How does BC:R2 look shittier than BC:R from 2 years ago? Pretty disappointing. I'm glad I looked at reviews for what I thought would be an instant purchase.

Does it really matter that much how it looks?

sure does, mainly due to the fact that it has regressed from the first. from what i've read it's a worse game all around too. how does a sequel looks worse than the priginal after two years. way lame. ps-f u

" ps-f u "

Cause it's a phoned in piece of shit.

The jumping fucked up the graphics.

" The jumping fucked up the graphics. "

" How does BC:R2 look shittier than BC:R from 2 years ago? "

" I'm glad I looked at reviews for what I thought would be an instant purchase. "

The graphics looks HARRY. 
 
Get it?

I'm literally switching between my TV output of BCR1 on my PS3 and BCR2 on my 360 and there is no fucking way in hell BCR1 looks better. At all. 

" They didn't get worse. They got better.  "

I wouldn't say the graphics look worse, but I would say the game chugs along a lot of times, constantly putting too much on it's plate.

There seems to be quite a few instances of the background flickering and some general tearing I don't remember in the first game. Plus but I'm almost certain the action is zoomed out quite a bit (I haven't gone back to check). I'd say that's arguably worse.