The third game in the BioShock series leaves the bottom of the sea behind for an entirely new setting - the floating city of Columbia, circa 1912. Come to retrieve a girl named Elizabeth, ex-detective Booker DeWitt finds more in store for him there than he could ever imagine.
Guys, we made one of the most critically acclaimed games of the past decade and people are willing to buy a sequel to it based on brand recognition alone.
It's quite possible it's named Bioshock because, well, it may actually be in the Bioshock timeline. With this new time rift plot point, its very possible this once seemingly isolated storyline could be intrinsically linked to the pretense of the first game, or possibly even a new direction for the future game.
Part of the reason is marketing, but why were the first two named Bioshock? I think it has to be because of the biological developments in the plasmids. The same thing is also happening in Infinite and the plasmids are still central to the gameplay of that game, so why not keep the name Bioshock. I really wouldnt be surprised if Bioshock was just used from the start.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along
with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely
increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.
Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other
Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll
send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment