do you think this is where they are taking MW3? to me it seems so from the trailers, anywho i never played the 2nd one so forgive if thats what they imply in the end.... but this one sounds sweet if they do a WW3 scenario.

Yes.

I bet the Germans are responsible again. Third time's the charm right?

I bet the Germans are responsible again. Third time's the charm right?

I bet the Germans are responsible again. Third time's the charm right?

I bet its gonna be Hitler's great grandson that starts it. 

I'm so tired of this COD shit.  I think they need to just drop it and move on.  I want to see something different with these damn games.

Whatever it is, they could at least set it in a city that isn't New York... After experiencing Crysis 2, I don't think anyone can exceed my expectations regarding NYC...

I'm so tired of this COD shit.  I think they need to just drop it and move on.  I want to see something different with these damn games.

I just want to see what they do to further ruin the originally-brilliant story of Soap MacTavish and John Price.

do you think this is where they are taking MW3? to me it seems so from the trailers, anywho i never played the 2nd one so forgive if thats what they imply in the end.... but this one sounds sweet if they do a WW3 scenario.

What would the Russians do if they conquered the U.S.? Go on through Canada, or just occupy? 

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

@Djeffers03 said:

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

Yeah, head of video games? They are CRAZY!

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

It could be that their heading this direction, considering this time it's direction is pointed toward other countries beside America. I'm interested in seeing if they will make Makarov continue to blame certain attacks on the USA to gain an advantage, similar to what he did in Modern Warfare 2. Hopefully they actually took time to craft the story this time, unlike the mess they introduced in the second title.

I hope they make Makarov a more interesting villain. In MW2 it was just "HE'S A WHORE, A MAD DOG KILLER FOR THE HIGHEST BIDDER" then the infamous "No Russian" and then "I'll see you in hell Price"

@Djeffers03 said:

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

Yeah, I'm starting to question the documentarian credibility of these Modern Warfare games too.

man who cares anymore? I've enjoyed all 6 single player campaigns of Call of Duty games, and i'm eager to play MW3's campaign, but i don't care about the details anymore.. it's braindead writing coated with good cinematic action 

@jadeskye: True. Realistically speaking (this is what bothered me about Homefront), if the U.S. was invaded the Canadian, Australian and European militaries would be fighting as well. 

@HandsomeDead said:

@Djeffers03 said:

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

Yeah, I'm starting to question the documentarian credibility of these Modern Warfare games too.

I'm sorry, excuse me, this is where we draw the line for something that makes logical sense? You people did play the last game right?

@vidiot said:

@HandsomeDead said:

@Djeffers03 said:

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

Yeah, I'm starting to question the documentarian credibility of these Modern Warfare games too.

I'm sorry, excuse me, this is where we draw the line for something that makes logical sense? You people did play the last game right?

Don't be such a dense cunt.

Yup. I don't understand why the Russians are attacking other countries though, they only went to war with the US. Maybe Soap got some info out to have Europe see we didn't mean to fuck up. Then why wouldn't they just send troops to the US? Why would the Russians attack their countries?

@InternetCrab: So you're gonna buy it regardless then? All CoD games get good reviews. It's inevitable, they'll innovate the least amount possible, add in a couple of new things and everyone will say it's the best FPS around, the majority will get bored of it after a month and they'll go back to the last one, the one two before, or stick with CoD4. Unless there really is something NEW that they try, I really don't see myself buying this. Sorry IW/Raven/Whoever else is helping, but I'm suffering from CoD fatigue.

Wait. Wouldn't that be classified as Future Combat? as it could be a real case scenario that hasn't happen yet?

@HandsomeDead said:

@vidiot said:

@HandsomeDead said:

@Djeffers03 said:

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

Yeah, I'm starting to question the documentarian credibility of these Modern Warfare games too.

I'm sorry, excuse me, this is where we draw the line for something that makes logical sense? You people did play the last game right?

Don't be such a dense cunt.

No idea why you're calling me names. Illogical storyline+More illogical craziness=More lunacy. Which is something you agree with, unless your excellent sarcastic comment questioning the "documentarian credibility" was not sarcastic and was legit literal.

Speculation threads are pretty useless now that the plot can easily be known.

@HandsomeDead said:

@vidiot said:

@HandsomeDead said:

@Djeffers03 said:

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

Yeah, I'm starting to question the documentarian credibility of these Modern Warfare games too.

I'm sorry, excuse me, this is where we draw the line for something that makes logical sense? You people did play the last game right?

Don't be such a dense cunt.

No idea why you're calling me names. Illogical storyline+More illogical craziness=More lunacy. Which is something you agree with, unless your excellent sarcastic comment questioning the "documentarian credibility" was not sarcastic and was legit literal.

@vidiot said:

@HandsomeDead said:

@vidiot said:

@HandsomeDead said:

@Djeffers03 said:

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

Yeah, I'm starting to question the documentarian credibility of these Modern Warfare games too.

I'm sorry, excuse me, this is where we draw the line for something that makes logical sense? You people did play the last game right?

Don't be such a dense cunt.

No idea why you're calling me names. Illogical storyline+More illogical craziness=More lunacy. Which is something you agree with, unless your excellent sarcastic comment questioning the "documentarian credibility" was not sarcastic and was legit literal.

Because when it comes to discussing Modern Warfare, you're a slippery customer. Any time it comes up, you post like everyone else is playing the game like it's a statement of fact but you, and only you, can see through the bullshit and see it's actually a blockbuster technothriller so I can never tell if you're being obtuse, a little bit of a spastic or what.

@vidiot said:

@HandsomeDead said:

@vidiot said:

@HandsomeDead said:

@Djeffers03 said:

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

Yeah, I'm starting to question the documentarian credibility of these Modern Warfare games too.

I'm sorry, excuse me, this is where we draw the line for something that makes logical sense? You people did play the last game right?

Don't be such a dense cunt.

No idea why you're calling me names. Illogical storyline+More illogical craziness=More lunacy. Which is something you agree with, unless your excellent sarcastic comment questioning the "documentarian credibility" was not sarcastic and was legit literal.

Because when it comes to discussing Modern Warfare, you're a slippery customer. Any time it comes up, you post like everyone else is playing the game like it's a statement of fact but you, and only you, can see through the bullshit and see it's actually a blockbuster technothriller so I can never tell if you're being obtuse, a little bit of a spastic or what.

wish i could delete this thread, its gotten so off-topic.

@HandsomeDead said:

@vidiot said:

@HandsomeDead said:

@vidiot said:

@HandsomeDead said:

@Djeffers03 said:

@Yanngc33 said:

@Retro_Clone: not really no (open the spoiler tab at your own risk)

SPOILER WARNING: Click here to reveal hidden content.

Makarov is responsible for the terrorist attacks that hit Germany, France and England. He takes control of Russia after holding the president hostage and invades Europe. It's not World War 3, it's terrorism on a gigantic scale. It's bananas

A little weird that a few terrorist can overthrow a superpower and all of a sudden have the loyalty of the entire armed forces and population to go on and attack the world.

Yeah, I'm starting to question the documentarian credibility of these Modern Warfare games too.

I'm sorry, excuse me, this is where we draw the line for something that makes logical sense? You people did play the last game right?

Don't be such a dense cunt.

No idea why you're calling me names. Illogical storyline+More illogical craziness=More lunacy. Which is something you agree with, unless your excellent sarcastic comment questioning the "documentarian credibility" was not sarcastic and was legit literal.

Because when it comes to discussing Modern Warfare, you're a slippery customer. Any time it comes up, you post like everyone else is playing the game like it's a statement of fact but you, and only you, can see through the bullshit and see it's actually a blockbuster technothriller so I can never tell if you're being obtuse, a little bit of a spastic or what.

Hard time deciphering that last sentence. It should be noted that my playful addition to your comment, should be interpreted as nothing more as an agreement and reminder that MW2's "plot" is a muddled mess, and it's funny that people are finding the outlandish concepts in MW3 "weird". This is something that I assume you agree with, seeing how your own sarcastic comment, reminded that Modern Warfare is a series that has a plot and setting rooted in the logical constructs of hyper-fantasy. If we were to divorce ourselves from the conversation, we would see you making a sarcastic comment, and then me making another playful sarcastic comment.
Then you call me a dense cunt...For making an equal sarcastic comment.

Oh, no wait, it's because of my own personal past posts being critical of MW2's plot, and yet at the same time, accepting that it's not a terrible shooter? This makes me unqualified to even make a light jab at this? You are qualified? It seems you want to go back down a road we've traveled before, I'm just skimming over it friend. No intent on hijacking another thread.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's World War 3.