I did have a reply to your reply @icyeyes but the forum ate it- it never seemed to show up. I was really happy with it, too. It succinctly encapsulated what I feel about this. I don't know that I can remember the amazing word usage I used to do it again.
So pissed that this forum keeps eating my posts!
I'll try, but it wont be as good.
@icyeyes: ... So you don't like this because it would encourage people to maintain their subscription? The horrors of "segregating" an already "segregated" community feels like a weak cover story. ...
This may come as a shock to you, but this has nothing to do with when (if) I lost my subscription. I only speak from experience. I have been on the internet a long time and been apart of many many communities (sometimes as a moderator). I have experienced what happens when adding a "premium" forum to a forum that didn't have it before. It adds an element of toxicity that never goes away.
Beyond this I would also argue it is not necessary because I don't see what discussions premium members would need to have that non premium members should not be privy to. This concept implies that all non subscribers are "unconstructive" and have no valuable feedback to provide by sole merit of being a non subscribers. That concept is, by itself, completely false. I also don't see how it does any good for Giantbomb as a whole. Even when used just for feedback on premium only content. It just has no merit.
As to your suggestion about "filters". I feel this is also unnecessary as filtering is handled by the mods of the site. That's how Dave designed the sites forums to work. We live in harmony. If you genuinely feel someone is derailing a conversation and/or being unconstructive all you have to do is PM a mod or flag them and they will look into it. If nothing happens it just means they don't agree with you (and I can assure you they do discuss it first. it doesn't, generally, just go to one mod and then one mod decides on it). So even just adding a filter to filter out non subscribers because for some reason you are prejudice against their site status (bad joke, sorry) holds no merit for me.
I'm sorry, but I still disagree with your suggestion. I'm also sorry; I don't feel I wrote it as eloquently as I did before, but this is the second time I wrote this. Most of the angst in my words is because of that and not because of you.
Log in to comment