@MikkaQ said:
@Napalm said:
@MikkaQ said:
Nope, even the ones that are all serious and try to be good music, and are progressive or whatever. I have a lot of metal head friends [...]
Okay, so you don't know what you're talking about. Gotcha.
Right because making assumptions about people on the internet certainly demonstrates your deep knowledge of the universe.
While your opinion is your opinion, I am well within my right to critique and challenge that, especially when you're painting with very broad strokes in a way that makes you sound like you truly believe yourself. Disregarding the fact that you are ostensibly challenging all heavy metal made between 1986 and 2011, your opinion is both ignorant and factually wrong because you can, objectively, point to any number of subgenres and see the strides made with various bands, and in your designated time period, [twenty-five years], see the rise of at least half a dozen new subgenres that are well established at this point.
The 2000s have been an amazing melting pot of heavy metal, especially old bands returning from the dead, (Razor, Forbidden, Viking, Sacrifice), and new bands bringing along new genres, or returning roots. If metal isn't your thing, just say so before casting down half of the history within one genre of music.
Or talk out of your ass less.
@Catarrhal said:
@MikkaQ said:
I think the metal scene has been shitty for almost 25 years though, so hey.
A valid perspective. You might wanna listen to a record called Awaken the Guardian, if you haven't already.
Personally, even though you weren't speaking to me, haven't heard Fates Warning long enough to form an opinion.
Also to MikkaQ, listen to a little beast called Ironbound. You won't regret it.
Log in to comment