Why aren't any of the reviews live yet? Isn't the game out today? I thought that the policy with reviews are that the embargo can be "mandated" up until the point the game comes out? Well it's out. You can buy it right now from any outlet that sells games. So why aren't any review scores live?
Darksiders II
Game » consists of 30 releases. Released Aug 14, 2012
- Xbox 360
- PC
- PlayStation 3
- Xbox 360 Games Store
- + 6 more
- Wii U
- PlayStation Network (PS3)
- PlayStation 4
- Xbox One
- Nintendo Switch
- Google Stadia
Players return to the post-Apocalypse in the sequel to 2010's Darksiders, this time as former protagonist War's fellow Horseman of the Apocalypse, Death, the pale rider, who seeks to resurrect Humanity to clear his brother's good name.
In a few hours this thread should be locked.
I got my copy in the mail yesterday. Seems pretty rad. Assuming it retains the same level of quality as the first few hours, it has my seal of approval.
There's your review!
@Hunkulese said:
@Hunkulese People planning on buying the game day one may check the review before they go buy it and change their mind if the review is poor. People waiting for a good review probably won't be buying it day one anyway.
This pretty much, nice assessment.
It is dodgy, but if you take into account that Thq probably can't afford to not be careful and take every precaution.
X360 Magazine UK gave it a 90/100 and Game Masters UK an 88/100. Those two are the only two that show on Metacritic for the moment, at least.
Most worringly, though, is that viverra4 gave it a 0, arguing:
Fail of the year. grafon tonet, kinco tonet, vse tonet, sonyblyadi sosnooleyy. drakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakeface
Truly harsh words.
@JoeyRavn said:
Most worringly, though, is that viverra4 gave it a 0, arguing:
Fail of the year. grafon tonet, kinco tonet, vse tonet, sonyblyadi sosnooleyy. drakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefaceTrully harsh words.
Man...there goes my pre-order. :(
@JoeyRavn said:
X360 Magazine UK gave it a 90/100 and Game Masters UK an 88/100. Those two are the only two that show on Metacritic for the moment, at least.
Most worringly, though, is that viverra4 gave it a 0, arguing:
Fail of the year. grafon tonet, kinco tonet, vse tonet, sonyblyadi sosnooleyy. drakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefaceTrully harsh words.
Wow... that's a really thought provoking review. I like how he mixes a few real words with random gibberish to provide commentary on the game and the industry as a whole.
Here's a review for ya: Got the game at midnight last night, played until 5am in the morning, I'm now at work at 9am and thought about calling in. It's really fun, and really good.
Thanks for saving me $60, viverra4. Such a disappointment.X360 Magazine UK gave it a 90/100 and Game Masters UK an 88/100. Those two are the only two that show on Metacritic for the moment, at least.
Most worringly, though, is that viverra4 gave it a 0, arguing:
Fail of the year. grafon tonet, kinco tonet, vse tonet, sonyblyadi sosnooleyy. drakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefaceTruly harsh words.
@scalpel said:
Publications that buy the game on release can publish their reviews day one, right?
That's not really enough time to properly play a game though. Especially with a long game like Darksiders II.
@MariachiMacabre said:
@JoeyRavnThanks for saving me $60, viverra4. Such a disappointment.X360 Magazine UK gave it a 90/100 and Game Masters UK an 88/100. Those two are the only two that show on Metacritic for the moment, at least.
Most worringly, though, is that viverra4 gave it a 0, arguing:
Fail of the year. grafon tonet, kinco tonet, vse tonet, sonyblyadi sosnooleyy. drakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefaceTruly harsh words.
Aw man, drakeface is the worst! And sosnooleyy!? No thanks.
@Bobby_The_Great said:
Here's a review for ya: Got the game at midnight last night, played until 5am in the morning, I'm now at work at 9am and thought about calling in. It's really fun, and really good.
Nice, but not enough drakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakeface.
@MooseyMcMan said:
@scalpel said:
Publications that buy the game on release can publish their reviews day one, right?
That's not really enough time to properly play a game though. Especially with a long game like Darksiders II.
Yeah, I'm just wondering about the details of the embargo thing. I'm assuming it's something you sign in order to get a pre-release review copy. Theoretically, a publication could deny the review copy, get their hands on a pre-release copy in some shady manner and publish their review whenever they want. Doesn't even have to be shady, seeing as any person could walk into a Gamestop and get a game early from some clueless clerk.
@Heltom92 said:
@JoeyRavn said:
X360 Magazine UK gave it a 90/100 and Game Masters UK an 88/100. Those two are the only two that show on Metacritic for the moment, at least.
Most worringly, though, is that viverra4 gave it a 0, arguing:
Fail of the year. grafon tonet, kinco tonet, vse tonet, sonyblyadi sosnooleyy. drakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefacedrakefaceTrully harsh words.
Wow... that's a really thought provoking review. I like how he mixes a few real words with random gibberish to provide commentary on the game and the industry as a whole.
I like to think that the sheer level of terribleness of the game made him go into such a rage that he stroked out while writing his review.
@stinky said:
@scalpel: its about getting future games from the publisher. anyone can publish the review now, but they don't because they want to keep a good relationship with the publisher.
Getting games wouldn't be a problem provided you had a good source. I'd imagine a bigger concern would be not getting invited to events by the publisher etc.
Phil Kollar gave it a 9 over on Polygon. http://www.theverge.com/gaming/2012/8/14/3229370/darksiders-2-review
Edit: IGN gave it a 7.5 http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/14/darksiders-ii-review
Gamespot 8.5 http://www.gamespot.com/darksiders-ii/reviews/darksiders-ii-review-6391200/
Destructoid 9 http://www.destructoid.com/review-darksiders-ii-232783.phtml
and Gameinformer 9 https://www.gameinformer.com/games/darksiders_ii/b/ps3/archive/2012/08/14/death-39-s-loving-embrace.aspx
@Jeff said:
9AM on the day of release is hardly a rare embargo time. Everyone should move to midnight EDT on day of release, but not everyone does. It's a struggle.
So think of this post the next time you go to post something about how the lack of reviews for a game seems "fishy." It isn't.
Out of curiosity - and this probably isn't the place for it, but whatever - do you have an idea of why publishers embargo reviews until the release day? I mean, I get it if they know the game was disappointing, but this hardly seems like a bad game. I mean, THQ isn't doing great financially, and I think a few positive reviews right before launch might help push some of those on the fence. Feel free to educate this fool.
@Jeff: It's also terribly understandable given THQ's position, they can't really afford any press coverage of any kind.
No news is good news it seems. Super stoked that it seems like they didn't mess up what was fun about the first game.
@Heltom92 said:
Wow... that's a really thought provoking review. I like how he mixes a few real words with random gibberish to provide commentary on the game and the industry as a whole.
@Cincaid said:
Man...there goes my pre-order. :(
You guys are my favorite. Followed.
@Scrawnto said:
Are embargoes enforced by contracts that are signed to get pre-release copies? Is it a EULA sort of thing, where they say "If you play this copy we sent you, you implicitly agree to these terms:"? Or is it purely a matter of playing nice with the publishers?
Depends on the publisher. When I was working for my college newspaper, I got a pre-release copy of that awful Family Guy game for review along with a letter saying if we wanted to review the game, we would need to contact the PR rep before running it, and there was a not-so-subtle hint included in the packaging that if we gave it positive feedback, we would be put on a list to receive future titles for screening. The game came totally unsolicited, so I thought I'd give it a shot.
Went home, put the game in PS2 and the game broke on the second level. We didn't write the review, publisher asked us why not and I had to write a nice email explaining that the copy we got (not a beta, btw, the actual thing they were releasing in two weeks) had a crippling bug. We never got video games from them ever again.
@Ravenlight said:
@Heltom92 said:
Wow... that's a really thought provoking review. I like how he mixes a few real words with random gibberish to provide commentary on the game and the industry as a whole.
@Cincaid said:
Man...there goes my pre-order. :(
You guys are my favorite. Followed.
And that's why I only consider the community of GB as my home on the internet =)
@Jackhole said:
Edit: IGN gave it a 7.5 http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/14/darksiders-ii-review
Gamespot 8.5 http://www.gamespot.com/darksiders-ii/reviews/darksiders-ii-review-6391200/
Ouch, that has to suck a giant dick. I think THQ had bigger expectations than that.
@Grissefar: Seems IGN's only real complaint was how much it's "inspired" by other games, which I guess is a valid complaint, but it never really hurt my enjoyment of the first.
@HatKing said:
Out of curiosity - and this probably isn't the place for it, but whatever - do you have an idea of why publishers embargo reviews until the release day? I mean, I get it if they know the game was disappointing, but this hardly seems like a bad game. I mean, THQ isn't doing great financially, and I think a few positive reviews right before launch might help push some of those on the fence. Feel free to educate this fool.
If you break their rules I am sure they won't be sending you any more review copies.
@Jeff said:
9AM on the day of release is hardly a rare embargo time. Everyone should move to midnight EDT on day of release, but not everyone does. It's a struggle.
So think of this post the next time you go to post something about how the lack of reviews for a game seems "fishy." It isn't.
It just seems incredibly cheesy and gross. It totally may not be the case, but when you see some of the weird tactics taken by game publishers in the past, and a pretty decent ad campaign by THQ (followed by little to no news upon its launch), it's hard not to get suspicious.
Are they going to lose that many sales because they waited until later in the day for publications to post their reviews? It's a good game, from all I've read. They should be trying to get that news out as much as possible.
I'm probably missing something plainly obvious, but embargoes after the launch day are bad for the consumer.
@Klei said:
@phrosnite said:
IGN's review was hilarious. I don't know who that skirt was but she doesn't know shit.
This. I don't know who Audrey Drake is, but whenever she gives her opinion about something, I always wonder why she's tasked to represent IGN's views with her reviews.
Hey, let's lay off the misogyny, okay? Who gives a shit if it was a female reviewer? Jesus.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment