Heavy Rain was ok but had a ton of ugly story problems, sort of off-gameplay and left a bad taste in my mouth. LA Noire had a bit of a shitty ending (though I get why they did it that way) and the gameplay wasn't always perfect BUT it was a much better game then Heavy Rain with a much better, more consistent story.
Which did you like better L.A. Noire or Heavy Rain?
brilliantI haven't played Heavy Rain but voted for it anyway. I became very bored of L.A. Noire about half way through the second disc.
Heavy Rain was ok but had a ton of ugly story problems, sort of off-gameplay and left a bad taste in my mouth. LA Noire had a bit of a shitty ending (though I get why they did it that way) and the gameplay wasn't always perfect BUT it was a much better game then Heavy Rain with a much better, more consistent story.The thing I liked about Heavy Rain is that I felt every little thing had some sort of consequence. L.A. Noire didn't do that as well, but I still liked the story.
Heavy Rain cut a chunk out of their own plot, making it incomplete and really confusing. At least LA Noire didn't rip out a chunk of the story.
@JasonR86 said:Yeah, they handled consequences really well. But the main story was so...off in so many ways those consequences didn't really matter to me.Heavy Rain was ok but had a ton of ugly story problems, sort of off-gameplay and left a bad taste in my mouth. LA Noire had a bit of a shitty ending (though I get why they did it that way) and the gameplay wasn't always perfect BUT it was a much better game then Heavy Rain with a much better, more consistent story.The thing I liked about Heavy Rain is that I felt every little thing had some sort of consequence. L.A. Noire didn't do that as well, but I still liked the story.
@JasonR86 said:
@Zacagawea said:I still can't get myself to beat L.A. Noire so my answer should be obvious enoughHow can you not 'get yourself' to beat a game? What does that mean?
I've had that problem too. You start a game and want to finish it but just can't for some strange reason. Not liking one aspect and dreading to go through it can lead me to not put in a game for awhile. For example I bought Prince of Persia 08 in 2009 and didn't finish it until this year. It ended up being one of my favorite games this generation but I put it away and didn't look at it because I didn't like the camera.
...yeah, I guess. I guess it is just weird to me because I've never had that problem. I'll only stop if I'm on a section I can't beat 'like the last level of Ninja Gaiden 2' or I'm not enjoying the game.@JasonR86 said:
@Zacagawea said:I still can't get myself to beat L.A. Noire so my answer should be obvious enoughHow can you not 'get yourself' to beat a game? What does that mean?I've had that problem too. You start a game and want to finish it but just can't for some strange reason. Not liking one aspect and dreading to go through it can lead me to not put in a game for awhile. For example I bought Prince of Persia 08 in 2009 and didn't finish it until this year. It ended up being one of my favorite games this generation but I put it away and didn't look at it because I didn't like the camera.
@JasonR86: Well that was the case with me. I completed a level but ended up falling of ledges so many times due to some wonky camera controls I put it away. I picked it up later and never had the same problem and enjoyed my experience.
@Zacagawea said:By having other games to play and feeling like I've seen all that game has to offer.I still can't get myself to beat L.A. Noire so my answer should be obvious enoughHow can you not 'get yourself' to beat a game? What does that mean?
I was impacted by Heavy Rain, it was easily the most impressive storytelling experience that i've seen in a game (Followed by Alan Wake). LA Noire was "Meh" for me.
Despite the awful movement controls, and the gaping plot-hole, I adored Heavy Rain and its characters. The amount of influence your own choices impacted upon the story gave an extra amount of attachment to the story too, and it's overall one of my favourite cinematic experiences within gaming.
L.A Noire did get kinda dull, and the majority of the Arson department was so boned. The interrogations I really didn't like because of how simple and arbitrary they were either. The characters were fantastic, though, and while the over-arching story sucked, there were some truly amazing self-contained stories within some of the cases. Gameplay wise I didn't like the shooting, but the chases, both on-foot and by car, were pretty exhilarating and some of the best the game has to had to offer. The open-world was a complete waste too, with it ironically being the largest World with a Rockstar logo on it, and having barely anything to do.
I played Heavy Rain with three friends, each of us playing one of the characters in the game. It was easily one of my favorite gaming experiences and leaps and bounds more fun than L.A. Noire
Heavy Rain: 2011's 2010 Muliplayer Game of the Year.
JAAAAAAASSSOOONNNNN!!!
Actually I voted LA Noire. Both games were good but the facial capture stuff was pretty impressive.
I'm assuming we are comparing these two games, because they are probably the largest budgeted adventure games made recently?
I would probably vote for L.A. Noire, but just barely. As much as I enjoyed Heavy Rain, there were some serious plot issues especially how certain parts were presented. While I liked how the game could radically effect parts of the plot, I personally more enjoyed the lengthy TV season style of Noire.
My choices for putting one-over-the-other seem like severe nit-picking though.
Heavy Rain easily. Wanna-Be critics love to tear it down but the experience of playing through it (especially the first time) is second to none. LA Noire is a good game but not great. History will remember it more for it's facial tech than anything else. Both games are worthwhile plays but Heavy Rain has far more weight in my opinion.
Heavy Rain, it kept me hooked till the end and as much as I don't like QTE the game handled it smartly. L.A. Noire was good until half way through the game where the story flipped on its head and missions went through the same boring procedures and the gun play and open world was rubbish.
Those are the two "big" games that I haven't played, and I don't know yet if I plan to. I watched a lot of Heavy Rain knowing (or thinking?) that I'm not going to play it, and everything I see in it just isn't great. I mean, maybe the story is good, and maybe it's fun to play, but that voice acting is terrible. L.A. Noire just kind of look boring. I felt that way before it even came out. The only thing I would probably like about it is that era it takes place in. I'm sure the game is of great quality, but it isn't for my tastes.
LA Noire. Heavy Rain was interesting and had some very tense, exciting moments, but, being built as an interactive movie, it depended more than most games on its plot. Unfortunately, that plot was riddled with holes.
L.A. Noire wasn't quite as ambitious as Heavy Rain was in its storytelling, but it was a more entertaining game with a story that, while not earth-shattering, at least made sense.
LA Noire. As much as I loved Heavy Rain, I'm a giant sucker for Noir detective stories in general, as such LA Noire hit a note with me that hasn't been hit with me before. I thought the story in Heavy Rain was very cool, as well as the things they did with the way that game played, but I enjoyed LA Noire a bit more because the voice acting was better and the setting was a little more interesting to me.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment