I have two. Halo: ODST, and Viking: Battle for Asgard. Now I'll address ODST first, as it's the more disappointing one, because me and my brother split the game to pay new. And what we got was.. well, just not fun. I actually got excited over playing as a human ODST soldier with stealth-heavy gameplay. I didn't exactly get that. A lot of the levels have you basically pulling off some of the same shit as before, 'cept now you don't have shields, which the developers equate with increased mortality, or something. Then there's the fact that the storyline was just so god damned confusing. One flashback happened, then another, and another, and after awhile.. I just lost track of how these were supposed to line up chronologically. Also, it kind of feels like the developers wanted to go for a more open-ended mission structure.. but it ended up being somewhat linear regardless. Not fun, and the multiplayer barely made up for the original cost of the game.
Now, Viking isn't as bad. I paid $8.95 for it in the bargain bin at GameStop, so I had a bit of an idea that it might be crap. But man, did I not know how bad. The gameplay was just.. ugh. Skarin's combat was sluggish and damned-near impossible when fighting against large groups. The stealth missions were infuriating, and the followup where you took over the fortress was worse, and the formula was basically cloned for each one. Go in at night, fuck up their shit in sneaky fashion, get eff out of dodge. Return with massive uber-army, burst down walls, defeat troll/other ginormous beast, take out their mages, then take out the leader, and hooray, you win! Got extremely trying towards the end of the game. The sieges themselves were chaotic and annoying, and the amount of enemies on-screen sometimes froze the disc. Dragons felt a bit tacked-on, and didn't really play as massive a role as they were supposed to. Overall, not a good game, but it was cheap, so I knew what I was getting into.
Log in to comment