UK Government Chooses PEGI Ratings
Yeah saw this earlier, makes me so fucking happy I always hated the BBFC and the way they carried themselves.
Besides, who cares what parents will recognise, it's legally enforced now so parents still have nobody to blame but themselves. That was the whole point of this battle, PEGI will now be legally enforced.
I support it. Why should a video game be judged by movie standards? That'd be like me reviewing Final Fantasy VII by shooter standards.
...but there is no law on the PEGI ratings. (Like I said not 100% on that one)
" Yeah saw this earlier, makes me so fucking happy I always hated the BBFC and the way they carried themselves.Besides, who cares what parents will recognise, it's legally enforced now so parents still have nobody to blame but themselves. That was the whole point of this battle, PEGI will now be legally enforced. "
"@The_A_Drain said:Aww right that does make sense that this would now make the PEGI ratings legal" Yeah saw this earlier, makes me so fucking happy I always hated the BBFC and the way they carried themselves.Besides, who cares what parents will recognise, it's legally enforced now so parents still have nobody to blame but themselves. That was the whole point of this battle, PEGI will now be legally enforced. "But about the parents, apart from the obvious to stop underage kids playing games, isn't that the whole point of rating systems so that parents can decided what their children play?But yea I agree this makes it better all round"
Well, I mean the kid can't buy the game now (whereas before they could buy some games that were not BBFC rated) and so if the parent is not gonna look at the box and simply buy it for the kid anyway, they are gonna do that regardless off ratings label, i've seen it, I worked retail for 3 years and sometimes more than once every weekend you'd get a parent buying GTA for their kids to shut them up, I even asked some of them and was met with a varity of responses from " I know I shouldnt but it's to shut them up" to "Don't fucking tell me what to buy my kids asshole"
" PEGI age ratings are now colour coded link edit: you have to remember that BBFC is the norm for movies as well people were seeing PEGI as an unofficial rating. "
Definately a step in the right direction in regards to keeping mature games out of the hands of younger players. A parent can still buy a child a mature rated game with the new system but the parent is now held more accountable for it. That and having two different ratings systems seemed absurd.
This is good news really. Many games have two ratings on the box, a BBFC one and a PEGI one. While they are usually the same rating, they can still cause confusion. Having one rating keeps everything simple. What they should do, is have PEGI rate the games, but use the far more recognizable BBFC design for the rating on the box. I'm sure it can't be that hard to work out a deal like that.
"@Video_Game_King said:Why shouldn't it? "" I support it. Why should a video game be judged by movie standards? That'd be like me reviewing Final Fantasy VII by shooter standards. "
"@The_Ish said:Because video games and movies are two completely different things with completely different standards and entirely separate methods of interacting with humans. You don't use one standard for another medium. ""@Video_Game_King said:Why shouldn't it? "" I support it. Why should a video game be judged by movie standards? That'd be like me reviewing Final Fantasy VII by shooter standards. "
But watching a guy shoot another gut in the face is pretty universal. Changing that situation into one where you are pretending to be that guy changes little in the way of the idea that someone is shooting someone in the face, and that deserves a certain rating. What does the BBFC do that is different from PEGI? "
"@The_Ish said:But I imagine that actually being in the mindset that you have shot a guy (multiplied when you're playing a rail shooter) does more than just watching some guy get shot. And even though I'm not British (I'm from the Moon Kingdom), I'll say that I'm not a fan of a movie rating system being applied to video games. Don't cross the mediums! "But watching a guy shoot another gut in the face is pretty universal. Changing that situation into one where you are pretending to be that guy changes little in the way of the idea that someone is shooting someone in the face, and that deserves a certain rating. What does the BBFC do that is different from PEGI? "
"@Video_Game_King said:There's obviously differences to be considered because of the interaction that's inherent to the medium, but the movie rating system was never applied to video games anyway. It was the same organisation, but there are different dudes and i imagine they're intelligent enough to judge games independently. There will be some cross-over between acceptable and offensive subject matter, but the game aspect is thought about. Case in point, all the Manhunt 2 shenanigans, whereas films like Saw and Hostel get released with little trouble. ""@The_Ish said:But I imagine that actually being in the mindset that you have shot a guy (multiplied when you're playing a rail shooter) does more than just watching some guy get shot. And even though I'm not British (I'm from the Moon Kingdom), I'll say that I'm not a fan of a movie rating system being applied to video games. Don't cross the mediums! "But watching a guy shoot another gut in the face is pretty universal. Changing that situation into one where you are pretending to be that guy changes little in the way of the idea that someone is shooting someone in the face, and that deserves a certain rating. What does the BBFC do that is different from PEGI? "
" I support it. Why should a video game be judged by movie standards? That'd be like me reviewing Final Fantasy VII by shooter standards. "
But wouldn't that be an example of people being afraid of the effects of a relatively new medium? Saw and Hostel would never have come out in the 60's. "
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment