I didn't have the option to beat the stickman to death, just shoot him :(
Although I have to disagree with Magnuson, why make a (non) game about a extremely lethal topic?Perhaps to show the lack of control felt by both parties? The person who was being led to his death didn't have much control over it: the only control that the shooter, who I'm assuming was meant to be a part of the Khmer Rouge, had was whether or not to shoot the person or fire into the sky. Personally, I made sure to play through three times to see what conclusions the game offered. My runs went with a shot into the sky, then the mine, and then the shooting.
While I appreciate the educational nature of this I fail to see how the game's content is relevant to the topic it's supposed to educate us about. Not knowing anything about the game before playing it I assumed it was the obligatory "if you finish the objective you are a bad person" type of game, but being blown up by a mine along the way cut that part of the game too. If it weren't for actual text explaining the horrors of that regime I'd be left clueless or even slightly annoyed. I feel that if you want to make a point with your arty experiment you could at least make it reflect what you are trying to say, maybe a game mechanic that would create associations with the subject or something along these lines. You can't just repackage an old one you did with a Sigur Ros song and say it's about the Ukrainian purge. This way it actually seems exploitative and the constant links to your blog cement that feeling. It all translates to "HEY HERE IS A TEASER FOR A BAD THING THAT I LEARNED ABOUT ON MY VACATION! COME TO MY BLOG TO LEARN MORE ABOUT IT! THERE IS A PICTURE OF A SOLDIER BLUDGENING A BABY OVER A TREE!!!! CHECK IT OUT! I"M AN ARTIST!". Or at least that's how I felt about all of this.
I am a little dismayed that this is the game Patrick chose to write about. This is a nongame, is fairly short and shallow, and even if you like it it provides a brief experience and a brief feeling. There are plenty of actual games with at least some depth that challenge and expand what is possible in the medium. Particularly, Every Day The Same Dream, and pretty much everything by Molleindustria. Molleindustria is by far one of the most interesting and creative video game development companies out there right now, and I would have preferred if he gave them more recognition with an article than this guy, whose work I find generally one-note and simplistic in its minimalism(not to say I dislike it; I just find it it be less of an achievement within the medium).
I think I would have felt more emotional impact if the game had better graphics. Before you dismiss this comment as graphics whoring, you have to admit that it is easier to connect to characters who appear more lifelike. Imagine how crazy this would be with modern graphics.
Also, I didn't know you could release spacebar at any time to stop walking. I was waiting for a prompt and finally stopped at the fields. Some kind of indication that you can stop whenever would be good.
I get the feeling this would actually have the potential to be really emotional if it was put at the end of a real game, and for the ending sequence you get to play as the killer of the main character you've been playing as the whole time.
The fact that you have spent that much time with the character before this long, final march would make the final decision much harder, I think.
Though I guess you need to have some incentive to actually shoot the main character then as well.
Also, I feel like I missed out on a big part of this "nongame" by dying from a mine before actually getting to the field...
Interesting. When it said walk to the fields I knew instinctively it was about the The Killing Fields and the Cambodian genocide.
The other non-game which I enjoyed was Every Day the Same Dream. Depressing in many ways, but very thought-provoking. Certainly a more fully rounded game than this one.
I'm still of the opinion that you can make a poignant art statement and still have the journey be entertaining. Take the dim statements about the American Dream in books like The Great Gatsby or The Grapes of Wrath, or the statements about racism and insanity in Heart of Darkness (or its film adaptation Apocalypse Now.) Those journeys are still absolutely entertaining, as are the ones that Cole Phelps, John Marston, Tim, and the perhaps less-artful Amnesia: The Dark Descent and create powerfully "un-fun" experiences and artful messages.
Making a statement through games, books, and film that is not entertaining and serves to make a point is still art. Just don't expect it to be very meaningful art if you can't make it either wide-reaching or appealing to the general human condition. For example, some of the most famous photos of America's Great Depression did appeal to the general American self-sympathy of the time or an inherent desire to know that, well, maybe some people really are worse off. Making an unpleasant statement about the recovery from a horrific event affecting a small(er) portion of the world is still a valid goal, but the way film and books generally approach this idea is by making the experience entertaining through well-executed prose, dialogue, or occasional moments of levity that contrast the work's darkest moments.
I find this work, I suppose, more akin to paintings or photographs intended for artistic value. However, this particular work is overtly blunt in its execution, a particular style I've never supported as it's akin to a speech made through pictures rather than artfully crafted series of metaphors. That's probably due to my background as a writer, but I just find a lack of subtlety to be unpleasant and, more to the point, to be equitable to a lack of artfulness.
I really like projects and "games" like this. I hope we see this field of interactive experiences that seems to bridge the gap between art, entertainment, education, and so many other things continue to grow.
Interactivity is capable of making great moments that much more emotional, shocking, involved, etc. and I hope we can keep seeing things like this in the future.
I quit reading and played the game. At first I didn't think I was the killer I saw hit space and both walked and than I stopped and the sprite with the gun stopped that made me feel a little bad. I have no reason to kill that sprite. Never ran into a mine though i shot up ito the air.
I played this game the last time someone linked it, music was nice but from the outset I was expecting it to rope me into some kind of impossible choice, if I were to be given one at all, something that immediately put me off.
I guess I appreciated the ambiguity of the final choice and could very well see how someone, who didn't give the whole affair much thought, would just line up the sight and pull the trigger, and that's interesting in itself. At the same time, as I pointed the crosshair upwards, I knew that this was a game and that it in turn knew every possible outcome of this choice. If it didn't want me to win, then I wouldn't.
Then again, it turned out it was never about winning, it was actually very specifically about being in a very possible no-winning situation.
I still wanted to win, and I spite the game, and the world, for not allowing me.
Artsy egotistical people, creating abstract content in an effort to selflessly educate the world in its wrong doings? Sigh this postmodernist generation is such a sad era, everyone is Picasso, everyone is mother Teressa
,everyone is Plato, and everyone thinks their voice deserves to be heard.
Put down the art history text book, and have an original idea before you die.
I played the game twice.. and both times was killed by a mine. The first time I just chose not to participate to see if it did anything as a result. It didn't, so I eventually decided "fine, since that's apparently not an option, I'll walk" ...and then a mine killed us both. Second time I just decided to walk from the start, and I walked a lot farther. and then a mine killed us both again. If I play it again and a mine kills me yet again, then screw this. The only thing this is teaching me or making me think about is that mines are bad, which I already know.
I feel like this not game, emotional experience flash thing has been done a lot better before ( Every Day The Same Dream for example). Maybe its the fact that I already know about these and many other tragedies, but this had zero impact on me (The information in the end being really the only thing I cared about). I am open to these kinds of things but yeah... nothing.
That was really interesting. Jonsi's song really brought emotion out of the experience. Him and Sigur Ros make amazing music. Experience or game, whatever it is it got me to think about and research the troubled past and current state of Cambodia for a while. Pretty powerful stuff.
first off, great article. Thank you Patrick for once again giving me a reason to visit the site besides awesome, funny content. Secondly, this is a interesting concept, not all games have to be entertaining, not all games have to about plots 7 thru 10, and sometimes it takes one simple concept to realize what kind of people we are.
I felt this game was really confusing without knowing the background behind it. I definitely would have liked a better set up other than two pixelated dudes walking for 5 minutes.
I shot the sky, let the guy go and watched the epilogue. Was it worth it? Not for me.
I don't need to play a game about the massacres in Cambodia and would've learned more about the issue in that 5 minute period by googling about it rather than playing this non-game.
Patrick's articles are always interesting reads.
I had never heard of this 'game' before and going into it blind, with no prior knowledge definitely impacted how I 'played' it. Without knowing the circumstances that lead up to my character marching an unarmed man through the wilderness, I began to think. Who am I? and Why am I doing this?
After eventually finding out the theme of the game, well, I felt kind of dirty. I'm probably looking too much into this small piece of interactive narration too much, but it did have an impact on me. I've taken plenty of history courses throughout my college education and from what I've learned, stuff like this isn't all that uncommon. Stuff like this does happen and all it takes is people to follow along and do nothing, as they might as well be holding down the space bar on their keyboard.
I know it's easy to kick an experiment like this, but I don't see the point in limiting expression because it clashes with what we come into games for. Since I never really had preconceived notions about video games (they were becoming popular when I first learned about them in the seventies), I'm happy people continue to experiment with these sorts of things, whether or not people want to call them games.
That particular Gametrekking should have had a fourth result, since it allowed the reticule to go anywhere: I killed myself (or, at least I tried to), thereby inadvertently escaping punishment and letting him go free, as well as removing myself from this situation I was pressed into continuing. What I'm happy for, though, is that they at least let things go different ways. Some of these experiments force a single, inevitable action which, although it CAN be powerful, often makes our interaction superfluous. At least this one, if we manage to survive, gave us a choice. Another event I can think of is that the victim hits a mine, divesting us of the responsibility of killing them (or perhaps that opens a few branches, one where the victim dies, another where they live and are in pain, which branches into us killing them or leaving them there).
Really cool project. Thanks for writing about it.
The first time, I shot the dude. The second time, I did not shoot the dude, purely to see if not shooting the dude was a viable ending. Didn't much affect me, because it's a game. Or a nongame as the case may be. I have a very thick wall in my mind separating a pixel art guy shooting another pixel art guy with a pixel gun and an actual killing. Were you to put me in a field in reality with a gun and another human being, would I be able to shoot them? No, of course not, but that has no bearing on this experience at all, or vise verse. I dunno, maybe I'm just not artsy enough for this shit.
By that I mean this has convinced me of the whole "games as art" thing. That's quite a feat.
I do still believe that Call of Duty has its place. It's the same place that Michael Bay movies have in cinema - stupid fun. And there isn't anything wrong with that, it exists for a reason.
But I think that ideas like this need to be expanded more. I've been on the fence for arty video games for a long time, but this is a good example of that. Well, arty interactive experiences, I guess. That term sucks, though. Anyway, I hope these kinds of ideas get expanded on, but not in the "great graphics and powerful narrative" way. This has simplistic graphics by today's standards, even by the standards a decade ago. But man, this has a lot of impact and a whole lot of that is in its simplicity. I think its lack of narrative expands on the whole simplicity thing. This really is powerful.
Also, to that user that said that bullshit about not caring what happens in Cambodia - fuck him, he's a fucking waste of space.
No, wait, I don't want to insult people that are wastes of space like that.That guy is somehow less than that.
Lots of people travel and then put their experiences into the video game they're making. You don't need a buzzword for it.
GameTrekking project is not about attempting some objective presentation of Cambodia, or any other place that I've been to," he said, "but rather about my trying to express something of my own particular encounters with places as I travel in the twenty-first century.
I played this game months ago. Usually I am impressed by the art games Newgrounds usually makes, but this isn't one of them. It takes so freaking long to get to the fields you'll either end up thinking you're not doing something right or the game is just endless. I also thought the attempt at inspirational music came off more cheesy than anything else.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment