Do you prefer the Bombcast when it's funny or when it's insightful?

Do listen more closely when Paul Barnett talks about the evolution of the medium or are you a fan of Mega64's origin story? 
   
The Bombcast tends to have elements of both, but which one do you dig more?

I listen to the bombcast for their insight fullness. I listen to Sarcastic gamer (all except community cast) for the laughs. And Playstation Nation for in between funny and insightful

These guys genuinely seem to enjoy what they're doing and that's what drew me to the Bombcast. They're hilarious at times, chattin' with the Mega64 crew about hot durgers, and at other times... well, hilarious. There's insight to be had if you're interested in a dissection of beans or why Phoenix Down is named the way it is, but I don't come to Giant Bomb looks for ponderous reflections about the gaming industry. However, if they provide it, their discussion style would most certainly make it worth hearing.

" NO NO!  Don't make me choose.  Please! "

Funny, I miss taste tests.

insightful things can be funny

I like the funny sections, I don't care if it's horribly off topic or anything. 
For example the "How many ______ could take a ________?" or the swedish candy section.

If there were a 'Both' option, I would use it. But since I had to choose I picked 'Funny', because it is more fun.

I like it when they mix it up, so fuck voting, basically. Sorry. 

I have yet to find it either. I suppose either would be an improvement.

It's better when it's funny. The insightful stuff isn't particularly insightful, although it could be considered funny.

I like it when they're humourously insightful!

C. Bot...wait...
 
Well then, fuck you.
 
But seriously, both. I like learning of new things from the Bombcast, but at the same time one of the reasons I listen to it is because of their behavior.

As much as I enjoy the insightful discussions they have, it's definitely better when it's funny. The humor is kinda the biggest reason there is to listen to the Bombcast.

I love how many people are mad about the lack of an all-of-the-above option. C'mon guys, do you really not at least lean one way or the other? 
 
The Bombcast serves both purposes and you can like both--I happen to be in that boat myself--but if everybody just puts "both," the poll stops being interesting as a barometer of opinion. Both is the safe choice and, as such, is lame.

I prefer it when the guys from Tested are not involved in any way.