Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Batman: Arkham Knight

    Game » consists of 11 releases. Released Jun 23, 2015

    Developer Rocksteady's return to the Batman series takes place one year after the events of Arkham City. It expands the open world from the previous game and allows players to finally drive the Batmobile throughout Gotham City's streets.

    Isn't Batman Against Using Guns?

    • 58 results
    • 1
    • 2
    Avatar image for i8donuts
    i8Donuts

    102

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    The first time I watch the Arkham Knight E3 gameplay footage I was blown away by it. It wasn't until today when I watched it a second time a thought popped into my head. Isn't Batman against using guns and killing people? So why would he let his Batmobile turn into a tank that is equipped with a cannon and two machine guns?

    Avatar image for flasaltine
    flasaltine

    2547

    Forum Posts

    739

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Batman finally realized that guns are sick as fuck.

    Avatar image for aetheldod
    Aetheldod

    3914

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    He is against guns killing people yes , but the batmobile has always used some for other purposes I presume , but never for killing.

    Avatar image for zella
    Zella

    1275

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #4  Edited By Zella

    He is mainly against killing people, he has used all manner of nonlethal guns before. In the trailer you can hear Alfred say how the tanks he is fighting are unmanned so he is free to use the rockets and stuff. Batmobile has a nonlethal gun as well, to deal with normal crooks and stuff.

    Also before someone mentions it yeah there was also super old school Batman who totally ran around with a gun blasting fools.

    Avatar image for zolroyce
    ZolRoyce

    1589

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    I think that would be a really great twist on Batman that he just gets so depressed and disheartened that he eventually gets to a dark place where he can and does kill and how he and those around him deal with that.
    But I have to assume there is some sort of hey man video games explanation of like, rubber bullets or super Batman WayneTech explosions that aren't the killing kind but the concussion knock out kind and man I don't know, video games, just go with us on this one.

    Avatar image for mikemcn
    mikemcn

    8642

    Forum Posts

    4863

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 8

    The Batmobile has always been a big fat plothole in a plothole-filled hero story. Like the time in the Dark Knight when batman blows the fuck out of homeless peoples' homes to make an explosions for a tv ad, i mean for him to get through. I'm sure he didn't hurt any innocents with 2-3 thermobraic rockets.

    Avatar image for nightriff
    nightriff

    7248

    Forum Posts

    1467

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 7

    Thought the same thing too, seems like the tank really won't add anything to the gameplay except confusion.

    Avatar image for steadying
    Steadying

    1902

    Forum Posts

    8

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    They're not guns, they're " guns. "

    Avatar image for neckface
    neckface

    69

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    It's just plain ol' magic

    Avatar image for liquidprince
    LiquidPrince

    17073

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    They are riot guns not designed to kill but disband riots which have been re-purposed to destroy the unmanned tanks of the Arkham Knight.

    Avatar image for hero_swe
    hero_swe

    1378

    Forum Posts

    44

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    I don't know man, it's as a weak argument of him being a good guy by not killing bad guys when the bad guys he doesn't kill repeatedly causes lots of death (*cough*joker*cough*)

    Avatar image for lazyaza
    Lazyaza

    2584

    Forum Posts

    7938

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 27

    User Lists: 43

    @hero_swe said:

    I don't know man, it's as a weak argument of him being a good guy by not killing bad guys when the bad guys he doesn't kill repeatedly causes lots of death (*cough*joker*cough*)

    You basically summed up Batmans entire dilemma and one of the key things about his character that makes him who he is. Batman not killing = Batman. Soon as Batman kills he's not Batman anymore.

    Avatar image for markwahlberg
    MarkWahlberg

    4713

    Forum Posts

    3782

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #13  Edited By MarkWahlberg
    No Caption Provided

    Avatar image for huser
    huser

    1452

    Forum Posts

    81

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    @hero_swe said:

    I don't know man, it's as a weak argument of him being a good guy by not killing bad guys when the bad guys he doesn't kill repeatedly causes lots of death (*cough*joker*cough*)

    That's not really Batman's fault or problem. Guy puts them away, he might do more to help keep them there, but it's the legal system of DC's America that keep them alive.

    Avatar image for crithon
    crithon

    3979

    Forum Posts

    1823

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    #15  Edited By crithon
    No Caption Provided

    I would get into arguments about this especially with 1989 batman's gun use.

    No Caption Provided

    I tend to say it's a reference to Dark Knight Returns but also the scenes are more like sight gags that end with a good laugh then actually anything that's context of the character.

    No Caption Provided

    and my personal favorite in Batman first appearance.

    No Caption Provided

    I'd imagine it's one of those Gatling gun sequences where you can get away with anything. But I hear that it's used to shoot down robots in Arkham Knight and then rubber bullets on pedestrians.

    ...... yeah, I heard Paul Dini is not involved in this game

    No Caption Provided

    Avatar image for koolaid
    koolaid

    1435

    Forum Posts

    16

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    People have been putting guns on the bat mobile for a long time and I've always hated it.

    Especially in the Tim Butron Batman. He uses those mounted guns to blow people away! So why doesn't he always use them!?

    Avatar image for mormonwarrior
    MormonWarrior

    2945

    Forum Posts

    577

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 15

    User Lists: 21

    Someone in one of the livestreams mentioned that you can just straight up run over guys, which would definitely kill them so...I'd say it's sort of a moot point when they give you free reign in a giant vehicle like that.

    Avatar image for boom_goes_the_dynamite
    Boom_goes_the_dynamite

    970

    Forum Posts

    78

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    Batman is against guns and killing, but he has used guns in the past, and fired them. Like firing a gun at the big bad in Final Crisis, but then Batman died.

    No Caption Provided

    Avatar image for white
    white

    1697

    Forum Posts

    47

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    You're calling a 60mm cannon a "gun?

    Avatar image for ethanielrain
    EthanielRain

    1629

    Forum Posts

    45

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #20  Edited By EthanielRain

    Suspending disbelief is required for Batman...add guns that could shoot through buildings and missiles being fired in the middle of city streets never hurting anyone to the list of things not to think about :)

    Avatar image for slashdance
    SlashDance

    1867

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #21  Edited By SlashDance

    Whatever man, he already spent 3 games beating dudes up real bad and leaving them unconscious, lying in the snow with all limbs broken. The ones that didn't die of hypothermia or internal bleeding probably ended up in a wheelchair.

    Batman is an asshole.

    Avatar image for rupertthebear
    RupertTheBear

    578

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    Maybe Rocksteady doesn't understand the concept of the "No Killing" rule.

    Loading Video...

    Avatar image for justin258
    Justin258

    16686

    Forum Posts

    26

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 8

    @i8donuts: I remember hearing that they were supposed to be rubber bullets.

    But yes, the sidesteps they have to take to make sure that Batman doesn't "kill" anybody can be pretty hilarious sometimes. You know some of those poor motherfuckers in Arkham Asylum and City are not going to have full use of all of their limbs after the medics get done with them.

    But if we're going to talk about the damage to the human body in the Arkham games, we could always delve into blunt force trauma or cracking ribs or perhaps internal bleeding, any number of things that Batman could have done that might have caused the death of those criminals, in some cases worse deaths than just shooting them would have caused.

    It might be better for everybody if further Batman stories took the position that he tries his best not to kill but sometimes winds up doing it anyway. Then you slip into a whole 'nother can of worms with what is essentially an "oops, didn't mean to" attitude from Batman, so then again it may not be better.

    Avatar image for corevi
    Corevi

    6796

    Forum Posts

    391

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    It might be better for everybody if further Batman stories took the position that he tries his best not to kill but sometimes winds up doing it anyway. Then you slip into a whole 'nother can of worms with what is essentially an "oops, didn't mean to" attitude from Batman, so then again it may not be better.

    It's been done before many times. Hell it happened to The Joker at the end of Arkham City.

    Avatar image for doctordonkey
    doctordonkey

    2139

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    He doesn't kill, but apparently has no qualms throwing his full weight into a dude and slamming his fuckin' skull against a concrete wall. Considering he is at peak human condition, that would straight murder someone, not knock them out.

    Avatar image for mikelemmer
    MikeLemmer

    1535

    Forum Posts

    3089

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 54

    User Lists: 2

    @hero_swe: In Batman's defense, the Joker died in his first appearance until the creators realized he was too good to toss. Given the stuff the Joker survives (such as getting run over by a semi on the highway), I don't think the Batman could kill the Joker even if he tried.

    Avatar image for mariachimacabre
    MariachiMacabre

    7097

    Forum Posts

    106

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #27  Edited By MariachiMacabre

    @lazyaza said:

    @hero_swe said:

    I don't know man, it's as a weak argument of him being a good guy by not killing bad guys when the bad guys he doesn't kill repeatedly causes lots of death (*cough*joker*cough*)

    You basically summed up Batmans entire dilemma and one of the key things about his character that makes him who he is. Batman not killing = Batman. Soon as Batman kills he's not Batman anymore.

    Yeah. Hell, a big sideplot of The Dark Knight Returns and the main reason for the events for Under The Red Hood was Batman's refusal to kill the Joker. It's central to who he is.

    They don't use it as an argument for him being a good guy, they use it as an example that he and his mission are flawed.

    Avatar image for slaegar
    Slaegar

    935

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #28  Edited By Slaegar

    Well bare hands and feet kill twice as many people as rifles (Including ARs, M16 style guns and AKs, AK47 style guns which there are like a million variants) in The US. So a Batman character would kill far far far more than the people he is trying and failing to stop. He may as well pick up a gun and roll. I mean in New York it's OK for police to molest you on the street without cause so picking a pistol won't turn you into a monster.

    Source by the way:

    http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8

    Avatar image for humanity
    Humanity

    21858

    Forum Posts

    5738

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 40

    User Lists: 16

    #29  Edited By Humanity

    I'm not a fan of this Batmobile at all.

    We can all agree one of the sickest Batmobiles out there was the one featured in Batman Returns

    No Caption Provided

    Avatar image for gokaired
    gokaired

    581

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    @crithon said:

    ...... yeah, I heard Paul Dini is not involved in this game

    No Caption Provided

    Yep, It doesn't fill me with as much confidence as I'd like, what's worse is Geoff John's is a consultant, and I wouldn't trust him with Batman with a feather.

    Avatar image for crithon
    crithon

    3979

    Forum Posts

    1823

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    @gokaired said:

    @crithon said:

    ...... yeah, I heard Paul Dini is not involved in this game

    No Caption Provided

    Yep, It doesn't fill me with as much confidence as I'd like, what's worse is Geoff John's is a consultant, and I wouldn't trust him with Batman with a feather.

    well, Dini seems to be positive about his experience with Rocksteady, and the word was they turned him down when he offered to work for them. And there have been just negative reaction from comic book writers working with video games. And Batman Arkham City an example of everyone going "yeah that plot kinda sucked." That could have been rocksteady's fault designing set pieces more then actual story.

    To be honest, I never felt Rocksteady got Paul Dini style, they used a lot of references from the TV show and comics, but they really seemed to be trying to emulate more Frank Miller or Jeph Loeb when it came to their idea of a story. And I also heard Jim Lee was consulted on this game and him and Geoff Johns made more of a 90s Image era style of comic books, style over substance. And that's the problem everyone is having with DC now, like even the DC animation has taken a dive in quality.

    Avatar image for gokaired
    gokaired

    581

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    @crithon said:

    @gokaired said:

    @crithon said:

    ...... yeah, I heard Paul Dini is not involved in this game

    No Caption Provided

    Yep, It doesn't fill me with as much confidence as I'd like, what's worse is Geoff John's is a consultant, and I wouldn't trust him with Batman with a feather.

    well, Dini seems to be positive about his experience with Rocksteady, and the word was they turned him down when he offered to work for them. And there have been just negative reaction from comic book writers working with video games. And Batman Arkham City an example of everyone going "yeah that plot kinda sucked." That could have been rocksteady's fault designing set pieces more then actual story.

    To be honest, I never felt Rocksteady got Paul Dini style, they used a lot of references from the TV show and comics, but they really seemed to be trying to emulate more Frank Miller or Jeph Loeb when it came to their idea of a story. And I also heard Jim Lee was consulted on this game and him and Geoff Johns made more of a 90s Image era style of comic books, style over substance. And that's the problem everyone is having with DC now, like even the DC animation has taken a dive in quality.

    It's nice i'm not the only one that has noticed. :)

    Avatar image for rvone
    RVonE

    5027

    Forum Posts

    8740

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    @humanity said:

    I'm not a fan of this Batmobile at all.

    We can all agree one of the sickest Batmobiles out there was the one featured in Batman Returns

    No Caption Provided

    Obviously.

    Avatar image for wrighteous86
    wrighteous86

    4036

    Forum Posts

    3673

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 1

    The Batmobile's guns should exclusively shoot out tiny batarangs.

    Avatar image for nasp
    nasp

    652

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    ive always said that batman would be cooler if he didnt follow that no kill rule.ide like him better if he just did what needed to be done to save the day.i dont like that he has a self inflicted weakness.

    Avatar image for pcorb
    pcorb

    681

    Forum Posts

    7

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    @zella said:

    In the trailer you can hear Alfred say how the tanks he is fighting are unmanned so he is free to use the rockets and stuff.

    I thought that was mighty convenient, but whatever. When he said "all cops are actually robots" and "there's no need to worry about friendly fire or any of that silly shit" I did start to get a bit suspicious though.

    Avatar image for oursin_360
    OurSin_360

    6675

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    I think the batmobile has always had some guns on it, he just doesn't kill with them.

    Avatar image for the_ruiner
    The_Ruiner

    1801

    Forum Posts

    28

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #38  Edited By The_Ruiner

    He's against shooting people with bullets. But his vehicles have always had some kind of projectile weapon. Missiles mostly.

    Avatar image for ntm
    NTM

    12222

    Forum Posts

    38

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    The guns are for other things, such as unmanned vehicles in which he takes out in this game. If we're referring to Batman in general, there are multiple options that he can take alternatively to killing with huge weapons of destruction. It also goes with him trying to be intimidating.

    Avatar image for crithon
    crithon

    3979

    Forum Posts

    1823

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    @gokaired said:

    @crithon said:

    @gokaired said:

    @crithon said:

    ...... yeah, I heard Paul Dini is not involved in this game

    No Caption Provided

    Yep, It doesn't fill me with as much confidence as I'd like, what's worse is Geoff John's is a consultant, and I wouldn't trust him with Batman with a feather.

    well, Dini seems to be positive about his experience with Rocksteady, and the word was they turned him down when he offered to work for them. And there have been just negative reaction from comic book writers working with video games. And Batman Arkham City an example of everyone going "yeah that plot kinda sucked." That could have been rocksteady's fault designing set pieces more then actual story.

    To be honest, I never felt Rocksteady got Paul Dini style, they used a lot of references from the TV show and comics, but they really seemed to be trying to emulate more Frank Miller or Jeph Loeb when it came to their idea of a story. And I also heard Jim Lee was consulted on this game and him and Geoff Johns made more of a 90s Image era style of comic books, style over substance. And that's the problem everyone is having with DC now, like even the DC animation has taken a dive in quality.

    It's nice i'm not the only one that has noticed. :)

    Well, if your not aware of this, Paul Dini let it slip as to what's going on With DC animation and Cartoon Network in a recent podcast of Kevin Smith. That's probably the harshest he's been on any studio and he's worked on a lot mediocer stuff. But yeah, I felt that a big comparison is Jeph Loeb's Hush and Dini's Heart of Hush, you can really see the difference between the writers and I felt these games are trying to aim more for Loeb's style then Dini. But that makes sense through a video game perspective of just set piece designs.

    Avatar image for ltsmash
    ltsmash

    820

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    He doesn't always use guns, but when he does use guns, they are the BIGGEST GUNS.

    Avatar image for deactivated-62f93c42ce57b
    deactivated-62f93c42ce57b

    919

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    im pretty sure he's always kept a derringer in his garter belt.

    Avatar image for deathstriker
    Deathstriker

    1271

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    They said he was shooting "drone" tanks and hopefully by now most people know what drone means. The tumbler and bat-pod obviously had weapons in the Nolan movies. Hell, he kills Talia in TDKR by shooting her off a bridge.

    Avatar image for gokaired
    gokaired

    581

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #44  Edited By gokaired

    @deathstriker said:

    They said he was shooting "drone" tanks and hopefully by now most people know what drone means. The tumbler and bat-pod obviously had weapons in the Nolan movies. Hell, he kills Talia in TDKR by shooting her off a bridge.

    You know it's funny, Ra's was stretching an acceptable death but then knocking Two Face off a building and the Talia? Batman doesn't kill my foot! XD

    Avatar image for 49th
    49th

    3988

    Forum Posts

    26

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #45  Edited By 49th

    Just because he has guns doesn't mean he will use them on everything. You won't be able to sit in the bat mobile and murder all the enemies.

    He needs missiles for when he is fighting against tanks or the world is about to end.

    Avatar image for john1912
    John1912

    2508

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #46  Edited By John1912

    Im sure you can only use those guns and cannons on other vehicles. They arent going to let you run over and shoot every thug on the street. It would ruin the combat. At best there would be non lethal alternate fire modes for humans.

    Avatar image for spoonman671
    Spoonman671

    5874

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #47  Edited By Spoonman671

    Batman understands that only he is responsible enough to make use of firearms, and they are not suited for use amongst the common folk. You're probably just not sophisticated enough to properly delineate between moral and immoral firearm ownership, but don't worry, this is a capacity exclusive to The Superiors.

    @rvone said:

    @humanity said:

    I'm not a fan of this Batmobile at all.

    We can all agree one of the sickest Batmobiles out there was the one featured in Batman Returns

    No Caption Provided

    Obviously.

    Fuck no.
    Fuck no.

    Avatar image for humanity
    Humanity

    21858

    Forum Posts

    5738

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 40

    User Lists: 16

    Avatar image for rvone
    RVonE

    5027

    Forum Posts

    8740

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    Batman understands that only he is responsible enough to make use of firearms, and they are not suited for use amongst the common folk. You're probably just not sophisticated enough to properly delineate between moral and immoral firearm ownership, but don't worry, this is a capacity exclusive to The Superiors.

    @rvone said:

    @humanity said:

    I'm not a fan of this Batmobile at all.

    We can all agree one of the sickest Batmobiles out there was the one featured in Batman Returns

    No Caption Provided

    Obviously.

    Fuck no.
    Fuck no.

    lol, that's a good joke.

    Avatar image for hamst3r
    Hamst3r

    5520

    Forum Posts

    7837

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 2

    "Those human-shaped shells are unmanned! Soulless husks! It's okay to shoot them!"

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.