Borderlands 2 is on my wish list but I never had a chance to play the original. If I play through it, how long does it take and is it worth it before the sequel is released? I am looking to play this possibly over the next 2 weeks on PS3.
Borderlands 2
Game » consists of 33 releases. Released Sep 18, 2012
- Xbox 360
- PC
- PlayStation Network (PS3)
- PlayStation 3
- + 9 more
- Xbox 360 Games Store
- PlayStation Vita
- PlayStation Network (Vita)
- Linux
- PlayStation 4
- Mac
- Android
- Xbox One
- Nintendo Switch
Return to Pandora as part of a new group of ragtag Vault Hunters in this sequel to the 2009 first-person "role-playing shooter" Borderlands, now with new crazy enemies, new crazy character classes, and even crazier weapons.
Should I or do I need to play Borderlands before Borderlands 2?
I don't think you need to play it, but you could probably manage to play it all the way until 2 is released. You may want to pick it up for cheap just to make sure you'll even want 2 since it seems to just be more of the same.
It takes as long as you want. The story is insignificant. It's just a loot driven FPS with quests and skill trees. So no, you don't need to play it, but it's still really good. If you can pick up a GOTY edition I would recommend it. Skip Mad Moxxi, the rest of the DLC is good though.
@Vivek: Borderlands is a timeless classic. Definitely go for the Game of the Year edition, but keep in mind--if you're the type who likes to finish everything, you may need longer than two weeks.
Also: Lilith is the best character, flat-out. Even Randy Pitchford acknowledges this.
I've been thinking about picking it up since it's dirt cheap everywhere but I've been told by various people that it's boring to play by yourself. Not sure how much truth is in that - I was just fine playing through Diablo 3 by myself even though a majority of the time I played with a friend.
In the end though I decided to just wait for Borderlands 2 - it's coming out pretty soon and if I dive deep into the original now I might feel burnt out on that style of gameplay by the time the sequel comes out.
I doubt you need to, but you probably should. Story is pointless and the writing is funny, especially in the Knoxx DLC. It's probably worth playing just for the gun fountain when you throw away all your unwanted guns.
Borderlands doesn't have a deep story or anything like that, but I think you'll enjoy the sequel more if you have knowledge of the first game.
It's also pretty cheap now, if you hate it, you know not to waste money on Borderlands 2.
I'd hold out til 2 with a FOV slider.
Borderlands 1 was all right, but its super narrow FOV made playing it for any extended periods of time hard. There were ways to get around it, and maybe someone figured out how to permanently change it, but every time you sprinted or boosted, after it was done, it'd return to a narrow fov.
If you're playing on a console, I dunno. Rent it, have a save file, and get some cheap DLC for Borderlands 2?
Borderlands is not known for its story, so I don't think you will miss that much if you start with Borderlands 2. I mean I played Mass Effect 2 before Mass Effect, and I totally enjoyed the game, and the story is really important in the Mass Effect franchise. So, you will totally have fun in Borderlands 2 even if you never played Borderlands. Although if it's cheap, you should totally get it because it's super rad.
@Vivek:
Well, you have a personal computer device, why not try it right now?
Borderlands: Game of the Year for £9.99
Borderlands: The Zombie Island of Dr. Ned
Borderlands: Mad Moxxi's Underdome Riot
Borderlands: The Secret Armory of General Knoxx
Borderlands: Claptrap's Robot Revolution
http://store.steampowered.com/app/901566/
.
It's a fine game, you'll definitely get your money's worth out of it. As to whether or not you need to play it, for the story and shit? No. But that's not what Borderlands is. It's just good co-op fun!
http://www.giantbomb.com/steam/92-718/your-guide-to-the-steam-summer-sale-2012/35-553995/
I certainly don't think you need to play it, but it was pretty enjoyable. The only major problem is that it's a huge time sink, and I think the best stuff is probably in the DLC, which you wouldn't get to until later.
I doubt you'll need to, but you should. Its a fantastic game, pretty cheap now, and I'm sure you'll still be able to find people to play with online. Most importantly it will give you a chance to get a feel for the game mechanics. If you don't like the original you probably shouldn't bother picking up the sequel because from what I've been hearing it's still very much the same game.
@Zelyre said:
I'd hold out til 2 with a FOV slider.
Borderlands 1 was all right, but its super narrow FOV made playing it for any extended periods of time hard. There were ways to get around it, and maybe someone figured out how to permanently change it, but every time you sprinted or boosted, after it was done, it'd return to a narrow fov.
If you're playing on a console, I dunno. Rent it, have a save file, and get some cheap DLC for Borderlands 2?
Huh? I never had any issues with the FOV in Borderlands, unless you're one of those insane people that constantly needs the FOV at something insane like 150.
Anyway, I'd suggest giving the first one a look at a cheaper price to know if you'll like the series or not. I had fun on my first playthrough but can't even make myself play it since then.
You don't have to play it. The story isn't what you're there for. You should play it because its a great game.
I've played Borderlands 7 or 8 times, maybe more. I don't think you need to play it before Borderlands 2 and I don't think you should play it before Borderlands 2. Borderlands 2 looks like more of the same so why would you want to possibly burn yourself out by playing it?
i feel like this same question came up alot with diablo 3. i doubt you'll need to play the original, but its an awesome game, so if you're interested in the sequel there's no reason you shouldn't play the previous installment
5$ on Steam right now, so I'd recommend it for that price.
Personally though, I wouldn't want to play a bunch of borderlands just before 2, so I don't get bored with it.
i would agree with all the people who've said you don't need to play the first but should cause it's a fun game. the only reason to not play the first one at this point is if you're planning on picking up 2 at launch and are the type of gamer who (like me) likes to space out there third and first person shooters to avoid getting burned out on them. As an aside there are only two fps's that i go back to regularly, halo and borderlands..
The story is inconsequential. There may be callbacks in Borderlands 2, but it isn't like you will be missing out on some grand story arc.
@believer258 said:
@Zelyre said:
I'd hold out til 2 with a FOV slider.
Borderlands 1 was all right, but its super narrow FOV made playing it for any extended periods of time hard. There were ways to get around it, and maybe someone figured out how to permanently change it, but every time you sprinted or boosted, after it was done, it'd return to a narrow fov.
If you're playing on a console, I dunno. Rent it, have a save file, and get some cheap DLC for Borderlands 2?
Huh? I never had any issues with the FOV in Borderlands, unless you're one of those insane people that constantly needs the FOV at something insane like 150.
Anyway, I'd suggest giving the first one a look at a cheaper price to know if you'll like the series or not. I had fun on my first playthrough but can't even make myself play it since then.
This. If you like FPS and hack-and-slash style loot, but not both, you may not enjoy it.
Then again the game is so damn cheap there's really no reason not to. And make sure you at least get the Zombie Island of Dr. Ned. It's fucking awesome. For reference, a friend of mine immediately pre-ordered Diablo III without ever having played the first 2. D3 may be subpar anyway, but the point stands: Test out the cheaper merchandise first!
@addictedtopinescent said:
5$ on Steam right now, so I'd recommend it for that price.
Personally though, I wouldn't want to play a bunch of borderlands just before 2, so I don't get bored with it.
$7.98 for me, but thanks! Downloading now lol
You don't need to play it. It depends on how much free time you have and do you have a backlog of games? If yes, then I would say skip it, because Borderlands 2 looks to be the same as Borderlands 1, but better at everything.
I ordered the game of the year edition yesterday because I want to become familiar with the series instead of going in blind in September.
I doubt I'll burn out on that type of gameplay since I haven't played an FPS regularly for a VERY long time. The only shooty game I've played in the past several months is Gears of War 3 and that's not really a FPS. ME3 had some shooting except that I rarely used firearms as an Adept (stasis+warp detonation all the way). Skyrim and The Witcher 2 are all swords and magic. Stuff like Asura's Wrath, Walking Dead, Fez, Iron Brigade, and Dark Souls round out the rest of the console games I've played this year.
I think I'm ready to get into some RPG loot FPS action.
It's a great game you can find for dirt cheap. Why not play it? Plus, there are the little bonuses you'll get in BL2 for having save data from the first game and, who knows, you might just get a few of the more "in" jokes in BL2.
all in all, no reason not to play it, barring time and your own personal life.
Borderlands was okay. Not exactly sure why people loved it so much, it failed at nearly everything it promised.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment