Im going to start killing puppies.

" @Meteora said:

" Why is this thread still up?  You can't compare a JRPG with a Shooter...  Besides its normally easy to make a shooter game easy to play. "

Such a stupid statement. It takes a lot of work making a fun/balanced game like Bad Company 2. The level design and flow of maps for multiplayer must have taken forever to get right.  Final Fantasy 13 must have been easy to make. Most of the time and effort must have been put in the graphics. Square is still using the same storylines, and 1 dimensional characters from 10 years ago.  Oh, and don't forget you are pressing the X button for the first 10 hours of the game.   Bad Company 2 is a much better game because it is fun, plain and simple. One of the best class-based multiplayer shooters out there (the best being Team Fortress 2), versus one of the most boring, and mediocre JRPGs. No competition really. Final Fantasy continues to sell on brand name alone. Don't expect the next Final Fantasy to sell that well after people get burned from this crapfest. "

Jesus christ get off the mans back, he's saying that he believes that a good jrpg...in my opinion the first good jrpg since..late ps2 games like final fantasy xii and persona 4, is rated lower then a game with a market that is completely flooded at the moment and basically the same exact thing as every other one of it's kind. I also have no idea why this is rated so low for it's linearity, yes it's linear, yes your getting the story explained to you at the same time. It NEEDS to be this linear your fugitives on the run, if you could walk into a city and talk to a bunch of people without anyone asking any questions i think that would make the review lower then having the first 25 hours of gameplay moving the story forward and being logical. I completely agree with you poster dude.   

This just in:
 
Sex is better than peanut butter.