• 107 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for assinass
#1 Posted by AssInAss (3269 posts) -

EA's President: “I have not green lit one game to be developed as a single player experience."

Speaking in a Q&A as part of the Cloud Gaming USA conference (via Superannuation), which takes place later this month, Gibeau said the strides EA has mace in “creating a platform that connects consumers across multiple devices,” allows the firm to provide a better experience for players as the firm pushes for a connected experience with all of its titles.
“We are very proud of the way EA evolved with consumers,” said Gibeau. “I have not green lit one game to be developed as a single player experience. Today, all of our games include online applications and digital services that make them live 24/7/365.
“For all the investments we’ve made in mobile and social, we never abandoned consoles. We are working closely with the console manufacturers and we are very excited about the Gen4 consoles that will be launched in the months and years ahead.”
You can read Gibeau’s entire thoughts on Cloud Gaming and more through the online PDF brochure here.
The 2nd Annual Cloud Gaming USA Conference & Expo takes place in San Francisco, next week, September 11-12..
Speakers include Gibeau, as well as Chris Early, Ubisoft – VP of Digital Publishing, Jason Holtman, Valve – Director of Business Development, and Carsten van Husen, GameForge 4D – CEO.

Well, that's it then. Pack it up guys. No more Mirror's Edge 2 :(

No Caption Provided

Faith, you're going to have to some other publisher that isn't a massive dick. Maybe try Square Enix?

I mean, this sounds like a joke. It's insane. What happened to that John Riccitiello guy who funded Dead Space and Mirror's Edge? If this is actually true, going forward?

Fuck EA.

Avatar image for sexytoad
#2 Posted by SexyToad (2939 posts) -

I don't have fast Internet at my house, so most games I play are ssp. ThIs sucks.

Avatar image for konig_kei
#3 Posted by konig_kei (967 posts) -

And the servers for the games will be shut down 6 months later rendering them useless. Way to go EA!

Avatar image for razielcuts
#4 Posted by RazielCuts (3278 posts) -
Avatar image for teflonbilly
#5 Posted by TeflonBilly (4742 posts) -

And this is why EA was voted worst company in the US

Avatar image for euandewar
#6 Posted by EuanDewar (5160 posts) -

Mirrors Edge multiplayer sounds cool

Avatar image for babychoochoo
#7 Posted by BabyChooChoo (6611 posts) -

I always felt Mirror's Edge would be a fantastic multiplayer game. Races, chases, and I wish I had more words that rhymed. Maybe I'm missing something, but adding multiplayer and dropping the shooting mechanics seems like it would make a potential sequel infinitely better. That said, I probably wouldn't buy it anyway considering it'd definitely require Origin on PC and not having to deal with Origin means more to me than any game.

Avatar image for beachthunder
#8 Posted by BeachThunder (14650 posts) -

I think this just means that there's going to be more tacked on multiplayer modes. I'm sure there will be some sort of deathmatch in Mirror's Edge 2...

Avatar image for demoskinos
#9 Posted by Demoskinos (17350 posts) -

Fantastic... that means I can expect some awful tacked on multiplayer feature for Dragon Age III? Fuuuuck that.

Avatar image for assinass
#10 Posted by AssInAss (3269 posts) -

I mean, maybe I'm over-reacting, this just means they'll still green-light SP games that'll have some online leaderboards, right? Mirror's Edge had them, that's all that's needed to be green-lit?

Right?

Can someone calm me down?

Avatar image for little_socrates
#11 Posted by Little_Socrates (5844 posts) -

Mirror's Edge 2 is still a dead dream, y'all.

That said, expect the developers there to still keep making great single player experiences because that is what most of them do well. EA has an army of quality single player devs, and one or two quality multiplayer devs.

Avatar image for gunstarred
#12 Edited by GunstarRed (6044 posts) -

I'm going to assume they just mean what they said last time. More modes that have you constantly competing with your friends Like NFS, SSX etc... That kind of stuff would be perfect for Mirrors Edge.

Avatar image for cornbredx
#13 Posted by CornBREDX (7216 posts) -

EA has been going this way for years. It's nothing new. 
 
I have always thought it was ridiculous. It's fine to make multiplayer and single player focused games, but to just focus on multiplayer feels narrow minded. There are still people who cant play online and people who dont want to (with good reason). It's always been incredibly weird to me they want to force it on players. I mean ya i like the occasional multiplayer game, but sometime I want a more focused game then that. 
 
Doesn't matter, we'll still get good games. They'll just come from other places.  The world is changing, doesn't bother me. It's not like video games are disappearing altogether.
 
@TeflonBilly: Um... no. It didn't have anything to do with this. That was solely due to the reaction to ME3's ending.

Avatar image for freakache
#14 Posted by FreakAche (3052 posts) -

@TeflonBilly said:

And this is why EA was voted worst company in the US

The "worst company in the US" thing is obviously hyperbolic and crazy, but every time I play an EA game from the past couple of years, it becomes obvious why people seem to hate them more than they have ever hated them before.

Avatar image for phatmac
#15 Edited by Phatmac (5931 posts) -

Fuck Valve too then since they said the exact same thing. Mirror's Edge kinda sucks so I'm not sad that their probably won't be a sequel so yeah. Let's try not to rag on EA so much.

Avatar image for rapid
#16 Posted by Rapid (1604 posts) -

@Demoskinos said:

Fantastic... that means I can expect some awful tacked on multiplayer feature for Dragon Age III? Fuuuuck that.

Exactly what came to my mind. It's probably the only game left that I am interesting in published by EA.

Avatar image for assinass
#18 Posted by AssInAss (3269 posts) -
Avatar image for mustachio
#19 Posted by Mustachio (268 posts) -

You guys might be interested to know that Mirror's Edge originally had multiplayer. One team played the runners while the other team played runner-cops. The runners scored/won by getting their packages to the destination given, and each level would essentially be a big urban sandbox for jumping around and circling back on yourself and whatnot. It was mentioned in the first Edge cover feature of the game, but I guess it got canned for whatever reason. It sounded kind of fun.

Avatar image for penguindust
#20 Posted by PenguinDust (12999 posts) -

Gen4? Aren't we heading into Gen 8?

Avatar image for artisanbreads
#21 Edited by ArtisanBreads (8319 posts) -

@EuanDewar said:

Mirrors Edge multiplayer sounds cool

I was going to say this. Mirrors Edge was amazing, but that was because of its mechanics mostly. The story was garbage. Adding in multi would be one of my big suggestions. I'm very tired of multiplayer shooters but this would be something that I could get into.

Rather than say, one side is runners and the other are guys with guns trying to take them down though, I would love to see straight up races (a no brainer) but also a competitive mode with say, 6 players, where AI were playing the role of the guys trying to hunt you down, like in the campaign, and there would be objectives each team of 3 had to achieve while both being hunted by the AI. That way no one is just playing a shooter, because that's not the point of Mirrors Edge.

Avatar image for justin258
#22 Posted by Justin258 (14485 posts) -

I don't think this is that big of a deal.

...what? Sue me. Aside from Dragon Age (which the guy saying that seems to have forgotten about), EA has produced a whole lot of good games that have multiplayer. Even Dead Space 2's multiplayer wasn't that bad and its single player campaign was fucking great.

Most games have multiplayer these days and, really, most games in the past have had multiplayer.

Avatar image for murdouken
#23 Edited by Murdouken (769 posts) -

@PenguinDust: Numbering generations is dumb in the first place. Some people start from PS1/N64/Saturn I think, whereas other start at Coleco Telstar/Magnavox Odyssey

Avatar image for wickedcobra03
#24 Posted by WickedCobra03 (2241 posts) -

Most of my time has revolved around SP gaming for the past recent years. Before I graduated college, I was either in the dorms, or for a good while in the house I loved in, the wireless signal was not as good in my bedroom, and instead of trying to get up some access points, I didn't care a ton, and played just about all single-player games most of the time. And now still going into the real world, I got rid of Xbox Live! awhile ago, and now sparsely play PC and PS3 games online due to time constraints, and ease. It is way easier to jump into a single-player game save at a give time in the week for an hour than and master some online mode in that same hour or two.

Avatar image for mr_skeleton
#25 Posted by Mr_Skeleton (5195 posts) -

@Rapid said:

@Demoskinos said:

Fantastic... that means I can expect some awful tacked on multiplayer feature for Dragon Age III? Fuuuuck that.

Exactly what came to my mind. It's probably the only game left that I am interesting in published by EA.

An online co-op mode from an old school style RPG from Bioware? You realize they have done it before EA right?

Avatar image for rapid
#26 Edited by Rapid (1604 posts) -

@Mr_Skeleton Yes but after DA2 I want them to focus on improving the single player content. better quest content and a well put together ending to end the trilogy. I rather have that than a multi player mode I won't play after 2.months =/

Avatar image for mr_skeleton
#27 Posted by Mr_Skeleton (5195 posts) -

@Rapid: Me and my friends will play the hell out of a co-op DA, I guess it comes down to taste but what I'm saying adding multyplayer doesn't mean it will be bad and anyway usually different teams work on SP and MP.

Avatar image for iam3green
#28 Posted by iam3green (14368 posts) -

wow sounds stupid. all games don't need multiplayer.

Avatar image for thehbk
#29 Posted by TheHBK (5670 posts) -

EA isn't the only one who publishes or develops games. Furthermore, they have to make a return on the investment in making a game. They don't have Faith that Mirror's Edge 2 would sell well so why bother? Though a Mirror's Edge game with Mulitplayer would be sweet. Races and deathmatch with the jumping and crappy hand to hand fighting would be entertaining.

Avatar image for redroach
#30 Posted by RedRoach (1401 posts) -

@GenocidalKitten said:

The idea that the masses want strictly multiplayer games is just stupid. Look at Skyrim that sold really well and was single player .

I don't think EA's president should be proud of anything, Mass Effect 3's multiplayer isn't what made it successful.

Yeah but It extended the life of the game. Multiplayer gives people a reason (less so if it's poor multiplayer) for people to keep playing after they beat the game. If anything this is just another way to combat both pirated games and used games. If you want to play MP, you have to buy the game, and if it has MP, people are less likely to trade it in, which means more new copies sold.

Avatar image for dagbiker
#31 Posted by Dagbiker (7044 posts) -

I wouldnt mind this if EA wasnt always shutting down servers.

Avatar image for willin
#32 Posted by Willin (1388 posts) -

Guys, I don't mean to blow your mind with something revolutionary but you can play the single player without playing the multiplayer. I just did it with Spec Ops: The Line, it's possible.

Avatar image for zeforgotten
#33 Posted by ZeForgotten (10368 posts) -
@Willin said:

Guys, I don't mean to blow your mind with something revolutionary but you can play the single player without playing the multiplayer. I just did it with Spec Ops: The Line, it's possible.

I .. what?.. nonsense. 
Are you serious?!
Avatar image for lukeweizer
#34 Posted by Lukeweizer (3282 posts) -

Why does Mirror's Edge 2 have to be single player only?

Avatar image for hailinel
#35 Posted by Hailinel (25787 posts) -

@Demoskinos said:

Fantastic... that means I can expect some awful tacked on multiplayer feature for Dragon Age III? Fuuuuck that.

Yeah, because if there was ever a problem that hurt Dragon Age II, it was the lack of multiplayer.

Avatar image for assinass
#36 Posted by AssInAss (3269 posts) -

@Willin said:

Guys, I don't mean to blow your mind with something revolutionary but you can play the single player without playing the multiplayer. I just did it with Spec Ops: The Line, it's possible.

And yet even the lead developer hated that shit and thought it reflected badly on the game's tone and opinion of the game.

Avatar image for zelyre
#37 Posted by Zelyre (1770 posts) -

@Mr_Skeleton said:

@Rapid said:

@Demoskinos said:

Fantastic... that means I can expect some awful tacked on multiplayer feature for Dragon Age III? Fuuuuck that.

Exactly what came to my mind. It's probably the only game left that I am interesting in published by EA.

An online co-op mode from an old school style RPG from Bioware? You realize they have done it before EA right?

Baldur's Gate? Man, the multiplayer in that game was a pain in the ass.

I wish Bioware made a RPG based on a popular D&D realm. Where one player could be a DM and the other players played PCs. The campaign creator would have to be highly flexible and easy to use. Tile based maps that would load instantly... highly scriptable language... easy to create dialogue trees. Hell, it could even run off Gamespy, I'm sure there'd be people playing it for over a decade!

The icon you have for your avatar? That'd make an -awesome- logo for it.

Avatar image for terramagi
#38 Posted by Terramagi (1167 posts) -

@PenguinDust said:

Gen4? Aren't we heading into Gen 8?

They reboot every franchise they have every 2 years, you're really surprised they're rebooting THE ENTIRE MEDIUM?

Avatar image for giantstalker
#39 Posted by Giantstalker (2336 posts) -

As long as they completely get rid of the SP from Battlefield and focus entirely on the multiplayer, that's something I could get behind.

Avatar image for demoskinos
#40 Posted by Demoskinos (17350 posts) -

@Hailinel said:

@Demoskinos said:

Fantastic... that means I can expect some awful tacked on multiplayer feature for Dragon Age III? Fuuuuck that.

Yeah, because if there was ever a problem that hurt Dragon Age II, it was the lack of multiplayer.

Hey, Dragon Age 2 wasn't by far up to what Origins was but I still loved my time with the game. Seeing as they've been polling fans for weeks on the Bioware forums for months about different issues I think Dragon Age 2 was a good learning experience for them and I think they are assuredly taking Dragon Age III seriously.

Avatar image for terramagi
#41 Posted by Terramagi (1167 posts) -

@Demoskinos said:

@Hailinel said:

@Demoskinos said:

Fantastic... that means I can expect some awful tacked on multiplayer feature for Dragon Age III? Fuuuuck that.

Yeah, because if there was ever a problem that hurt Dragon Age II, it was the lack of multiplayer.

Hey, Dragon Age 2 wasn't by far up to what Origins was but I still loved my time with the game. Seeing as they've been polling fans for weeks on the Bioware forums for months about different issues I think Dragon Age 2 was a good learning experience for them and I think they are assuredly taking Dragon Age III seriously.

Yeah, that'll turn out well for them.

Every person who liked their good games left after Dragon Age 2. The odd few stragglers who deluded themselves into thinking "everybody just gets one bad one!" abandoned them after Mass Effect 3. The only people left are furries and shippers.

Avatar image for freshbandito
#42 Posted by Freshbandito (705 posts) -

I think people are twisting what he means. To me it looks like he's trying to say that they're tying games into an online service where you can constantly be online competing be it in multiplayer or Autolog style leaderboards and he's touting the fact that all the games he's signed off for release have featured one of these ideas so far and he's backing it as a value proposition.

But don't let me stop your knee's jerking.

Avatar image for chrissedoff
#43 Posted by chrissedoff (2359 posts) -

All this means is that most of EA's games will have an online component, which is not even a change from what they've been doing.

Avatar image for irrelevantjohn
#44 Posted by IrrelevantJohn (1194 posts) -

I'm pretty sure EA has stated this already in the past but this one sounds like it almost seals the deal.

Avatar image for dabe
#45 Posted by dabe (302 posts) -

@Freshbandito said:

I think people are twisting what he means. To me it looks like he's trying to say that they're tying games into an online service where you can constantly be online competing be it in multiplayer or Autolog style leaderboards and he's touting the fact that all the games he's signed off for release have featured one of these ideas so far and he's backing it as a value proposition.

But don't let me stop your knee's jerking.

This. The thread title clearly caught a few peoples attention.

Avatar image for zeforgotten
#46 Posted by ZeForgotten (10368 posts) -
@Freshbandito said:

I think people are twisting what he means. To me it looks like he's trying to say that they're tying games into an online service where you can constantly be online competing be it in multiplayer or Autolog style leaderboards and he's touting the fact that all the games he's signed off for release have featured one of these ideas so far and he's backing it as a value proposition.

But don't let me stop your knee's jerking.

That is exactly what he was talking about and how I understood it too, but twisting someones words into something completely different is always more fun. 
It makes up a dumb reason to put a stick up your own ass and get angry instead of just being angry for no reason at all.  
 
Made up reasons are better to be angry about than no reasons! :P
Avatar image for mordeaniischaos
#47 Posted by MordeaniisChaos (5904 posts) -

@AssInAss: The first Mirror's Edge had significant social ties in the way that leaderboards work. Plus, there are interesting things they could do with multiplayer in that game. Hell, I'd be happy with a head to head race mode.

Avatar image for mekon
#48 Posted by mekon (436 posts) -

Well I hope they don't give up on SP altogether, Alice Madness Returns was pretty decent. I suppose it helps having the original designer onboard for that one.

Avatar image for dukest3
#49 Posted by DukesT3 (2095 posts) -

Oh well.

Avatar image for freshbandito
#50 Posted by Freshbandito (705 posts) -

@ZeForgotten: Good point, let's get up on that wagon :D