can still suck my dick, right along with the MPAA and any other organization that does "the lord's work" (and the government's) under the guise of self-regulation and protecting the children, without any of the legal culpability of the government actually hands-on doing it.

When the government does it, directly, there is legal recourse. When "we" regulate "ourselves" under the bullshit threat that the "government will do it for us" if we don't, then we have de-facto government censorship, anyway.

I agree with you, and I must ask: would you be okay with there being no rating system whatsoever or perhaps a rating system with no restrictions on content that people will see (e.g. AO games getting just as much attention as Mature games)?

I gotta say: I disagree wholeheartedly. If not for the ESRB, we'd have a nice FEDERALLY MANDATED body that would be actively censoring games rather than merely rating them. Unlike the MPAA, the ESRB is not in the habit of threatening a game's content be cut in order to make a lower rating (at least not the same way R goes to PG-13) AND they're much, MUCH more transparent than the MPAA, who STILL haven't released their methods nor standards and likely never will (hence why the Joker can kill a man with a pencil and remain PG-13, but two dudes kissing is automatically an R).

Or in other words:

No Caption Provided
The devil you know, sometimes better than the devil you don't.
The devil you know, sometimes better than the devil you don't.

Avatar image for evilsbane
Evilsbane

5624

Forum Posts

315

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

So..this is a good thing, awesome good news for once!

Avatar image for haggis
haggis

1674

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

Edited By haggis

Look, all this ESRB stuff is voluntary anyway. But it's not as if age gates have ever been an obstacle to under-age kids watching trailers for mature rated games. If this is the sort of thing the ESRB is spending their money on, then it's just one more confirmation that the whole thing is a waste of time and money.

I don't have a problem with voluntary ratings (I'd rather have that than the government doing it for them) because it does help parents, and offers some transparency. But no one has a hard time finding trailers for M-rated games on the internet. This is nothing more than the ESRB finally admitting reality: there's nothing they can do to stop kids from watching these trailers, so why bother?

Game publishers might voluntarily recut trailers with less violence for younger gamers, but in the end I doubt it will change the way publishers market games. They might say it will to stroke the ESRB's back, but that will just be to keep government regulators off their back. Not because it helps their marketing campaigns at all.

Avatar image for hagane
Hagane

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The way I see it, there is no incentive for publishers to take advantage of this. At least as long as age gates on videos are the joke they are.

Avatar image for hollitz
hollitz

2398

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 12

Edited By hollitz

I'm sure I'll be thankful for this if I ever give two fucks about watching a trailer. But really, the only thing less interesting to me than trailers are blogs posts about preorder bonuses and DLC season passes.

Avatar image for corvak
Corvak

2048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Keeping government regulators off their backs is the whole reason the ESRB exists. Could you imagine the chaos if games had to pass ratings that were different depending on the state you're in? It'd be as chaotic as film in the 50s and 60s, where individual municipalities screened every film before allowing it to be viewed by the public.

The game industry doesnt want kids playing violent games any more than parents do. It's rather sad to hear about parents who ignore ratings and buy Call of Duty for their twelve year olds, despite its M rating. Retail clerks working in game stores even mention the rating, if it's obvious its a purchase for a child, but it doesnt change anything.

Age gated videos are of course useless except as a way to prove you at least tried to stop minors from watching...how many of us have lied to an age gate? Pretty sure most of us just raised a hand there. It's like when they mandated that you have to be 13 to agree to things and make forum accounts online.

I can say as a canadian, i'm happy that we have the ESRB, because its funded indirectly through my game purchases, not my tax dollars, and if the americans implemented a federal body to rate games, we'd be forced to make one too.

Avatar image for killerfly
KillerFly

475

Forum Posts

1765

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 33

@smcn said:

Trailers are nothing but advertisements that people watch deliberately. The sooner you and everyone else realize that and stop complaining about CG trailers that don't provide anything useful, the happier you'll be.

I never said anything about CG trailers. I don't mind those at all.

Avatar image for meatsim
MeatSim

11201

Forum Posts

150

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 23

Edited By MeatSim

I can't remember that last time I looked to see what age rating the game I was playing had.

Avatar image for hardtarget
Hardtarget

389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

Edited By Hardtarget

Age gates just need to stop, they are not effective and only impede

Avatar image for elincoln
ELincoln

16

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

At a glance, seems like pretty smart changes. Can't say I care much about the marketing end of games, but this looks like common sense stuff. Definitely support it in spirit.

Avatar image for dougcl
DougCL

370

Forum Posts

155

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

inconsequential, but an interesting read.

Avatar image for durden77
durden77

321

Forum Posts

56

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Seems like a respectable development. Although I've never thought that age confirms did anything at all to protect young people, they are annoying. So to have a more streamlined system is nice.

Avatar image for phantomzxro
phantomzxro

1613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@gaftra said:

Always interesting to see how these regulations develop. Did the president's statement about further reviewing violent media yield any fruit? Curious if the Gun lobby managed to spur this forward.

Interesting point but i don't think gun lobbyist had a direct cause for this but i do think that the rating system is under the spotlight of late so they are tighten up a bit not that it needed it.

The ESRB is working on a big marketing push to raise awareness to parents and others who are unaware, so I'm sure that they are just redesigning some things and making some small improvements to better serve when they do start their marketing campaign.

Avatar image for ogred
OGred

201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@arch4non said:

Coming soon to an EA title near you: Unskippable trailers shown before the title screen!

Say it ain't so!

Avatar image for fakekisser
FakeKisser

466

Forum Posts

19

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 30

I would also expect reforms to go in a more restrictive direction than more allowing. Interesting.

Avatar image for bingbangboom
bingbangboom

112

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I never understood how and why the ESRB had so much power with advertising with videogames. It is something that all publishers opt into, not demanded by the government. Always thought that the whole thing was weird, especially with verifying "age" before viewing a trailer.

Avatar image for mooninaut
Mooninaut

20

Forum Posts

18

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mooninaut

Voluntary ratings are fine with me but in environment where retailers will refuse to sell unrated games, and console manufacturers won't approve unrated games, "voluntary" is a lie. I'd rather have no ratings than mandatory "voluntary" ratings. Censorship sucks no matter who is doing it.

At least in the US, the First Amendment prohibits Federal and State governments from censoring games. So the argument that we need the ESRB to keep the gummint off our backs strikes me as flawed if not wholly invalid.

Avatar image for thehunter1320
thehunter1320

29

Forum Posts

286

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 10

@evan223: When I say that, I'm imagining they're going to release the green-band for everyone and then do a special "exclusive red-band" that is age gated that is the same trailer with a tad more violence to get more eyeballs on the content. I'm not saying it's a bad thing, it's just what PR is going to do with these new rules.

Avatar image for herbiebug
HerbieBug

4228

Forum Posts

43

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

fine. whatever.