what make a game rock or suck

what make reviewers think that a game suck or not

If the game is good, then it rocks.

If the game is bad, then it sucks.

Rock, Paper, Suck my balls.

If the game is good, then it rocks.

If the game is bad, then it sucks.

unga bunga, 8.8 = suck..

They make a pilgrimage to a mystic mountain where they consult the great number tumbler, here they will receive the sacred score and return home imbued with number powa to spread to the masses.

No seriously, they play the game and if the production values, game mechanics, voice acting, controls, sound and story don't suck then the game rocks!

@digitalsea87 said:

@Canteu

If the game is good, then it rocks.

If the game is bad, then it sucks.

I think personal preference plays a good 50% in deciding whether it rocks or sucks and thats a huge wildcard.

The only answer is graphics.

Is the game fun to play and/or entertaining? Then it rocks! Otherwise it sucks.

@3ds24:

There are a myriad of variables that can contribute to a given game's Rock/Suck factor.

Did you actually expect an answer or are you just posing vague questions to increase your post count?

If it's a small or midrange developer, it either sucks or is meh, with the occasional exception. If it's a large dev with a substantial fanbase and lots of marketing, you get a free pass for churning out shit to mediocre games.

@NTM said:

Rock, Paper, Suck my balls.

I usually like games that have fantastic grammar.