Hey everyone, I have this problem-nothing serious of course- but it must be some form of OCD.
When I buy a game for one system, I feel compulsion to buy the sequel for the same system for no other reason than to have consistency. An example being Dead Space, I was planning on buying it and its sequel for the PS3. But the EA store was out of stock for the PS3 version so I bought the 360 version, now when Dead Space 2 comes out, I have no choice but to buy it for the 360 even though the PS3 version will have the Wii game.
I don't fully know why I have this kind of problem. Maybe it has something to do with how I keep my game library in order, all sequels are kept in with their own respective series and are divided among specific systems. So maybe I don't like the idea of having Dead Space on the left hand side the shelf with the 360 games, and Dead Space 2 on the right hand side of the shelf with the PS3 games.
Am I the only one with this kind of problem?
Am I the only one with this problem?
I usually buy the sequel for the same system as well, unless I hear the sequel is better on the other console (like with Dead Space 2, which comes with Dead Space: Extraction as you mentioned). Some games also use the save files of previous games, so it is necessary to buy the sequel for the same console.
But it probably does have something to do with the way you organize your games. Unless Dead Space 2 uses the previous game's save file in some way, I think this would be a good way to break your habit and get the better version for the PS3! Break the cycle!
For a long time I did that too.
But that was ages ago. I did buy Dead Space on the PS3 though so I guess I'm just "lucky" with the whole Dead Space: Extraction thingy coming for the PS3 too.
I was planning on doing the same thing with Bioshock 2, but that plan fell through due to the release of Dante's Inferno. I am hoping to do the same thing with Dead Space 2 (lets hope that plan stays) so you are not alone .
Now for the Dead Space sequal you probably should just buy it on the PS3 just because there giving the Wii's ported game bundle in with the PS3's game... Which is the best reason to buy DS on the PS3 at the moment.
For example, I have Call of Duty 4 on my PS3, but have Modern Warfare 2 on my Xbox 360. It's alright, but there's always a though in the back of my mind thinking, "What if when they release MW3, you get something special for having MW and MW2?" If so, I would miss out, even though I have both the games. It's like what DICE does with the whole "Battlefield veteran" thing and it really bugs me.
I'm glad you didn't buy it for the ps3, you made the right decision, it's the most inferior version. I know i'm going to get a reply for it, however I just want to cite my source.
http://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/p-2.html
You can solve your multiplatform dilemma by stop buying the ps3 version for multiplatform games if you care about better textures and overall graphics. Then again I could say the pc version is superior to both of them, however that's irrelevent.
Never done that, but c'mon, Dead Space 2 on the ps3 is going to be way better because of it including extraction. I have Dead Space for 360 (1000G!) but when I saw the ps3 I said sucks for you microsoft.
I do not have that problem. I typically go for which ever edition is better, or has more features. For example, Dead Space 2 comes with Extraction, that on-rail shooter, but only currently on the PS3 version. So, I'll be getting that one, even though it's probably only a timed exclusive and Extraction will probably hit XBLA pretty soon.
Gotta keep yourself organized, I do the same thing. I like to look at my stack of games and have everything be squared away.
I try to do that, but sometimes I can't help myself. I'll usually break my organization on a PC game; most often these days, it'll be a Steam sale that'll get me to bite.
But I remember my Mass Effect 2 dilemma, where I was trying my best to hold off on buying it, heard such universal praise about it, wanted it immediately, and instead of going through Steam and having it delivered in bits, I ended up buying a discounted copy of the 360 version and waiting ages for shipping. All because I own the 360 version of the first game. Of course, there was another big reason for that one: savegame support. I wouldn't have been able to import in my Shepard if I went multi-platform.
I don't buy the sequel unless I actually want the game but... I will generally buy it for the same system I suppose.
My thing is that if there is a series of games I like to play them in order. So I will sometimes put off playing a newer game to play the previous title. I'm trying to break the habit though because some sequels truly overshadow the first game.
Nah, not really. Usually when a sequel came out for a game I enjoyed it was exclusive to the console or I didn't own other consoles it was coming out for. And after the craziness of Square switching from being a long time Nintendo partner to working instead with Sony when the PSX came out, I never really worried about console consistency." @Symphony: Well coming back to my topic. Have you never had this problem with games? "
I have Dead Space for the 360, but will be getting DS2 to for the PS3 since it'll have Extraction and I have an old 360 without hdmi support while my PS3 does have hdmi soooo yeah. Altman Be Praised.
(I should mention I bought Dead Space for the 360 before I owned a PS3)
I don't have it as severe as you but it sorta bugs me that I have games of a series for different systems. Like Final Fantasy XIII for the 360 or Jet Set Radio on the DC and JSRF for the Xbox (There was no choice but still). I feel that dilemma differently with Portal 2. I have Portal for the 360 and it will feel weird buying Portal 2 for the 360 knowing it's the inferior version, whereas I buy it for the PS3 and now I have these games on different consoles. I can see where you are coming from.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment