4K 50" HDTV under $1000 for your PS4/X1/PC

Avatar image for shadowskill11
ShadowSkill11

1877

Forum Posts

48

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

http://kotaku.com/moneysaver-one-shot-a-4k-tv-for-966-513671749

I just couldn't pass this up myself. I got a PS4/X1 launch model pre-ordered on Monday and couldn't resist this deal today.

Avatar image for deactivated-601df795ee52f
deactivated-601df795ee52f

3618

Forum Posts

6548

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

That's an impressive deal, but I think I'll hold off until 4KTVs are more common. I've never heard of Seiki Digital and I'd be more comfortable with a brand I'm familiar with.

Avatar image for azteck
Azteck

7415

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

I'd rather use a 4k TV with my PC where I actually have use for it.

Avatar image for jazzycola
Jazzycola

672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By Jazzycola

Seiki? Good luck with that. Also, games will not run at 4k resolution. There's just no way, so there isn't a benefit to have it for gaming (not to mention there is very little media that even has 4k content).

Avatar image for zoozilla
zoozilla

1025

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

I don't really get the point of 4k TVs - I mean, movie theaters still use 2K a lot of the time. A 4K TV that's only 50 inches doesn't seem very compelling. That's just me, though.

Avatar image for icemo
Icemo

716

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

There is really no need for 4k television if you don't have a monster PC that costs a lot of money. You might be able to watch 4k movies when they come out with next gen consoles, but I don't think they have enough power for playing games at 4k resolution. I would wait for 4K material to be more common if I were you.

Avatar image for evilnights
EvilNiGHTS

1169

Forum Posts

128

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

If HDTV prices over the last ten years are any indication, they'll drop faster than my pants while checking the Xvideos RSS feed. No sense in being an early adopter on this stuff.

Avatar image for nethlem
Nethlem

828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Nethlem

No sense in being an early adopter on this stuff.

Especially a cheap one..

50" 4k TV for less than $1000? There has to be something stinking here, no way they can deliver that resolution at that price, at least not without cutting back on performance in other areas like latency/colors/features. I wouldn't trust a regular HDTV in the sub $1000 to be suitable for my gaming needs, so a 4k TV in that price range seems kinda like a fishy deal.

Avatar image for pillclinton
PillClinton

3604

Forum Posts

210

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Save the money, buy a really nice, even bigger 1080p TV, or buy a high quality 30'' monitor. All those would be better choices.

Avatar image for mrfluke
mrfluke

6260

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#10  Edited By mrfluke

wayyyyyyyyyy to early to buy one of those,

its a great price though.

Avatar image for tourgen
tourgen

4568

Forum Posts

645

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 11

#11  Edited By tourgen

how close to a 50" do you have to sit to make the difference between 1080 and 4000 matter? 2 feet?

Avatar image for colourful_hippie
colourful_hippie

6335

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

lol yeah because I'll be able to take advantage of all the native 4k games, huh? I won't lie though, if I didn't already bought the nice tv that I did a couple months ago I probably would have jumped on this offer, I could see myself messing around with it on a PC.

Avatar image for strikealight
StrikeALight

1275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By StrikeALight

@mrfluke said:

wayyyyyyyyyy to early to buy one of those,

its a great price though.

Yeah, think I'll pass.

Avatar image for societysays
SocietySays

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By SocietySays

@nethlem said:

@evilnights said:

No sense in being an early adopter on this stuff.

Especially a cheap one..

50" 4k TV for less than $1000? There has to be something stinking here, no way they can deliver that resolution at that price, at least not without cutting back on performance in other areas like latency/colors/features. I wouldn't trust a regular HDTV in the sub $1000 to be suitable for my gaming needs, so a 4k TV in that price range seems kinda like a fishy deal.

You must have at least a 50" screen right? Otherwise I think you paid a bit to much.

Avatar image for impartialgecko
impartialgecko

1964

Forum Posts

27

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 2

4K TVs are dumb. This coming console generation is just about to make 1080p standard and there's no media out there that makes it worth diving in early.

Avatar image for slowhanded
slowhanded

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Why not spend that money on say, a better TV? $1000 can get you a panny plasma. More than likely better than what you're watching from, and far better quality than a budget, no-name brand 4k TV. The blacks alone should be a huge upgrade from most LCDs.

Avatar image for themanwithnoplan
TheManWithNoPlan

7843

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 14

#17  Edited By TheManWithNoPlan

While that's a pretty good deal, in reality you'd have to be a special kind of crazy to buy one now. It'll be awhile before there's a significant amount of anything to support 4k.

Avatar image for andorski
Andorski

5482

Forum Posts

2310

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Why would you want a 4K TV for PS4 or X1? The vast majority of games will be at 1080p.

Avatar image for zekhariah
Zekhariah

700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#19  Edited By Zekhariah

@andorski: They probably have decent upscaling hardware.

The big limitation with 4k right now will be the max 30Hz screen refresh rate, because of the current HDMI standard. Work is being done to finalize an update leading into having higher frame-rate 4k work (and display port theoretically ahs some support of it), but its not really a mature tech. I think Samsung indicated their TVs would be upgradable to the new standard when it comes out, but that is not the sort of arrangement Seiki will have (though I do think they are probably a legit enough brand - post CCFL backlights there should not be to much left to have a horrible failure rate even if you go cheap on materials).

Avatar image for shagge
ShaggE

9562

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

4K? More like "por qué"! Oooooooh snap.

Avatar image for nethlem
Nethlem

828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@kryptickiller: I've got an 60" Samsung Plasma from last years lineup. And that thing, even with a really good deal, did cost me 1400 Euro.

Not saying that cheap things are worse no matter what. But when somebody is trying to sell you a Ferrari for $100 there has to be something fishy about that deal.

Avatar image for bemusedchunk
bemusedchunk

912

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

I don't even think many video cards can hit the 4k resolution needed yet...

Avatar image for thecreamfilling
TheCreamFilling

1235

Forum Posts

832

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Is 4K the new 3D?

Avatar image for winternet
Winternet

8454

Forum Posts

2255

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#24  Edited By Winternet

Wake me up when 16k comes around.

Avatar image for societysays
SocietySays

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@nethlem: I totally agree with you with regards to this tv. I was just wondering what size of screen you had as I have not seen a tv below 50" for more than $900.

Avatar image for somejerk
SomeJerk

4077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By SomeJerk

What's confirmed about this panel is that it's got the pixels, just not the prettiest colours. This is the real deal, this is an attempt at shaking up the industry and I hope it takes us somewhere.

I thought what if, I got one of these for development? What if I modified Diablo 2 to take advantage of 4K? Here's the equivalent of D2's 800x600 resolution maximum in a 4k 16:9 field.

No Caption Provided

I think it'd be weird to get one of these displays if you weren't a huge PC nerd able to put it to use but more sales for this company = larger chance the big players will adapt.