Ubisoft sued for ripping off Assassins Creed idea

Avatar image for distortedwon
#1 Edited by distortedwon (12 posts) -

John L. Beiswenger, an American science fiction author, is suing Ubisoft over alleged similarities between his novel, Link, and the Assassin's Creed franchise. He claims that Ubisoft used his idea of a device that allows people to access and experience the memories of their ancestors and that his book also focuses on major historical events and assassins.

http://www.destructoid.com/ubisoft-sued-for-ripping-off-assassin-s-creed-idea-226063.phtml

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2012-04-18-ubisoft-sued-by-author-over-assassins-creed-copyright-infringement

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for a_dog
#2 Posted by A_Dog (760 posts) -

Wow, it only took him 5 years to realise...

Avatar image for subjugation
#3 Posted by Subjugation (4970 posts) -

I wonder who has a better team of lawyers ....

Avatar image for yummylee
#4 Posted by Yummylee (24646 posts) -

Ellipses...

Avatar image for n7
#5 Posted by N7 (4159 posts) -

He's also suing Gametrailers for promoting the copyright infringement LOL

Avatar image for gargantuan
#6 Edited by Gargantuan (1906 posts) -

The Ayreon CDs also involves a machine that let people experience their ancestors memories

Avatar image for wintersnowblind
#7 Posted by WinterSnowblind (7598 posts) -

@ryanrulez said:

Wow, it only took him 5 years to realise...

In fairness, it's not like videogames are as well known to most people as movies are. With a movie or something, you'd probably see a trailer or read a review somewhere, but if you're not into videogames, you probably wouldn't even know what Assassins Creed is, let alone the fact it's about a person that uses a futuristic device to access memories of his ancestors.

Avatar image for werupenstein
#8 Posted by Kidavenger (4231 posts) -

@amazon said:

Book Description

Publication Date: January 20, 2003
Contrary to the beliefs of Nobel Laureate Dr. Francis Crick and most modern day scientists, but in alignment with the religious beliefs of billions of human beings on earth, the soul is alive and well and active in our daily lives. Contrary also to the beliefs of most neuroscientists, it is the soul, not the brain, which is designed to remember.

This story principally takes place in the facilities of Search International, Inc., a product research firm near Madison, Wisconsin. They call their work "product research," because the engineers, medical professionals and scientific staff are specifically focused on the development of new products for client manufacturers.

Commercialization of new technologies was the company's only objective until an unusual accident occurred; an accident which led management and the biotechnology research staff known as the Biochip Team into a discovery beyond their imaginations, a discovery which could well be considered the most important to mankind for all time.

The truly astonishing hypothesis, developed by Search International, suggests that at the functional center of the nucleus of every cell is an atemporal Particle of zero mass and infinite capacity for memory a biological singularity. The same Particle is a component of every cell in the body. It is the "fabric of the soul."

The author lets the reader be present right alongside the scientists as they uncover some of the very secrets of Creation, and while test subjects are taken back in time to recall ancestral memories, a process key to proving the existence of the human soul. Intrigue enters the plot as competitors, a foreign government, and a special-interest group learn of Search International's discoveries.

I wonder if the guy that first thought up time travel can go sue everyone for copying that idea...

Avatar image for big_weasel
#9 Posted by BiG_Weasel (566 posts) -

Shame Bill Shakespeare can't sue Disney for ripping off King Lear for The Lion King, or the writers for Dances with Wolves can't sue James Cameron for stealing their plot for Avatar.

Avatar image for mattyftm
#10 Edited by MattyFTM (14816 posts) -

This whole thing seems like a guy just suing whoever he can to try and make a quick buck. I mean, he's suing GameTrailers too. I don't know why. There almost certainly will be similarities between his fiction and Assassin's creed, but there are similarities between Star Trek and Mass Effect, that doesn't mean BioWare ripped off Gene Roddenberry.

Moderator
Avatar image for babblinmule
#11 Edited by babblinmule (1280 posts) -

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the concept of reliving a life through the eyes of your ancestors MUST have been done before this guy and the assassins creed games in one way or another. Genetic memory hardly seems like an original concept (I'm no brain... doctor.... person, but isnt there an entire school of thought devoted to the concept of genetic memory?)

Avatar image for deranged_midget
#12 Posted by Deranged (2022 posts) -

@MattyFTM said:

This whole thing seems like a guy just suing whoever he can to try and make a quick buck. I mean, he's suing GameTrailers too. I don't know why. There may be similarities between his fiction and Assassin's creed, but there are similarities between Star Trek and Mass Effect, that doesn't mean BioWare ripped off Gene Roddenberry.

True say.

Avatar image for sergio
#13 Posted by Sergio (3557 posts) -

It's still fairly Quantum Leapish.

Avatar image for bigchickendinner
#14 Posted by BigChickenDinner (787 posts) -

He either 1, knew it the whole time, and just wanted to let it get big for massive dmg or 2, is just doing this to generate sales of his book.

Avatar image for ussbutte
#15 Edited by ussbutte (37 posts) -

Sucks for him that "the 'ideas' that are the fruit of an author's labors go into the public domain, while only the author's particular expression remains the author's to control". [1]

Avatar image for gaff
#16 Posted by Gaff (2658 posts) -

From what I can see mister Beiswenger publishes his books through Infinity Publishing, a Print on Demand publisher.

The probability that a Ubisoft employee read the book is looking very slim.

Also, "Search International"? Seriously?

Avatar image for fox01313
#17 Posted by fox01313 (5253 posts) -

If his book was closer to the AC series then maybe it could have a chance but after reading the synopsis of it & seeing that the book was written in 2003, it seems like yet another case of a flimsy thing for lawyers to fight over on how much of a connection there is between the two as it doesn't look like there's going to be much confusion between the two. As much as I know that I'm not being good at the AC series, it seems quite unique enough that it can stand on it's own.

Avatar image for gunslingerpanda
#18 Posted by GunslingerPanda (5204 posts) -

His book sounds like spiritualistic guff, anyway.

Avatar image for buzz_killington
#19 Posted by buzz_killington (3655 posts) -

So was Harry Potter... and any other successful franchise with a 'hook'. Ideas are out there, folks, it's how you use them.

Avatar image for freakache
#20 Posted by FreakAche (3057 posts) -

@BiG_Weasel said:

Shame Bill Shakespeare can't sue Disney for ripping off King Lear for The Lion King, or the writers for Dances with Wolves can't sue James Cameron for stealing their plot for Avatar.

Wouldn't The Lion King have more in common with Hamlet? Granted, I can barely remember anything that happened in King Lear.

Avatar image for i_smell
#21 Edited by I_smell (4219 posts) -

@Sergio said:

It's still fairly Quantum Leapish.

If Ezio had to help a random schoolgirl pass her exams before leaping to another time I'd play that.

ACTUALLY... thinking about it... if Telltale made an adventure game where you played as Sam from Quantum Leap and had to figure out how to solve the problem of that episode, I think I'd play that.

+Unless this dude's book has 8 hours of running across rooftops and swan-diving into bails of hay then it's not Assassin's Creed.

Avatar image for justin258
#22 Edited by Justin258 (14642 posts) -

@FreakAche said:

@BiG_Weasel said:

Shame Bill Shakespeare can't sue Disney for ripping off King Lear for The Lion King, or the writers for Dances with Wolves can't sue James Cameron for stealing their plot for Avatar.

Wouldn't The Lion King have more in common with Hamlet?

Yes, but more currently, this. It's actually more that and Hamlet smashed together.

Anime rips off Disney then Disney rips off anime. Go figure.

EDIT: Insert "If this guy can sue Assassin's Creed then ___ can sue ___ for stealing ___" comment here.

Avatar image for lordandrew
#23 Posted by LordAndrew (14601 posts) -

He can't be the first person to have this idea. It doesn't look like something anyone at Ubisoft would be aware of either. It appears that he's just a copyright troll. Great.

Avatar image for blacklagoon
#24 Edited by BlackLagoon (1975 posts) -

Ancestral memory is hardly a new thing, and even there the book deviates from AC, focusing on the soul and spirituality, while AC is completely secular / materialistic to the point of using the genetic memory motif even in the game menus. Nor does it seem the book features millennia of conflict between templars and a clan assassins descended from the persian Ḥashshāshīn, or an advanced pre-human civilzation. Can't really see this getting particularly far in court.

Avatar image for dagbiker
#25 Posted by Dagbiker (7046 posts) -

@FreakAche said:

@BiG_Weasel said:

Shame Bill Shakespeare can't sue Disney for ripping off King Lear for The Lion King, or the writers for Dances with Wolves can't sue James Cameron for stealing their plot for Avatar.

Wouldn't The Lion King have more in common with Hamlet? Granted, I can barely remember anything that happened in King Lear.

The Lion King was a Rip off of Kimba the White Lion

Loading Video...

Avatar image for sackmanjones
#26 Posted by Sackmanjones (5548 posts) -

Good lord people

Avatar image for tim_the_corsair
#27 Posted by Tim_the_Corsair (3053 posts) -

That synopsis was appallingly written

Avatar image for azteck
#28 Posted by Azteck (7416 posts) -

I doubt the concept of genetic memory was thought of originally by him. It's kind of a well known concept.

Avatar image for familyphotoshoot
#29 Posted by familyphotoshoot (712 posts) -

Frank Herbert was using genetic memory as a major plotpoint well over 50 years ago. This is dumb.

Avatar image for jonny_mung
#30 Posted by jonny_mung (91 posts) -

This guy better hope that Ubisoft hasn't sent the court a bunch of pictures of their employees socks...

Avatar image for artgarcrunkle
#31 Posted by artgarcrunkle (988 posts) -

Copyright troll. Waited four games in to maximize his profits. Gonna get settled out of court then the guy will lose all the money he stole when he gets sued by the ghost of Theodule Ribot.

Avatar image for mattyftm
#32 Posted by MattyFTM (14816 posts) -

@I_smell said:

@Sergio said:

It's still fairly Quantum Leapish.

If Ezio had to help a random schoolgirl pass her exams before leaping to another time I'd play that.

ACTUALLY... thinking about it... if Telltale made an adventure game where you played as Sam from Quantum Leap and had to figure out how to solve the problem of that episode, I think I'd play that

I actually tweeted about that exact idea a few months back. It's the perfect format for a telltale episodic adventure game. Plus, imagine the dialogue choices:

-Oh Boy.

-OH BOY!!!

-OOOOOOOHH BOY!!!!

-OH BOOOOOOOY!!!!

Moderator
Avatar image for kazona
#33 Posted by Kazona (3395 posts) -

Even if they got the idea from his book, he won't win this. And for good reason too. It's an idea. You can't plagiarise an idea.

Avatar image for kazona
#34 Posted by Kazona (3395 posts) -
@artgarcrunkle

Copyright troll. Waited four games in to maximize his profits. Gonna get settled out of court then the guy will lose all the money he stole when he gets sued by the ghost of Theodule Ribot.

I see no reason why Ubisoft would settle. Unless there is something that I'm missing, this guy's case has no chance of holding up in court.

Then again, settling is usually the easiest way. But personally I think Ubisoft would be a fool to settle. If only because that'd give the impression (true or not) that the guy was in the right.
Avatar image for willthemagicasian
#35 Edited by WilltheMagicAsian (1548 posts) -

I don't know, there have been plenty of ridiculous lawsuits that were successful. It may just be easier to settle instead of risking their game franchise. It's the difference between a couple million and three plus years of work not being able to be sold.

Avatar image for ahmadmetallic
#36 Posted by AhmadMetallic (19301 posts) -
@buzz_killington said:

So was Harry Potter... and any other successful franchise with a 'hook'. Ideas are out there, folks, it's how you use them.

If that's how the way things worked then the copyright laws wouldn't really exist would they?
Avatar image for mcshank
#37 Posted by McShank (1688 posts) -

NEW Lawsuit! Digimon Vs Pokemon!!! MW Vs Battlefield!!!!!! Transformers Vs Zoid Vs Gundams Vs Mecha Godzilla!!!

Avatar image for buzz_killington
#38 Posted by buzz_killington (3655 posts) -

@AhmadMetallic said:

@buzz_killington said:

So was Harry Potter... and any other successful franchise with a 'hook'. Ideas are out there, folks, it's how you use them.

If that's how the way things worked then the copyright laws wouldn't really exist would they?

Well, opening a burger joint named McDonald's with a golden arch logo that doesn't pay royalties to McDonald's would be deceptive and wrong. Literature is different. Unless its blatant plagarism, where passages are word for word copies from another work, a claim that anyone "stole" anything from anyone else is just bullshit. McDonald's can't sue Burger King for selling burgers at chained restaurants, because they did it first. Copyright laws exist for that reason alone. This is a pathetic, opportunistic man trying to exploit copyright laws to earn a few bucks. He knows that Ubi will probably settle out of court, because legal fees are fucking sky-high, so he's just exploiting the non-sensical American copyright laws for monetary gain.

Avatar image for still_i_cry
#39 Posted by Still_I_Cry (2521 posts) -

@Tim_the_Corsair said:

That synopsis was appallingly written

Going to agree.

I usually don't like putting down the writing of others but..wow.

Avatar image for lordandrew
#40 Posted by LordAndrew (14601 posts) -

@AhmadMetallic said:

@buzz_killington said:

So was Harry Potter... and any other successful franchise with a 'hook'. Ideas are out there, folks, it's how you use them.

If that's how the way things worked then the copyright laws wouldn't really exist would they?

Ideas are not copyrightable. The system was not designed for that. Copyright protects the creative works that result from the ideas, not the ideas themselves.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.