Who needs magazine covers anymore? We have Facebook! Well, unless someone accidentally posts something to Facebook early, which appears to be the case with the next Assassin's Creed game.
The intrepid folks at NeoGAF--specifically, Enosh--screen captured what appears to be the first details on Assassin's Creed: Revelations. The links show a viral marketing campaign designed to unlock information on Revelations, which, despite my joke, is probably tied to an impending magazine cover.
Naturally, everything disappeared just as quickly as it arrived. What's Ubisoft have to say?
"No comment," said a company spokesperson.
Luckily, we have Assassin's Creed production manager Azaïzia Aymar answering questions about this on Twitter. Aymar isn't being secretive whatsoever, so it's possible the Facebook marketing only went live a little too early. If everything comes back online and your "Likes" are needed, I'll make sure and update.
Ubisoft already said another major Assassin's Creed was coming this year, though it's unclear whether we should be expecting another off-shoot like Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood or a proper sequel. There is no three to be found here, though, suggesting the wait for that one is a little bit farther down the line.
Assassin's Creed: Revelations
Game » consists of 16 releases. Released Nov 15, 2011
Assassin's Creed: Revelations is the fourth installment in the Assassin's Creed franchise and the final entry in Ezio Auditore's main storyline. A few levels also put players back in control of the original Assassin's Creed's Altair, and depict his rise to the Mentorship of the Crusades-era Brotherhood of Assassins.
Assassin's Creed: Revelations Shows Up On Facebook, Suddenly Disappears
Who needs magazine covers anymore? We have Facebook! Well, unless someone accidentally posts something to Facebook early, which appears to be the case with the next Assassin's Creed game.
The intrepid folks at NeoGAF--specifically, Enosh--screen captured what appears to be the first details on Assassin's Creed: Revelations. The links show a viral marketing campaign designed to unlock information on Revelations, which, despite my joke, is probably tied to an impending magazine cover.
Naturally, everything disappeared just as quickly as it arrived. What's Ubisoft have to say?
"No comment," said a company spokesperson.
Luckily, we have Assassin's Creed production manager Azaïzia Aymar answering questions about this on Twitter. Aymar isn't being secretive whatsoever, so it's possible the Facebook marketing only went live a little too early. If everything comes back online and your "Likes" are needed, I'll make sure and update.
Ubisoft already said another major Assassin's Creed was coming this year, though it's unclear whether we should be expecting another off-shoot like Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood or a proper sequel. There is no three to be found here, though, suggesting the wait for that one is a little bit farther down the line.
Dammit ubisoft why can't you just give me the POP 2008 sequel instead of ANOTHER Aassassin Creed which is starting to get stale.
I'm guessing (hoping) this is the 3DS game where Ezio travels to Masyaf to learn more about Altair. Seems like that'd be a fairly interesting story.
" @Metal_Mills: Do that, if you dig third person action games and are intrigued by the trailers go for it. The series is very cool, def start with AC2. "if you encourage people to start with AC2, you're a bad person and i dislike you :(
" Yeah Ubisoft!!! Run this franchise into the ground just like you did with Prince of Persia and Splinter Cell. "Except that each AC game is better than the last.
" @phrosnite said:exactly! i genuinely despise the concept of running franchises into the ground, and i would be especially pissed about this one because im a total AC fanboy, however i have nothing but admiration and respect for AC2 and Brotherhood because they're both top notch masterpieces with splendid gameplay/mission innovation, beautiful visuals, mindblowing story progression and extremely unique soundtracks" Yeah Ubisoft!!! Run this franchise into the ground just like you did with Prince of Persia and Splinter Cell. "Except that each AC game is better than the last. "
" @phrosnite said:This was true for Splinter Cell until the 4th... AC game every year doesn't sound good to me considering they aren't fixing the atrocious combat system and difficulty of the game. As long as every game sells 9 million copies they won't be changing the formula anytime soon." Yeah Ubisoft!!! Run this franchise into the ground just like you did with Prince of Persia and Splinter Cell. "Except that each AC game is better than the last. "
Oh and as much as I loved the PoP series(the original, but from what I heard the 08 version is similar to the classic ones just really easy and with cel shaded graphics)I doubt they will return to it anytime soon.They had a chance to do something with The Forgotten Sands but it turned out sub par.AC is their money maker and they still have lots of story to work with.
"
@DJJoeJoe said:"if you encourage people to start with AC2, you're a bad person and i dislike you :(
@Metal_Mills: Do that, if you dig third person action games and are intrigued by the trailers go for it. The series is very cool, def start with AC2.
"
"
Well AC1 was good in terms of concept, but bad in terms of putting that concept into actual practicality.
And while I did personally like what it did I think that put simply it could've been much, much, much better. As in AC2 better.
So I also support the advice of starting the series from AC2, because not everybody has the time to play every game, so the games do play should be really good, and really fun/emersive or both.
" @Ahmad_Metallic said:but but but..."
@DJJoeJoe said:"if you encourage people to start with AC2, you're a bad person and i dislike you :(
@Metal_Mills: Do that, if you dig third person action games and are intrigued by the trailers go for it. The series is very cool, def start with AC2.
"
"
Well AC1 was good in terms of concept, but bad in terms of putting that concept into actual practicality.And while I did personally like what it did I think that put simply it could've been much, much, much better. As in AC2 better.
So I also support the advice of starting the series from AC2, because not everybody has the time to play every game, so the games do play should be really good, and really fun/emersive or both.
"
I think I'd be ok with one other offshoot, so long as it's not set in Italy and features Ezio, that shit is done.
" @Grissefar: How can you say AC2 was a dissapointment?The first one was a hit or miss, an original title but with lots of repetitive design.So I don't see why anyone would of been hyped for a sequel.People just wanted to see if they could improve I don't know what kind of wild expectations you had.Although now that I've played Brotherhood I can say it is leaps and bounds more better in story and gameplay terms.Graphics were improved too.Oh and as much as I loved the PoP series(the original, but from what I heard the 08 version is similar to the classic ones just really easy and with cel shaded graphics)I doubt they will return to it anytime soon.They had a chance to do something with The Forgotten Sands but it turned out sub par.AC is their money maker and they still have lots of story to work with. "Climbing: slow and sluggish, when I expected it to be quick like Infamous or flashy like PoP 08.
Combat: slow and sluggish, when I want either responsive and challenging like Ninja Gaiden or slow and flashy like PoP 08.
Story: I tried but I could not give a shit, sorry, and it didn't seem like Ubisoft could either.
It's might not help that I didn't play/compare it to AC1, which is supposedly a bigger shit. Such is the human mind.
I haven't finished Brotherhood yet because I got bored. If this isn't drastically different, I probably won't play it.
" Ubisoft should be careful not to go overkill with this franchise. 3 games in 3 years is a lot. "This is true looks like there going the Activison route.
It's not Assassin's Creed III, so I'm guessing we're getting some more Ezio. Which I'm totally fine with. Given the crazy note that Brotherhood ended on, I'm totally ready for another one of these games. I can't get enough.
Should we just stop numbering sequels? After 2 it just sounds kinda dumb, and often all it does is make a lot of potential customers think they can't enjoy the game if they haven't played every game before it.
The industry as a whole also needs to get a lot better at getting new players up to speed. It should be standard that somebody can pick up a game at any point in a franchise and expect to be told in some form what the hell is going on. They shouldn't have to go to a dry wiki page or whatever. Mass Effect 3 having 'interactive comics' for the first two games is the sort of thing I'm talking about - that seems like a very smart move to me.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment