Why is it that ALMOST every time...

"  A huge thing with modern games is that they have no replay value, are really short, and are typically one-play charlies. Most major modern games are FPS games and are MP-focused. I still play games from the late 90s all the time. Hell, I've logged sveral thousand of hours of StarCraft and hundreds of hours for other games. The ONLY game I can see real replay value in this generation is Alan Wake.    Little Bobby says: Modern Warfare 2I say: Tribes 2Little Bobby says: Command & Conquer 4I say: Total AnnihilationLittle Bobby says: ChromehoundsI say: MechWarriorLittle Bobby says: Rainbow Six VegasI say: Rogue SpearLittle Bobby says: Resident Evil 5I say: Resident EvilLittle Bobby says: Metal Gear Solid 4I say: Metal Gear SolidLittle Bobby says: Fallout: New VegasI say: DiabloLittle Bobby says: Mass EffectI say: Final Fantasy VIILittle Bobby says: Civilization IVI say: Civilization IILittle Bobby says: RuneScapeI say: EverQuestLittle Bobby says: Medal of Honor (2010)I say: Medal of HonorLittle Bobby says: HaloI say: Quake "

You come off as extremely close-minded. Threads are for discussion, not your preaching. 
  
Also, I think you fail to realize that                       and                      which is why                         .

" You come off as extremely close-minded. Threads are for discussion, not your preaching.   Also, I think you fail to realize that                       and                      which is why                         . "

" You come off as extremely close-minded. Threads are for discussion, not your preaching.   Also, I think you fail to realize that                       and                      which is why                         . "

How has this reached page 3?

I think it's because it's harder to create an original game now, whereas back then with games much fewer it was easier to do something new and interesting. But I am a fan of both the classic games and the new ones. Just enjoy it ha

I'd rather be concerned why there is DLC announced even before the damn game is out.

Where have I heard this "old games were better, lowest common denominator" thing before?

" @MetalGearGeorge said:

" It is because most old games don't hold up very well. For example, since as a kid i only had a playstation 1 i had never played GoldenEye on the 64.  That was until i got the chance to play it last week at a friends house and all i've got to say is that the controls suck so much ass i only played for 5 minutes and then gave up. "

You should try playing with friends next time, and maybe play longer than 5 minutes before delivering your peasant verdict. "

" Where have I heard this "old games were better, lowest common denominator" thing before? "

"Little Bobby says: Mass Effect  

 I say: Final Fantasy VII"

"  A huge thing with modern games is that they have no replay value, are really short, and are typically one-play charlies. Most major modern games are FPS games and are MP-focused. I still play games from the late 90s all the time. Hell, I've logged sveral thousand of hours of StarCraft and hundreds of hours for other games. The ONLY game I can see real replay value in this generation is Alan Wake.

"  The reason for games being not as good as they were is because human beings are generally stupid, and back in the 90s, gamers were generally very intelligent people, as they were typically geeks. However now that everyone and their grandma is a gamer, companies can get away with releasing really garbage, so called "AAA" titles. "

This thread is depressing

Speaking of old games, I don't think I have enough fish for all the trolls here, and I really want to cross that bridge...

 but I don't care what you think.