I notice that if something gets hyped up, it gets attention then review bombed to get it down to what the aggregate number (usually more average) people want.
But are things that bad to get 1/10. The other take is, well 10/10 is unfair too, because the claim that nothing's perfect. Whatever the case, people believe 10/10 is reflective of that (even if it's not). Then it's just opinions, who knows, maybe some highly acclaimed thing is 1/10, or some lowly acclaimed thing is genuinely 10/10 for some.
So then most say well things should round out.
But, are things sometimes just superb. Do we need the counter review bombs? Or are things bad, and we need these review bombs to off set things. Lets put it to the polls.