Avatar image for ignor
#1 Posted by Ignor (3186 posts) -
Avatar image for mracoon
#2 Posted by mracoon (5099 posts) -

There does seem to be some difference between the two things in their meaning but I don't think that in games that they're any different. From what I can tell, an apocalypse precedes and armageddon.

Moderator
Avatar image for video_game_king
#3 Posted by Video_Game_King (36564 posts) -

Isn't Armageddon more of a Christian concept, while the Apocalypse is used to refer to any sort of end-of-days scenario?

Avatar image for thephilatron
#4 Posted by ThePhilatron (287 posts) -

Both are Christian concepts. Apocalypse refers to the whole end whereas Armageddon refers specifically to the final battle during the end.

Avatar image for bones8677
#5 Posted by Bones8677 (3492 posts) -

Yeah, they're both different things. But are a part of the same event. The End of the World.

Avatar image for sodacat
#6 Posted by sodacat (250 posts) -

Bumping this because, two years later, we still have both concepts and their descriptions still make them completely interchangeable.

Avatar image for marino
#7 Posted by Marino (6233 posts) -

@sodacat: So...change them?

Staff
Avatar image for sodacat
#8 Posted by sodacat (250 posts) -

@Marino: OK, I'm going to change Apocalypse to a concept about drastic world/universe wide changes, while Armageddon will be about an absolute end to existence. I don't know how common usage will bear that out, but based on the literal translation of the words that's the best distinction I can make between the two concepts.