@Meowshi said:
Well dude, the article implies that it was his games which are being considered espionage. If that is not the case, then I'll drop this entire thing. Until that is proven, then I'm going to continue saying that it's irrelevant. Making politically-charged video games are not "espionage", and would only be considered so in a backwards, despicable government. You're getting upset because you're ignoring what everyone is saying. Hardly anyone has said, "Wow the government in Iran is killing people, how terrible!" Rather, people are criticizing the reasoning behind it. According to YoThatLimp, the US don't really execute people on espionage charges as much as we used to. I really don't know if that's true or not.
I can't recall the last time we executed anyone for treason (a citizen acting treasonous against the government) or espionage (meaning separate from treason, in that it is conducted by someone that is otherwise entirely an agent of another state). Aldrich Ames committed treason and did prison time; wasn't executed. Anna Chapman (Soviet spy) was uncovered and sent safely back home to Russia and became an international darling and a fashion icon, and had plenty of sexy photoshoots in magazines, and (I believe?) did a shoot for Playboy, and joined the executive board of a banking institution. Kind of a double-standard, but I'm not sure if that's because we just don't take spies seriously anymore or if we have a soft spot for super cute russian chicks (who doesn't?).
As to what it is they're really claiming is espionage, I'm not sure. Making a game sympathetic to one side or another could be considered propaganda (and in America, we'd probably call someone making a game that is pro-Iran as terrorism, because we're fucking insane). I definitely don't see that it would be espionage. Espionage is just a fancy word for spying. I really doubt that the real story behind all the poor reporting is that the games themselves are why there are charges of espionage.
Of course, most nations spy on each other and there are news reports of that being uncovered all the time. We spy on Russia. They spy on us. Same with Britain and Brazil and every other major country. My understanding, however (and I could be wrong on this) is that most civilized nations these days safely return the spies they discover, because they expect the same from their counterparts. That isn't to say you don't interrogate the spy (and that may be more severe and more frightening in some countries than others).
Unfortunately, the more paranoid and crazy countries, I fear, are more likely to just execute them for a show of power or to instill more fear into their own population ("see, the American dogs are sending spies! And this is what we do to traitors!"). And for exactly that reason, it's hard to say whether someone is actually a spy or if the country in question is just mistaken or even intentionally making false accusations. I mean, are we really going to admit someone is a spy? That would do our country harm and would absolutely do no good to the individual being accused. The only recourse is, possibly, to turn it into an international incident and manipulate the media into spinning the situation (and possibly the sentiment) such that there is a favorable outcome.
Anyway, that's kind of the whole point of spying and diplomacy I suppose, isn't it?
Log in to comment